In Situ and ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pine in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor System

In situ and ex situ catalytic pyrolysis were compared in a system with two 2-in. bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Pine was pyrolyzed in the system with a catalyst, HZSM-5 with a silica-to-alumina ratio of 30, placed either in the first (pyrolysis) reactor or the second (upgrading) reactor. Both the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & fuels 2016-03, Vol.30 (3), p.2144-2157
Hauptverfasser: Iisa, Kristiina, French, Richard J, Orton, Kellene A, Yung, Matthew M, Johnson, David K, ten Dam, Jeroen, Watson, Michael J, Nimlos, Mark R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2157
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2144
container_title Energy & fuels
container_volume 30
creator Iisa, Kristiina
French, Richard J
Orton, Kellene A
Yung, Matthew M
Johnson, David K
ten Dam, Jeroen
Watson, Michael J
Nimlos, Mark R
description In situ and ex situ catalytic pyrolysis were compared in a system with two 2-in. bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Pine was pyrolyzed in the system with a catalyst, HZSM-5 with a silica-to-alumina ratio of 30, placed either in the first (pyrolysis) reactor or the second (upgrading) reactor. Both the pyrolysis and upgrading temperatures were 500 °C, and the weight hourly space velocity was 1.1 h–1. Five catalytic cycles were completed in each experiment. The catalytic cycles were continued until oxygenates in the vapors became dominant. The catalyst was then oxidized, after which a new catalytic cycle was begun. The in situ configuration gave slightly higher oil yield but also higher oxygen content than the ex situ configuration, which indicates that the catalyst deactivated faster in the in situ configuration than the ex situ configuration. Analysis of the spent catalysts confirmed higher accumulation of metals in the in situ experiment. In all experiments, the organic oil mass yields varied between 14 and 17% and the carbon efficiencies between 20 and 25%. The organic oxygen concentrations in the oils were 16–18%, which represented a 45% reduction compared to corresponding noncatalytic pyrolysis oils prepared in the same fluidized bed reactor system. GC/MS analysis showed the oils to contain one- to four-ring aromatic hydrocarbons and a variety of oxygenates (phenols, furans, benzofurans, methoxyphenols, naphthalenols, indenols). High fractions of oxygen were rejected as water, CO, and CO2, which indicates the importance of dehydration, decarbonylation, and decarboxylation reactions. Light gases were the major sources of carbon losses, followed by char and coke.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1247120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c123473178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-ff911c2066d97c7677f4d1a5e3c79cfab435bdb0b08a4d2d20dfe88ad89f1f083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_weB9a5L9SPaoxY9CwWL1KCGbTGzKNitJFlx_vVvagzdPM7w878A8CF1TMqOE0Vul4ww8hM_B9tDGWdmMaVWeoAktGclKwupTNCFC8IxUrDhHFzFuCSFVLsoJ-lh4vHapx8obDN-Hfa6SaofkNF4NoWuH6CLuLF45D9h5rPA9eL3J1lq1gB_b3hn3A2ZMDX4FpVMX8HqICXaX6MyqNsLVcU7R--PD2_w5W748LeZ3y0wVtEiZtTWlmpGqMjXXvOLcFoaqEnLNa21VU-RlYxrSEKEKwwwjxoIQyojaUktEPkU3h7tdTE5G7RLoje68B50kZQWnjIwQP0A6dDEGsPIruJ0Kg6RE7lXKUaX8o1IeVY7N_NDcA9uuD3585t_WL3JJfiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Situ and ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pine in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor System</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Iisa, Kristiina ; French, Richard J ; Orton, Kellene A ; Yung, Matthew M ; Johnson, David K ; ten Dam, Jeroen ; Watson, Michael J ; Nimlos, Mark R</creator><creatorcontrib>Iisa, Kristiina ; French, Richard J ; Orton, Kellene A ; Yung, Matthew M ; Johnson, David K ; ten Dam, Jeroen ; Watson, Michael J ; Nimlos, Mark R ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>In situ and ex situ catalytic pyrolysis were compared in a system with two 2-in. bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Pine was pyrolyzed in the system with a catalyst, HZSM-5 with a silica-to-alumina ratio of 30, placed either in the first (pyrolysis) reactor or the second (upgrading) reactor. Both the pyrolysis and upgrading temperatures were 500 °C, and the weight hourly space velocity was 1.1 h–1. Five catalytic cycles were completed in each experiment. The catalytic cycles were continued until oxygenates in the vapors became dominant. The catalyst was then oxidized, after which a new catalytic cycle was begun. The in situ configuration gave slightly higher oil yield but also higher oxygen content than the ex situ configuration, which indicates that the catalyst deactivated faster in the in situ configuration than the ex situ configuration. Analysis of the spent catalysts confirmed higher accumulation of metals in the in situ experiment. In all experiments, the organic oil mass yields varied between 14 and 17% and the carbon efficiencies between 20 and 25%. The organic oxygen concentrations in the oils were 16–18%, which represented a 45% reduction compared to corresponding noncatalytic pyrolysis oils prepared in the same fluidized bed reactor system. GC/MS analysis showed the oils to contain one- to four-ring aromatic hydrocarbons and a variety of oxygenates (phenols, furans, benzofurans, methoxyphenols, naphthalenols, indenols). High fractions of oxygen were rejected as water, CO, and CO2, which indicates the importance of dehydration, decarbonylation, and decarboxylation reactions. Light gases were the major sources of carbon losses, followed by char and coke.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>catalytic pyrolysis ; HZSM-5 ; INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANAYLYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; pine ; vapor phase upgrading</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; fuels, 2016-03, Vol.30 (3), p.2144-2157</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-ff911c2066d97c7677f4d1a5e3c79cfab435bdb0b08a4d2d20dfe88ad89f1f083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-ff911c2066d97c7677f4d1a5e3c79cfab435bdb0b08a4d2d20dfe88ad89f1f083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,2769,27085,27933,27934,56747,56797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1247120$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iisa, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orton, Kellene A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Dam, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimlos, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>In Situ and ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pine in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor System</title><title>Energy &amp; fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>In situ and ex situ catalytic pyrolysis were compared in a system with two 2-in. bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Pine was pyrolyzed in the system with a catalyst, HZSM-5 with a silica-to-alumina ratio of 30, placed either in the first (pyrolysis) reactor or the second (upgrading) reactor. Both the pyrolysis and upgrading temperatures were 500 °C, and the weight hourly space velocity was 1.1 h–1. Five catalytic cycles were completed in each experiment. The catalytic cycles were continued until oxygenates in the vapors became dominant. The catalyst was then oxidized, after which a new catalytic cycle was begun. The in situ configuration gave slightly higher oil yield but also higher oxygen content than the ex situ configuration, which indicates that the catalyst deactivated faster in the in situ configuration than the ex situ configuration. Analysis of the spent catalysts confirmed higher accumulation of metals in the in situ experiment. In all experiments, the organic oil mass yields varied between 14 and 17% and the carbon efficiencies between 20 and 25%. The organic oxygen concentrations in the oils were 16–18%, which represented a 45% reduction compared to corresponding noncatalytic pyrolysis oils prepared in the same fluidized bed reactor system. GC/MS analysis showed the oils to contain one- to four-ring aromatic hydrocarbons and a variety of oxygenates (phenols, furans, benzofurans, methoxyphenols, naphthalenols, indenols). High fractions of oxygen were rejected as water, CO, and CO2, which indicates the importance of dehydration, decarbonylation, and decarboxylation reactions. Light gases were the major sources of carbon losses, followed by char and coke.</description><subject>catalytic pyrolysis</subject><subject>HZSM-5</subject><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANAYLYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>pine</subject><subject>vapor phase upgrading</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_weB9a5L9SPaoxY9CwWL1KCGbTGzKNitJFlx_vVvagzdPM7w878A8CF1TMqOE0Vul4ww8hM_B9tDGWdmMaVWeoAktGclKwupTNCFC8IxUrDhHFzFuCSFVLsoJ-lh4vHapx8obDN-Hfa6SaofkNF4NoWuH6CLuLF45D9h5rPA9eL3J1lq1gB_b3hn3A2ZMDX4FpVMX8HqICXaX6MyqNsLVcU7R--PD2_w5W748LeZ3y0wVtEiZtTWlmpGqMjXXvOLcFoaqEnLNa21VU-RlYxrSEKEKwwwjxoIQyojaUktEPkU3h7tdTE5G7RLoje68B50kZQWnjIwQP0A6dDEGsPIruJ0Kg6RE7lXKUaX8o1IeVY7N_NDcA9uuD3585t_WL3JJfiw</recordid><startdate>20160317</startdate><enddate>20160317</enddate><creator>Iisa, Kristiina</creator><creator>French, Richard J</creator><creator>Orton, Kellene A</creator><creator>Yung, Matthew M</creator><creator>Johnson, David K</creator><creator>ten Dam, Jeroen</creator><creator>Watson, Michael J</creator><creator>Nimlos, Mark R</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society (ACS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160317</creationdate><title>In Situ and ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pine in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor System</title><author>Iisa, Kristiina ; French, Richard J ; Orton, Kellene A ; Yung, Matthew M ; Johnson, David K ; ten Dam, Jeroen ; Watson, Michael J ; Nimlos, Mark R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-ff911c2066d97c7677f4d1a5e3c79cfab435bdb0b08a4d2d20dfe88ad89f1f083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>catalytic pyrolysis</topic><topic>HZSM-5</topic><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANAYLYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>pine</topic><topic>vapor phase upgrading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iisa, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orton, Kellene A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yung, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Dam, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimlos, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iisa, Kristiina</au><au>French, Richard J</au><au>Orton, Kellene A</au><au>Yung, Matthew M</au><au>Johnson, David K</au><au>ten Dam, Jeroen</au><au>Watson, Michael J</au><au>Nimlos, Mark R</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Situ and ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pine in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor System</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2016-03-17</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2144</spage><epage>2157</epage><pages>2144-2157</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><abstract>In situ and ex situ catalytic pyrolysis were compared in a system with two 2-in. bubbling fluidized bed reactors. Pine was pyrolyzed in the system with a catalyst, HZSM-5 with a silica-to-alumina ratio of 30, placed either in the first (pyrolysis) reactor or the second (upgrading) reactor. Both the pyrolysis and upgrading temperatures were 500 °C, and the weight hourly space velocity was 1.1 h–1. Five catalytic cycles were completed in each experiment. The catalytic cycles were continued until oxygenates in the vapors became dominant. The catalyst was then oxidized, after which a new catalytic cycle was begun. The in situ configuration gave slightly higher oil yield but also higher oxygen content than the ex situ configuration, which indicates that the catalyst deactivated faster in the in situ configuration than the ex situ configuration. Analysis of the spent catalysts confirmed higher accumulation of metals in the in situ experiment. In all experiments, the organic oil mass yields varied between 14 and 17% and the carbon efficiencies between 20 and 25%. The organic oxygen concentrations in the oils were 16–18%, which represented a 45% reduction compared to corresponding noncatalytic pyrolysis oils prepared in the same fluidized bed reactor system. GC/MS analysis showed the oils to contain one- to four-ring aromatic hydrocarbons and a variety of oxygenates (phenols, furans, benzofurans, methoxyphenols, naphthalenols, indenols). High fractions of oxygen were rejected as water, CO, and CO2, which indicates the importance of dehydration, decarbonylation, and decarboxylation reactions. Light gases were the major sources of carbon losses, followed by char and coke.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02165</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-0624
ispartof Energy & fuels, 2016-03, Vol.30 (3), p.2144-2157
issn 0887-0624
1520-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1247120
source ACS Publications
subjects catalytic pyrolysis
HZSM-5
INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANAYLYTICAL CHEMISTRY
pine
vapor phase upgrading
title In Situ and ex Situ Catalytic Pyrolysis of Pine in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T23%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Situ%20and%20ex%20Situ%20Catalytic%20Pyrolysis%20of%20Pine%20in%20a%20Bench-Scale%20Fluidized%20Bed%20Reactor%20System&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Iisa,%20Kristiina&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-03-17&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2144&rft.epage=2157&rft.pages=2144-2157&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02165&rft_dat=%3Cacs_osti_%3Ec123473178%3C/acs_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true