Considerations for How to Rate CPV

Considerations for How to Rate CPV

The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) industry is introducing multiple products into the marketplace, but, as yet, the; community has not embraced a unified method for assessing a nameplate rating. The choices of whether to use 850,; 900, or 1000 W/m2 for the direct-normal irradiance and whether to li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kurtz, S., Miller, M., Marion, B., Emery, K., McConnell, R., Surendran, S., Kimber, A.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
CONCENTRATORS
PV DEGRADATION RATES
RADIANT FLUX DENSITY
SOLAR ENERGY
Solar Energy - Photovoltaics
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Kurtz, S.
Miller, M.
Marion, B.
Emery, K.
McConnell, R.
Surendran, S.
Kimber, A.
description The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) industry is introducing multiple products into the marketplace, but, as yet, the; community has not embraced a unified method for assessing a nameplate rating. The choices of whether to use 850,; 900, or 1000 W/m2 for the direct-normal irradiance and whether to link the rating to ambient or cell temperature will; affect how CPV modules are rated and compared with other technologies. This paper explores the qualitative and; quantitative ramifications of these choices using data from two multi-junction CPV modules and two flat-plate; modules.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.3658287
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1007337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1007337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-o217t-56c2db8b7f9e842760cd76ff5c1aaa26e362e8e8c9a0dc8ab674394da0476e013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtKAzEUgOEgCo7VhW8Quk89uZ2TLGVQWygoouKuZHLBEZlAE_D1FXT1f6ufsWsJGwmob-RGo3XK0QkbpLVSEEo8ZQOAN0IZ_X7OLlr7BFCeyA1sPdalzSkfQ59_xUs98m395r3y59AzH5_eLtlZCV8tX_13xV7v717Grdg_PuzG272oSlIXFqNKk5uo-OyMIoSYCEuxUYYQFGaNKrvsog-QogsTktHepACGMIPUK7b--9bW50OLc8_xI9ZlybEfJABpTfoHXZ8-Ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Considerations for How to Rate CPV</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Kurtz, S. ; Miller, M. ; Marion, B. ; Emery, K. ; McConnell, R. ; Surendran, S. ; Kimber, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, S. ; Miller, M. ; Marion, B. ; Emery, K. ; McConnell, R. ; Surendran, S. ; Kimber, A. ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) industry is introducing multiple products into the marketplace, but, as yet, the; community has not embraced a unified method for assessing a nameplate rating. The choices of whether to use 850,; 900, or 1000 W/m2 for the direct-normal irradiance and whether to link the rating to ambient or cell temperature will; affect how CPV modules are rated and compared with other technologies. This paper explores the qualitative and; quantitative ramifications of these choices using data from two multi-junction CPV modules and two flat-plate; modules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.3658287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>CONCENTRATORS ; PV DEGRADATION RATES ; RADIANT FLUX DENSITY ; SOLAR ENERGY ; Solar Energy - Photovoltaics</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,780,784,789,885,23930,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1007337$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marion, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surendran, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Considerations for How to Rate CPV</title><description>The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) industry is introducing multiple products into the marketplace, but, as yet, the; community has not embraced a unified method for assessing a nameplate rating. The choices of whether to use 850,; 900, or 1000 W/m2 for the direct-normal irradiance and whether to link the rating to ambient or cell temperature will; affect how CPV modules are rated and compared with other technologies. This paper explores the qualitative and; quantitative ramifications of these choices using data from two multi-junction CPV modules and two flat-plate; modules.</description><subject>CONCENTRATORS</subject><subject>PV DEGRADATION RATES</subject><subject>RADIANT FLUX DENSITY</subject><subject>SOLAR ENERGY</subject><subject>Solar Energy - Photovoltaics</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotzMtKAzEUgOEgCo7VhW8Quk89uZ2TLGVQWygoouKuZHLBEZlAE_D1FXT1f6ufsWsJGwmob-RGo3XK0QkbpLVSEEo8ZQOAN0IZ_X7OLlr7BFCeyA1sPdalzSkfQ59_xUs98m395r3y59AzH5_eLtlZCV8tX_13xV7v717Grdg_PuzG272oSlIXFqNKk5uo-OyMIoSYCEuxUYYQFGaNKrvsog-QogsTktHepACGMIPUK7b--9bW50OLc8_xI9ZlybEfJABpTfoHXZ8-Ow</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Kurtz, S.</creator><creator>Miller, M.</creator><creator>Marion, B.</creator><creator>Emery, K.</creator><creator>McConnell, R.</creator><creator>Surendran, S.</creator><creator>Kimber, A.</creator><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Considerations for How to Rate CPV</title><author>Kurtz, S. ; Miller, M. ; Marion, B. ; Emery, K. ; McConnell, R. ; Surendran, S. ; Kimber, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-o217t-56c2db8b7f9e842760cd76ff5c1aaa26e362e8e8c9a0dc8ab674394da0476e013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>CONCENTRATORS</topic><topic>PV DEGRADATION RATES</topic><topic>RADIANT FLUX DENSITY</topic><topic>SOLAR ENERGY</topic><topic>Solar Energy - Photovoltaics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marion, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surendran, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurtz, S.</au><au>Miller, M.</au><au>Marion, B.</au><au>Emery, K.</au><au>McConnell, R.</au><au>Surendran, S.</au><au>Kimber, A.</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Considerations for How to Rate CPV</atitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><abstract>The concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) industry is introducing multiple products into the marketplace, but, as yet, the; community has not embraced a unified method for assessing a nameplate rating. The choices of whether to use 850,; 900, or 1000 W/m2 for the direct-normal irradiance and whether to link the rating to ambient or cell temperature will; affect how CPV modules are rated and compared with other technologies. This paper explores the qualitative and; quantitative ramifications of these choices using data from two multi-junction CPV modules and two flat-plate; modules.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><doi>10.1063/1.3658287</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1007337
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects CONCENTRATORS
PV DEGRADATION RATES
RADIANT FLUX DENSITY
SOLAR ENERGY
Solar Energy - Photovoltaics
title Considerations for How to Rate CPV
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A18%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Considerations%20for%20How%20to%20Rate%20CPV&rft.au=Kurtz,%20S.&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.3658287&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1007337%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true