Guidelines for harmonized vulnerability and risk assessment for non-nuclear critical infrastructure

Loss assessment of critical infrastructures (CIs) subject to natural hazards is fundamental to stress tests. The systemic approach that lifelines require for performance modelling is an open research topic, given their logical and physical complexity. The Work Package 4 (WP4) of STREST focused on th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tsionis, Georgios, Iervolino, I, Anastasiadis, A, Argyroudis, S, Babič, A, Basco, A, Casotto, C, Crowley, H, Dolšek, M, Fotopoulou, S, Galbusera, L, Giannopoulos, G, Giardini, D, Kakderi, K, Karafagka, S, Matos, J P, Mignan, A, Pitilakis, K, Rodrigues, D, Salzano, E, Schleiss, A J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 28344
creator Tsionis, Georgios
Iervolino, I
Anastasiadis, A
Argyroudis, S
Babič, A
Basco, A
Casotto, C
Crowley, H
Dolšek, M
Fotopoulou, S
Galbusera, L
Giannopoulos, G
Giardini, D
Kakderi, K
Karafagka, S
Matos, J P
Mignan, A
Pitilakis, K
Rodrigues, D
Salzano, E
Schleiss, A J
description Loss assessment of critical infrastructures (CIs) subject to natural hazards is fundamental to stress tests. The systemic approach that lifelines require for performance modelling is an open research topic, given their logical and physical complexity. The Work Package 4 (WP4) of STREST focused on the guidelines for the vulnerability assessment of critical infrastructures categorized as: A Individual, single-site infrastructures with high risk and potential for high local impact and regional or global consequences; B Distributed and/or geographically-extended infrastructures with potentially high economic and environmental impact; C Distributed, multiple-site infrastructures with low individual impact but large collective impact or dependencies. This reference report documents and summarizes the results of STREST WP4 via a series of applications and procedures (mostly referring to the seismic hazard case because of the level of advancement of research with respect to other natural hazards). The main attempt was to treat different CIs in a homogeneous framework derived and adapted from the well-known performance-based earthquake engineering developed for individual structures. From this effort it may be concluded that it seems possible to apply a unique logical framework to different CIs exposed to different natural hazards; nevertheless the performance/loss models for the key vulnerable components of each of them are still mostly lacking.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>officepubeu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_officepubeu_primary_vtls000376437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>vtls000376437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-officepubeu_primary_vtls0003764373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVy8FKAzEQgOGAFqy275Cjl4XUtJvmXKw-gPcym53gYHa2zCSF9ukF6Qt4-i_f_2Ce41uI_bZ3IT6a5cZt9t1uF_2TWavS4Fzw--BiXJr00WjEQoxq8yz2G2SamW442ksrjAIDFapXCzxaIf2xoIqqE3L9G3jmjlsqCGKTUKUExRJnAa3SUm2CK7PIUBTX976Y1-P71-Gzm3OmhOc2YDudhSaQ6-lSizrnfOi3Pvh_0F__VE6B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines for harmonized vulnerability and risk assessment for non-nuclear critical infrastructure</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Tsionis, Georgios ; Iervolino, I ; Anastasiadis, A ; Argyroudis, S ; Babič, A ; Basco, A ; Casotto, C ; Crowley, H ; Dolšek, M ; Fotopoulou, S ; Galbusera, L ; Giannopoulos, G ; Giardini, D ; Kakderi, K ; Karafagka, S ; Matos, J P ; Mignan, A ; Pitilakis, K ; Rodrigues, D ; Salzano, E ; Schleiss, A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsionis, Georgios ; Iervolino, I ; Anastasiadis, A ; Argyroudis, S ; Babič, A ; Basco, A ; Casotto, C ; Crowley, H ; Dolšek, M ; Fotopoulou, S ; Galbusera, L ; Giannopoulos, G ; Giardini, D ; Kakderi, K ; Karafagka, S ; Matos, J P ; Mignan, A ; Pitilakis, K ; Rodrigues, D ; Salzano, E ; Schleiss, A J</creatorcontrib><description>Loss assessment of critical infrastructures (CIs) subject to natural hazards is fundamental to stress tests. The systemic approach that lifelines require for performance modelling is an open research topic, given their logical and physical complexity. The Work Package 4 (WP4) of STREST focused on the guidelines for the vulnerability assessment of critical infrastructures categorized as: A Individual, single-site infrastructures with high risk and potential for high local impact and regional or global consequences; B Distributed and/or geographically-extended infrastructures with potentially high economic and environmental impact; C Distributed, multiple-site infrastructures with low individual impact but large collective impact or dependencies. This reference report documents and summarizes the results of STREST WP4 via a series of applications and procedures (mostly referring to the seismic hazard case because of the level of advancement of research with respect to other natural hazards). The main attempt was to treat different CIs in a homogeneous framework derived and adapted from the well-known performance-based earthquake engineering developed for individual structures. From this effort it may be concluded that it seems possible to apply a unique logical framework to different CIs exposed to different natural hazards; nevertheless the performance/loss models for the key vulnerable components of each of them are still mostly lacking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-5593</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9279646079</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9789279646072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Luxembourg: Publications Office</publisher><subject>accident prevention ; environmental impact ; industrial infrastructure ; industrial research ; natural disaster ; natural hazard ; research report ; risk prevention</subject><creationdate>2016</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsionis, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasiadis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argyroudis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babič, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casotto, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolšek, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotopoulou, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbusera, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giardini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakderi, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karafagka, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitilakis, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzano, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleiss, A J</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines for harmonized vulnerability and risk assessment for non-nuclear critical infrastructure</title><description>Loss assessment of critical infrastructures (CIs) subject to natural hazards is fundamental to stress tests. The systemic approach that lifelines require for performance modelling is an open research topic, given their logical and physical complexity. The Work Package 4 (WP4) of STREST focused on the guidelines for the vulnerability assessment of critical infrastructures categorized as: A Individual, single-site infrastructures with high risk and potential for high local impact and regional or global consequences; B Distributed and/or geographically-extended infrastructures with potentially high economic and environmental impact; C Distributed, multiple-site infrastructures with low individual impact but large collective impact or dependencies. This reference report documents and summarizes the results of STREST WP4 via a series of applications and procedures (mostly referring to the seismic hazard case because of the level of advancement of research with respect to other natural hazards). The main attempt was to treat different CIs in a homogeneous framework derived and adapted from the well-known performance-based earthquake engineering developed for individual structures. From this effort it may be concluded that it seems possible to apply a unique logical framework to different CIs exposed to different natural hazards; nevertheless the performance/loss models for the key vulnerable components of each of them are still mostly lacking.</description><subject>accident prevention</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>industrial infrastructure</subject><subject>industrial research</subject><subject>natural disaster</subject><subject>natural hazard</subject><subject>research report</subject><subject>risk prevention</subject><issn>1018-5593</issn><isbn>9279646079</isbn><isbn>9789279646072</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZ-</sourceid><recordid>eNqVy8FKAzEQgOGAFqy275Cjl4XUtJvmXKw-gPcym53gYHa2zCSF9ukF6Qt4-i_f_2Ce41uI_bZ3IT6a5cZt9t1uF_2TWavS4Fzw--BiXJr00WjEQoxq8yz2G2SamW442ksrjAIDFapXCzxaIf2xoIqqE3L9G3jmjlsqCGKTUKUExRJnAa3SUm2CK7PIUBTX976Y1-P71-Gzm3OmhOc2YDudhSaQ6-lSizrnfOi3Pvh_0F__VE6B</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Tsionis, Georgios</creator><creator>Iervolino, I</creator><creator>Anastasiadis, A</creator><creator>Argyroudis, S</creator><creator>Babič, A</creator><creator>Basco, A</creator><creator>Casotto, C</creator><creator>Crowley, H</creator><creator>Dolšek, M</creator><creator>Fotopoulou, S</creator><creator>Galbusera, L</creator><creator>Giannopoulos, G</creator><creator>Giardini, D</creator><creator>Kakderi, K</creator><creator>Karafagka, S</creator><creator>Matos, J P</creator><creator>Mignan, A</creator><creator>Pitilakis, K</creator><creator>Rodrigues, D</creator><creator>Salzano, E</creator><creator>Schleiss, A J</creator><general>Publications Office</general><scope>FZ-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Guidelines for harmonized vulnerability and risk assessment for non-nuclear critical infrastructure</title><author>Tsionis, Georgios ; Iervolino, I ; Anastasiadis, A ; Argyroudis, S ; Babič, A ; Basco, A ; Casotto, C ; Crowley, H ; Dolšek, M ; Fotopoulou, S ; Galbusera, L ; Giannopoulos, G ; Giardini, D ; Kakderi, K ; Karafagka, S ; Matos, J P ; Mignan, A ; Pitilakis, K ; Rodrigues, D ; Salzano, E ; Schleiss, A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-officepubeu_primary_vtls0003764373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>accident prevention</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>industrial infrastructure</topic><topic>industrial research</topic><topic>natural disaster</topic><topic>natural hazard</topic><topic>research report</topic><topic>risk prevention</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsionis, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iervolino, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasiadis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argyroudis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babič, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basco, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casotto, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolšek, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fotopoulou, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbusera, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giardini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakderi, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karafagka, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignan, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitilakis, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzano, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleiss, A J</creatorcontrib><collection>EU BookShop</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsionis, Georgios</au><au>Iervolino, I</au><au>Anastasiadis, A</au><au>Argyroudis, S</au><au>Babič, A</au><au>Basco, A</au><au>Casotto, C</au><au>Crowley, H</au><au>Dolšek, M</au><au>Fotopoulou, S</au><au>Galbusera, L</au><au>Giannopoulos, G</au><au>Giardini, D</au><au>Kakderi, K</au><au>Karafagka, S</au><au>Matos, J P</au><au>Mignan, A</au><au>Pitilakis, K</au><au>Rodrigues, D</au><au>Salzano, E</au><au>Schleiss, A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines for harmonized vulnerability and risk assessment for non-nuclear critical infrastructure</atitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28344</volume><issn>1018-5593</issn><isbn>9279646079</isbn><isbn>9789279646072</isbn><abstract>Loss assessment of critical infrastructures (CIs) subject to natural hazards is fundamental to stress tests. The systemic approach that lifelines require for performance modelling is an open research topic, given their logical and physical complexity. The Work Package 4 (WP4) of STREST focused on the guidelines for the vulnerability assessment of critical infrastructures categorized as: A Individual, single-site infrastructures with high risk and potential for high local impact and regional or global consequences; B Distributed and/or geographically-extended infrastructures with potentially high economic and environmental impact; C Distributed, multiple-site infrastructures with low individual impact but large collective impact or dependencies. This reference report documents and summarizes the results of STREST WP4 via a series of applications and procedures (mostly referring to the seismic hazard case because of the level of advancement of research with respect to other natural hazards). The main attempt was to treat different CIs in a homogeneous framework derived and adapted from the well-known performance-based earthquake engineering developed for individual structures. From this effort it may be concluded that it seems possible to apply a unique logical framework to different CIs exposed to different natural hazards; nevertheless the performance/loss models for the key vulnerable components of each of them are still mostly lacking.</abstract><cop>Luxembourg</cop><pub>Publications Office</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1018-5593
ispartof
issn 1018-5593
language eng
recordid cdi_officepubeu_primary_vtls000376437
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects accident prevention
environmental impact
industrial infrastructure
industrial research
natural disaster
natural hazard
research report
risk prevention
title Guidelines for harmonized vulnerability and risk assessment for non-nuclear critical infrastructure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-officepubeu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20for%20harmonized%20vulnerability%20and%20risk%20assessment%20for%20non-nuclear%20critical%20infrastructure&rft.au=Tsionis,%20Georgios&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=28344&rft.issn=1018-5593&rft.isbn=9279646079&rft.isbn_list=9789279646072&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cofficepubeu%3Evtls000376437%3C/officepubeu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true