What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?

A recent wave of brain research has advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of conscious states, contents and functions. A host of questions remain to be explored, as shown by lively debates between models of higher vs. lower-order aspects of consciousness, as well as global vs. local mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bernard J. Baars, Zoran Josipovic
Format: Buch
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Bernard J. Baars
Zoran Josipovic
description A recent wave of brain research has advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of conscious states, contents and functions. A host of questions remain to be explored, as shown by lively debates between models of higher vs. lower-order aspects of consciousness, as well as global vs. local models. (Baars 2007; Block, 2009; Dennett and Cohen, 2011; Lau and Rosenthal, 2011). Over some twenty-five centuries the contemplative traditions have also developed explicit descriptions and taxonomies of the mind, to interpret experiences that are often reported in contemplative practices (Radhakrishnan & Moore, 1967; Rinbochay & Naper, 1981). These traditional descriptions sometimes converge on current scientific debates, such as the question of conceptual vs. non-conceptual consciousness; reflexivity or “self-knowing” associated with consciousness; the sense of self and consciousness; and aspects of consciousness that are said to continue during sleep. These real or claimed aspects of consciousness have not been fully integrated into scientific models so far. This Research Topic in Consciousness Research aims to provide a forum for theoretical proposals, new empirical findings, integrative literature reviews, and methodological improvements inspired by meditation-based models. We include a broad array of topics, including but not limited to: replicable findings from a variety of systematic mental practices; changes in brain functioning and organization that can be attributed to such practices; their effects on adaptation and neural plasticity; measurable effects on perception, cognition, affect and self-referential processes. We include contributions that address the question of causal attribution. Many published studies are correlational in nature, because of the inherent difficulty of conducting longitudinal experiments based on a major lifestyle decision, such as the decision to commit to a mental practice over a period of years. We also feature clinical and case studies, integrative syntheses and significant opinion articles.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/978-2-88919-971-6
format Book
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oapen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_oapen_doabooks_62614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>62614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4617-8e8cbaeee98da58d566f8055223911a636f98361d4d7a25d094abdafc8d7fc7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzM1KAzEUQOGACtbaBxA3eYFo_ibJXYkUrULBjeKy3ElucHSalMno8yvq6vBtDmMXSl4ZE-AafBBahAAKBHgl3BE707_8kTpmC-WcFcEre8pWrb1LKTVo5QEWDF7fcOYRCy_0OdUWByqR-Eg4FZ6nuuexlpn2hxHn4Yv4YcI4D5HazTk7yTg2Wv13yV7u757XD2L7tHlc325FtE55ESjEHokIQsIupM65HGTXaW1AKXTGZQjGqWSTR90lCRb7hDmG5HP00SzZ5d-34oHKLlXsa_1oO6edsuYbmgFH0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype></control><display><type>book</type><title>What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?</title><source>DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books</source><creator>Bernard J. Baars ; Zoran Josipovic</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernard J. Baars ; Zoran Josipovic</creatorcontrib><description>A recent wave of brain research has advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of conscious states, contents and functions. A host of questions remain to be explored, as shown by lively debates between models of higher vs. lower-order aspects of consciousness, as well as global vs. local models. (Baars 2007; Block, 2009; Dennett and Cohen, 2011; Lau and Rosenthal, 2011). Over some twenty-five centuries the contemplative traditions have also developed explicit descriptions and taxonomies of the mind, to interpret experiences that are often reported in contemplative practices (Radhakrishnan &amp; Moore, 1967; Rinbochay &amp; Naper, 1981). These traditional descriptions sometimes converge on current scientific debates, such as the question of conceptual vs. non-conceptual consciousness; reflexivity or “self-knowing” associated with consciousness; the sense of self and consciousness; and aspects of consciousness that are said to continue during sleep. These real or claimed aspects of consciousness have not been fully integrated into scientific models so far. This Research Topic in Consciousness Research aims to provide a forum for theoretical proposals, new empirical findings, integrative literature reviews, and methodological improvements inspired by meditation-based models. We include a broad array of topics, including but not limited to: replicable findings from a variety of systematic mental practices; changes in brain functioning and organization that can be attributed to such practices; their effects on adaptation and neural plasticity; measurable effects on perception, cognition, affect and self-referential processes. We include contributions that address the question of causal attribution. Many published studies are correlational in nature, because of the inherent difficulty of conducting longitudinal experiments based on a major lifestyle decision, such as the decision to commit to a mental practice over a period of years. We also feature clinical and case studies, integrative syntheses and significant opinion articles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-8714</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 2889199711</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9782889199716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88919-971-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media SA</publisher><subject>Book Industry Communication ; contemplative practice ; Cultural issues ; functional plasticity ; Meditation ; mindfulness ; neural correlates of consciousness ; Psychology ; Society &amp; social sciences ; Society and Social Sciences ; structural plasticity ; thema EDItEUR</subject><creationdate>2016</creationdate><tpages>166</tpages><format>166</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Frontiers Research Topics</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>306,780,784,786,27923,55308</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernard J. Baars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoran Josipovic</creatorcontrib><title>What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?</title><description>A recent wave of brain research has advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of conscious states, contents and functions. A host of questions remain to be explored, as shown by lively debates between models of higher vs. lower-order aspects of consciousness, as well as global vs. local models. (Baars 2007; Block, 2009; Dennett and Cohen, 2011; Lau and Rosenthal, 2011). Over some twenty-five centuries the contemplative traditions have also developed explicit descriptions and taxonomies of the mind, to interpret experiences that are often reported in contemplative practices (Radhakrishnan &amp; Moore, 1967; Rinbochay &amp; Naper, 1981). These traditional descriptions sometimes converge on current scientific debates, such as the question of conceptual vs. non-conceptual consciousness; reflexivity or “self-knowing” associated with consciousness; the sense of self and consciousness; and aspects of consciousness that are said to continue during sleep. These real or claimed aspects of consciousness have not been fully integrated into scientific models so far. This Research Topic in Consciousness Research aims to provide a forum for theoretical proposals, new empirical findings, integrative literature reviews, and methodological improvements inspired by meditation-based models. We include a broad array of topics, including but not limited to: replicable findings from a variety of systematic mental practices; changes in brain functioning and organization that can be attributed to such practices; their effects on adaptation and neural plasticity; measurable effects on perception, cognition, affect and self-referential processes. We include contributions that address the question of causal attribution. Many published studies are correlational in nature, because of the inherent difficulty of conducting longitudinal experiments based on a major lifestyle decision, such as the decision to commit to a mental practice over a period of years. We also feature clinical and case studies, integrative syntheses and significant opinion articles.</description><subject>Book Industry Communication</subject><subject>contemplative practice</subject><subject>Cultural issues</subject><subject>functional plasticity</subject><subject>Meditation</subject><subject>mindfulness</subject><subject>neural correlates of consciousness</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Society &amp; social sciences</subject><subject>Society and Social Sciences</subject><subject>structural plasticity</subject><subject>thema EDItEUR</subject><issn>1664-8714</issn><isbn>2889199711</isbn><isbn>9782889199716</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>V1H</sourceid><recordid>eNotzM1KAzEUQOGACtbaBxA3eYFo_ibJXYkUrULBjeKy3ElucHSalMno8yvq6vBtDmMXSl4ZE-AafBBahAAKBHgl3BE707_8kTpmC-WcFcEre8pWrb1LKTVo5QEWDF7fcOYRCy_0OdUWByqR-Eg4FZ6nuuexlpn2hxHn4Yv4YcI4D5HazTk7yTg2Wv13yV7u757XD2L7tHlc325FtE55ESjEHokIQsIupM65HGTXaW1AKXTGZQjGqWSTR90lCRb7hDmG5HP00SzZ5d-34oHKLlXsa_1oO6edsuYbmgFH0g</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Bernard J. Baars</creator><creator>Zoran Josipovic</creator><general>Frontiers Media SA</general><scope>V1H</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?</title><author>Bernard J. Baars ; Zoran Josipovic</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4617-8e8cbaeee98da58d566f8055223911a636f98361d4d7a25d094abdafc8d7fc7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Book Industry Communication</topic><topic>contemplative practice</topic><topic>Cultural issues</topic><topic>functional plasticity</topic><topic>Meditation</topic><topic>mindfulness</topic><topic>neural correlates of consciousness</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Society &amp; social sciences</topic><topic>Society and Social Sciences</topic><topic>structural plasticity</topic><topic>thema EDItEUR</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernard J. Baars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoran Josipovic</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernard J. Baars</au><au>Zoran Josipovic</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?</btitle><seriestitle>Frontiers Research Topics</seriestitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issn>1664-8714</issn><isbn>2889199711</isbn><isbn>9782889199716</isbn><abstract>A recent wave of brain research has advanced our understanding of the neural mechanisms of conscious states, contents and functions. A host of questions remain to be explored, as shown by lively debates between models of higher vs. lower-order aspects of consciousness, as well as global vs. local models. (Baars 2007; Block, 2009; Dennett and Cohen, 2011; Lau and Rosenthal, 2011). Over some twenty-five centuries the contemplative traditions have also developed explicit descriptions and taxonomies of the mind, to interpret experiences that are often reported in contemplative practices (Radhakrishnan &amp; Moore, 1967; Rinbochay &amp; Naper, 1981). These traditional descriptions sometimes converge on current scientific debates, such as the question of conceptual vs. non-conceptual consciousness; reflexivity or “self-knowing” associated with consciousness; the sense of self and consciousness; and aspects of consciousness that are said to continue during sleep. These real or claimed aspects of consciousness have not been fully integrated into scientific models so far. This Research Topic in Consciousness Research aims to provide a forum for theoretical proposals, new empirical findings, integrative literature reviews, and methodological improvements inspired by meditation-based models. We include a broad array of topics, including but not limited to: replicable findings from a variety of systematic mental practices; changes in brain functioning and organization that can be attributed to such practices; their effects on adaptation and neural plasticity; measurable effects on perception, cognition, affect and self-referential processes. We include contributions that address the question of causal attribution. Many published studies are correlational in nature, because of the inherent difficulty of conducting longitudinal experiments based on a major lifestyle decision, such as the decision to commit to a mental practice over a period of years. We also feature clinical and case studies, integrative syntheses and significant opinion articles.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media SA</pub><doi>10.3389/978-2-88919-971-6</doi><tpages>166</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-8714
ispartof
issn 1664-8714
language eng
recordid cdi_oapen_doabooks_62614
source DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books
subjects Book Industry Communication
contemplative practice
Cultural issues
functional plasticity
Meditation
mindfulness
neural correlates of consciousness
Psychology
Society & social sciences
Society and Social Sciences
structural plasticity
thema EDItEUR
title What can neuroscience learn from contemplative practices?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A17%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oapen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=What%20can%20neuroscience%20learn%20from%20contemplative%20practices?&rft.au=Bernard%20J.%20Baars&rft.date=2016&rft.issn=1664-8714&rft.isbn=2889199711&rft.isbn_list=9782889199716&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/978-2-88919-971-6&rft_dat=%3Coapen%3E62614%3C/oapen%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true