Eutectic mixture of local anesthesia cream can reduce both the radial pain and sympathetic response during transradial coronary angiography

ADIAL ARTERY SPASM IS ONE OF THE MOST COMMON COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSRADIAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY (TRA): the radial artery is prone to cathecholamine-induced contraction and radial pain during TRA could increase the sympathetic tone. The object of this study was to evaluate whether the eutectic mixture...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Korean circulation journal 2011, 41(12), , pp.726-732
Hauptverfasser: Youn, Young Jin, Kim, Woo-Taek, Lee, Jun-Won, Ahn, Sung-Gyun, Ahn, Min-Soo, Kim, Jang-Young, Yoo, Byung-Su, Lee, Seung-Hwan, Yoon, Junghan, Choe, Kyung-Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ADIAL ARTERY SPASM IS ONE OF THE MOST COMMON COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSRADIAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY (TRA): the radial artery is prone to cathecholamine-induced contraction and radial pain during TRA could increase the sympathetic tone. The object of this study was to evaluate whether the eutectic mixture of local anesthesia (EMLA) cream, in addition to lidocaine infiltration, could reduce the sympathetic response by reducing radial pain during TRA. Seventy-six patients were randomized 1 : 1 to either EMLA or control groups. Radial pain was measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the verbal rating scale (VRS-4). Sympathetic response, including systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate (PR), stroke volume (SV) and total peripheral resistance (TPR), was measured by photoplethysmography. RADIAL PAIN MEASURED DURING LIDOCAINE INFILTRATION WAS SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER IN THE EMLA GROUP (VAS: 3.1 vs. 4.0, p=0.04; VRS-4: 2.0 vs. 2.2, p=0.03) and the sympathetic response was significantly blunted in the EMLA group from baseline to lidocaine infiltration (ΔSBP, mm Hg: 5 vs. 13, p
ISSN:1738-5520
1738-5555
DOI:10.4070/kcj.2011.41.12.726