Improvement of compliance to the Portland intensive insulin therapy during liver transplantation after introducing an application software: a retrospective single center cohort study

Background: The Portland intensive insulin therapy is effective to control acute hyperglycemic change after graft re-perfusion during liver transplantation. However, the time-consuming sophistication acts as a barrier leading to misinterpretation and decreasing the compliance to the protocol; thus,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and pain medicine (Korean society of anesthesiologists) 2022, 17(3), , pp.312-319
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Young Woong, Han, Sangbin, Ko, Justin S., Lee, Su Nam, Gwak, Mi Sook, Kim, Gaab Soo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The Portland intensive insulin therapy is effective to control acute hyperglycemic change after graft re-perfusion during liver transplantation. However, the time-consuming sophistication acts as a barrier leading to misinterpretation and decreasing the compliance to the protocol; thus, we newly introduced an application software “Insulin protocol calculator” which automatically calculates therapeutic bolus/continuous insulin doses based on the Portland protocol. Methods: Of 144 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 74 patients were treated before the introduction of "Insulin protocol calculator" by using a paper manual, and 70 patients were treated by using the application software. Compliance was defined when patients were treated with exact bolus/continuous insulin doses according to the Portland protocol. Results: Compliance was significantly greater in app group than in paper group regarding bolus dose (94.5% and 86.9%, P < 0.001), continuous dose (88.9% and 77.3%, P = 0.001), and both doses (86.6% and 73.8%, P < 0.001). Blood glucose concentration was significantly lower in app group at 3 h (125 ± 17 mg/dl vs. 136 ± 19 mg/dl, P = 0.014), and 4 h (135 ± 22 mg/dl vs. 115 ± 15 mg/dl, P = 0.029) after graft re-perfusion. Acute hyperglycemic change during 30 min was more prominent in app group while hyperglycemia incidence was 71.4% vs. 54.1% (P = 0.031). However, hyperglycemia risk was comparable at 2 h (31.4% vs. 31.1%, P = 0.964), and even insignificantly lower in app group at 3 h (7.1% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.184).Conclusions: The compliance to the Portland protocol significantly improved after introducing the application software; post-reperfusion hyperglycemia was better controlled. “Insulin protocol calculator” is cost-effective and time saving with potential clinical benefit.
ISSN:1975-5171
2383-7977
DOI:10.17085/apm.22136