Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectances: a comparison of statistical methods

Further evaluation of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a method for the determination of nitrogen, lignin, and cellulose concentrations in dry, ground, temperate forest woody foliage is presented. A comparison is made between two regression methods, stepwise multiple linear regression and p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of forest research 1996-04, Vol.26 (4), p.590-600
Hauptverfasser: Bolster, Katherine L, Martin, Mary E, Aber, John D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 600
container_issue 4
container_start_page 590
container_title Canadian journal of forest research
container_volume 26
creator Bolster, Katherine L
Martin, Mary E
Aber, John D
description Further evaluation of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a method for the determination of nitrogen, lignin, and cellulose concentrations in dry, ground, temperate forest woody foliage is presented. A comparison is made between two regression methods, stepwise multiple linear regression and partial least squares regression. The partial least squares method showed consistently lower standard error of calibration and higher R 2 values with first and second difference equations. The first difference partial least squares regression equation resulted in standard errors of calibration of 0.106%, with an R 2 of 0.97 for nitrogen, 1.613% with an R 2 of 0.88 for lignin, and 2.103% with an R 2 of 0.89 for cellulose. The four most highly correlated wavelengths in the near infrared region, and the chemical bonds represented, are shown for each constituent and both regression methods. Generalizability of both methods for prediction of protein, lignin, and cellulose concentrations on independent data sets is discussed. Prediction accuracy for independent data sets and species from other sites was increased using partial least squares regression, but was poor for sample sets containing tissue types or laboratory-measured concentration ranges beyond those of the calibration set.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/x26-068
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_nrcre</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nrcresearch_primary_10_1139_x26_068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1139_x26_068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1718-3db4dad5693312de8f017f2c69fe038aa2f53376db143c08da7147b1203805303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouK7iK-QmCNVJ06Zdb7L-hQUvei7TZLIbadMlyUFfwmc2Wq-eZhi-75uZH2PnAq6EkKvrj1IVoNoDthAltIUC2RyyBUBVFzWo5pidxPgOAFJJWLCvO0oURucxucnzyXKNoc-dDah_R-gN9y6FaUue68lr8inMaud5CkTcToPDLfH-k3vCkOfZHcjwQHYgnTCb4g3HbB_3GFycN8WUY2JyGgc-UtpNJp6yI4tDpLO_umRvD_ev66di8_L4vL7dFFo0oi2k6SuDplYrKUVpqLUgGltqtbIEskUsbS1lo0wvKqmhNdiIqukzENlCLUEu2cWcq8MUYz6z2wc3YvjsBHQ_GLuMscsYs_JyVvqgA8X8nt79K_4GtbV1tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectances: a comparison of statistical methods</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bolster, Katherine L ; Martin, Mary E ; Aber, John D</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Katherine L ; Martin, Mary E ; Aber, John D</creatorcontrib><description>Further evaluation of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a method for the determination of nitrogen, lignin, and cellulose concentrations in dry, ground, temperate forest woody foliage is presented. A comparison is made between two regression methods, stepwise multiple linear regression and partial least squares regression. The partial least squares method showed consistently lower standard error of calibration and higher R 2 values with first and second difference equations. The first difference partial least squares regression equation resulted in standard errors of calibration of 0.106%, with an R 2 of 0.97 for nitrogen, 1.613% with an R 2 of 0.88 for lignin, and 2.103% with an R 2 of 0.89 for cellulose. The four most highly correlated wavelengths in the near infrared region, and the chemical bonds represented, are shown for each constituent and both regression methods. Generalizability of both methods for prediction of protein, lignin, and cellulose concentrations on independent data sets is discussed. Prediction accuracy for independent data sets and species from other sites was increased using partial least squares regression, but was poor for sample sets containing tissue types or laboratory-measured concentration ranges beyond those of the calibration set.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x26-068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 1996-04, Vol.26 (4), p.590-600</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1718-3db4dad5693312de8f017f2c69fe038aa2f53376db143c08da7147b1203805303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Katherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aber, John D</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectances: a comparison of statistical methods</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>Further evaluation of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a method for the determination of nitrogen, lignin, and cellulose concentrations in dry, ground, temperate forest woody foliage is presented. A comparison is made between two regression methods, stepwise multiple linear regression and partial least squares regression. The partial least squares method showed consistently lower standard error of calibration and higher R 2 values with first and second difference equations. The first difference partial least squares regression equation resulted in standard errors of calibration of 0.106%, with an R 2 of 0.97 for nitrogen, 1.613% with an R 2 of 0.88 for lignin, and 2.103% with an R 2 of 0.89 for cellulose. The four most highly correlated wavelengths in the near infrared region, and the chemical bonds represented, are shown for each constituent and both regression methods. Generalizability of both methods for prediction of protein, lignin, and cellulose concentrations on independent data sets is discussed. Prediction accuracy for independent data sets and species from other sites was increased using partial least squares regression, but was poor for sample sets containing tissue types or laboratory-measured concentration ranges beyond those of the calibration set.</description><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouK7iK-QmCNVJ06Zdb7L-hQUvei7TZLIbadMlyUFfwmc2Wq-eZhi-75uZH2PnAq6EkKvrj1IVoNoDthAltIUC2RyyBUBVFzWo5pidxPgOAFJJWLCvO0oURucxucnzyXKNoc-dDah_R-gN9y6FaUue68lr8inMaud5CkTcToPDLfH-k3vCkOfZHcjwQHYgnTCb4g3HbB_3GFycN8WUY2JyGgc-UtpNJp6yI4tDpLO_umRvD_ev66di8_L4vL7dFFo0oi2k6SuDplYrKUVpqLUgGltqtbIEskUsbS1lo0wvKqmhNdiIqukzENlCLUEu2cWcq8MUYz6z2wc3YvjsBHQ_GLuMscsYs_JyVvqgA8X8nt79K_4GtbV1tw</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Bolster, Katherine L</creator><creator>Martin, Mary E</creator><creator>Aber, John D</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectances: a comparison of statistical methods</title><author>Bolster, Katherine L ; Martin, Mary E ; Aber, John D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1718-3db4dad5693312de8f017f2c69fe038aa2f53376db143c08da7147b1203805303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Katherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aber, John D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolster, Katherine L</au><au>Martin, Mary E</au><au>Aber, John D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectances: a comparison of statistical methods</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>590-600</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><abstract>Further evaluation of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a method for the determination of nitrogen, lignin, and cellulose concentrations in dry, ground, temperate forest woody foliage is presented. A comparison is made between two regression methods, stepwise multiple linear regression and partial least squares regression. The partial least squares method showed consistently lower standard error of calibration and higher R 2 values with first and second difference equations. The first difference partial least squares regression equation resulted in standard errors of calibration of 0.106%, with an R 2 of 0.97 for nitrogen, 1.613% with an R 2 of 0.88 for lignin, and 2.103% with an R 2 of 0.89 for cellulose. The four most highly correlated wavelengths in the near infrared region, and the chemical bonds represented, are shown for each constituent and both regression methods. Generalizability of both methods for prediction of protein, lignin, and cellulose concentrations on independent data sets is discussed. Prediction accuracy for independent data sets and species from other sites was increased using partial least squares regression, but was poor for sample sets containing tissue types or laboratory-measured concentration ranges beyond those of the calibration set.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x26-068</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-5067
ispartof Canadian journal of forest research, 1996-04, Vol.26 (4), p.590-600
issn 0045-5067
1208-6037
language eng
recordid cdi_nrcresearch_primary_10_1139_x26_068
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Determination of carbon fraction and nitrogen concentration in tree foliage by near infrared reflectances: a comparison of statistical methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_nrcre&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20carbon%20fraction%20and%20nitrogen%20concentration%20in%20tree%20foliage%20by%20near%20infrared%20reflectances:%20a%20comparison%20of%20statistical%20methods&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Bolster,%20Katherine%20L&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=590-600&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x26-068&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_nrcre%3E10_1139_x26_068%3C/crossref_nrcre%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true