'Incidental findings' during surgery : a surgical dilemma or the price paid for autonomy?
Examines the legal implications for medical personnel when they make unexpected findings that are not related to the surgery for which a patient has consented. Outlines the legal requirements for consent in criminal and common law, looking at cases in Canada that have dealt with incidental findings....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Otago law review 2013, Vol.13 (1), p.81-106 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 106 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 81 |
| container_title | Otago law review |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Snelling, Jeanne Anderson, Lynley C Van Rij, Andre M |
| description | Examines the legal implications for medical personnel when they make unexpected findings that are not related to the surgery for which a patient has consented. Outlines the legal requirements for consent in criminal and common law, looking at cases in Canada that have dealt with incidental findings. Discusses NZ medical law and relevant cases that have arisen involving consent. Seeks to identify principles applicable to the issue, considers possible legal approaches, and make suggestions for law and policy that would need to be legally tested. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nlnz</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nlnz_indexnz_998359453602837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>998359453602837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nlnz_indexnz_9983594536028373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUhjMoWC_vcMChU6FtWm1cHETR3aWThCatkfRUkhasT-9BfACX_8YH_4QFKU-zKEsSMWNz7x9xTL1IAlaGF6yM0thLC7VBZbDxIajBUQA_uEa7EXYgv9lURCljddtK6Bz0dw1PZypSaRTUNMmh77Brx_2STWtpvV79fMHWp-P1cI7Q4vtGT_pFLkTBc5HlfBOnBd_y_6gPv1c-3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>'Incidental findings' during surgery : a surgical dilemma or the price paid for autonomy?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Snelling, Jeanne ; Anderson, Lynley C ; Van Rij, Andre M</creator><creatorcontrib>Snelling, Jeanne ; Anderson, Lynley C ; Van Rij, Andre M</creatorcontrib><description>Examines the legal implications for medical personnel when they make unexpected findings that are not related to the surgery for which a patient has consented. Outlines the legal requirements for consent in criminal and common law, looking at cases in Canada that have dealt with incidental findings. Discusses NZ medical law and relevant cases that have arisen involving consent. Seeks to identify principles applicable to the issue, considers possible legal approaches, and make suggestions for law and policy that would need to be legally tested. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2324-4119</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0078-6918</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Bioethics ; Informed consent (Medical law) ; Law and legislation ; Legal status, laws, etc ; Medical laws and legislation ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Otago law review, 2013, Vol.13 (1), p.81-106</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4021</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,998359453602837&tab=innz&search_scope=INNZ&vid=NLNZ&offset=0$$DView this record in NLNZ$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snelling, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Lynley C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rij, Andre M</creatorcontrib><title>'Incidental findings' during surgery : a surgical dilemma or the price paid for autonomy?</title><title>Otago law review</title><description>Examines the legal implications for medical personnel when they make unexpected findings that are not related to the surgery for which a patient has consented. Outlines the legal requirements for consent in criminal and common law, looking at cases in Canada that have dealt with incidental findings. Discusses NZ medical law and relevant cases that have arisen involving consent. Seeks to identify principles applicable to the issue, considers possible legal approaches, and make suggestions for law and policy that would need to be legally tested. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Informed consent (Medical law)</subject><subject>Law and legislation</subject><subject>Legal status, laws, etc</subject><subject>Medical laws and legislation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2324-4119</issn><issn>0078-6918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUhjMoWC_vcMChU6FtWm1cHETR3aWThCatkfRUkhasT-9BfACX_8YH_4QFKU-zKEsSMWNz7x9xTL1IAlaGF6yM0thLC7VBZbDxIajBUQA_uEa7EXYgv9lURCljddtK6Bz0dw1PZypSaRTUNMmh77Brx_2STWtpvV79fMHWp-P1cI7Q4vtGT_pFLkTBc5HlfBOnBd_y_6gPv1c-3g</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Snelling, Jeanne</creator><creator>Anderson, Lynley C</creator><creator>Van Rij, Andre M</creator><scope>DUNLO</scope><scope>GOM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>'Incidental findings' during surgery : a surgical dilemma or the price paid for autonomy?</title><author>Snelling, Jeanne ; Anderson, Lynley C ; Van Rij, Andre M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nlnz_indexnz_9983594536028373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Informed consent (Medical law)</topic><topic>Law and legislation</topic><topic>Legal status, laws, etc</topic><topic>Medical laws and legislation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snelling, Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Lynley C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rij, Andre M</creatorcontrib><collection>Index New Zealand (A&I)</collection><collection>Index New Zealand</collection><jtitle>Otago law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snelling, Jeanne</au><au>Anderson, Lynley C</au><au>Van Rij, Andre M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'Incidental findings' during surgery : a surgical dilemma or the price paid for autonomy?</atitle><jtitle>Otago law review</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>81-106</pages><issn>2324-4119</issn><issn>0078-6918</issn><abstract>Examines the legal implications for medical personnel when they make unexpected findings that are not related to the surgery for which a patient has consented. Outlines the legal requirements for consent in criminal and common law, looking at cases in Canada that have dealt with incidental findings. Discusses NZ medical law and relevant cases that have arisen involving consent. Seeks to identify principles applicable to the issue, considers possible legal approaches, and make suggestions for law and policy that would need to be legally tested. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.</abstract></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2324-4119 |
| ispartof | Otago law review, 2013, Vol.13 (1), p.81-106 |
| issn | 2324-4119 0078-6918 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_nlnz_indexnz_998359453602837 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Bioethics Informed consent (Medical law) Law and legislation Legal status, laws, etc Medical laws and legislation Patients Surgery |
| title | 'Incidental findings' during surgery : a surgical dilemma or the price paid for autonomy? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A33%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nlnz&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='Incidental%20findings'%20during%20surgery%20:%20a%20surgical%20dilemma%20or%20the%20price%20paid%20for%20autonomy?&rft.jtitle=Otago%20law%20review&rft.au=Snelling,%20Jeanne&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=81-106&rft.issn=2324-4119&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnlnz%3E998359453602837%3C/nlnz%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |