Where is the Human in the Loop? Human Factors Analysis of Extended Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aerial System Operations within a Remote Operations Environment
Many envisioned technological and conceptual innovations focus on allocating more functions to automation, relegating the human as an afterthought if not a nuisance. Yet, until complete autonomy is realized, the human will remain “in the loop”. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is su...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Unverricht, James R Chancey, Eric T Politowicz, Michael S Buck, Billy K Geuther, Steven C Ballard, Kathryn M |
description | Many envisioned technological and conceptual innovations focus on allocating more functions to automation, relegating the human as an afterthought if not a nuisance. Yet, until complete autonomy is realized, the human will remain “in the loop”. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is supporting research for the development and maturation of automated technologies and architectures for the future of advanced air mobility. Standing up a remote operations center used to control, manage, and monitor multiple highly automated vehicles is an important step towards realizing the advanced air mobility vision. At the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Langley Research Center, a remote operation center exists and has been tested using humans piloting simulated vehicles. In this paper, we explore the human element within live flight operations that rely on increasingly automated technologies. Four ground control station operators performed multiple live flight operations. We employed a naturalistic approach and relied on qualitative data such as interviews and discussions with subject matter experts to help facilitate discovery. The present work evaluates the functions that the human and the automation had during the live operations, lists psychological constructs that may have promoted or reduced task performance, and provides recommendations on design of the remote operations environment and training of future ground control station operators. |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20220016705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20220016705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202200167053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjT0KwlAQhNNYiHoDi72AECNqKSIJFoLgbymLWc1Csi-8Xf9u41F9ioWd1TDzzTDN6LkvyBOwghUE80uFAiwfs3CunnyjDI_mvMJUsHxoaLsTpHcjySmHHesFS1iw0Dtf87kw2ErYSaBT8hzo-qFGFSxr8mjsROHGVoQrhBVVzugXpXJl76QisXbUOGGp1PlqK-pm6WY27wkqHsS8HpI4SeK4PxrHw8Ef_AJtH0-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Where is the Human in the Loop? Human Factors Analysis of Extended Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aerial System Operations within a Remote Operations Environment</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Unverricht, James R ; Chancey, Eric T ; Politowicz, Michael S ; Buck, Billy K ; Geuther, Steven C ; Ballard, Kathryn M</creator><creatorcontrib>Unverricht, James R ; Chancey, Eric T ; Politowicz, Michael S ; Buck, Billy K ; Geuther, Steven C ; Ballard, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><description>Many envisioned technological and conceptual innovations focus on allocating more functions to automation, relegating the human as an afterthought if not a nuisance. Yet, until complete autonomy is realized, the human will remain “in the loop”. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is supporting research for the development and maturation of automated technologies and architectures for the future of advanced air mobility. Standing up a remote operations center used to control, manage, and monitor multiple highly automated vehicles is an important step towards realizing the advanced air mobility vision. At the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Langley Research Center, a remote operation center exists and has been tested using humans piloting simulated vehicles. In this paper, we explore the human element within live flight operations that rely on increasingly automated technologies. Four ground control station operators performed multiple live flight operations. We employed a naturalistic approach and relied on qualitative data such as interviews and discussions with subject matter experts to help facilitate discovery. The present work evaluates the functions that the human and the automation had during the live operations, lists psychological constructs that may have promoted or reduced task performance, and provides recommendations on design of the remote operations environment and training of future ground control station operators.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Langley Research Center</publisher><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220016705$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unverricht, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chancey, Eric T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politowicz, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, Billy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geuther, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><title>Where is the Human in the Loop? Human Factors Analysis of Extended Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aerial System Operations within a Remote Operations Environment</title><description>Many envisioned technological and conceptual innovations focus on allocating more functions to automation, relegating the human as an afterthought if not a nuisance. Yet, until complete autonomy is realized, the human will remain “in the loop”. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is supporting research for the development and maturation of automated technologies and architectures for the future of advanced air mobility. Standing up a remote operations center used to control, manage, and monitor multiple highly automated vehicles is an important step towards realizing the advanced air mobility vision. At the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Langley Research Center, a remote operation center exists and has been tested using humans piloting simulated vehicles. In this paper, we explore the human element within live flight operations that rely on increasingly automated technologies. Four ground control station operators performed multiple live flight operations. We employed a naturalistic approach and relied on qualitative data such as interviews and discussions with subject matter experts to help facilitate discovery. The present work evaluates the functions that the human and the automation had during the live operations, lists psychological constructs that may have promoted or reduced task performance, and provides recommendations on design of the remote operations environment and training of future ground control station operators.</description><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjT0KwlAQhNNYiHoDi72AECNqKSIJFoLgbymLWc1Csi-8Xf9u41F9ioWd1TDzzTDN6LkvyBOwghUE80uFAiwfs3CunnyjDI_mvMJUsHxoaLsTpHcjySmHHesFS1iw0Dtf87kw2ErYSaBT8hzo-qFGFSxr8mjsROHGVoQrhBVVzugXpXJl76QisXbUOGGp1PlqK-pm6WY27wkqHsS8HpI4SeK4PxrHw8Ef_AJtH0-U</recordid><creator>Unverricht, James R</creator><creator>Chancey, Eric T</creator><creator>Politowicz, Michael S</creator><creator>Buck, Billy K</creator><creator>Geuther, Steven C</creator><creator>Ballard, Kathryn M</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><title>Where is the Human in the Loop? Human Factors Analysis of Extended Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aerial System Operations within a Remote Operations Environment</title><author>Unverricht, James R ; Chancey, Eric T ; Politowicz, Michael S ; Buck, Billy K ; Geuther, Steven C ; Ballard, Kathryn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202200167053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unverricht, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chancey, Eric T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politowicz, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck, Billy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geuther, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballard, Kathryn M</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unverricht, James R</au><au>Chancey, Eric T</au><au>Politowicz, Michael S</au><au>Buck, Billy K</au><au>Geuther, Steven C</au><au>Ballard, Kathryn M</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Where is the Human in the Loop? Human Factors Analysis of Extended Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aerial System Operations within a Remote Operations Environment</atitle><abstract>Many envisioned technological and conceptual innovations focus on allocating more functions to automation, relegating the human as an afterthought if not a nuisance. Yet, until complete autonomy is realized, the human will remain “in the loop”. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is supporting research for the development and maturation of automated technologies and architectures for the future of advanced air mobility. Standing up a remote operations center used to control, manage, and monitor multiple highly automated vehicles is an important step towards realizing the advanced air mobility vision. At the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Langley Research Center, a remote operation center exists and has been tested using humans piloting simulated vehicles. In this paper, we explore the human element within live flight operations that rely on increasingly automated technologies. Four ground control station operators performed multiple live flight operations. We employed a naturalistic approach and relied on qualitative data such as interviews and discussions with subject matter experts to help facilitate discovery. The present work evaluates the functions that the human and the automation had during the live operations, lists psychological constructs that may have promoted or reduced task performance, and provides recommendations on design of the remote operations environment and training of future ground control station operators.</abstract><cop>Langley Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20220016705 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Behavioral Sciences |
title | Where is the Human in the Loop? Human Factors Analysis of Extended Visual Line of Sight Unmanned Aerial System Operations within a Remote Operations Environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Where%20is%20the%20Human%20in%20the%20Loop?%20Human%20Factors%20Analysis%20of%20Extended%20Visual%20Line%20of%20Sight%20Unmanned%20Aerial%20System%20Operations%20within%20a%20Remote%20Operations%20Environment&rft.au=Unverricht,%20James%20R&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20220016705%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |