Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation
Blunt body entry vehicles are subject to dynamic instability during terminal descent. This often manifests as limit cycle oscillations in total angle of attack, but can diverge into tumbling behavior under certain conditions. For the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle (MSR EEV), there is a const...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Needels, Jacob Gage, Peter Hill, Jeffrey |
description | Blunt body entry vehicles are subject to dynamic instability during terminal descent. This often manifests as limit cycle oscillations in total angle of attack, but can diverge into tumbling behavior under certain conditions. For the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle (MSR EEV), there is a constraint on the orientation of the sample tubes so backward impact is impermissible. Past missions have chosen to deploy parachutes to preclude tumbling, but active events after release of MSR EEV have been ground-ruled out with the intent to maximize system reliability. Prevention of tumbling during subsonic descent is a design driver for MSR EEV. During preliminary design of the MSR EEV, six degree-of-freedom numerical simulations indicated an unacceptably high probability of tumbling for a 60degree sphere-cone forebody geometry, which necessitated a design change. Decreasing the forebody angle was expected to improve dynamic stability, but would also adversely impact mass, aeroheating, and manufacturing risk. Hence there was strong motivation to understand the physical drivers for the onset of tumbling, and to determine: (a) whether the causes of tumbling are representative of physically realizable vehicle entry configurations and (b) what changes can be made to existing design and analysis practices to ensure a stable vehicle. |
format | Other |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20210017153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20210017153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202100171533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAjzzCtJLSooSi1JLMnMz1PIT1MIS83ITM5JVQgpzU3KycxLVwgoSk3JTAZJFyukFeXnKpjpuvi7KbjmlRRVKiTmpSi4pBYnp-aVKARn5pbmgM3hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4eunmJxYnxQI3F8UYGRoYGBobmhqbGxgSkAXduNKo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>other</recordtype></control><display><type>other</type><title>Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Needels, Jacob ; Gage, Peter ; Hill, Jeffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Needels, Jacob ; Gage, Peter ; Hill, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>Blunt body entry vehicles are subject to dynamic instability during terminal descent. This often manifests as limit cycle oscillations in total angle of attack, but can diverge into tumbling behavior under certain conditions. For the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle (MSR EEV), there is a constraint on the orientation of the sample tubes so backward impact is impermissible. Past missions have chosen to deploy parachutes to preclude tumbling, but active events after release of MSR EEV have been ground-ruled out with the intent to maximize system reliability. Prevention of tumbling during subsonic descent is a design driver for MSR EEV. During preliminary design of the MSR EEV, six degree-of-freedom numerical simulations indicated an unacceptably high probability of tumbling for a 60degree sphere-cone forebody geometry, which necessitated a design change. Decreasing the forebody angle was expected to improve dynamic stability, but would also adversely impact mass, aeroheating, and manufacturing risk. Hence there was strong motivation to understand the physical drivers for the onset of tumbling, and to determine: (a) whether the causes of tumbling are representative of physically realizable vehicle entry configurations and (b) what changes can be made to existing design and analysis practices to ensure a stable vehicle.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Aeronautics (General) ; Aircraft Stability And Control</subject><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,797</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210017153$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Needels, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gage, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation</title><description>Blunt body entry vehicles are subject to dynamic instability during terminal descent. This often manifests as limit cycle oscillations in total angle of attack, but can diverge into tumbling behavior under certain conditions. For the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle (MSR EEV), there is a constraint on the orientation of the sample tubes so backward impact is impermissible. Past missions have chosen to deploy parachutes to preclude tumbling, but active events after release of MSR EEV have been ground-ruled out with the intent to maximize system reliability. Prevention of tumbling during subsonic descent is a design driver for MSR EEV. During preliminary design of the MSR EEV, six degree-of-freedom numerical simulations indicated an unacceptably high probability of tumbling for a 60degree sphere-cone forebody geometry, which necessitated a design change. Decreasing the forebody angle was expected to improve dynamic stability, but would also adversely impact mass, aeroheating, and manufacturing risk. Hence there was strong motivation to understand the physical drivers for the onset of tumbling, and to determine: (a) whether the causes of tumbling are representative of physically realizable vehicle entry configurations and (b) what changes can be made to existing design and analysis practices to ensure a stable vehicle.</description><subject>Aeronautics (General)</subject><subject>Aircraft Stability And Control</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>other</rsrctype><recordtype>other</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAjzzCtJLSooSi1JLMnMz1PIT1MIS83ITM5JVQgpzU3KycxLVwgoSk3JTAZJFyukFeXnKpjpuvi7KbjmlRRVKiTmpSi4pBYnp-aVKARn5pbmgM3hYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4eunmJxYnxQI3F8UYGRoYGBobmhqbGxgSkAXduNKo</recordid><creator>Needels, Jacob</creator><creator>Gage, Peter</creator><creator>Hill, Jeffrey</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><title>Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation</title><author>Needels, Jacob ; Gage, Peter ; Hill, Jeffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202100171533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>other</rsrctype><prefilter>other</prefilter><language>eng</language><topic>Aeronautics (General)</topic><topic>Aircraft Stability And Control</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Needels, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gage, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Needels, Jacob</au><au>Gage, Peter</au><au>Hill, Jeffrey</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation</title><abstract>Blunt body entry vehicles are subject to dynamic instability during terminal descent. This often manifests as limit cycle oscillations in total angle of attack, but can diverge into tumbling behavior under certain conditions. For the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry Vehicle (MSR EEV), there is a constraint on the orientation of the sample tubes so backward impact is impermissible. Past missions have chosen to deploy parachutes to preclude tumbling, but active events after release of MSR EEV have been ground-ruled out with the intent to maximize system reliability. Prevention of tumbling during subsonic descent is a design driver for MSR EEV. During preliminary design of the MSR EEV, six degree-of-freedom numerical simulations indicated an unacceptably high probability of tumbling for a 60degree sphere-cone forebody geometry, which necessitated a design change. Decreasing the forebody angle was expected to improve dynamic stability, but would also adversely impact mass, aeroheating, and manufacturing risk. Hence there was strong motivation to understand the physical drivers for the onset of tumbling, and to determine: (a) whether the causes of tumbling are representative of physically realizable vehicle entry configurations and (b) what changes can be made to existing design and analysis practices to ensure a stable vehicle.</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20210017153 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Aeronautics (General) Aircraft Stability And Control |
title | Interpretation of Vehicle Tumbling Predictions from 6-DOF Entry and Descent Simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A28%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.au=Needels,%20Jacob&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20210017153%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |