Mitigating fatigue on the flight deck: how is controlled rest used in practice?

Controlled Rest (CR) refers to a short, voluntary nap opportunity taken by pilots on the flight deck as a countermeasure to unanticipated sleepiness in flight. This study explores the profile of CR use in a long-haul commercial airline. Forty-four pilots wore actiwatches and filled in an application...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chronobiology international 2020-10, Vol.37 (9-10), p.1483-1491
Hauptverfasser: Hilditch, Cassie J, Arsintescu, Lucica, Gregory, Kevin B, Flynn-Evans, Erin E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1491
container_issue 9-10
container_start_page 1483
container_title Chronobiology international
container_volume 37
creator Hilditch, Cassie J
Arsintescu, Lucica
Gregory, Kevin B
Flynn-Evans, Erin E
description Controlled Rest (CR) refers to a short, voluntary nap opportunity taken by pilots on the flight deck as a countermeasure to unanticipated sleepiness in flight. This study explores the profile of CR use in a long-haul commercial airline. Forty-four pilots wore actiwatches and filled in an application-based sleep/work diary for approximately 2 weeks resulting in complete records from 239 flights. Timing of sleep periods and flight schedules were analyzed relative to home-base time. Pearson correlations were used to assess the influence of pilot demographics on CR use. A mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of schedule factors on CR. CR was taken on 46% (n=110) of flights, with 80% (n=106/133) of all CR attempts estimated by actigraphy to have successfully achieved sleep. Average sleep duration during successful rest periods was estimated as 31.7 ± 12.2 minutes. CR was more frequent on return (60%, n=71) vs. outbound flights (33%, n=39); 2-pilot (69%, n=83) vs. >2-pilot flights (23%, n=27); 10h duration flights (27%, n=30); and night (55%, n=76) vs. day flights (34%, n=34) (all p≤0.001). There was no significant difference for direction of travel (eastbound: 51%, n= 57; westbound: 40%, n= 44; p=0.059). Of note, 22% (n=26) of augmented flights contained both CR and bunk rest. Data from this airline show that CR is most commonly used as a countermeasure to sleepiness on flights
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07420528.2020.1803898
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20205006806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2437127389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7188ce50e6c97b07f1eb00c333b41d7835919d37c79b886737dc2857196728ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwDwDlyKXDSZYm5YLQxJc0tAucozRNt0DXjiQV4t-TssHJlvW8tvUgdEFgSkDCNYgZBU7llAJNIwlMFvIAjQmnPMtBsEM0HphsgEboJIR3gBTM2TEaMSqZ5Dkbo-WLi26lo2tXuE5l1VvctTiuLa4bt1pHXFnzcYPX3Rd2AZuujb5rGlthb0PEfUida_HWaxOdsben6KjWTbBn-zpBbw_3r_OnbLF8fJ7fLTLDhIiZIFIay8HmphAliJrYEsAwxsoZqYRkvCBFxYQRRSllLpioDJVckCIXVFrNJuhqt3fru88-vaI2LhjbNLq1XR8UnTFBqEhSEsp3qPFdCN7WauvdRvtvRUANLtWfSzW4VHuXKXe5P9GXG1v9p_7kJeB8B7Q6aJXEhN8FHCAfPP8A1991pQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437127389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigating fatigue on the flight deck: how is controlled rest used in practice?</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Hilditch, Cassie J ; Arsintescu, Lucica ; Gregory, Kevin B ; Flynn-Evans, Erin E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilditch, Cassie J ; Arsintescu, Lucica ; Gregory, Kevin B ; Flynn-Evans, Erin E</creatorcontrib><description>Controlled Rest (CR) refers to a short, voluntary nap opportunity taken by pilots on the flight deck as a countermeasure to unanticipated sleepiness in flight. This study explores the profile of CR use in a long-haul commercial airline. Forty-four pilots wore actiwatches and filled in an application-based sleep/work diary for approximately 2 weeks resulting in complete records from 239 flights. Timing of sleep periods and flight schedules were analyzed relative to home-base time. Pearson correlations were used to assess the influence of pilot demographics on CR use. A mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of schedule factors on CR. CR was taken on 46% (n=110) of flights, with 80% (n=106/133) of all CR attempts estimated by actigraphy to have successfully achieved sleep. Average sleep duration during successful rest periods was estimated as 31.7 ± 12.2 minutes. CR was more frequent on return (60%, n=71) vs. outbound flights (33%, n=39); 2-pilot (69%, n=83) vs. &gt;2-pilot flights (23%, n=27); &lt;10h (63%, n=80) vs. &gt;10h duration flights (27%, n=30); and night (55%, n=76) vs. day flights (34%, n=34) (all p≤0.001). There was no significant difference for direction of travel (eastbound: 51%, n= 57; westbound: 40%, n= 44; p=0.059). Of note, 22% (n=26) of augmented flights contained both CR and bunk rest. Data from this airline show that CR is most commonly used as a countermeasure to sleepiness on flights &lt;10h duration (2-pilot crews) and home-base nighttime flights. Future studies are required to determine the generalizability of these results to other airlines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-6073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2020.1803898</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32838563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center: Taylor and Francis</publisher><subject>Aeronautics (General)</subject><ispartof>Chronobiology international, 2020-10, Vol.37 (9-10), p.1483-1491</ispartof><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7188ce50e6c97b07f1eb00c333b41d7835919d37c79b886737dc2857196728ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7188ce50e6c97b07f1eb00c333b41d7835919d37c79b886737dc2857196728ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205006806$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32838563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilditch, Cassie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsintescu, Lucica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Kevin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn-Evans, Erin E</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigating fatigue on the flight deck: how is controlled rest used in practice?</title><title>Chronobiology international</title><addtitle>Chronobiol Int</addtitle><description>Controlled Rest (CR) refers to a short, voluntary nap opportunity taken by pilots on the flight deck as a countermeasure to unanticipated sleepiness in flight. This study explores the profile of CR use in a long-haul commercial airline. Forty-four pilots wore actiwatches and filled in an application-based sleep/work diary for approximately 2 weeks resulting in complete records from 239 flights. Timing of sleep periods and flight schedules were analyzed relative to home-base time. Pearson correlations were used to assess the influence of pilot demographics on CR use. A mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of schedule factors on CR. CR was taken on 46% (n=110) of flights, with 80% (n=106/133) of all CR attempts estimated by actigraphy to have successfully achieved sleep. Average sleep duration during successful rest periods was estimated as 31.7 ± 12.2 minutes. CR was more frequent on return (60%, n=71) vs. outbound flights (33%, n=39); 2-pilot (69%, n=83) vs. &gt;2-pilot flights (23%, n=27); &lt;10h (63%, n=80) vs. &gt;10h duration flights (27%, n=30); and night (55%, n=76) vs. day flights (34%, n=34) (all p≤0.001). There was no significant difference for direction of travel (eastbound: 51%, n= 57; westbound: 40%, n= 44; p=0.059). Of note, 22% (n=26) of augmented flights contained both CR and bunk rest. Data from this airline show that CR is most commonly used as a countermeasure to sleepiness on flights &lt;10h duration (2-pilot crews) and home-base nighttime flights. Future studies are required to determine the generalizability of these results to other airlines.</description><subject>Aeronautics (General)</subject><issn>0742-0528</issn><issn>1525-6073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwDwDlyKXDSZYm5YLQxJc0tAucozRNt0DXjiQV4t-TssHJlvW8tvUgdEFgSkDCNYgZBU7llAJNIwlMFvIAjQmnPMtBsEM0HphsgEboJIR3gBTM2TEaMSqZ5Dkbo-WLi26lo2tXuE5l1VvctTiuLa4bt1pHXFnzcYPX3Rd2AZuujb5rGlthb0PEfUida_HWaxOdsben6KjWTbBn-zpBbw_3r_OnbLF8fJ7fLTLDhIiZIFIay8HmphAliJrYEsAwxsoZqYRkvCBFxYQRRSllLpioDJVckCIXVFrNJuhqt3fru88-vaI2LhjbNLq1XR8UnTFBqEhSEsp3qPFdCN7WauvdRvtvRUANLtWfSzW4VHuXKXe5P9GXG1v9p_7kJeB8B7Q6aJXEhN8FHCAfPP8A1991pQ</recordid><startdate>20201002</startdate><enddate>20201002</enddate><creator>Hilditch, Cassie J</creator><creator>Arsintescu, Lucica</creator><creator>Gregory, Kevin B</creator><creator>Flynn-Evans, Erin E</creator><general>Taylor and Francis</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201002</creationdate><title>Mitigating fatigue on the flight deck: how is controlled rest used in practice?</title><author>Hilditch, Cassie J ; Arsintescu, Lucica ; Gregory, Kevin B ; Flynn-Evans, Erin E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7188ce50e6c97b07f1eb00c333b41d7835919d37c79b886737dc2857196728ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aeronautics (General)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilditch, Cassie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arsintescu, Lucica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Kevin B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn-Evans, Erin E</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chronobiology international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilditch, Cassie J</au><au>Arsintescu, Lucica</au><au>Gregory, Kevin B</au><au>Flynn-Evans, Erin E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigating fatigue on the flight deck: how is controlled rest used in practice?</atitle><jtitle>Chronobiology international</jtitle><addtitle>Chronobiol Int</addtitle><date>2020-10-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1491</epage><pages>1483-1491</pages><issn>0742-0528</issn><eissn>1525-6073</eissn><abstract>Controlled Rest (CR) refers to a short, voluntary nap opportunity taken by pilots on the flight deck as a countermeasure to unanticipated sleepiness in flight. This study explores the profile of CR use in a long-haul commercial airline. Forty-four pilots wore actiwatches and filled in an application-based sleep/work diary for approximately 2 weeks resulting in complete records from 239 flights. Timing of sleep periods and flight schedules were analyzed relative to home-base time. Pearson correlations were used to assess the influence of pilot demographics on CR use. A mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyze the impact of schedule factors on CR. CR was taken on 46% (n=110) of flights, with 80% (n=106/133) of all CR attempts estimated by actigraphy to have successfully achieved sleep. Average sleep duration during successful rest periods was estimated as 31.7 ± 12.2 minutes. CR was more frequent on return (60%, n=71) vs. outbound flights (33%, n=39); 2-pilot (69%, n=83) vs. &gt;2-pilot flights (23%, n=27); &lt;10h (63%, n=80) vs. &gt;10h duration flights (27%, n=30); and night (55%, n=76) vs. day flights (34%, n=34) (all p≤0.001). There was no significant difference for direction of travel (eastbound: 51%, n= 57; westbound: 40%, n= 44; p=0.059). Of note, 22% (n=26) of augmented flights contained both CR and bunk rest. Data from this airline show that CR is most commonly used as a countermeasure to sleepiness on flights &lt;10h duration (2-pilot crews) and home-base nighttime flights. Future studies are required to determine the generalizability of these results to other airlines.</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><pub>Taylor and Francis</pub><pmid>32838563</pmid><doi>10.1080/07420528.2020.1803898</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0742-0528
ispartof Chronobiology international, 2020-10, Vol.37 (9-10), p.1483-1491
issn 0742-0528
1525-6073
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20205006806
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Aeronautics (General)
title Mitigating fatigue on the flight deck: how is controlled rest used in practice?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigating%20fatigue%20on%20the%20flight%20deck:%20how%20is%20controlled%20rest%20used%20in%20practice?&rft.jtitle=Chronobiology%20international&rft.au=Hilditch,%20Cassie%20J&rft.date=2020-10-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1491&rft.pages=1483-1491&rft.issn=0742-0528&rft.eissn=1525-6073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07420528.2020.1803898&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_CYI%3E2437127389%3C/proquest_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437127389&rft_id=info:pmid/32838563&rfr_iscdi=true