Pterodactyl: Trade Study for an Integrated Control System Design of a Mechanically Deployed Entry Vehicle
This paper presents a trade study method used to evaluate and down-select from a set of guidance and control (G&C) system designs for a mechanically deployable entry vehicle (DEV). The Pterodactyl project, funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), was prompted by the cha...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Alunni, Antonella I. D'Souza, Sarah N. Hays, Zane B. Yount, Bryan C. Okolo, Wendy A. Margolis, Benjamin W. L. Nikaido, Ben E. Johnson, Breanna J. Barton, Jeffrey D. Lopez, Gabriel Wolfarth, Lawrence S. |
description | This paper presents a trade study method used to evaluate and down-select from a set of guidance and control (G&C) system designs for a mechanically deployable entry vehicle (DEV). The Pterodactyl project, funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), was prompted by the challenge to develop an effective G&C system for a vehicle without a backshell, which is the case for DEVs. For the DEV, the project assumed a specific aeroshell geometry pertaining to an Adaptable, Deployable, Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT) vehicle, which was successfully developed by STMD prior to this study. The Pterodactyl project designed three different G&C systems for the vehicle's precise entry, which this paper briefly discusses. This paper details the Figures of Merit (FOMs) and metrics used during the course of the project's G&C system assessment. Each G&C configuration was traded against the three FOMs categories: G&C system performance, affordability and life cycle costs, and safety and mission success. The relative importance of the FOMs was determined from the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which was used to develop weights that were combined with quantitative design metrics and engineering judgement to rank the G&C systems against one another. This systematic method takes into consideration the project's input while simultaneously reducing unintentional judgement bias and ultimately was used to select a single G&C design for the project to continue pursuing in the next prototyping and testing phase. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20200000423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20200000423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202000004233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURbM4iPoHDu8HhJI6ubYVHQShxbU8ktc28EwkeQ75eyO4e5cznHPXyt2FYrBoJPMJhoiWoJe3zTCFCOjh6oXmiEIWmuAlBoY-J6EntJTc7CFMgHAjs6B3BplzES8OuRy60md40OIM01atJuREux83an_uhuZy8JhwLGUadaWr7466rv_oDyxjO4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Pterodactyl: Trade Study for an Integrated Control System Design of a Mechanically Deployed Entry Vehicle</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Alunni, Antonella I. ; D'Souza, Sarah N. ; Hays, Zane B. ; Yount, Bryan C. ; Okolo, Wendy A. ; Margolis, Benjamin W. L. ; Nikaido, Ben E. ; Johnson, Breanna J. ; Barton, Jeffrey D. ; Lopez, Gabriel ; Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alunni, Antonella I. ; D'Souza, Sarah N. ; Hays, Zane B. ; Yount, Bryan C. ; Okolo, Wendy A. ; Margolis, Benjamin W. L. ; Nikaido, Ben E. ; Johnson, Breanna J. ; Barton, Jeffrey D. ; Lopez, Gabriel ; Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[This paper presents a trade study method used to evaluate and down-select from a set of guidance and control (G&C) system designs for a mechanically deployable entry vehicle (DEV). The Pterodactyl project, funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), was prompted by the challenge to develop an effective G&C system for a vehicle without a backshell, which is the case for DEVs. For the DEV, the project assumed a specific aeroshell geometry pertaining to an Adaptable, Deployable, Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT) vehicle, which was successfully developed by STMD prior to this study. The Pterodactyl project designed three different G&C systems for the vehicle's precise entry, which this paper briefly discusses. This paper details the Figures of Merit (FOMs) and metrics used during the course of the project's G&C system assessment. Each G&C configuration was traded against the three FOMs categories: G&C system performance, affordability and life cycle costs, and safety and mission success. The relative importance of the FOMs was determined from the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which was used to develop weights that were combined with quantitative design metrics and engineering judgement to rank the G&C systems against one another. This systematic method takes into consideration the project's input while simultaneously reducing unintentional judgement bias and ultimately was used to select a single G&C design for the project to continue pursuing in the next prototyping and testing phase.]]></description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,800,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200000423$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alunni, Antonella I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Souza, Sarah N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Zane B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yount, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okolo, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Benjamin W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikaido, Ben E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Breanna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</creatorcontrib><title>Pterodactyl: Trade Study for an Integrated Control System Design of a Mechanically Deployed Entry Vehicle</title><description><![CDATA[This paper presents a trade study method used to evaluate and down-select from a set of guidance and control (G&C) system designs for a mechanically deployable entry vehicle (DEV). The Pterodactyl project, funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), was prompted by the challenge to develop an effective G&C system for a vehicle without a backshell, which is the case for DEVs. For the DEV, the project assumed a specific aeroshell geometry pertaining to an Adaptable, Deployable, Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT) vehicle, which was successfully developed by STMD prior to this study. The Pterodactyl project designed three different G&C systems for the vehicle's precise entry, which this paper briefly discusses. This paper details the Figures of Merit (FOMs) and metrics used during the course of the project's G&C system assessment. Each G&C configuration was traded against the three FOMs categories: G&C system performance, affordability and life cycle costs, and safety and mission success. The relative importance of the FOMs was determined from the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which was used to develop weights that were combined with quantitative design metrics and engineering judgement to rank the G&C systems against one another. This systematic method takes into consideration the project's input while simultaneously reducing unintentional judgement bias and ultimately was used to select a single G&C design for the project to continue pursuing in the next prototyping and testing phase.]]></description><subject>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFi7EKwjAURbM4iPoHDu8HhJI6ubYVHQShxbU8ktc28EwkeQ75eyO4e5cznHPXyt2FYrBoJPMJhoiWoJe3zTCFCOjh6oXmiEIWmuAlBoY-J6EntJTc7CFMgHAjs6B3BplzES8OuRy60md40OIM01atJuREux83an_uhuZy8JhwLGUadaWr7466rv_oDyxjO4s</recordid><startdate>20200106</startdate><enddate>20200106</enddate><creator>Alunni, Antonella I.</creator><creator>D'Souza, Sarah N.</creator><creator>Hays, Zane B.</creator><creator>Yount, Bryan C.</creator><creator>Okolo, Wendy A.</creator><creator>Margolis, Benjamin W. L.</creator><creator>Nikaido, Ben E.</creator><creator>Johnson, Breanna J.</creator><creator>Barton, Jeffrey D.</creator><creator>Lopez, Gabriel</creator><creator>Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200106</creationdate><title>Pterodactyl: Trade Study for an Integrated Control System Design of a Mechanically Deployed Entry Vehicle</title><author>Alunni, Antonella I. ; D'Souza, Sarah N. ; Hays, Zane B. ; Yount, Bryan C. ; Okolo, Wendy A. ; Margolis, Benjamin W. L. ; Nikaido, Ben E. ; Johnson, Breanna J. ; Barton, Jeffrey D. ; Lopez, Gabriel ; Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_202000004233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alunni, Antonella I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Souza, Sarah N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Zane B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yount, Bryan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okolo, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margolis, Benjamin W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikaido, Ben E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Breanna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Jeffrey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alunni, Antonella I.</au><au>D'Souza, Sarah N.</au><au>Hays, Zane B.</au><au>Yount, Bryan C.</au><au>Okolo, Wendy A.</au><au>Margolis, Benjamin W. L.</au><au>Nikaido, Ben E.</au><au>Johnson, Breanna J.</au><au>Barton, Jeffrey D.</au><au>Lopez, Gabriel</au><au>Wolfarth, Lawrence S.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Pterodactyl: Trade Study for an Integrated Control System Design of a Mechanically Deployed Entry Vehicle</btitle><date>2020-01-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract><![CDATA[This paper presents a trade study method used to evaluate and down-select from a set of guidance and control (G&C) system designs for a mechanically deployable entry vehicle (DEV). The Pterodactyl project, funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), was prompted by the challenge to develop an effective G&C system for a vehicle without a backshell, which is the case for DEVs. For the DEV, the project assumed a specific aeroshell geometry pertaining to an Adaptable, Deployable, Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT) vehicle, which was successfully developed by STMD prior to this study. The Pterodactyl project designed three different G&C systems for the vehicle's precise entry, which this paper briefly discusses. This paper details the Figures of Merit (FOMs) and metrics used during the course of the project's G&C system assessment. Each G&C configuration was traded against the three FOMs categories: G&C system performance, affordability and life cycle costs, and safety and mission success. The relative importance of the FOMs was determined from the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which was used to develop weights that were combined with quantitative design metrics and engineering judgement to rank the G&C systems against one another. This systematic method takes into consideration the project's input while simultaneously reducing unintentional judgement bias and ultimately was used to select a single G&C design for the project to continue pursuing in the next prototyping and testing phase.]]></abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20200000423 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance |
title | Pterodactyl: Trade Study for an Integrated Control System Design of a Mechanically Deployed Entry Vehicle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Pterodactyl:%20Trade%20Study%20for%20an%20Integrated%20Control%20System%20Design%20of%20a%20Mechanically%20Deployed%20Entry%20Vehicle&rft.au=Alunni,%20Antonella%20I.&rft.date=2020-01-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20200000423%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |