Nozzle Plume/Shock Interaction Experimental and Computational Sonic Boom Analyses from the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel
A wind tunnel test and a computational study were conducted to investigate the complex interactions between a supersonic nozzle plume and shock waves of differing strengths generated from various aft surfaces typical of supersonic aircraft. These analytically-defined aft surfaces were representative...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Durston, Donald A. Cliff, Susan E. Denison, Marie F. Jensen, James C. Moran, Patrick J. Smith, Nathanial T. Heineck, James T. Schairer, Edward T. Kushner, Laura K. Castner, Raymond S. Elmiligui, Alaa Carter, Melissa B. Winski, Courtney Spells Shea, Patrick Ryan |
description | A wind tunnel test and a computational study were conducted to investigate the complex interactions between a supersonic nozzle plume and shock waves of differing strengths generated from various aft surfaces typical of supersonic aircraft. These analytically-defined aft surfaces were representative of horizontal tails of various sizes, and an aft deck. CFD simulations of many proposed model configurations allowed for assessments of the detailed flow interactions of components in close proximity to the nozzle, as well as assessments of the nozzle jet flow itself. The evaluation of the computational results for many candidate configurations guided the design of model components. The interactions of the waveforms from these surfaces with the jet exhaust plume can have significant adverse effects on the loudness of the sonic boom if the surfaces are not carefully integrated into an aircraft design. The greatest discrepancy in estimating sonic boom loudness for low-boom flight vehicles is currently in predicting the signatures from the aft part of an aircraft, including the interactions with the plume flow. The objectives of this test were to gain a better understanding of these interactions, and to provide a detailed experimental database from multiple sources for use as validation cases for CFD tool development. The subject test was run in the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel in February 2016 at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.0, and was funded by the NASA Commercial Supersonics Technology (CST) Project. The nozzle flow was provided by high-pressure air (HPA) pumped through the model, and pressure signature data were acquired with the NASA 14-inch sonic boom pressure rail. The rail measured the locations of the shocks and expansions at various distances and off-track angles from the model. This enabled the impact of the nozzle plume/shock interactions on the near- and mid-field sonic boom pressure waveforms to be quantified. Schlieren images of the flow field around and behind the model were obtained with an RBOS (Retroreflective Background-Oriented Schlieren) technique to determine the origins of the shock and expansion waves, to identify the shape and boundaries of the plume, and to determine the changes in incoming and exiting waveforms within the plume. A total pressure rake was positioned closely behind the model nozzle in order to measure the total pressure profiles of the flow above, within, and below the nozzle exhaust. Model angles and position |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20190001341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20190001341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201900013413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMEKgkAURd20iOoPWrwfkDSDcGmi1EYChZYx2ROlmffEmYH0C_rspmjf6nLO5d659yp4miTCWVqFm7Ll-gEnMjiI2nRMkD17HDqFZIQEQXdIWfXWiE_pTMnU1XBgVpA4HjVqaAZHpkUokjKBRDkV-3AbYe_nzAZK6y71d3jp3GNliVAuvVkjpMbVLxfeOs-q9OiT0OJKZtDXbRDGQRCE0S6M_tRv2dhGCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Nozzle Plume/Shock Interaction Experimental and Computational Sonic Boom Analyses from the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Durston, Donald A. ; Cliff, Susan E. ; Denison, Marie F. ; Jensen, James C. ; Moran, Patrick J. ; Smith, Nathanial T. ; Heineck, James T. ; Schairer, Edward T. ; Kushner, Laura K. ; Castner, Raymond S. ; Elmiligui, Alaa ; Carter, Melissa B. ; Winski, Courtney Spells ; Shea, Patrick Ryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Durston, Donald A. ; Cliff, Susan E. ; Denison, Marie F. ; Jensen, James C. ; Moran, Patrick J. ; Smith, Nathanial T. ; Heineck, James T. ; Schairer, Edward T. ; Kushner, Laura K. ; Castner, Raymond S. ; Elmiligui, Alaa ; Carter, Melissa B. ; Winski, Courtney Spells ; Shea, Patrick Ryan</creatorcontrib><description>A wind tunnel test and a computational study were conducted to investigate the complex interactions between a supersonic nozzle plume and shock waves of differing strengths generated from various aft surfaces typical of supersonic aircraft. These analytically-defined aft surfaces were representative of horizontal tails of various sizes, and an aft deck. CFD simulations of many proposed model configurations allowed for assessments of the detailed flow interactions of components in close proximity to the nozzle, as well as assessments of the nozzle jet flow itself. The evaluation of the computational results for many candidate configurations guided the design of model components. The interactions of the waveforms from these surfaces with the jet exhaust plume can have significant adverse effects on the loudness of the sonic boom if the surfaces are not carefully integrated into an aircraft design. The greatest discrepancy in estimating sonic boom loudness for low-boom flight vehicles is currently in predicting the signatures from the aft part of an aircraft, including the interactions with the plume flow. The objectives of this test were to gain a better understanding of these interactions, and to provide a detailed experimental database from multiple sources for use as validation cases for CFD tool development. The subject test was run in the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel in February 2016 at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.0, and was funded by the NASA Commercial Supersonics Technology (CST) Project. The nozzle flow was provided by high-pressure air (HPA) pumped through the model, and pressure signature data were acquired with the NASA 14-inch sonic boom pressure rail. The rail measured the locations of the shocks and expansions at various distances and off-track angles from the model. This enabled the impact of the nozzle plume/shock interactions on the near- and mid-field sonic boom pressure waveforms to be quantified. Schlieren images of the flow field around and behind the model were obtained with an RBOS (Retroreflective Background-Oriented Schlieren) technique to determine the origins of the shock and expansion waves, to identify the shape and boundaries of the plume, and to determine the changes in incoming and exiting waveforms within the plume. A total pressure rake was positioned closely behind the model nozzle in order to measure the total pressure profiles of the flow above, within, and below the nozzle exhaust. Model angles and positions in the tunnel were measured by photogrammetry using two cameras since the lack of a model force balance prevented the measurement of model deflections under load.Navier-Stokes computations using two different CFD codes were compared to the experimental sonic boom pressure signature data, and the rake total pressure data in the plume. A computational schlieren technique was used to compare the computed flow field with the RBOS images. The computational results were also used to complement the test data with flow field quantities that could not be measured, such as Mach number and pressure distributions to distinguish shock waves and expansion waves.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</subject><creationdate>2018</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190001341$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durston, Donald A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cliff, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denison, Marie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Nathanial T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heineck, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schairer, Edward T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushner, Laura K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castner, Raymond S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmiligui, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winski, Courtney Spells</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Patrick Ryan</creatorcontrib><title>Nozzle Plume/Shock Interaction Experimental and Computational Sonic Boom Analyses from the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel</title><description>A wind tunnel test and a computational study were conducted to investigate the complex interactions between a supersonic nozzle plume and shock waves of differing strengths generated from various aft surfaces typical of supersonic aircraft. These analytically-defined aft surfaces were representative of horizontal tails of various sizes, and an aft deck. CFD simulations of many proposed model configurations allowed for assessments of the detailed flow interactions of components in close proximity to the nozzle, as well as assessments of the nozzle jet flow itself. The evaluation of the computational results for many candidate configurations guided the design of model components. The interactions of the waveforms from these surfaces with the jet exhaust plume can have significant adverse effects on the loudness of the sonic boom if the surfaces are not carefully integrated into an aircraft design. The greatest discrepancy in estimating sonic boom loudness for low-boom flight vehicles is currently in predicting the signatures from the aft part of an aircraft, including the interactions with the plume flow. The objectives of this test were to gain a better understanding of these interactions, and to provide a detailed experimental database from multiple sources for use as validation cases for CFD tool development. The subject test was run in the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel in February 2016 at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.0, and was funded by the NASA Commercial Supersonics Technology (CST) Project. The nozzle flow was provided by high-pressure air (HPA) pumped through the model, and pressure signature data were acquired with the NASA 14-inch sonic boom pressure rail. The rail measured the locations of the shocks and expansions at various distances and off-track angles from the model. This enabled the impact of the nozzle plume/shock interactions on the near- and mid-field sonic boom pressure waveforms to be quantified. Schlieren images of the flow field around and behind the model were obtained with an RBOS (Retroreflective Background-Oriented Schlieren) technique to determine the origins of the shock and expansion waves, to identify the shape and boundaries of the plume, and to determine the changes in incoming and exiting waveforms within the plume. A total pressure rake was positioned closely behind the model nozzle in order to measure the total pressure profiles of the flow above, within, and below the nozzle exhaust. Model angles and positions in the tunnel were measured by photogrammetry using two cameras since the lack of a model force balance prevented the measurement of model deflections under load.Navier-Stokes computations using two different CFD codes were compared to the experimental sonic boom pressure signature data, and the rake total pressure data in the plume. A computational schlieren technique was used to compare the computed flow field with the RBOS images. The computational results were also used to complement the test data with flow field quantities that could not be measured, such as Mach number and pressure distributions to distinguish shock waves and expansion waves.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjMEKgkAURd20iOoPWrwfkDSDcGmi1EYChZYx2ROlmffEmYH0C_rspmjf6nLO5d659yp4miTCWVqFm7Ll-gEnMjiI2nRMkD17HDqFZIQEQXdIWfXWiE_pTMnU1XBgVpA4HjVqaAZHpkUokjKBRDkV-3AbYe_nzAZK6y71d3jp3GNliVAuvVkjpMbVLxfeOs-q9OiT0OJKZtDXbRDGQRCE0S6M_tRv2dhGCw</recordid><startdate>20181107</startdate><enddate>20181107</enddate><creator>Durston, Donald A.</creator><creator>Cliff, Susan E.</creator><creator>Denison, Marie F.</creator><creator>Jensen, James C.</creator><creator>Moran, Patrick J.</creator><creator>Smith, Nathanial T.</creator><creator>Heineck, James T.</creator><creator>Schairer, Edward T.</creator><creator>Kushner, Laura K.</creator><creator>Castner, Raymond S.</creator><creator>Elmiligui, Alaa</creator><creator>Carter, Melissa B.</creator><creator>Winski, Courtney Spells</creator><creator>Shea, Patrick Ryan</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181107</creationdate><title>Nozzle Plume/Shock Interaction Experimental and Computational Sonic Boom Analyses from the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel</title><author>Durston, Donald A. ; Cliff, Susan E. ; Denison, Marie F. ; Jensen, James C. ; Moran, Patrick J. ; Smith, Nathanial T. ; Heineck, James T. ; Schairer, Edward T. ; Kushner, Laura K. ; Castner, Raymond S. ; Elmiligui, Alaa ; Carter, Melissa B. ; Winski, Courtney Spells ; Shea, Patrick Ryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201900013413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durston, Donald A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cliff, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denison, Marie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Nathanial T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heineck, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schairer, Edward T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kushner, Laura K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castner, Raymond S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmiligui, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Melissa B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winski, Courtney Spells</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Patrick Ryan</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durston, Donald A.</au><au>Cliff, Susan E.</au><au>Denison, Marie F.</au><au>Jensen, James C.</au><au>Moran, Patrick J.</au><au>Smith, Nathanial T.</au><au>Heineck, James T.</au><au>Schairer, Edward T.</au><au>Kushner, Laura K.</au><au>Castner, Raymond S.</au><au>Elmiligui, Alaa</au><au>Carter, Melissa B.</au><au>Winski, Courtney Spells</au><au>Shea, Patrick Ryan</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Nozzle Plume/Shock Interaction Experimental and Computational Sonic Boom Analyses from the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel</btitle><date>2018-11-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>A wind tunnel test and a computational study were conducted to investigate the complex interactions between a supersonic nozzle plume and shock waves of differing strengths generated from various aft surfaces typical of supersonic aircraft. These analytically-defined aft surfaces were representative of horizontal tails of various sizes, and an aft deck. CFD simulations of many proposed model configurations allowed for assessments of the detailed flow interactions of components in close proximity to the nozzle, as well as assessments of the nozzle jet flow itself. The evaluation of the computational results for many candidate configurations guided the design of model components. The interactions of the waveforms from these surfaces with the jet exhaust plume can have significant adverse effects on the loudness of the sonic boom if the surfaces are not carefully integrated into an aircraft design. The greatest discrepancy in estimating sonic boom loudness for low-boom flight vehicles is currently in predicting the signatures from the aft part of an aircraft, including the interactions with the plume flow. The objectives of this test were to gain a better understanding of these interactions, and to provide a detailed experimental database from multiple sources for use as validation cases for CFD tool development. The subject test was run in the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel in February 2016 at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.0, and was funded by the NASA Commercial Supersonics Technology (CST) Project. The nozzle flow was provided by high-pressure air (HPA) pumped through the model, and pressure signature data were acquired with the NASA 14-inch sonic boom pressure rail. The rail measured the locations of the shocks and expansions at various distances and off-track angles from the model. This enabled the impact of the nozzle plume/shock interactions on the near- and mid-field sonic boom pressure waveforms to be quantified. Schlieren images of the flow field around and behind the model were obtained with an RBOS (Retroreflective Background-Oriented Schlieren) technique to determine the origins of the shock and expansion waves, to identify the shape and boundaries of the plume, and to determine the changes in incoming and exiting waveforms within the plume. A total pressure rake was positioned closely behind the model nozzle in order to measure the total pressure profiles of the flow above, within, and below the nozzle exhaust. Model angles and positions in the tunnel were measured by photogrammetry using two cameras since the lack of a model force balance prevented the measurement of model deflections under load.Navier-Stokes computations using two different CFD codes were compared to the experimental sonic boom pressure signature data, and the rake total pressure data in the plume. A computational schlieren technique was used to compare the computed flow field with the RBOS images. The computational results were also used to complement the test data with flow field quantities that could not be measured, such as Mach number and pressure distributions to distinguish shock waves and expansion waves.</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20190001341 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Aerodynamics Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics |
title | Nozzle Plume/Shock Interaction Experimental and Computational Sonic Boom Analyses from the NASA Ames 9- by 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A35%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Nozzle%20Plume/Shock%20Interaction%20Experimental%20and%20Computational%20Sonic%20Boom%20Analyses%20from%20the%20NASA%20Ames%209-%20by%207-Foot%20Supersonic%20Wind%20Tunnel&rft.au=Durston,%20Donald%20A.&rft.date=2018-11-07&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20190001341%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |