How Much is Remembered as a Function of Presentation Modality?

According to a widespread claim often used for teaching recommendations, students remember 10 percent of what they read, 20 percent of what they hear, 30 percent of what they see, and 50 percent of what they see and hear. Clearly, the percentages cannot be correct, and there is no empirical evidence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, Vivian I., Healy, Alice F., Carlson, Kenneth W., Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J., Barshi, Immanuel
Format: Other
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Schneider, Vivian I.
Healy, Alice F.
Carlson, Kenneth W.
Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J.
Barshi, Immanuel
description According to a widespread claim often used for teaching recommendations, students remember 10 percent of what they read, 20 percent of what they hear, 30 percent of what they see, and 50 percent of what they see and hear. Clearly, the percentages cannot be correct, and there is no empirical evidence even for the ordering. To investigate the ordering, we used a laboratory paradigm that has already revealed some findings regarding the ordering of modalities for remembering information. In this paradigm, subjects are given messages instructing them to move in a grid of four stacked matrices by clicking a computer mouse. The current experiment compared 3 modalities presented either once, see (visual arrows), hear (auditory words), read (visual words); twice in succession, see see, hear hear, read read; or in two different successive modalities, see hear, hear see, see read, read see, hear read, read hear. We found better performance for messages presented twice than for those presented once, regardless of modality. For the twice-presented messages performance varied as a function of the second modality, with best performance for see and worst for read.
format Other
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170011076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20170011076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700110763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLDzyC9X8C1NzlDILFYISs1NzU1KLUpNUUgsVkhUcCvNSy7JzM9TyE9TCChKLU7NK0kE833zUxJzMksq7XkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4OMm2uIs4duXmJxYnxeSVFxvJGBobmBgaGhgbmZMQFpAONfK4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>other</recordtype></control><display><type>other</type><title>How Much is Remembered as a Function of Presentation Modality?</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Schneider, Vivian I. ; Healy, Alice F. ; Carlson, Kenneth W. ; Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J. ; Barshi, Immanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Vivian I. ; Healy, Alice F. ; Carlson, Kenneth W. ; Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J. ; Barshi, Immanuel</creatorcontrib><description>According to a widespread claim often used for teaching recommendations, students remember 10 percent of what they read, 20 percent of what they hear, 30 percent of what they see, and 50 percent of what they see and hear. Clearly, the percentages cannot be correct, and there is no empirical evidence even for the ordering. To investigate the ordering, we used a laboratory paradigm that has already revealed some findings regarding the ordering of modalities for remembering information. In this paradigm, subjects are given messages instructing them to move in a grid of four stacked matrices by clicking a computer mouse. The current experiment compared 3 modalities presented either once, see (visual arrows), hear (auditory words), read (visual words); twice in succession, see see, hear hear, read read; or in two different successive modalities, see hear, hear see, see read, read see, hear read, read hear. We found better performance for messages presented twice than for those presented once, regardless of modality. For the twice-presented messages performance varied as a function of the second modality, with best performance for see and worst for read.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><creationdate>2017</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170011076$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Vivian I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Alice F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barshi, Immanuel</creatorcontrib><title>How Much is Remembered as a Function of Presentation Modality?</title><description>According to a widespread claim often used for teaching recommendations, students remember 10 percent of what they read, 20 percent of what they hear, 30 percent of what they see, and 50 percent of what they see and hear. Clearly, the percentages cannot be correct, and there is no empirical evidence even for the ordering. To investigate the ordering, we used a laboratory paradigm that has already revealed some findings regarding the ordering of modalities for remembering information. In this paradigm, subjects are given messages instructing them to move in a grid of four stacked matrices by clicking a computer mouse. The current experiment compared 3 modalities presented either once, see (visual arrows), hear (auditory words), read (visual words); twice in succession, see see, hear hear, read read; or in two different successive modalities, see hear, hear see, see read, read see, hear read, read hear. We found better performance for messages presented twice than for those presented once, regardless of modality. For the twice-presented messages performance varied as a function of the second modality, with best performance for see and worst for read.</description><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>other</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>other</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLDzyC9X8C1NzlDILFYISs1NzU1KLUpNUUgsVkhUcCvNSy7JzM9TyE9TCChKLU7NK0kE833zUxJzMksq7XkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4OMm2uIs4duXmJxYnxeSVFxvJGBobmBgaGhgbmZMQFpAONfK4I</recordid><startdate>20171109</startdate><enddate>20171109</enddate><creator>Schneider, Vivian I.</creator><creator>Healy, Alice F.</creator><creator>Carlson, Kenneth W.</creator><creator>Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J.</creator><creator>Barshi, Immanuel</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171109</creationdate><title>How Much is Remembered as a Function of Presentation Modality?</title><author>Schneider, Vivian I. ; Healy, Alice F. ; Carlson, Kenneth W. ; Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J. ; Barshi, Immanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700110763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>other</rsrctype><prefilter>other</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Vivian I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Alice F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barshi, Immanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Vivian I.</au><au>Healy, Alice F.</au><au>Carlson, Kenneth W.</au><au>Buck-Gengler, Carolyn J.</au><au>Barshi, Immanuel</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><title>How Much is Remembered as a Function of Presentation Modality?</title><date>2017-11-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>According to a widespread claim often used for teaching recommendations, students remember 10 percent of what they read, 20 percent of what they hear, 30 percent of what they see, and 50 percent of what they see and hear. Clearly, the percentages cannot be correct, and there is no empirical evidence even for the ordering. To investigate the ordering, we used a laboratory paradigm that has already revealed some findings regarding the ordering of modalities for remembering information. In this paradigm, subjects are given messages instructing them to move in a grid of four stacked matrices by clicking a computer mouse. The current experiment compared 3 modalities presented either once, see (visual arrows), hear (auditory words), read (visual words); twice in succession, see see, hear hear, read read; or in two different successive modalities, see hear, hear see, see read, read see, hear read, read hear. We found better performance for messages presented twice than for those presented once, regardless of modality. For the twice-presented messages performance varied as a function of the second modality, with best performance for see and worst for read.</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170011076
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Behavioral Sciences
title How Much is Remembered as a Function of Presentation Modality?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A28%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.au=Schneider,%20Vivian%20I.&rft.date=2017-11-09&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20170011076%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true