The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission
Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Arney, Dale Earle, Kevin Cirillo, Bill Jones, Christopher Klovstad, Jordan Grande, Melanie Stromgren, Chel |
description | Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction. |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170009116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20170009116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700091163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAIyUhV8MwtSEwuUchPU_DNLC7OzM9TcCktSiwBMYAoUcE3sahYwb8oKbMkMQemhIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i4uYY4e-jmJRYnxueVFBXHGxkYmhsYGFgaGpoZE5AGAKZ9KR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Arney, Dale ; Earle, Kevin ; Cirillo, Bill ; Jones, Christopher ; Klovstad, Jordan ; Grande, Melanie ; Stromgren, Chel</creator><creatorcontrib>Arney, Dale ; Earle, Kevin ; Cirillo, Bill ; Jones, Christopher ; Klovstad, Jordan ; Grande, Melanie ; Stromgren, Chel</creatorcontrib><description>Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Langley Research Center</publisher><subject>Man/System Technology And Life Support ; Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><creationdate>2017</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170009116$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arney, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klovstad, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromgren, Chel</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</title><description>Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.</description><subject>Man/System Technology And Life Support</subject><subject>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAIyUhV8MwtSEwuUchPU_DNLC7OzM9TcCktSiwBMYAoUcE3sahYwb8oKbMkMQemhIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i4uYY4e-jmJRYnxueVFBXHGxkYmhsYGFgaGpoZE5AGAKZ9KR8</recordid><startdate>20170912</startdate><enddate>20170912</enddate><creator>Arney, Dale</creator><creator>Earle, Kevin</creator><creator>Cirillo, Bill</creator><creator>Jones, Christopher</creator><creator>Klovstad, Jordan</creator><creator>Grande, Melanie</creator><creator>Stromgren, Chel</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170912</creationdate><title>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</title><author>Arney, Dale ; Earle, Kevin ; Cirillo, Bill ; Jones, Christopher ; Klovstad, Jordan ; Grande, Melanie ; Stromgren, Chel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700091163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Man/System Technology And Life Support</topic><topic>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arney, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klovstad, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromgren, Chel</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arney, Dale</au><au>Earle, Kevin</au><au>Cirillo, Bill</au><au>Jones, Christopher</au><au>Klovstad, Jordan</au><au>Grande, Melanie</au><au>Stromgren, Chel</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</atitle><date>2017-09-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.</abstract><cop>Langley Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170009116 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Man/System Technology And Life Support Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance |
title | The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A45%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Mission%20Duration%20on%20a%20Mars%20Orbital%20Mission&rft.au=Arney,%20Dale&rft.date=2017-09-12&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20170009116%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |