The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission

Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Arney, Dale, Earle, Kevin, Cirillo, Bill, Jones, Christopher, Klovstad, Jordan, Grande, Melanie, Stromgren, Chel
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Arney, Dale
Earle, Kevin
Cirillo, Bill
Jones, Christopher
Klovstad, Jordan
Grande, Melanie
Stromgren, Chel
description Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170009116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20170009116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700091163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAIyUhV8MwtSEwuUchPU_DNLC7OzM9TcCktSiwBMYAoUcE3sahYwb8oKbMkMQemhIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i4uYY4e-jmJRYnxueVFBXHGxkYmhsYGFgaGpoZE5AGAKZ9KR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Arney, Dale ; Earle, Kevin ; Cirillo, Bill ; Jones, Christopher ; Klovstad, Jordan ; Grande, Melanie ; Stromgren, Chel</creator><creatorcontrib>Arney, Dale ; Earle, Kevin ; Cirillo, Bill ; Jones, Christopher ; Klovstad, Jordan ; Grande, Melanie ; Stromgren, Chel</creatorcontrib><description>Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Langley Research Center</publisher><subject>Man/System Technology And Life Support ; Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><creationdate>2017</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170009116$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arney, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klovstad, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromgren, Chel</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</title><description>Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.</description><subject>Man/System Technology And Life Support</subject><subject>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAIyUhV8MwtSEwuUchPU_DNLC7OzM9TcCktSiwBMYAoUcE3sahYwb8oKbMkMQemhIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i4uYY4e-jmJRYnxueVFBXHGxkYmhsYGFgaGpoZE5AGAKZ9KR8</recordid><startdate>20170912</startdate><enddate>20170912</enddate><creator>Arney, Dale</creator><creator>Earle, Kevin</creator><creator>Cirillo, Bill</creator><creator>Jones, Christopher</creator><creator>Klovstad, Jordan</creator><creator>Grande, Melanie</creator><creator>Stromgren, Chel</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170912</creationdate><title>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</title><author>Arney, Dale ; Earle, Kevin ; Cirillo, Bill ; Jones, Christopher ; Klovstad, Jordan ; Grande, Melanie ; Stromgren, Chel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700091163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Man/System Technology And Life Support</topic><topic>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arney, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earle, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klovstad, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromgren, Chel</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arney, Dale</au><au>Earle, Kevin</au><au>Cirillo, Bill</au><au>Jones, Christopher</au><au>Klovstad, Jordan</au><au>Grande, Melanie</au><au>Stromgren, Chel</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission</atitle><date>2017-09-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>Performance alone is insufficient to assess the total impact of changing mission parameters on a space mission concept, architecture, or campaign; the benefit, cost, and risk must also be understood. This paper examines the impact to benefit, cost, and risk of changing the total mission duration of a human Mars orbital mission. The changes in the sizing of the crew habitat, including consumables and spares, was assessed as a function of duration, including trades of different life support strategies; this was used to assess the impact on transportation system requirements. The impact to benefit is minimal, while the impact on cost is dominated by the increases in transportation costs to achieve shorter total durations. The risk is expected to be reduced by decreasing total mission duration; however, large uncertainty exists around the magnitude of that reduction.</abstract><cop>Langley Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170009116
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Man/System Technology And Life Support
Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance
title The Impact of Mission Duration on a Mars Orbital Mission
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A45%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Mission%20Duration%20on%20a%20Mars%20Orbital%20Mission&rft.au=Arney,%20Dale&rft.date=2017-09-12&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20170009116%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true