Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Control Approaches to Satisfy Mars Human Mission Landing Criteria
Precision landing on Mars is a challenge. All Mars lander missions prior to the 2012 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) had landing location uncertainty ellipses on the order of hundreds of kilometers. Sending humans to the surface of Mars will likely require multiple landers delivered in close proximity...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia Powell, Richard W. |
description | Precision landing on Mars is a challenge. All Mars lander missions prior to the 2012 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) had landing location uncertainty ellipses on the order of hundreds of kilometers. Sending humans to the surface of Mars will likely require multiple landers delivered in close proximity, which will in turn require orders of magnitude improvement in landing accuracy. MSL was the first Mars mission to use an Apollo-derived bank angle guidance to reduce the size of the landing ellipse. It utilized commanded bank angle magnitude to control total range and bank angle reversals to control cross range. A shortcoming of this bank angle guidance is that the open loop phase of flight created by use of bank reversals increases targeting errors. This paper presents a comparison of entry, descent and landing performance for a vehicle with a low lift-to-drag ratio using both bank angle control and an alternative guidance called Direct Force Control (DFC). DFC eliminates the open loop flight errors by directly controlling two forces independently, lift and side force. This permits independent control of down range and cross range. Performance results, evaluated using the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST2), including propellant use and landing accuracy, are presented. |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170001619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20170001619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700016193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLEKwkAQRNNYiPoHFvsBEe4UFEs5oylMpX1YLhddiXvh9lLk7z1EbG1mYN7wptmz4BjGHI5OrOOYA3IDlxTEdzgP1CBb9xmNT0_fwaHvg0f7cALRwxUjSTtChUGgHF7IUJEIef5ZTKDoAuE8m7TYiVt8e5YtT8XNlCtGwTrJpV4rvVNK6a3eb_7gNwvUO3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Control Approaches to Satisfy Mars Human Mission Landing Criteria</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia ; Powell, Richard W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia ; Powell, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><description>Precision landing on Mars is a challenge. All Mars lander missions prior to the 2012 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) had landing location uncertainty ellipses on the order of hundreds of kilometers. Sending humans to the surface of Mars will likely require multiple landers delivered in close proximity, which will in turn require orders of magnitude improvement in landing accuracy. MSL was the first Mars mission to use an Apollo-derived bank angle guidance to reduce the size of the landing ellipse. It utilized commanded bank angle magnitude to control total range and bank angle reversals to control cross range. A shortcoming of this bank angle guidance is that the open loop phase of flight created by use of bank reversals increases targeting errors. This paper presents a comparison of entry, descent and landing performance for a vehicle with a low lift-to-drag ratio using both bank angle control and an alternative guidance called Direct Force Control (DFC). DFC eliminates the open loop flight errors by directly controlling two forces independently, lift and side force. This permits independent control of down range and cross range. Performance results, evaluated using the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST2), including propellant use and landing accuracy, are presented.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Langley Research Center</publisher><subject>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><creationdate>2017</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170001619$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><title>Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Control Approaches to Satisfy Mars Human Mission Landing Criteria</title><description>Precision landing on Mars is a challenge. All Mars lander missions prior to the 2012 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) had landing location uncertainty ellipses on the order of hundreds of kilometers. Sending humans to the surface of Mars will likely require multiple landers delivered in close proximity, which will in turn require orders of magnitude improvement in landing accuracy. MSL was the first Mars mission to use an Apollo-derived bank angle guidance to reduce the size of the landing ellipse. It utilized commanded bank angle magnitude to control total range and bank angle reversals to control cross range. A shortcoming of this bank angle guidance is that the open loop phase of flight created by use of bank reversals increases targeting errors. This paper presents a comparison of entry, descent and landing performance for a vehicle with a low lift-to-drag ratio using both bank angle control and an alternative guidance called Direct Force Control (DFC). DFC eliminates the open loop flight errors by directly controlling two forces independently, lift and side force. This permits independent control of down range and cross range. Performance results, evaluated using the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST2), including propellant use and landing accuracy, are presented.</description><subject>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjLEKwkAQRNNYiPoHFvsBEe4UFEs5oylMpX1YLhddiXvh9lLk7z1EbG1mYN7wptmz4BjGHI5OrOOYA3IDlxTEdzgP1CBb9xmNT0_fwaHvg0f7cALRwxUjSTtChUGgHF7IUJEIef5ZTKDoAuE8m7TYiVt8e5YtT8XNlCtGwTrJpV4rvVNK6a3eb_7gNwvUO3M</recordid><startdate>20170205</startdate><enddate>20170205</enddate><creator>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia</creator><creator>Powell, Richard W.</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170205</creationdate><title>Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Control Approaches to Satisfy Mars Human Mission Landing Criteria</title><author>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia ; Powell, Richard W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201700016193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Richard W.</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dwyer Cianciolo, Alicia</au><au>Powell, Richard W.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Control Approaches to Satisfy Mars Human Mission Landing Criteria</atitle><date>2017-02-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>Precision landing on Mars is a challenge. All Mars lander missions prior to the 2012 Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) had landing location uncertainty ellipses on the order of hundreds of kilometers. Sending humans to the surface of Mars will likely require multiple landers delivered in close proximity, which will in turn require orders of magnitude improvement in landing accuracy. MSL was the first Mars mission to use an Apollo-derived bank angle guidance to reduce the size of the landing ellipse. It utilized commanded bank angle magnitude to control total range and bank angle reversals to control cross range. A shortcoming of this bank angle guidance is that the open loop phase of flight created by use of bank reversals increases targeting errors. This paper presents a comparison of entry, descent and landing performance for a vehicle with a low lift-to-drag ratio using both bank angle control and an alternative guidance called Direct Force Control (DFC). DFC eliminates the open loop flight errors by directly controlling two forces independently, lift and side force. This permits independent control of down range and cross range. Performance results, evaluated using the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST2), including propellant use and landing accuracy, are presented.</abstract><cop>Langley Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20170001619 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Spacecraft Design, Testing And Performance |
title | Entry, Descent, and Landing Guidance and Control Approaches to Satisfy Mars Human Mission Landing Criteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A59%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Entry,%20Descent,%20and%20Landing%20Guidance%20and%20Control%20Approaches%20to%20Satisfy%20Mars%20Human%20Mission%20Landing%20Criteria&rft.au=Dwyer%20Cianciolo,%20Alicia&rft.date=2017-02-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20170001619%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |