Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS

This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of dia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Loehle, Stefan, Nawaz, Anuscheh, Herdrich, Georg, Fasoulas, Stefanos, Martinez, Edward, Raiche, George
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Loehle, Stefan
Nawaz, Anuscheh
Herdrich, Georg
Fasoulas, Stefanos
Martinez, Edward
Raiche, George
description This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20160007555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20160007555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201600075553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPB0zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU_BITSxRcMsprVBwT0xPLVZIyy9S8MhMz1BwzSvJSMwpqARK5pcXK-gq-DkGOyo45gLVJOalKHgGBfMwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_dvMTixPi8kqLieCMDQzMDAwNzU1NTYwLSAJcuLcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Loehle, Stefan ; Nawaz, Anuscheh ; Herdrich, Georg ; Fasoulas, Stefanos ; Martinez, Edward ; Raiche, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Loehle, Stefan ; Nawaz, Anuscheh ; Herdrich, Georg ; Fasoulas, Stefanos ; Martinez, Edward ; Raiche, George</creatorcontrib><description>This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics ; Instrumentation And Photography</subject><creationdate>2016</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,776,796</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160007555$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loehle, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawaz, Anuscheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herdrich, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasoulas, Stefanos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raiche, George</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</title><description>This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.</description><subject>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Instrumentation And Photography</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPB0zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU_BITSxRcMsprVBwT0xPLVZIyy9S8MhMz1BwzSvJSMwpqARK5pcXK-gq-DkGOyo45gLVJOalKHgGBfMwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_dvMTixPi8kqLieCMDQzMDAwNzU1NTYwLSAJcuLcI</recordid><startdate>20160613</startdate><enddate>20160613</enddate><creator>Loehle, Stefan</creator><creator>Nawaz, Anuscheh</creator><creator>Herdrich, Georg</creator><creator>Fasoulas, Stefanos</creator><creator>Martinez, Edward</creator><creator>Raiche, George</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160613</creationdate><title>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</title><author>Loehle, Stefan ; Nawaz, Anuscheh ; Herdrich, Georg ; Fasoulas, Stefanos ; Martinez, Edward ; Raiche, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201600075553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Instrumentation And Photography</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loehle, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawaz, Anuscheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herdrich, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasoulas, Stefanos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raiche, George</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loehle, Stefan</au><au>Nawaz, Anuscheh</au><au>Herdrich, Georg</au><au>Fasoulas, Stefanos</au><au>Martinez, Edward</au><au>Raiche, George</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</atitle><date>2016-06-13</date><risdate>2016</risdate><abstract>This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20160007555
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics
Instrumentation And Photography
title Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Heat%20Flux%20Gages%20for%20High%20Enthalpy%20Flows%20-%20NASA%20Ames%20and%20IRS&rft.au=Loehle,%20Stefan&rft.date=2016-06-13&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20160007555%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true