Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS
This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of dia...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Loehle, Stefan Nawaz, Anuscheh Herdrich, Georg Fasoulas, Stefanos Martinez, Edward Raiche, George |
description | This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry. |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20160007555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20160007555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201600075553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPB0zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU_BITSxRcMsprVBwT0xPLVZIyy9S8MhMz1BwzSvJSMwpqARK5pcXK-gq-DkGOyo45gLVJOalKHgGBfMwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_dvMTixPi8kqLieCMDQzMDAwNzU1NTYwLSAJcuLcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Loehle, Stefan ; Nawaz, Anuscheh ; Herdrich, Georg ; Fasoulas, Stefanos ; Martinez, Edward ; Raiche, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Loehle, Stefan ; Nawaz, Anuscheh ; Herdrich, Georg ; Fasoulas, Stefanos ; Martinez, Edward ; Raiche, George</creatorcontrib><description>This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics ; Instrumentation And Photography</subject><creationdate>2016</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,776,796</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160007555$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loehle, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawaz, Anuscheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herdrich, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasoulas, Stefanos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raiche, George</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</title><description>This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.</description><subject>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Instrumentation And Photography</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPB0zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU_BITSxRcMsprVBwT0xPLVZIyy9S8MhMz1BwzSvJSMwpqARK5pcXK-gq-DkGOyo45gLVJOalKHgGBfMwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_dvMTixPi8kqLieCMDQzMDAwNzU1NTYwLSAJcuLcI</recordid><startdate>20160613</startdate><enddate>20160613</enddate><creator>Loehle, Stefan</creator><creator>Nawaz, Anuscheh</creator><creator>Herdrich, Georg</creator><creator>Fasoulas, Stefanos</creator><creator>Martinez, Edward</creator><creator>Raiche, George</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160613</creationdate><title>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</title><author>Loehle, Stefan ; Nawaz, Anuscheh ; Herdrich, Georg ; Fasoulas, Stefanos ; Martinez, Edward ; Raiche, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201600075553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Instrumentation And Photography</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loehle, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawaz, Anuscheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herdrich, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasoulas, Stefanos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raiche, George</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loehle, Stefan</au><au>Nawaz, Anuscheh</au><au>Herdrich, Georg</au><au>Fasoulas, Stefanos</au><au>Martinez, Edward</au><au>Raiche, George</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS</atitle><date>2016-06-13</date><risdate>2016</risdate><abstract>This article is a companion to a paper on heat flux measurements as initiated under a Space Act Agreement in 2011. The current focus of this collaboration between the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and NASA Ames Research Center is the comparison and refinement of diagnostic measurements. A first experimental campaign to test different heat flux gages in the NASA Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) and the Plasmawindkanaele (PWK) at IRS was established. This paper focuses on the results of the measurements conducted at IRS. The tested gages included a at face and hemispherical probe head, a 4" hemispherical slug calorimeter, a null-point calorimeter from Ames and a null-point calorimeter developed for this purpose at IRS. The Ames null-point calorimeter was unfortunately defective upon arrival. The measured heat fluxes agree fairly well with each other. The reason for discrepancies can be attributed to signal-to-noise levels and the probe geometry.</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20160007555 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Fluid Mechanics And Thermodynamics Instrumentation And Photography |
title | Comparison of Heat Flux Gages for High Enthalpy Flows - NASA Ames and IRS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Heat%20Flux%20Gages%20for%20High%20Enthalpy%20Flows%20-%20NASA%20Ames%20and%20IRS&rft.au=Loehle,%20Stefan&rft.date=2016-06-13&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20160007555%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |