Longitudinally Jointed Edge-wise Compression Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Coupon Testing and FE Analysis: Three Methods of Strain Measurement, and Comparison

Three means (i.e., typical foil strain gages, fiber optic sensors, and a digital image correlation (DIC) system) were implemented to measure strains on the back and front surfaces of a longitudinally jointed curved test article subjected to edge-wise compression testing, at NASA Goddard Space Flight...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Farrokh, Babak, AbdulRahim, Nur Aida, Segal, Ken, Fan, Terry, Jones, Justin, Hodges, Ken, Mashni, Noah, Garg, Naman, Sang, Alex, Gifford, Dawn, Froggatt, Mark
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Farrokh, Babak
AbdulRahim, Nur Aida
Segal, Ken
Fan, Terry
Jones, Justin
Hodges, Ken
Mashni, Noah
Garg, Naman
Sang, Alex
Gifford, Dawn
Froggatt, Mark
description Three means (i.e., typical foil strain gages, fiber optic sensors, and a digital image correlation (DIC) system) were implemented to measure strains on the back and front surfaces of a longitudinally jointed curved test article subjected to edge-wise compression testing, at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, according to ASTM C364. The Pre-test finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to assess ultimate failure load and predict strain distribution pattern throughout the test coupon. The predicted strain pattern contours were then utilized as guidelines for installing the strain measurement instrumentations. The strain gages and fiber optic sensors were bonded on the specimen at locations with nearly the same strain values, as close as possible to each other, so that, comparisons between the measured strains by strain gages and fiber optic sensors, as well as the DIC system are justified. The test article was loaded to failure (at approximately 38 kips), at the strain value of approximately 10,000mu epsilon As a part of this study, the validity of the measured strains by fiber optic sensors is examined against the strain gage and DIC data, and also will be compared with FEA predictions.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20130009099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20130009099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201300090993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjDEKwkAQRdNYiHoDizmAwqpV7EQSRLQyfVizYzKQzISdDZLDeFdXsbf68P7_b5q8LsI1hcER27Yd4SzEAR1krsb1kxThKF3vUZWE4SSMYyXd_UtFKSDcLLsnVU1EQx83BWogriFiyDM4RO-opHsoGo8IVwyNOAV5wC14SxyJ1cFjhxxW39fHbT2p8DyZPGyruPjlLFnmWXE8rdmqLTl4LbdmszPGpCZNd3_qN34KT2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Longitudinally Jointed Edge-wise Compression Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Coupon Testing and FE Analysis: Three Methods of Strain Measurement, and Comparison</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Farrokh, Babak ; AbdulRahim, Nur Aida ; Segal, Ken ; Fan, Terry ; Jones, Justin ; Hodges, Ken ; Mashni, Noah ; Garg, Naman ; Sang, Alex ; Gifford, Dawn ; Froggatt, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrokh, Babak ; AbdulRahim, Nur Aida ; Segal, Ken ; Fan, Terry ; Jones, Justin ; Hodges, Ken ; Mashni, Noah ; Garg, Naman ; Sang, Alex ; Gifford, Dawn ; Froggatt, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Three means (i.e., typical foil strain gages, fiber optic sensors, and a digital image correlation (DIC) system) were implemented to measure strains on the back and front surfaces of a longitudinally jointed curved test article subjected to edge-wise compression testing, at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, according to ASTM C364. The Pre-test finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to assess ultimate failure load and predict strain distribution pattern throughout the test coupon. The predicted strain pattern contours were then utilized as guidelines for installing the strain measurement instrumentations. The strain gages and fiber optic sensors were bonded on the specimen at locations with nearly the same strain values, as close as possible to each other, so that, comparisons between the measured strains by strain gages and fiber optic sensors, as well as the DIC system are justified. The test article was loaded to failure (at approximately 38 kips), at the strain value of approximately 10,000mu epsilon As a part of this study, the validity of the measured strains by fiber optic sensors is examined against the strain gage and DIC data, and also will be compared with FEA predictions.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Goddard Space Flight Center</publisher><subject>Composite Materials</subject><creationdate>2013</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,796,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20130009099$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrokh, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdulRahim, Nur Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segal, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashni, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Naman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froggatt, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Longitudinally Jointed Edge-wise Compression Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Coupon Testing and FE Analysis: Three Methods of Strain Measurement, and Comparison</title><description>Three means (i.e., typical foil strain gages, fiber optic sensors, and a digital image correlation (DIC) system) were implemented to measure strains on the back and front surfaces of a longitudinally jointed curved test article subjected to edge-wise compression testing, at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, according to ASTM C364. The Pre-test finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to assess ultimate failure load and predict strain distribution pattern throughout the test coupon. The predicted strain pattern contours were then utilized as guidelines for installing the strain measurement instrumentations. The strain gages and fiber optic sensors were bonded on the specimen at locations with nearly the same strain values, as close as possible to each other, so that, comparisons between the measured strains by strain gages and fiber optic sensors, as well as the DIC system are justified. The test article was loaded to failure (at approximately 38 kips), at the strain value of approximately 10,000mu epsilon As a part of this study, the validity of the measured strains by fiber optic sensors is examined against the strain gage and DIC data, and also will be compared with FEA predictions.</description><subject>Composite Materials</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjDEKwkAQRdNYiHoDizmAwqpV7EQSRLQyfVizYzKQzISdDZLDeFdXsbf68P7_b5q8LsI1hcER27Yd4SzEAR1krsb1kxThKF3vUZWE4SSMYyXd_UtFKSDcLLsnVU1EQx83BWogriFiyDM4RO-opHsoGo8IVwyNOAV5wC14SxyJ1cFjhxxW39fHbT2p8DyZPGyruPjlLFnmWXE8rdmqLTl4LbdmszPGpCZNd3_qN34KT2Q</recordid><startdate>20130506</startdate><enddate>20130506</enddate><creator>Farrokh, Babak</creator><creator>AbdulRahim, Nur Aida</creator><creator>Segal, Ken</creator><creator>Fan, Terry</creator><creator>Jones, Justin</creator><creator>Hodges, Ken</creator><creator>Mashni, Noah</creator><creator>Garg, Naman</creator><creator>Sang, Alex</creator><creator>Gifford, Dawn</creator><creator>Froggatt, Mark</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130506</creationdate><title>Longitudinally Jointed Edge-wise Compression Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Coupon Testing and FE Analysis: Three Methods of Strain Measurement, and Comparison</title><author>Farrokh, Babak ; AbdulRahim, Nur Aida ; Segal, Ken ; Fan, Terry ; Jones, Justin ; Hodges, Ken ; Mashni, Noah ; Garg, Naman ; Sang, Alex ; Gifford, Dawn ; Froggatt, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201300090993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Composite Materials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrokh, Babak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbdulRahim, Nur Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segal, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mashni, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garg, Naman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froggatt, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrokh, Babak</au><au>AbdulRahim, Nur Aida</au><au>Segal, Ken</au><au>Fan, Terry</au><au>Jones, Justin</au><au>Hodges, Ken</au><au>Mashni, Noah</au><au>Garg, Naman</au><au>Sang, Alex</au><au>Gifford, Dawn</au><au>Froggatt, Mark</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Longitudinally Jointed Edge-wise Compression Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Coupon Testing and FE Analysis: Three Methods of Strain Measurement, and Comparison</btitle><date>2013-05-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><abstract>Three means (i.e., typical foil strain gages, fiber optic sensors, and a digital image correlation (DIC) system) were implemented to measure strains on the back and front surfaces of a longitudinally jointed curved test article subjected to edge-wise compression testing, at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, according to ASTM C364. The Pre-test finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to assess ultimate failure load and predict strain distribution pattern throughout the test coupon. The predicted strain pattern contours were then utilized as guidelines for installing the strain measurement instrumentations. The strain gages and fiber optic sensors were bonded on the specimen at locations with nearly the same strain values, as close as possible to each other, so that, comparisons between the measured strains by strain gages and fiber optic sensors, as well as the DIC system are justified. The test article was loaded to failure (at approximately 38 kips), at the strain value of approximately 10,000mu epsilon As a part of this study, the validity of the measured strains by fiber optic sensors is examined against the strain gage and DIC data, and also will be compared with FEA predictions.</abstract><cop>Goddard Space Flight Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20130009099
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Composite Materials
title Longitudinally Jointed Edge-wise Compression Honeycomb Composite Sandwich Coupon Testing and FE Analysis: Three Methods of Strain Measurement, and Comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Longitudinally%20Jointed%20Edge-wise%20Compression%20Honeycomb%20Composite%20Sandwich%20Coupon%20Testing%20and%20FE%20Analysis:%20Three%20Methods%20of%20Strain%20Measurement,%20and%20Comparison&rft.au=Farrokh,%20Babak&rft.date=2013-05-06&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20130009099%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true