Response to "Toward Unified Satellite Climatology of Aerosol Properties. 3. MODIS Versus MISR Versus AERONET"

A recent paper by Mishchenko et al. compares near-coincident MISR, MODIS, and AERONET aerosol optical depth (AOD) products, and reports much poorer agreement than that obtained by the instrument teams and others. We trace the reasons for the discrepancies primarily to differences in (1) the treatmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kahn, Ralph A., Garay, Michael J., Nelson, David L., Levy, Robert C., Bull, Michael A., Diner, David J., Martonchik, John V., Hansen, Earl G., Remer, Lorraine A., Tanre, Didier
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Kahn, Ralph A.
Garay, Michael J.
Nelson, David L.
Levy, Robert C.
Bull, Michael A.
Diner, David J.
Martonchik, John V.
Hansen, Earl G.
Remer, Lorraine A.
Tanre, Didier
description A recent paper by Mishchenko et al. compares near-coincident MISR, MODIS, and AERONET aerosol optical depth (AOD) products, and reports much poorer agreement than that obtained by the instrument teams and others. We trace the reasons for the discrepancies primarily to differences in (1) the treatment of outliers, (2) the application of absolute vs. relative criteria for testing agreement, and (3) the ways in which seasonally varying spatial distributions of coincident retrievals are taken into account.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20110007301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20110007301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201100073013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFybEKwjAQgOEuDqK-gcPR3ZKawbnUih1qpY2uJdCLBNJcyUXEt3fR2en_4F8mU4c8k2eESJAqeukwws1bY3GEXkd0zkaE0tlJR3L0eAMZKDAQk4NroBlDtMgZyAya9lj3cMfAT4am7rufi6prL5VK18nCaMe4-XaVbE-VKs87r1kPPgYe9iLPhRAHKXL5Z38AeiE68Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Response to "Toward Unified Satellite Climatology of Aerosol Properties. 3. MODIS Versus MISR Versus AERONET"</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Kahn, Ralph A. ; Garay, Michael J. ; Nelson, David L. ; Levy, Robert C. ; Bull, Michael A. ; Diner, David J. ; Martonchik, John V. ; Hansen, Earl G. ; Remer, Lorraine A. ; Tanre, Didier</creator><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Ralph A. ; Garay, Michael J. ; Nelson, David L. ; Levy, Robert C. ; Bull, Michael A. ; Diner, David J. ; Martonchik, John V. ; Hansen, Earl G. ; Remer, Lorraine A. ; Tanre, Didier</creatorcontrib><description>A recent paper by Mishchenko et al. compares near-coincident MISR, MODIS, and AERONET aerosol optical depth (AOD) products, and reports much poorer agreement than that obtained by the instrument teams and others. We trace the reasons for the discrepancies primarily to differences in (1) the treatment of outliers, (2) the application of absolute vs. relative criteria for testing agreement, and (3) the ways in which seasonally varying spatial distributions of coincident retrievals are taken into account.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Goddard Space Flight Center</publisher><subject>Meteorology And Climatology</subject><creationdate>2010</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,796,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20110007301$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Ralph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garay, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diner, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martonchik, John V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Earl G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remer, Lorraine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanre, Didier</creatorcontrib><title>Response to "Toward Unified Satellite Climatology of Aerosol Properties. 3. MODIS Versus MISR Versus AERONET"</title><description>A recent paper by Mishchenko et al. compares near-coincident MISR, MODIS, and AERONET aerosol optical depth (AOD) products, and reports much poorer agreement than that obtained by the instrument teams and others. We trace the reasons for the discrepancies primarily to differences in (1) the treatment of outliers, (2) the application of absolute vs. relative criteria for testing agreement, and (3) the ways in which seasonally varying spatial distributions of coincident retrievals are taken into account.</description><subject>Meteorology And Climatology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFybEKwjAQgOEuDqK-gcPR3ZKawbnUih1qpY2uJdCLBNJcyUXEt3fR2en_4F8mU4c8k2eESJAqeukwws1bY3GEXkd0zkaE0tlJR3L0eAMZKDAQk4NroBlDtMgZyAya9lj3cMfAT4am7rufi6prL5VK18nCaMe4-XaVbE-VKs87r1kPPgYe9iLPhRAHKXL5Z38AeiE68Q</recordid><startdate>20100705</startdate><enddate>20100705</enddate><creator>Kahn, Ralph A.</creator><creator>Garay, Michael J.</creator><creator>Nelson, David L.</creator><creator>Levy, Robert C.</creator><creator>Bull, Michael A.</creator><creator>Diner, David J.</creator><creator>Martonchik, John V.</creator><creator>Hansen, Earl G.</creator><creator>Remer, Lorraine A.</creator><creator>Tanre, Didier</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100705</creationdate><title>Response to "Toward Unified Satellite Climatology of Aerosol Properties. 3. MODIS Versus MISR Versus AERONET"</title><author>Kahn, Ralph A. ; Garay, Michael J. ; Nelson, David L. ; Levy, Robert C. ; Bull, Michael A. ; Diner, David J. ; Martonchik, John V. ; Hansen, Earl G. ; Remer, Lorraine A. ; Tanre, Didier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_201100073013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Meteorology And Climatology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Ralph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garay, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diner, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martonchik, John V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Earl G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remer, Lorraine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanre, Didier</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kahn, Ralph A.</au><au>Garay, Michael J.</au><au>Nelson, David L.</au><au>Levy, Robert C.</au><au>Bull, Michael A.</au><au>Diner, David J.</au><au>Martonchik, John V.</au><au>Hansen, Earl G.</au><au>Remer, Lorraine A.</au><au>Tanre, Didier</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Response to "Toward Unified Satellite Climatology of Aerosol Properties. 3. MODIS Versus MISR Versus AERONET"</btitle><date>2010-07-05</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>A recent paper by Mishchenko et al. compares near-coincident MISR, MODIS, and AERONET aerosol optical depth (AOD) products, and reports much poorer agreement than that obtained by the instrument teams and others. We trace the reasons for the discrepancies primarily to differences in (1) the treatment of outliers, (2) the application of absolute vs. relative criteria for testing agreement, and (3) the ways in which seasonally varying spatial distributions of coincident retrievals are taken into account.</abstract><cop>Goddard Space Flight Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20110007301
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Meteorology And Climatology
title Response to "Toward Unified Satellite Climatology of Aerosol Properties. 3. MODIS Versus MISR Versus AERONET"
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A25%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Response%20to%20%22Toward%20Unified%20Satellite%20Climatology%20of%20Aerosol%20Properties.%203.%20MODIS%20Versus%20MISR%20Versus%20AERONET%22&rft.au=Kahn,%20Ralph%20A.&rft.date=2010-07-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20110007301%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true