Survey and Method for Determination of Trajectory Predictor Requirements

A survey of air-traffic-management researchers, representing a broad range of automation applications, was conducted to document trajectory-predictor requirements for future decision-support systems. Results indicated that the researchers were unable to articulate a basic set of trajectory-predictio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rentas, Tamika L., Green, Steven M., Cate, Karen Tung
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Rentas, Tamika L.
Green, Steven M.
Cate, Karen Tung
description A survey of air-traffic-management researchers, representing a broad range of automation applications, was conducted to document trajectory-predictor requirements for future decision-support systems. Results indicated that the researchers were unable to articulate a basic set of trajectory-prediction requirements for their automation concepts. Survey responses showed the need to establish a process to help developers determine the trajectory-predictor-performance requirements for their concepts. Two methods for determining trajectory-predictor requirements are introduced. A fast-time simulation method is discussed that captures the sensitivity of a concept to the performance of its trajectory-prediction capability. A characterization method is proposed to provide quicker, yet less precise results, based on analysis and simulation to characterize the trajectory-prediction errors associated with key modeling options for a specific concept. Concept developers can then identify the relative sizes of errors associated with key modeling options, and qualitatively determine which options lead to significant errors. The characterization method is demonstrated for a case study involving future airport surface traffic management automation. Of the top four sources of error, results indicated that the error associated with accelerations to and from turn speeds was unacceptable, the error associated with the turn path model was acceptable, and the error associated with taxi-speed estimation was of concern and needed a higher fidelity concept simulation to obtain a more precise result
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20090036347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20090036347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_200900363473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPAILi0qS61USMxLUfBNLcnIT1FIyy9ScEktSS3KzcxLLMnMz1PIT1MIKUrMSk0uyS-qVAgoSk3JBDEVglILSzOLUnNT80qKeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25eYnFifF5JUXG8kYGBpYGBsZmxibkxAWkAj04wiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Survey and Method for Determination of Trajectory Predictor Requirements</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Rentas, Tamika L. ; Green, Steven M. ; Cate, Karen Tung</creator><creatorcontrib>Rentas, Tamika L. ; Green, Steven M. ; Cate, Karen Tung</creatorcontrib><description>A survey of air-traffic-management researchers, representing a broad range of automation applications, was conducted to document trajectory-predictor requirements for future decision-support systems. Results indicated that the researchers were unable to articulate a basic set of trajectory-prediction requirements for their automation concepts. Survey responses showed the need to establish a process to help developers determine the trajectory-predictor-performance requirements for their concepts. Two methods for determining trajectory-predictor requirements are introduced. A fast-time simulation method is discussed that captures the sensitivity of a concept to the performance of its trajectory-prediction capability. A characterization method is proposed to provide quicker, yet less precise results, based on analysis and simulation to characterize the trajectory-prediction errors associated with key modeling options for a specific concept. Concept developers can then identify the relative sizes of errors associated with key modeling options, and qualitatively determine which options lead to significant errors. The characterization method is demonstrated for a case study involving future airport surface traffic management automation. Of the top four sources of error, results indicated that the error associated with accelerations to and from turn speeds was unacceptable, the error associated with the turn path model was acceptable, and the error associated with taxi-speed estimation was of concern and needed a higher fidelity concept simulation to obtain a more precise result</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Ames Research Center</publisher><subject>Air Transportation And Safety</subject><creationdate>2009</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,780,800</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090036347$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rentas, Tamika L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cate, Karen Tung</creatorcontrib><title>Survey and Method for Determination of Trajectory Predictor Requirements</title><description>A survey of air-traffic-management researchers, representing a broad range of automation applications, was conducted to document trajectory-predictor requirements for future decision-support systems. Results indicated that the researchers were unable to articulate a basic set of trajectory-prediction requirements for their automation concepts. Survey responses showed the need to establish a process to help developers determine the trajectory-predictor-performance requirements for their concepts. Two methods for determining trajectory-predictor requirements are introduced. A fast-time simulation method is discussed that captures the sensitivity of a concept to the performance of its trajectory-prediction capability. A characterization method is proposed to provide quicker, yet less precise results, based on analysis and simulation to characterize the trajectory-prediction errors associated with key modeling options for a specific concept. Concept developers can then identify the relative sizes of errors associated with key modeling options, and qualitatively determine which options lead to significant errors. The characterization method is demonstrated for a case study involving future airport surface traffic management automation. Of the top four sources of error, results indicated that the error associated with accelerations to and from turn speeds was unacceptable, the error associated with the turn path model was acceptable, and the error associated with taxi-speed estimation was of concern and needed a higher fidelity concept simulation to obtain a more precise result</description><subject>Air Transportation And Safety</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPAILi0qS61USMxLUfBNLcnIT1FIyy9ScEktSS3KzcxLLMnMz1PIT1MIKUrMSk0uyS-qVAgoSk3JBDEVglILSzOLUnNT80qKeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25eYnFifF5JUXG8kYGBpYGBsZmxibkxAWkAj04wiQ</recordid><startdate>20090921</startdate><enddate>20090921</enddate><creator>Rentas, Tamika L.</creator><creator>Green, Steven M.</creator><creator>Cate, Karen Tung</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090921</creationdate><title>Survey and Method for Determination of Trajectory Predictor Requirements</title><author>Rentas, Tamika L. ; Green, Steven M. ; Cate, Karen Tung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_200900363473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Air Transportation And Safety</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rentas, Tamika L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cate, Karen Tung</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rentas, Tamika L.</au><au>Green, Steven M.</au><au>Cate, Karen Tung</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Survey and Method for Determination of Trajectory Predictor Requirements</atitle><date>2009-09-21</date><risdate>2009</risdate><abstract>A survey of air-traffic-management researchers, representing a broad range of automation applications, was conducted to document trajectory-predictor requirements for future decision-support systems. Results indicated that the researchers were unable to articulate a basic set of trajectory-prediction requirements for their automation concepts. Survey responses showed the need to establish a process to help developers determine the trajectory-predictor-performance requirements for their concepts. Two methods for determining trajectory-predictor requirements are introduced. A fast-time simulation method is discussed that captures the sensitivity of a concept to the performance of its trajectory-prediction capability. A characterization method is proposed to provide quicker, yet less precise results, based on analysis and simulation to characterize the trajectory-prediction errors associated with key modeling options for a specific concept. Concept developers can then identify the relative sizes of errors associated with key modeling options, and qualitatively determine which options lead to significant errors. The characterization method is demonstrated for a case study involving future airport surface traffic management automation. Of the top four sources of error, results indicated that the error associated with accelerations to and from turn speeds was unacceptable, the error associated with the turn path model was acceptable, and the error associated with taxi-speed estimation was of concern and needed a higher fidelity concept simulation to obtain a more precise result</abstract><cop>Ames Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20090036347
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Air Transportation And Safety
title Survey and Method for Determination of Trajectory Predictor Requirements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A52%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Survey%20and%20Method%20for%20Determination%20of%20Trajectory%20Predictor%20Requirements&rft.au=Rentas,%20Tamika%20L.&rft.date=2009-09-21&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20090036347%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true