Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies
This presentation considers the use of new launch vehicles in defense against near-Earth objects, building upon expertise in launch vehicle and spacecraft design, astronomy and planetary science and missile defense. This work also seeks to demonstrate the synergy needed between architectures for hum...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Adams, Robert B. |
description | This presentation considers the use of new launch vehicles in defense against near-Earth objects, building upon expertise in launch vehicle and spacecraft design, astronomy and planetary science and missile defense. This work also seeks to demonstrate the synergy needed between architectures for human/robotic exploration initiatives and planetary defense. Three different mitigation operations were baselined for this study--nuclear standoff explosion, kinetic interceptor, and solar collector--however, these are not the only viable options. The design and predicted performance of each of these methods is discussed and compared. It is determined that the nuclear interceptor option can deflect NEOs of smaller size (100-500 m) with 2 years or more time before impact, and larger NEOs with 5 or more years warning; kinetic interceptors may be effective for deflection of asteroids up to 300-400 m but require 8-10 years warning time; and, solar collectors may be able to deflect NEOs up to 1 km if issues pertaining to long operation can be overcome. Ares I and Ares V vehicles show sufficient performance to enable the development of a near-term categorization and mitigation architecture. |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20090008675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20090008675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_200900086753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPD0S00sUnBNLCrJUPBPykpNLlHQ8HP111TwzSzJTE8syczPU_AvAFHFCqHFmXnpCq4VBTn5RRCZkNTkjLz8nPz0zNRiHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NIOPmGuLsoZuXWJwYn1dSVBxvZGBgaWBgYGFmbmpMQBoAIlcvrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Adams, Robert B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><description>This presentation considers the use of new launch vehicles in defense against near-Earth objects, building upon expertise in launch vehicle and spacecraft design, astronomy and planetary science and missile defense. This work also seeks to demonstrate the synergy needed between architectures for human/robotic exploration initiatives and planetary defense. Three different mitigation operations were baselined for this study--nuclear standoff explosion, kinetic interceptor, and solar collector--however, these are not the only viable options. The design and predicted performance of each of these methods is discussed and compared. It is determined that the nuclear interceptor option can deflect NEOs of smaller size (100-500 m) with 2 years or more time before impact, and larger NEOs with 5 or more years warning; kinetic interceptors may be effective for deflection of asteroids up to 300-400 m but require 8-10 years warning time; and, solar collectors may be able to deflect NEOs up to 1 km if issues pertaining to long operation can be overcome. Ares I and Ares V vehicles show sufficient performance to enable the development of a near-term categorization and mitigation architecture.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Marshall Space Flight Center</publisher><subject>Lunar And Planetary Science And Exploration</subject><creationdate>2008</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,776,796</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20090008675$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><title>Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies</title><description>This presentation considers the use of new launch vehicles in defense against near-Earth objects, building upon expertise in launch vehicle and spacecraft design, astronomy and planetary science and missile defense. This work also seeks to demonstrate the synergy needed between architectures for human/robotic exploration initiatives and planetary defense. Three different mitigation operations were baselined for this study--nuclear standoff explosion, kinetic interceptor, and solar collector--however, these are not the only viable options. The design and predicted performance of each of these methods is discussed and compared. It is determined that the nuclear interceptor option can deflect NEOs of smaller size (100-500 m) with 2 years or more time before impact, and larger NEOs with 5 or more years warning; kinetic interceptors may be effective for deflection of asteroids up to 300-400 m but require 8-10 years warning time; and, solar collectors may be able to deflect NEOs up to 1 km if issues pertaining to long operation can be overcome. Ares I and Ares V vehicles show sufficient performance to enable the development of a near-term categorization and mitigation architecture.</description><subject>Lunar And Planetary Science And Exploration</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPD0S00sUnBNLCrJUPBPykpNLlHQ8HP111TwzSzJTE8syczPU_AvAFHFCqHFmXnpCq4VBTn5RRCZkNTkjLz8nPz0zNRiHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NIOPmGuLsoZuXWJwYn1dSVBxvZGBgaWBgYGFmbmpMQBoAIlcvrA</recordid><startdate>20081023</startdate><enddate>20081023</enddate><creator>Adams, Robert B.</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081023</creationdate><title>Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies</title><author>Adams, Robert B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_200900086753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Lunar And Planetary Science And Exploration</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Robert B.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies</atitle><date>2008-10-23</date><risdate>2008</risdate><abstract>This presentation considers the use of new launch vehicles in defense against near-Earth objects, building upon expertise in launch vehicle and spacecraft design, astronomy and planetary science and missile defense. This work also seeks to demonstrate the synergy needed between architectures for human/robotic exploration initiatives and planetary defense. Three different mitigation operations were baselined for this study--nuclear standoff explosion, kinetic interceptor, and solar collector--however, these are not the only viable options. The design and predicted performance of each of these methods is discussed and compared. It is determined that the nuclear interceptor option can deflect NEOs of smaller size (100-500 m) with 2 years or more time before impact, and larger NEOs with 5 or more years warning; kinetic interceptors may be effective for deflection of asteroids up to 300-400 m but require 8-10 years warning time; and, solar collectors may be able to deflect NEOs up to 1 km if issues pertaining to long operation can be overcome. Ares I and Ares V vehicles show sufficient performance to enable the development of a near-term categorization and mitigation architecture.</abstract><cop>Marshall Space Flight Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_nasa_ntrs_20090008675 |
source | NASA Technical Reports Server |
subjects | Lunar And Planetary Science And Exploration |
title | Near Earth Object (NEO) Mitigation Options Using Exploration Technologies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Near%20Earth%20Object%20(NEO)%20Mitigation%20Options%20Using%20Exploration%20Technologies&rft.au=Adams,%20Robert%20B.&rft.date=2008-10-23&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20090008675%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |