Comparison of AMZIRC and GRCop-84

The mechanical properties of two copper alloys with high thermal conductivity, GRCop-84 and AMZIRC, were compared. These are competing alloys in high temperature, high heat flux applications such as rocket nozzles. The GRCop-84 data presented was taken from previous work. The results of new tensile,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: de Groh, Henry C. III, Ellis, David, Loewenthal, William
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator de Groh, Henry C. III
Ellis, David
Loewenthal, William
description The mechanical properties of two copper alloys with high thermal conductivity, GRCop-84 and AMZIRC, were compared. These are competing alloys in high temperature, high heat flux applications such as rocket nozzles. The GRCop-84 data presented was taken from previous work. The results of new tensile, creep, and compression tests on AMZIRC are presented. Tests were done on as-received hard drawn material, and on material that had been subjected to a heat treatment designed to simulate a brazing operation at 935 C. As-received AMZIRC was found to have excellent properties at temperatures below 550 C, with room temperature yield and ultimate tensile strengths of about 500 MPa, and ductile failures. By comparison, GRCop-84 s room temperature tensile yield and ultimate strengths are about 200 and 380 MPa respectively. However, the simulated brazing heat treatment substantially decreased the mechanical properties of AMZIRC; and the strength of as-received AMZIRC dropped precipitously as test temperatures exceeded 500 C. The properties of GRCop-84 were not significantly affected by the 935 C heat treatment. As a result, there appear to be advantages to GRCop- 84 over AMZIRC if use or processing temperatures of greater than 500 C are expected. Tensile creep tests were done at 500 and 650 C. At these temperatures, the creep properties of GRCop-84 were superior to AMZIRC s. At equivalent rupture life and stress, GRCop-84 was found to have a 150 C temperature advantage over AMZIRC; for equivalent rupture life and temperature GRCop-84 was two times stronger.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_20060005039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20060005039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_200600050393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFB0zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU3D0jfIMclZIzEtRcA9yzi_QtTDhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4eunmJxYnxeSVFxfFGBgZmBgYGpgbGlsYEpAFKnx-l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Comparison of AMZIRC and GRCop-84</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>de Groh, Henry C. III ; Ellis, David ; Loewenthal, William</creator><creatorcontrib>de Groh, Henry C. III ; Ellis, David ; Loewenthal, William</creatorcontrib><description>The mechanical properties of two copper alloys with high thermal conductivity, GRCop-84 and AMZIRC, were compared. These are competing alloys in high temperature, high heat flux applications such as rocket nozzles. The GRCop-84 data presented was taken from previous work. The results of new tensile, creep, and compression tests on AMZIRC are presented. Tests were done on as-received hard drawn material, and on material that had been subjected to a heat treatment designed to simulate a brazing operation at 935 C. As-received AMZIRC was found to have excellent properties at temperatures below 550 C, with room temperature yield and ultimate tensile strengths of about 500 MPa, and ductile failures. By comparison, GRCop-84 s room temperature tensile yield and ultimate strengths are about 200 and 380 MPa respectively. However, the simulated brazing heat treatment substantially decreased the mechanical properties of AMZIRC; and the strength of as-received AMZIRC dropped precipitously as test temperatures exceeded 500 C. The properties of GRCop-84 were not significantly affected by the 935 C heat treatment. As a result, there appear to be advantages to GRCop- 84 over AMZIRC if use or processing temperatures of greater than 500 C are expected. Tensile creep tests were done at 500 and 650 C. At these temperatures, the creep properties of GRCop-84 were superior to AMZIRC s. At equivalent rupture life and stress, GRCop-84 was found to have a 150 C temperature advantage over AMZIRC; for equivalent rupture life and temperature GRCop-84 was two times stronger.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Glenn Research Center</publisher><subject>Metals And Metallic Materials</subject><creationdate>2006</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,796,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20060005039$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Groh, Henry C. III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewenthal, William</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of AMZIRC and GRCop-84</title><description>The mechanical properties of two copper alloys with high thermal conductivity, GRCop-84 and AMZIRC, were compared. These are competing alloys in high temperature, high heat flux applications such as rocket nozzles. The GRCop-84 data presented was taken from previous work. The results of new tensile, creep, and compression tests on AMZIRC are presented. Tests were done on as-received hard drawn material, and on material that had been subjected to a heat treatment designed to simulate a brazing operation at 935 C. As-received AMZIRC was found to have excellent properties at temperatures below 550 C, with room temperature yield and ultimate tensile strengths of about 500 MPa, and ductile failures. By comparison, GRCop-84 s room temperature tensile yield and ultimate strengths are about 200 and 380 MPa respectively. However, the simulated brazing heat treatment substantially decreased the mechanical properties of AMZIRC; and the strength of as-received AMZIRC dropped precipitously as test temperatures exceeded 500 C. The properties of GRCop-84 were not significantly affected by the 935 C heat treatment. As a result, there appear to be advantages to GRCop- 84 over AMZIRC if use or processing temperatures of greater than 500 C are expected. Tensile creep tests were done at 500 and 650 C. At these temperatures, the creep properties of GRCop-84 were superior to AMZIRC s. At equivalent rupture life and stress, GRCop-84 was found to have a 150 C temperature advantage over AMZIRC; for equivalent rupture life and temperature GRCop-84 was two times stronger.</description><subject>Metals And Metallic Materials</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFB0zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU3D0jfIMclZIzEtRcA9yzi_QtTDhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4eunmJxYnxeSVFxfFGBgZmBgYGpgbGlsYEpAFKnx-l</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>de Groh, Henry C. III</creator><creator>Ellis, David</creator><creator>Loewenthal, William</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Comparison of AMZIRC and GRCop-84</title><author>de Groh, Henry C. III ; Ellis, David ; Loewenthal, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_200600050393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Metals And Metallic Materials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Groh, Henry C. III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewenthal, William</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Groh, Henry C. III</au><au>Ellis, David</au><au>Loewenthal, William</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Comparison of AMZIRC and GRCop-84</btitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><abstract>The mechanical properties of two copper alloys with high thermal conductivity, GRCop-84 and AMZIRC, were compared. These are competing alloys in high temperature, high heat flux applications such as rocket nozzles. The GRCop-84 data presented was taken from previous work. The results of new tensile, creep, and compression tests on AMZIRC are presented. Tests were done on as-received hard drawn material, and on material that had been subjected to a heat treatment designed to simulate a brazing operation at 935 C. As-received AMZIRC was found to have excellent properties at temperatures below 550 C, with room temperature yield and ultimate tensile strengths of about 500 MPa, and ductile failures. By comparison, GRCop-84 s room temperature tensile yield and ultimate strengths are about 200 and 380 MPa respectively. However, the simulated brazing heat treatment substantially decreased the mechanical properties of AMZIRC; and the strength of as-received AMZIRC dropped precipitously as test temperatures exceeded 500 C. The properties of GRCop-84 were not significantly affected by the 935 C heat treatment. As a result, there appear to be advantages to GRCop- 84 over AMZIRC if use or processing temperatures of greater than 500 C are expected. Tensile creep tests were done at 500 and 650 C. At these temperatures, the creep properties of GRCop-84 were superior to AMZIRC s. At equivalent rupture life and stress, GRCop-84 was found to have a 150 C temperature advantage over AMZIRC; for equivalent rupture life and temperature GRCop-84 was two times stronger.</abstract><cop>Glenn Research Center</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_20060005039
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Metals And Metallic Materials
title Comparison of AMZIRC and GRCop-84
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A56%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Comparison%20of%20AMZIRC%20and%20GRCop-84&rft.au=de%20Groh,%20Henry%20C.%20III&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E20060005039%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true