Experimental evaluation of two turning vane designs for high-speed corner of 0.1-scale model of NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed altitude wind tunnel

Two turning vane designs were experimentally evaluated for corner 1 (downstream of the test section) of a 0.1-scale model of the NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT). Vane A was a controlled-diffusion airfoil shape; vane B was a circular-arc airfoil shape. The vane d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Moore, R. D., Boldman, D. R., Shyne, R. J.
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Moore, R. D.
Boldman, D. R.
Shyne, R. J.
description Two turning vane designs were experimentally evaluated for corner 1 (downstream of the test section) of a 0.1-scale model of the NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT). Vane A was a controlled-diffusion airfoil shape; vane B was a circular-arc airfoil shape. The vane designs were tested over corner inlet Mach numbers from 0.16 to 0.465. Several modifications in vane setting angle and vane spacing were also evaluated for vane A. The overall performance obtained from total pressure rakes indicated that vane B had a slightly lower loss coefficient than vane A. At Mach 0.35 (the design Mach number without the engine exhaust removal scoop), the loss coefficients were 0.150 and 0.178 for vanes B and A, respectively. Resetting the vane A angle by -5 deg. (vane A10) to turn the flow toward the outside corner reduced the loss coefficient to 0.119. The best configuration (vane A10) was also tested with a simulated engine exhaust removal scoop. The loss coefficient for that configuration was 0.164 at Mach 0.41 (the approximate design Mach number with the scoop).
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_19860018629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19860018629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_198600186293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjbGKwlAQRdNYiPoHFtNZRZJdEC1FFItlC91ehryb5MFzXph5MX7Lfu1G2N7qwr2ce6bZ7_HZQf0dkjgQHhx6Tj4KxZrSECn1Kl4aerCAHMw3YlRHpdY3bW4d4KiKKtAXUazL3CoOoHt0CK_qe3_d0xcGb3SBgbVq6TDaoCujTmMXbbzgkHzqHWjw4kapCMI8m9QcDIv_nGXL0_HncM6FjW-S1G7lbrspinK7-dh9vpn_AAGATbI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Experimental evaluation of two turning vane designs for high-speed corner of 0.1-scale model of NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed altitude wind tunnel</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Moore, R. D. ; Boldman, D. R. ; Shyne, R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, R. D. ; Boldman, D. R. ; Shyne, R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Two turning vane designs were experimentally evaluated for corner 1 (downstream of the test section) of a 0.1-scale model of the NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT). Vane A was a controlled-diffusion airfoil shape; vane B was a circular-arc airfoil shape. The vane designs were tested over corner inlet Mach numbers from 0.16 to 0.465. Several modifications in vane setting angle and vane spacing were also evaluated for vane A. The overall performance obtained from total pressure rakes indicated that vane B had a slightly lower loss coefficient than vane A. At Mach 0.35 (the design Mach number without the engine exhaust removal scoop), the loss coefficients were 0.150 and 0.178 for vanes B and A, respectively. Resetting the vane A angle by -5 deg. (vane A10) to turn the flow toward the outside corner reduced the loss coefficient to 0.119. The best configuration (vane A10) was also tested with a simulated engine exhaust removal scoop. The loss coefficient for that configuration was 0.164 at Mach 0.41 (the approximate design Mach number with the scoop).</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Legacy CDMS</publisher><subject>Research And Support Facilities (Air)</subject><creationdate>1986</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,796</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860018629$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldman, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shyne, R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental evaluation of two turning vane designs for high-speed corner of 0.1-scale model of NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed altitude wind tunnel</title><description>Two turning vane designs were experimentally evaluated for corner 1 (downstream of the test section) of a 0.1-scale model of the NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT). Vane A was a controlled-diffusion airfoil shape; vane B was a circular-arc airfoil shape. The vane designs were tested over corner inlet Mach numbers from 0.16 to 0.465. Several modifications in vane setting angle and vane spacing were also evaluated for vane A. The overall performance obtained from total pressure rakes indicated that vane B had a slightly lower loss coefficient than vane A. At Mach 0.35 (the design Mach number without the engine exhaust removal scoop), the loss coefficients were 0.150 and 0.178 for vanes B and A, respectively. Resetting the vane A angle by -5 deg. (vane A10) to turn the flow toward the outside corner reduced the loss coefficient to 0.119. The best configuration (vane A10) was also tested with a simulated engine exhaust removal scoop. The loss coefficient for that configuration was 0.164 at Mach 0.41 (the approximate design Mach number with the scoop).</description><subject>Research And Support Facilities (Air)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjbGKwlAQRdNYiPoHFtNZRZJdEC1FFItlC91ehryb5MFzXph5MX7Lfu1G2N7qwr2ce6bZ7_HZQf0dkjgQHhx6Tj4KxZrSECn1Kl4aerCAHMw3YlRHpdY3bW4d4KiKKtAXUazL3CoOoHt0CK_qe3_d0xcGb3SBgbVq6TDaoCujTmMXbbzgkHzqHWjw4kapCMI8m9QcDIv_nGXL0_HncM6FjW-S1G7lbrspinK7-dh9vpn_AAGATbI</recordid><startdate>19860401</startdate><enddate>19860401</enddate><creator>Moore, R. D.</creator><creator>Boldman, D. R.</creator><creator>Shyne, R. J.</creator><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860401</creationdate><title>Experimental evaluation of two turning vane designs for high-speed corner of 0.1-scale model of NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed altitude wind tunnel</title><author>Moore, R. D. ; Boldman, D. R. ; Shyne, R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_198600186293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Research And Support Facilities (Air)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldman, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shyne, R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, R. D.</au><au>Boldman, D. R.</au><au>Shyne, R. J.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Experimental evaluation of two turning vane designs for high-speed corner of 0.1-scale model of NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed altitude wind tunnel</btitle><date>1986-04-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><abstract>Two turning vane designs were experimentally evaluated for corner 1 (downstream of the test section) of a 0.1-scale model of the NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed Altitude Wind Tunnel (AWT). Vane A was a controlled-diffusion airfoil shape; vane B was a circular-arc airfoil shape. The vane designs were tested over corner inlet Mach numbers from 0.16 to 0.465. Several modifications in vane setting angle and vane spacing were also evaluated for vane A. The overall performance obtained from total pressure rakes indicated that vane B had a slightly lower loss coefficient than vane A. At Mach 0.35 (the design Mach number without the engine exhaust removal scoop), the loss coefficients were 0.150 and 0.178 for vanes B and A, respectively. Resetting the vane A angle by -5 deg. (vane A10) to turn the flow toward the outside corner reduced the loss coefficient to 0.119. The best configuration (vane A10) was also tested with a simulated engine exhaust removal scoop. The loss coefficient for that configuration was 0.164 at Mach 0.41 (the approximate design Mach number with the scoop).</abstract><cop>Legacy CDMS</cop><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_19860018629
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Research And Support Facilities (Air)
title Experimental evaluation of two turning vane designs for high-speed corner of 0.1-scale model of NASA Lewis Research Center's proposed altitude wind tunnel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A31%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Experimental%20evaluation%20of%20two%20turning%20vane%20designs%20for%20high-speed%20corner%20of%200.1-scale%20model%20of%20NASA%20Lewis%20Research%20Center's%20proposed%20altitude%20wind%20tunnel&rft.au=Moore,%20R.%20D.&rft.date=1986-04-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E19860018629%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true