A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary

A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary

A detailed analytical study was made to investigate the effects of fuselage cross section (circular and elliptical) and the structural arrangement (integral and nonintegral tanks) on aircraft performance. The vehicle was a 200 passenger, liquid hydrogen fueled Mach 6 transport designed to meet a ran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Pirrello, C. J., Baker, A. H., Stone, J. E.
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Structural Mechanics
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Pirrello, C. J.
Baker, A. H.
Stone, J. E.
description A detailed analytical study was made to investigate the effects of fuselage cross section (circular and elliptical) and the structural arrangement (integral and nonintegral tanks) on aircraft performance. The vehicle was a 200 passenger, liquid hydrogen fueled Mach 6 transport designed to meet a range goal of 9.26 Mn (5000 NM). A variety of trade studies were conducted in the area of configuration arrangement, structural design, and active cooling design in order to maximize the performance of each of three point design aircraft: (1) circular wing-body with nonintegral tanks, (2) circular wing-body with integral tanks and (3) elliptical blended wing-body with integral tanks. Aircraft range and weight were used as the basis for comparison. The resulting design and performance characteristics show that the blended body integral tank aircraft weights the least and has the greatest range capability, however, producibility and maintainability factors favor nonintegral tank concepts.
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>nasa_CYI</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_nasa_ntrs_19760011448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19760011448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-nasa_ntrs_197600114483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyU0KwjAQQOFuXIh6AxdzAMUGiz9LEcUDCC7LkE5sME1kJlPI7XXh3tX74E2rxwmcCgV80iZjfIFkVpuV6SvtCrjEgDb7kUIBm1KgDvryJpYUvQXL6oVgpN7bQLIC0WFALvNq4jAILX6dVcvr5X6-rSMKtjGztOa439W1MU1z2P7ZH0QUNow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary</title><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Pirrello, C. J. ; Baker, A. H. ; Stone, J. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pirrello, C. J. ; Baker, A. H. ; Stone, J. E.</creatorcontrib><description>A detailed analytical study was made to investigate the effects of fuselage cross section (circular and elliptical) and the structural arrangement (integral and nonintegral tanks) on aircraft performance. The vehicle was a 200 passenger, liquid hydrogen fueled Mach 6 transport designed to meet a range goal of 9.26 Mn (5000 NM). A variety of trade studies were conducted in the area of configuration arrangement, structural design, and active cooling design in order to maximize the performance of each of three point design aircraft: (1) circular wing-body with nonintegral tanks, (2) circular wing-body with integral tanks and (3) elliptical blended wing-body with integral tanks. Aircraft range and weight were used as the basis for comparison. The resulting design and performance characteristics show that the blended body integral tank aircraft weights the least and has the greatest range capability, however, producibility and maintainability factors favor nonintegral tank concepts.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Legacy CDMS: NASA</publisher><subject>Structural Mechanics</subject><creationdate>1976</creationdate><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PUBLIC_USE_PERMITTED</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,800,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760011448$$EView_record_in_NASA$$FView_record_in_$$GNASA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pirrello, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, J. E.</creatorcontrib><title>A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary</title><description>A detailed analytical study was made to investigate the effects of fuselage cross section (circular and elliptical) and the structural arrangement (integral and nonintegral tanks) on aircraft performance. The vehicle was a 200 passenger, liquid hydrogen fueled Mach 6 transport designed to meet a range goal of 9.26 Mn (5000 NM). A variety of trade studies were conducted in the area of configuration arrangement, structural design, and active cooling design in order to maximize the performance of each of three point design aircraft: (1) circular wing-body with nonintegral tanks, (2) circular wing-body with integral tanks and (3) elliptical blended wing-body with integral tanks. Aircraft range and weight were used as the basis for comparison. The resulting design and performance characteristics show that the blended body integral tank aircraft weights the least and has the greatest range capability, however, producibility and maintainability factors favor nonintegral tank concepts.</description><subject>Structural Mechanics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNqFyU0KwjAQQOFuXIh6AxdzAMUGiz9LEcUDCC7LkE5sME1kJlPI7XXh3tX74E2rxwmcCgV80iZjfIFkVpuV6SvtCrjEgDb7kUIBm1KgDvryJpYUvQXL6oVgpN7bQLIC0WFALvNq4jAILX6dVcvr5X6-rSMKtjGztOa439W1MU1z2P7ZH0QUNow</recordid><startdate>19760201</startdate><enddate>19760201</enddate><creator>Pirrello, C. J.</creator><creator>Baker, A. H.</creator><creator>Stone, J. E.</creator><general>NASA</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760201</creationdate><title>A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary</title><author>Pirrello, C. J. ; Baker, A. H. ; Stone, J. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-nasa_ntrs_197600114483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Structural Mechanics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pirrello, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, J. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pirrello, C. J.</au><au>Baker, A. H.</au><au>Stone, J. E.</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary</btitle><date>1976-02-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><abstract>A detailed analytical study was made to investigate the effects of fuselage cross section (circular and elliptical) and the structural arrangement (integral and nonintegral tanks) on aircraft performance. The vehicle was a 200 passenger, liquid hydrogen fueled Mach 6 transport designed to meet a range goal of 9.26 Mn (5000 NM). A variety of trade studies were conducted in the area of configuration arrangement, structural design, and active cooling design in order to maximize the performance of each of three point design aircraft: (1) circular wing-body with nonintegral tanks, (2) circular wing-body with integral tanks and (3) elliptical blended wing-body with integral tanks. Aircraft range and weight were used as the basis for comparison. The resulting design and performance characteristics show that the blended body integral tank aircraft weights the least and has the greatest range capability, however, producibility and maintainability factors favor nonintegral tank concepts.</abstract><cop>Legacy CDMS</cop><pub>NASA</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_nasa_ntrs_19760011448
source NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Structural Mechanics
title A fuselage/tank structure study for actively cooled hypersonic cruise vehicles, summary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A58%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-nasa_CYI&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=A%20fuselage/tank%20structure%20study%20for%20actively%20cooled%20hypersonic%20cruise%20vehicles,%20summary&rft.au=Pirrello,%20C.%20J.&rft.date=1976-02-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cnasa_CYI%3E19760011448%3C/nasa_CYI%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true