Optimizing choice and timing of behavioral outcome tests following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: A machine learning-based approach on multiple preclinical experiments

Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) is a potentially debilitating condition with long-term sequelae. Animal models are used to study rmTBI in a controlled environment, but there is currently no established standard battery of behavioral tests used. Primarily, we aimed to identify the best...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurotrauma 2023 (ja)
Hauptverfasser: Lassarén, Philipp, Conley, Grace, Boucher, Masen, Conley, Ashley N., Morriss, Nicholas J., Qiu, Jianhua, Mannix, Rebekah, Thelin, Eric Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue ja
container_start_page
container_title Journal of neurotrauma
container_volume
creator Lassarén, Philipp
Conley, Grace
Boucher, Masen
Conley, Ashley N.
Morriss, Nicholas J.
Qiu, Jianhua
Mannix, Rebekah
Thelin, Eric Peter
description Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) is a potentially debilitating condition with long-term sequelae. Animal models are used to study rmTBI in a controlled environment, but there is currently no established standard battery of behavioral tests used. Primarily, we aimed to identify the best combination and timing of behavioral tests to distinguish injured from non-injured animals in rmTBI studies, and secondarily, to determine whether combinations of independent experiments have better behavioral outcome prediction accuracy. Data of 1,203 mice from 58 rmTBI experiments, some of which has already been published, was used. In total, 11 types of behavioral tests were measured by 37 parameters at 13 timepoints during the first 6 months after injury. Univariate regression analyses were used to identify optimal combinations of behavioral tests and whether the inclusion of multiple heterogenous experiments improved accuracy. k-means clustering was used to determine whether a combination of multiple tests could discriminate mice with rmTBI from non-injured mice. We found that a combination of behavioral tests outperformed individual tests alone when discriminating animals with rmTBI from non-injured animals. The best timing for most individual behavioral tests was 3-4 months after first injury. Overall, Morris water maze (MWM; hidden and probe frequency) was the behavioral test with best capability of detecting injury effects (AUC=0.98). Combinations of open field tests and elevated plus mazes also performed well (AUC=0.92), as well as the forced swim test alone (AUC=0.90). In summary, multiple heterogeneous experiments tended to predict outcome better than individual experiments and MWM 3-4 months after injury was the optimal test, but several combinations performed well too. In order to design future preclinical rmTBI trials, we have included an interactive application available online utilizing the data from the study.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/neu.2022.0486
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>maryannliebert</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_maryannliebert_primary_10_1089_neu_2022_0486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1089_neu_2022_0486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-maryannliebert_primary_10_1089_neu_2022_04863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkMtOwzAQRS0EEuGxZD8_kGInTdOyQwjEjg37aOJO6VR-yXYK5av4RByJL2A10rn3aqQjxJ2SCyXXm3tH06KRTbOQy_XqTFSq6_p6I5fNuahK3te96tSluErpIKVqV01fiZ-3kNnyN7sP0HvPmgDdFmZWiN_BSHs8so9owE9Ze0uQKeUEO2-M_5xbkQJlznwksGzKOOJkMbOGMSI7YHeY4ukBHsGi3rMjMITRlWk9YqItYAjRlwi8AzuZzMEQhEjasGNdPtNXoMiWXE434mKHJtHt370W7cvz-9NrbTGe0DnDNFLMQyj9QgYlh1nOUOQMs5xhltP-b_ULZ6F1mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing choice and timing of behavioral outcome tests following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: A machine learning-based approach on multiple preclinical experiments</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lassarén, Philipp ; Conley, Grace ; Boucher, Masen ; Conley, Ashley N. ; Morriss, Nicholas J. ; Qiu, Jianhua ; Mannix, Rebekah ; Thelin, Eric Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lassarén, Philipp ; Conley, Grace ; Boucher, Masen ; Conley, Ashley N. ; Morriss, Nicholas J. ; Qiu, Jianhua ; Mannix, Rebekah ; Thelin, Eric Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) is a potentially debilitating condition with long-term sequelae. Animal models are used to study rmTBI in a controlled environment, but there is currently no established standard battery of behavioral tests used. Primarily, we aimed to identify the best combination and timing of behavioral tests to distinguish injured from non-injured animals in rmTBI studies, and secondarily, to determine whether combinations of independent experiments have better behavioral outcome prediction accuracy. Data of 1,203 mice from 58 rmTBI experiments, some of which has already been published, was used. In total, 11 types of behavioral tests were measured by 37 parameters at 13 timepoints during the first 6 months after injury. Univariate regression analyses were used to identify optimal combinations of behavioral tests and whether the inclusion of multiple heterogenous experiments improved accuracy. k-means clustering was used to determine whether a combination of multiple tests could discriminate mice with rmTBI from non-injured mice. We found that a combination of behavioral tests outperformed individual tests alone when discriminating animals with rmTBI from non-injured animals. The best timing for most individual behavioral tests was 3-4 months after first injury. Overall, Morris water maze (MWM; hidden and probe frequency) was the behavioral test with best capability of detecting injury effects (AUC=0.98). Combinations of open field tests and elevated plus mazes also performed well (AUC=0.92), as well as the forced swim test alone (AUC=0.90). In summary, multiple heterogeneous experiments tended to predict outcome better than individual experiments and MWM 3-4 months after injury was the optimal test, but several combinations performed well too. In order to design future preclinical rmTBI trials, we have included an interactive application available online utilizing the data from the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-7151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0486</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of neurotrauma, 2023 (ja)</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lassarén, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Masen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, Ashley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannix, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelin, Eric Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing choice and timing of behavioral outcome tests following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: A machine learning-based approach on multiple preclinical experiments</title><title>Journal of neurotrauma</title><description>Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) is a potentially debilitating condition with long-term sequelae. Animal models are used to study rmTBI in a controlled environment, but there is currently no established standard battery of behavioral tests used. Primarily, we aimed to identify the best combination and timing of behavioral tests to distinguish injured from non-injured animals in rmTBI studies, and secondarily, to determine whether combinations of independent experiments have better behavioral outcome prediction accuracy. Data of 1,203 mice from 58 rmTBI experiments, some of which has already been published, was used. In total, 11 types of behavioral tests were measured by 37 parameters at 13 timepoints during the first 6 months after injury. Univariate regression analyses were used to identify optimal combinations of behavioral tests and whether the inclusion of multiple heterogenous experiments improved accuracy. k-means clustering was used to determine whether a combination of multiple tests could discriminate mice with rmTBI from non-injured mice. We found that a combination of behavioral tests outperformed individual tests alone when discriminating animals with rmTBI from non-injured animals. The best timing for most individual behavioral tests was 3-4 months after first injury. Overall, Morris water maze (MWM; hidden and probe frequency) was the behavioral test with best capability of detecting injury effects (AUC=0.98). Combinations of open field tests and elevated plus mazes also performed well (AUC=0.92), as well as the forced swim test alone (AUC=0.90). In summary, multiple heterogeneous experiments tended to predict outcome better than individual experiments and MWM 3-4 months after injury was the optimal test, but several combinations performed well too. In order to design future preclinical rmTBI trials, we have included an interactive application available online utilizing the data from the study.</description><issn>0897-7151</issn><issn>1557-9042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqdkMtOwzAQRS0EEuGxZD8_kGInTdOyQwjEjg37aOJO6VR-yXYK5av4RByJL2A10rn3aqQjxJ2SCyXXm3tH06KRTbOQy_XqTFSq6_p6I5fNuahK3te96tSluErpIKVqV01fiZ-3kNnyN7sP0HvPmgDdFmZWiN_BSHs8so9owE9Ze0uQKeUEO2-M_5xbkQJlznwksGzKOOJkMbOGMSI7YHeY4ukBHsGi3rMjMITRlWk9YqItYAjRlwi8AzuZzMEQhEjasGNdPtNXoMiWXE434mKHJtHt370W7cvz-9NrbTGe0DnDNFLMQyj9QgYlh1nOUOQMs5xhltP-b_ULZ6F1mw</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Lassarén, Philipp</creator><creator>Conley, Grace</creator><creator>Boucher, Masen</creator><creator>Conley, Ashley N.</creator><creator>Morriss, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Qiu, Jianhua</creator><creator>Mannix, Rebekah</creator><creator>Thelin, Eric Peter</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Optimizing choice and timing of behavioral outcome tests following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: A machine learning-based approach on multiple preclinical experiments</title><author>Lassarén, Philipp ; Conley, Grace ; Boucher, Masen ; Conley, Ashley N. ; Morriss, Nicholas J. ; Qiu, Jianhua ; Mannix, Rebekah ; Thelin, Eric Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-maryannliebert_primary_10_1089_neu_2022_04863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lassarén, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Masen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, Ashley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannix, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thelin, Eric Peter</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lassarén, Philipp</au><au>Conley, Grace</au><au>Boucher, Masen</au><au>Conley, Ashley N.</au><au>Morriss, Nicholas J.</au><au>Qiu, Jianhua</au><au>Mannix, Rebekah</au><au>Thelin, Eric Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing choice and timing of behavioral outcome tests following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: A machine learning-based approach on multiple preclinical experiments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurotrauma</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issue>ja</issue><issn>0897-7151</issn><eissn>1557-9042</eissn><abstract>Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) is a potentially debilitating condition with long-term sequelae. Animal models are used to study rmTBI in a controlled environment, but there is currently no established standard battery of behavioral tests used. Primarily, we aimed to identify the best combination and timing of behavioral tests to distinguish injured from non-injured animals in rmTBI studies, and secondarily, to determine whether combinations of independent experiments have better behavioral outcome prediction accuracy. Data of 1,203 mice from 58 rmTBI experiments, some of which has already been published, was used. In total, 11 types of behavioral tests were measured by 37 parameters at 13 timepoints during the first 6 months after injury. Univariate regression analyses were used to identify optimal combinations of behavioral tests and whether the inclusion of multiple heterogenous experiments improved accuracy. k-means clustering was used to determine whether a combination of multiple tests could discriminate mice with rmTBI from non-injured mice. We found that a combination of behavioral tests outperformed individual tests alone when discriminating animals with rmTBI from non-injured animals. The best timing for most individual behavioral tests was 3-4 months after first injury. Overall, Morris water maze (MWM; hidden and probe frequency) was the behavioral test with best capability of detecting injury effects (AUC=0.98). Combinations of open field tests and elevated plus mazes also performed well (AUC=0.92), as well as the forced swim test alone (AUC=0.90). In summary, multiple heterogeneous experiments tended to predict outcome better than individual experiments and MWM 3-4 months after injury was the optimal test, but several combinations performed well too. In order to design future preclinical rmTBI trials, we have included an interactive application available online utilizing the data from the study.</abstract><doi>10.1089/neu.2022.0486</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-7151
ispartof Journal of neurotrauma, 2023 (ja)
issn 0897-7151
1557-9042
language eng
recordid cdi_maryannliebert_primary_10_1089_neu_2022_0486
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Optimizing choice and timing of behavioral outcome tests following repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: A machine learning-based approach on multiple preclinical experiments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-maryannliebert&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20choice%20and%20timing%20of%20behavioral%20outcome%20tests%20following%20repetitive%20mild%20traumatic%20brain%20injury:%20A%20machine%20learning-based%20approach%20on%20multiple%20preclinical%20experiments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurotrauma&rft.au=Lassar%C3%A9n,%20Philipp&rft.date=2023&rft.issue=ja&rft.issn=0897-7151&rft.eissn=1557-9042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/neu.2022.0486&rft_dat=%3Cmaryannliebert%3E10_1089_neu_2022_0486%3C/maryannliebert%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true