Labelling Exemptions for Carry-Over Additives and Processing Aids: The Requirement of No Technological Effect on the Final Product

Carry-over additives and processing aids are exempted from the mandatory listing as ingredients. In both cases, this exemption requires that the respective substance has no (more) technological effect on the final product. The interpretation of this element of European law shows that such a technolo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European food and feed law review 2021-12, Vol.16 (6), p.484-491
1. Verfasser: Schulz, Sonja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 491
container_issue 6
container_start_page 484
container_title European food and feed law review
container_volume 16
creator Schulz, Sonja
description Carry-over additives and processing aids are exempted from the mandatory listing as ingredients. In both cases, this exemption requires that the respective substance has no (more) technological effect on the final product. The interpretation of this element of European law shows that such a technological effect is only to be understood as the (lasting) active effect on the final food which is marketed to the consumer. The mere fact that one can tell from the qualities of the final product that a substance with a technological effect has been used is not sufficient. This can in particular be deduced from the decision of the Union legislator itself in the area of organic food. There, the use of certain additives as processing aids has expressly been authorised although (or precisely because) their use leads to a change in the final food. The aforementioned interpretation of the requirement of no technological effect on the final product is in line with the case law of the European Court of Justice.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>lexxion</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_lexxion_primary_effl_2021_06_006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>effl_2021_06_006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-lexxion_primary_effl_2021_06_0063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNTstKAzEUDaLgoP2Hu3M1kNwpY3VXyhQXoiKzDzG5aSOZpCZpmW79ciP4AZ7NgfPiXLAGxQNvVyiWl6wRqx5bvEd-zRY5f_KKrhOIy4Z9P6sP8t6FHQwzTYfiYshgY4KNSuncvp4owdoYV9yJMqhg4C1FTTn_VtbO5EcY9wTv9HV0iSYKBaKFlwgj6X2IPu6cVh4Ga0lXK0Cp6a0LVatD5qjLLbuyymda_PENu9sO4-ap9TTP9Y48JDepdJZkrZfIUUjeS8777v_JH-mdVYc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labelling Exemptions for Carry-Over Additives and Processing Aids: The Requirement of No Technological Effect on the Final Product</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Schulz, Sonja</creator><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><description>Carry-over additives and processing aids are exempted from the mandatory listing as ingredients. In both cases, this exemption requires that the respective substance has no (more) technological effect on the final product. The interpretation of this element of European law shows that such a technological effect is only to be understood as the (lasting) active effect on the final food which is marketed to the consumer. The mere fact that one can tell from the qualities of the final product that a substance with a technological effect has been used is not sufficient. This can in particular be deduced from the decision of the Union legislator itself in the area of organic food. There, the use of certain additives as processing aids has expressly been authorised although (or precisely because) their use leads to a change in the final food. The aforementioned interpretation of the requirement of no technological effect on the final product is in line with the case law of the European Court of Justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1862-2720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-8214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Lexxion Verlag</publisher><ispartof>European food and feed law review, 2021-12, Vol.16 (6), p.484-491</ispartof><rights>copyright by Lexxion</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><title>Labelling Exemptions for Carry-Over Additives and Processing Aids: The Requirement of No Technological Effect on the Final Product</title><title>European food and feed law review</title><description>Carry-over additives and processing aids are exempted from the mandatory listing as ingredients. In both cases, this exemption requires that the respective substance has no (more) technological effect on the final product. The interpretation of this element of European law shows that such a technological effect is only to be understood as the (lasting) active effect on the final food which is marketed to the consumer. The mere fact that one can tell from the qualities of the final product that a substance with a technological effect has been used is not sufficient. This can in particular be deduced from the decision of the Union legislator itself in the area of organic food. There, the use of certain additives as processing aids has expressly been authorised although (or precisely because) their use leads to a change in the final food. The aforementioned interpretation of the requirement of no technological effect on the final product is in line with the case law of the European Court of Justice.</description><issn>1862-2720</issn><issn>2190-8214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNTstKAzEUDaLgoP2Hu3M1kNwpY3VXyhQXoiKzDzG5aSOZpCZpmW79ciP4AZ7NgfPiXLAGxQNvVyiWl6wRqx5bvEd-zRY5f_KKrhOIy4Z9P6sP8t6FHQwzTYfiYshgY4KNSuncvp4owdoYV9yJMqhg4C1FTTn_VtbO5EcY9wTv9HV0iSYKBaKFlwgj6X2IPu6cVh4Ga0lXK0Cp6a0LVatD5qjLLbuyymda_PENu9sO4-ap9TTP9Y48JDepdJZkrZfIUUjeS8777v_JH-mdVYc</recordid><startdate>20211220</startdate><enddate>20211220</enddate><creator>Schulz, Sonja</creator><general>Lexxion Verlag</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20211220</creationdate><title>Labelling Exemptions for Carry-Over Additives and Processing Aids: The Requirement of No Technological Effect on the Final Product</title><author>Schulz, Sonja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-lexxion_primary_effl_2021_06_0063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><jtitle>European food and feed law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulz, Sonja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labelling Exemptions for Carry-Over Additives and Processing Aids: The Requirement of No Technological Effect on the Final Product</atitle><jtitle>European food and feed law review</jtitle><date>2021-12-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>484-491</pages><issn>1862-2720</issn><eissn>2190-8214</eissn><abstract>Carry-over additives and processing aids are exempted from the mandatory listing as ingredients. In both cases, this exemption requires that the respective substance has no (more) technological effect on the final product. The interpretation of this element of European law shows that such a technological effect is only to be understood as the (lasting) active effect on the final food which is marketed to the consumer. The mere fact that one can tell from the qualities of the final product that a substance with a technological effect has been used is not sufficient. This can in particular be deduced from the decision of the Union legislator itself in the area of organic food. There, the use of certain additives as processing aids has expressly been authorised although (or precisely because) their use leads to a change in the final food. The aforementioned interpretation of the requirement of no technological effect on the final product is in line with the case law of the European Court of Justice.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Lexxion Verlag</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1862-2720
ispartof European food and feed law review, 2021-12, Vol.16 (6), p.484-491
issn 1862-2720
2190-8214
language eng
recordid cdi_lexxion_primary_effl_2021_06_006
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
title Labelling Exemptions for Carry-Over Additives and Processing Aids: The Requirement of No Technological Effect on the Final Product
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A33%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-lexxion&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labelling%20Exemptions%20for%20Carry-Over%20Additives%20and%20Processing%20Aids:%20The%20Requirement%20of%20No%20Technological%20Effect%20on%20the%20Final%20Product&rft.jtitle=European%20food%20and%20feed%20law%20review&rft.au=Schulz,%20Sonja&rft.date=2021-12-20&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=484-491&rft.issn=1862-2720&rft.eissn=2190-8214&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Clexxion%3Eeffl_2021_06_006%3C/lexxion%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true