Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD

BACKGROUND: Disability and loss of function are acknowledged as important problems for people living with COPD, but there is a need for validated tools to assess them. RESEARCH QUESTION: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was originally validated for community-dwelling older ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ann Am Thorac Soc 2024-09, Vol.22 (1), p.72-82
Hauptverfasser: Blondeel, Astrid, Demeyer, Heleen, Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria, Buttery, Sara C, Buekers, Joren, Chynkiamis, Nikolaos, Josa-Culleré, Alícia, Delgado-Ortiz, Laura, Frei, Anja, Glorie, Lies, Gimeno-Santos, Elena, Hopkinson, Nick, Hume, Emily, Jansen, Carl-Philipp, Kirsten, Anne, Koch, Sarah, Megaritis, Dimitrios, Mellaerts, Paulien, Puhan, Milo A, Rochester, Lynn, Vogiatzis, Ioannis, Watz, Henrik, Wuyts, Marieke, Garcia-Aymerich, Judith, Troosters, Thierry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
container_title Ann Am Thorac Soc
container_volume 22
creator Blondeel, Astrid
Demeyer, Heleen
Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria
Buttery, Sara C
Buekers, Joren
Chynkiamis, Nikolaos
Josa-Culleré, Alícia
Delgado-Ortiz, Laura
Frei, Anja
Glorie, Lies
Gimeno-Santos, Elena
Hopkinson, Nick
Hume, Emily
Jansen, Carl-Philipp
Kirsten, Anne
Koch, Sarah
Megaritis, Dimitrios
Mellaerts, Paulien
Puhan, Milo A
Rochester, Lynn
Vogiatzis, Ioannis
Watz, Henrik
Wuyts, Marieke
Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
Troosters, Thierry
description BACKGROUND: Disability and loss of function are acknowledged as important problems for people living with COPD, but there is a need for validated tools to assess them. RESEARCH QUESTION: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was originally validated for community-dwelling older adults. The full instrument has not been validated to assess disability and loss of function in people with COPD. METHODS: People with COPD from 6 European countries completed the LLFDI as part of an observational study. Its validity was assessed in terms of 1) levels and distribution of LLFDI domain and subdomain scores; 2) floor and ceiling effects; 3) instrument structure (3 domains, 7 subdomains) by confirmatory factor analysis; and 4) construct validity by (i) convergent validity, based on Spearman correlation with COPD-relevant and related constructs (functional exercise capacity, severity of dyspnea and COPD-related health status), and (ii) known-groups validity, based on the distribution of LLFDI scores according to COPD-meaningful groups (disease severity, age groups and use of a walking aid). RESULTS: The study included 605 participants (aged 68±8 years, 37% female, FEV1 54±20%pred.). Most had impaired disability and function levels. We observed no floor effects and a ceiling effect in only two subdomains. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a moderate model fit for all LLFDI domains. Most of the correlations met our hypotheses (73%), with moderate to strong correlations for function domain (r min-max 0.25-0.70), followed by disability-limitation domain (r min-max 0.15-0.54), and weakest correlations in the disability-frequency domain (r min-max 0.04-0.41). The disability-limitation and function domains differed by disease severity, age group and use of a walking aid. The disability-frequency domain differed by disease severity and use of a walking aid, but not by age groups. CONCLUSION: The LLFDI, a valid patient-reported outcome to investigate disability and function, has proven good construct validity in people with COPD.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_756840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_756840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7568403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjM0OATEUhbsgIXiHu5aMVGuYWfsJiYSFSKyaMne4VEf0jp-3J-IBOJuz-M53KqKutEqjfqp1TbRCOMp3kribDNK62Kyto8wyFR6KHPiAMLeM0ZxyhEnpdx9ifQYjCnZLjvgJMx_4Wp7RM5CHJRYX99boRn4Pd-IDDBfLUVNUc-sCtr7dEO3JeDWcRqfSYXlDb7JwsTs0SppYStNVaU-ZQdxPelI3ROfnseEH67_eX3pIUpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Blondeel, Astrid ; Demeyer, Heleen ; Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria ; Buttery, Sara C ; Buekers, Joren ; Chynkiamis, Nikolaos ; Josa-Culleré, Alícia ; Delgado-Ortiz, Laura ; Frei, Anja ; Glorie, Lies ; Gimeno-Santos, Elena ; Hopkinson, Nick ; Hume, Emily ; Jansen, Carl-Philipp ; Kirsten, Anne ; Koch, Sarah ; Megaritis, Dimitrios ; Mellaerts, Paulien ; Puhan, Milo A ; Rochester, Lynn ; Vogiatzis, Ioannis ; Watz, Henrik ; Wuyts, Marieke ; Garcia-Aymerich, Judith ; Troosters, Thierry</creator><creatorcontrib>Blondeel, Astrid ; Demeyer, Heleen ; Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria ; Buttery, Sara C ; Buekers, Joren ; Chynkiamis, Nikolaos ; Josa-Culleré, Alícia ; Delgado-Ortiz, Laura ; Frei, Anja ; Glorie, Lies ; Gimeno-Santos, Elena ; Hopkinson, Nick ; Hume, Emily ; Jansen, Carl-Philipp ; Kirsten, Anne ; Koch, Sarah ; Megaritis, Dimitrios ; Mellaerts, Paulien ; Puhan, Milo A ; Rochester, Lynn ; Vogiatzis, Ioannis ; Watz, Henrik ; Wuyts, Marieke ; Garcia-Aymerich, Judith ; Troosters, Thierry</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Disability and loss of function are acknowledged as important problems for people living with COPD, but there is a need for validated tools to assess them. RESEARCH QUESTION: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was originally validated for community-dwelling older adults. The full instrument has not been validated to assess disability and loss of function in people with COPD. METHODS: People with COPD from 6 European countries completed the LLFDI as part of an observational study. Its validity was assessed in terms of 1) levels and distribution of LLFDI domain and subdomain scores; 2) floor and ceiling effects; 3) instrument structure (3 domains, 7 subdomains) by confirmatory factor analysis; and 4) construct validity by (i) convergent validity, based on Spearman correlation with COPD-relevant and related constructs (functional exercise capacity, severity of dyspnea and COPD-related health status), and (ii) known-groups validity, based on the distribution of LLFDI scores according to COPD-meaningful groups (disease severity, age groups and use of a walking aid). RESULTS: The study included 605 participants (aged 68±8 years, 37% female, FEV1 54±20%pred.). Most had impaired disability and function levels. We observed no floor effects and a ceiling effect in only two subdomains. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a moderate model fit for all LLFDI domains. Most of the correlations met our hypotheses (73%), with moderate to strong correlations for function domain (r min-max 0.25-0.70), followed by disability-limitation domain (r min-max 0.15-0.54), and weakest correlations in the disability-frequency domain (r min-max 0.04-0.41). The disability-limitation and function domains differed by disease severity, age group and use of a walking aid. The disability-frequency domain differed by disease severity and use of a walking aid, but not by age groups. CONCLUSION: The LLFDI, a valid patient-reported outcome to investigate disability and function, has proven good construct validity in people with COPD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6933</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2024-09, Vol.22 (1), p.72-82</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,776,27837</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/756840$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blondeel, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeyer, Heleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttery, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buekers, Joren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chynkiamis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josa-Culleré, Alícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Ortiz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glorie, Lies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimeno-Santos, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hume, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Carl-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Megaritis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellaerts, Paulien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puhan, Milo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochester, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogiatzis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watz, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuyts, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Aymerich, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troosters, Thierry</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD</title><title>Ann Am Thorac Soc</title><description>BACKGROUND: Disability and loss of function are acknowledged as important problems for people living with COPD, but there is a need for validated tools to assess them. RESEARCH QUESTION: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was originally validated for community-dwelling older adults. The full instrument has not been validated to assess disability and loss of function in people with COPD. METHODS: People with COPD from 6 European countries completed the LLFDI as part of an observational study. Its validity was assessed in terms of 1) levels and distribution of LLFDI domain and subdomain scores; 2) floor and ceiling effects; 3) instrument structure (3 domains, 7 subdomains) by confirmatory factor analysis; and 4) construct validity by (i) convergent validity, based on Spearman correlation with COPD-relevant and related constructs (functional exercise capacity, severity of dyspnea and COPD-related health status), and (ii) known-groups validity, based on the distribution of LLFDI scores according to COPD-meaningful groups (disease severity, age groups and use of a walking aid). RESULTS: The study included 605 participants (aged 68±8 years, 37% female, FEV1 54±20%pred.). Most had impaired disability and function levels. We observed no floor effects and a ceiling effect in only two subdomains. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a moderate model fit for all LLFDI domains. Most of the correlations met our hypotheses (73%), with moderate to strong correlations for function domain (r min-max 0.25-0.70), followed by disability-limitation domain (r min-max 0.15-0.54), and weakest correlations in the disability-frequency domain (r min-max 0.04-0.41). The disability-limitation and function domains differed by disease severity, age group and use of a walking aid. The disability-frequency domain differed by disease severity and use of a walking aid, but not by age groups. CONCLUSION: The LLFDI, a valid patient-reported outcome to investigate disability and function, has proven good construct validity in people with COPD.</description><issn>2329-6933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjM0OATEUhbsgIXiHu5aMVGuYWfsJiYSFSKyaMne4VEf0jp-3J-IBOJuz-M53KqKutEqjfqp1TbRCOMp3kribDNK62Kyto8wyFR6KHPiAMLeM0ZxyhEnpdx9ifQYjCnZLjvgJMx_4Wp7RM5CHJRYX99boRn4Pd-IDDBfLUVNUc-sCtr7dEO3JeDWcRqfSYXlDb7JwsTs0SppYStNVaU-ZQdxPelI3ROfnseEH67_eX3pIUpQ</recordid><startdate>20240923</startdate><enddate>20240923</enddate><creator>Blondeel, Astrid</creator><creator>Demeyer, Heleen</creator><creator>Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria</creator><creator>Buttery, Sara C</creator><creator>Buekers, Joren</creator><creator>Chynkiamis, Nikolaos</creator><creator>Josa-Culleré, Alícia</creator><creator>Delgado-Ortiz, Laura</creator><creator>Frei, Anja</creator><creator>Glorie, Lies</creator><creator>Gimeno-Santos, Elena</creator><creator>Hopkinson, Nick</creator><creator>Hume, Emily</creator><creator>Jansen, Carl-Philipp</creator><creator>Kirsten, Anne</creator><creator>Koch, Sarah</creator><creator>Megaritis, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Mellaerts, Paulien</creator><creator>Puhan, Milo A</creator><creator>Rochester, Lynn</creator><creator>Vogiatzis, Ioannis</creator><creator>Watz, Henrik</creator><creator>Wuyts, Marieke</creator><creator>Garcia-Aymerich, Judith</creator><creator>Troosters, Thierry</creator><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240923</creationdate><title>Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD</title><author>Blondeel, Astrid ; Demeyer, Heleen ; Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria ; Buttery, Sara C ; Buekers, Joren ; Chynkiamis, Nikolaos ; Josa-Culleré, Alícia ; Delgado-Ortiz, Laura ; Frei, Anja ; Glorie, Lies ; Gimeno-Santos, Elena ; Hopkinson, Nick ; Hume, Emily ; Jansen, Carl-Philipp ; Kirsten, Anne ; Koch, Sarah ; Megaritis, Dimitrios ; Mellaerts, Paulien ; Puhan, Milo A ; Rochester, Lynn ; Vogiatzis, Ioannis ; Watz, Henrik ; Wuyts, Marieke ; Garcia-Aymerich, Judith ; Troosters, Thierry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7568403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blondeel, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demeyer, Heleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttery, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buekers, Joren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chynkiamis, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josa-Culleré, Alícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Ortiz, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glorie, Lies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimeno-Santos, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hume, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Carl-Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Megaritis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellaerts, Paulien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puhan, Milo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochester, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogiatzis, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watz, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuyts, Marieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Aymerich, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troosters, Thierry</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blondeel, Astrid</au><au>Demeyer, Heleen</au><au>Alcaraz-Serrano, Victoria</au><au>Buttery, Sara C</au><au>Buekers, Joren</au><au>Chynkiamis, Nikolaos</au><au>Josa-Culleré, Alícia</au><au>Delgado-Ortiz, Laura</au><au>Frei, Anja</au><au>Glorie, Lies</au><au>Gimeno-Santos, Elena</au><au>Hopkinson, Nick</au><au>Hume, Emily</au><au>Jansen, Carl-Philipp</au><au>Kirsten, Anne</au><au>Koch, Sarah</au><au>Megaritis, Dimitrios</au><au>Mellaerts, Paulien</au><au>Puhan, Milo A</au><au>Rochester, Lynn</au><au>Vogiatzis, Ioannis</au><au>Watz, Henrik</au><au>Wuyts, Marieke</au><au>Garcia-Aymerich, Judith</au><au>Troosters, Thierry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD</atitle><jtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</jtitle><date>2024-09-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>72-82</pages><issn>2329-6933</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Disability and loss of function are acknowledged as important problems for people living with COPD, but there is a need for validated tools to assess them. RESEARCH QUESTION: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was originally validated for community-dwelling older adults. The full instrument has not been validated to assess disability and loss of function in people with COPD. METHODS: People with COPD from 6 European countries completed the LLFDI as part of an observational study. Its validity was assessed in terms of 1) levels and distribution of LLFDI domain and subdomain scores; 2) floor and ceiling effects; 3) instrument structure (3 domains, 7 subdomains) by confirmatory factor analysis; and 4) construct validity by (i) convergent validity, based on Spearman correlation with COPD-relevant and related constructs (functional exercise capacity, severity of dyspnea and COPD-related health status), and (ii) known-groups validity, based on the distribution of LLFDI scores according to COPD-meaningful groups (disease severity, age groups and use of a walking aid). RESULTS: The study included 605 participants (aged 68±8 years, 37% female, FEV1 54±20%pred.). Most had impaired disability and function levels. We observed no floor effects and a ceiling effect in only two subdomains. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a moderate model fit for all LLFDI domains. Most of the correlations met our hypotheses (73%), with moderate to strong correlations for function domain (r min-max 0.25-0.70), followed by disability-limitation domain (r min-max 0.15-0.54), and weakest correlations in the disability-frequency domain (r min-max 0.04-0.41). The disability-limitation and function domains differed by disease severity, age group and use of a walking aid. The disability-frequency domain differed by disease severity and use of a walking aid, but not by age groups. CONCLUSION: The LLFDI, a valid patient-reported outcome to investigate disability and function, has proven good construct validity in people with COPD.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2329-6933
ispartof Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2024-09, Vol.22 (1), p.72-82
issn 2329-6933
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_756840
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Late-Life%20Function%20and%20Disability%20Instrument%20in%20People%20Living%20with%20COPD&rft.jtitle=Ann%20Am%20Thorac%20Soc&rft.au=Blondeel,%20Astrid&rft.date=2024-09-23&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=72-82&rft.issn=2329-6933&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E20_500_12942_756840%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true