Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis

Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnair...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Moons, Johnny, Declerck, Hanne, Gijbels, Eveline, Jans, Marleen, Puttevils, Eva, Lerut, Toni, Nafteux, Philippe, Van Achterberg, Theo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS
container_volume
creator Moons, Johnny
Declerck, Hanne
Gijbels, Eveline
Jans, Marleen
Puttevils, Eva
Lerut, Toni
Nafteux, Philippe
Van Achterberg, Theo
description Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_751153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_751153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7511533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjE1OwzAQhb0AqaXtHWaNVGQnTX_YoiIOwN4aORMSsDzBYwd6Di6MWyGxhdX70XvflZobU-n1fnvYzNSNyKvWZldv93P1dZzQZ0wDB-AOxuIoJJCi0qG79B9D6gEDUOgxOGohkuOJ4gnGyIkde-g4AgmPPb4Q-jIQunzlHhAcB5djPHPfM4Y0pEKfqCDbc-F_M_qTDLJU1x16odWPLtTt4_H54Wn9lj3liYJtZURHttK20dqa6rCp7K4xpqnrhbr789imz1T_i_4NhVNqfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Moons, Johnny ; Declerck, Hanne ; Gijbels, Eveline ; Jans, Marleen ; Puttevils, Eva ; Lerut, Toni ; Nafteux, Philippe ; Van Achterberg, Theo</creator><creatorcontrib>Moons, Johnny ; Declerck, Hanne ; Gijbels, Eveline ; Jans, Marleen ; Puttevils, Eva ; Lerut, Toni ; Nafteux, Philippe ; Van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><description>Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (&lt;60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (&gt;70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-8694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC</publisher><ispartof>DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,316,781,785,27865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moons, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gijbels, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jans, Marleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puttevils, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerut, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nafteux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis</title><title>DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS</title><description>Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (&lt;60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (&gt;70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.</description><issn>1120-8694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjE1OwzAQhb0AqaXtHWaNVGQnTX_YoiIOwN4aORMSsDzBYwd6Di6MWyGxhdX70XvflZobU-n1fnvYzNSNyKvWZldv93P1dZzQZ0wDB-AOxuIoJJCi0qG79B9D6gEDUOgxOGohkuOJ4gnGyIkde-g4AgmPPb4Q-jIQunzlHhAcB5djPHPfM4Y0pEKfqCDbc-F_M_qTDLJU1x16odWPLtTt4_H54Wn9lj3liYJtZURHttK20dqa6rCp7K4xpqnrhbr789imz1T_i_4NhVNqfQ</recordid><startdate>20241007</startdate><enddate>20241007</enddate><creator>Moons, Johnny</creator><creator>Declerck, Hanne</creator><creator>Gijbels, Eveline</creator><creator>Jans, Marleen</creator><creator>Puttevils, Eva</creator><creator>Lerut, Toni</creator><creator>Nafteux, Philippe</creator><creator>Van Achterberg, Theo</creator><general>OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241007</creationdate><title>Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis</title><author>Moons, Johnny ; Declerck, Hanne ; Gijbels, Eveline ; Jans, Marleen ; Puttevils, Eva ; Lerut, Toni ; Nafteux, Philippe ; Van Achterberg, Theo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7511533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moons, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Declerck, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gijbels, Eveline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jans, Marleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puttevils, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerut, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nafteux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Achterberg, Theo</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moons, Johnny</au><au>Declerck, Hanne</au><au>Gijbels, Eveline</au><au>Jans, Marleen</au><au>Puttevils, Eva</au><au>Lerut, Toni</au><au>Nafteux, Philippe</au><au>Van Achterberg, Theo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis</atitle><jtitle>DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS</jtitle><date>2024-10-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1120-8694</issn><abstract>Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (&lt;60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (&gt;70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction.</abstract><pub>OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1120-8694
ispartof DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024-10
issn 1120-8694
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_751153
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Evaluation of patient satisfaction with an enhanced recovery protocol for esophageal resections: a concurrent quantitative and qualitative analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T14%3A20%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20patient%20satisfaction%20with%20an%20enhanced%20recovery%20protocol%20for%20esophageal%20resections:%20a%20concurrent%20quantitative%20and%20qualitative%20analysis&rft.jtitle=DISEASES%20OF%20THE%20ESOPHAGUS&rft.au=Moons,%20Johnny&rft.date=2024-10-07&rft.issn=1120-8694&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_751153%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true