Comparative Analysis of Interactive Modalities for Intuitive Endovascular Interventions

Endovascular intervention is a minimally invasive method for treating cardiovascular diseases. Although fluoroscopy, known for real-time catheter visualization, is commonly used, it exposes patients and physicians to ionizing radiation and lacks depth perception due to its 2D nature. To address these limitations, a study was conducted using teleoperation and 3D visualization techniques. This in-vitro study involved the use of a robotic catheter system and aimed to evaluate user performance through both subjective and objective measures. The focus was on determining the most effective modes of interaction. Three interactive modes for guiding robotic catheters were compared in the study: 1) Mode GM, using a gamepad for control and a standard 2D monitor for visual feedback; 2) Mode GH, with a gamepad for control and HoloLens providing 3D visualization; and 3) Mode HH, where HoloLens serves as both control input and visualization device. Mode GH outperformed other modalities in subjective metrics, except for mental demand. It exhibited a median tracking error of 4.72 mm, a median targeting error of 1.01 mm, a median duration of 82.34 s, and a median natural logarithm of dimensionless squared jerk of 40.38 in the in-vitro study. Mode GH showed 8.5%, 4.7%, 6.5%, and 3.9% improvements over Mode GM and 1.5%, 33.6%, 34.9%, and 8.1% over Mode HH for tracking error, targeting error, duration, and dimensionless squared jerk, respectively. To sum up, the user study emphasizes the potential benefits of employing HoloLens for enhanced 3D visualization in catheterization. The user study also illustrates the advantages of using a gamepad for catheter teleoperation, including user-friendliness and passive haptic feedback, compared to HoloLens. To further gauge the potential of using a more traditional joystick as a control input device, an additional study utilizing the Haption VirtuoseTM robot was conducted. It reveals the potential for achieving smoother trajectories, with a 38.9% reduction in total path length compared to a gamepad, potentially due to its larger range of motion and single-handed control.