Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry
Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal Of Natural Fibers 2024-05, Vol.21 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal Of Natural Fibers |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Abdela, Abebayehu Asfaw, Mieraf Buffel, Bart Sirahbizu, Belete Desplentere, frederik |
description | Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber
content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural
fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density
measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various
standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant
factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the
optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard
methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers'
and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward.
Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is
measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on
result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been
measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging,
volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result
showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is
enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller
size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset
using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_742725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_742725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7427253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyr1uwjAUQGEPReL3HTxXAjmOozTdEBBYQKjqbpnkppg6Dsq9RuTtYUDMMJ0zfB9sECVKTYVKv_psiHgSQmZJJAcMdoZCaxzP7QFa5EvwaKnjWzAYWqjB0_3p2JT4zXNTUHNH86qCgqz_e_IfwOCIW8834Gyo-dog33eFb2qgthuzXmUcwuTREfvMV7-LzfQ_OAgX8LrEsylAS6ETIXQkMyV1qmQqk_hNPHsZa7pSfAPr7ldA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Abdela, Abebayehu ; Asfaw, Mieraf ; Buffel, Bart ; Sirahbizu, Belete ; Desplentere, frederik</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdela, Abebayehu ; Asfaw, Mieraf ; Buffel, Bart ; Sirahbizu, Belete ; Desplentere, frederik</creatorcontrib><description>Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber
content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural
fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density
measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various
standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant
factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the
optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard
methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers'
and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward.
Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is
measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on
result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been
measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging,
volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result
showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is
enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller
size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset
using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-0478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><ispartof>Journal Of Natural Fibers, 2024-05, Vol.21 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,777,781,27841</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdela, Abebayehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asfaw, Mieraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffel, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirahbizu, Belete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desplentere, frederik</creatorcontrib><title>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</title><title>Journal Of Natural Fibers</title><description>Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber
content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural
fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density
measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various
standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant
factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the
optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard
methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers'
and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward.
Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is
measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on
result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been
measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging,
volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result
showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is
enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller
size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset
using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.</description><issn>1544-0478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyr1uwjAUQGEPReL3HTxXAjmOozTdEBBYQKjqbpnkppg6Dsq9RuTtYUDMMJ0zfB9sECVKTYVKv_psiHgSQmZJJAcMdoZCaxzP7QFa5EvwaKnjWzAYWqjB0_3p2JT4zXNTUHNH86qCgqz_e_IfwOCIW8834Gyo-dog33eFb2qgthuzXmUcwuTREfvMV7-LzfQ_OAgX8LrEsylAS6ETIXQkMyV1qmQqk_hNPHsZa7pSfAPr7ldA</recordid><startdate>20240531</startdate><enddate>20240531</enddate><creator>Abdela, Abebayehu</creator><creator>Asfaw, Mieraf</creator><creator>Buffel, Bart</creator><creator>Sirahbizu, Belete</creator><creator>Desplentere, frederik</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240531</creationdate><title>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</title><author>Abdela, Abebayehu ; Asfaw, Mieraf ; Buffel, Bart ; Sirahbizu, Belete ; Desplentere, frederik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7427253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdela, Abebayehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asfaw, Mieraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffel, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirahbizu, Belete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desplentere, frederik</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Journal Of Natural Fibers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdela, Abebayehu</au><au>Asfaw, Mieraf</au><au>Buffel, Bart</au><au>Sirahbizu, Belete</au><au>Desplentere, frederik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal Of Natural Fibers</jtitle><date>2024-05-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1544-0478</issn><abstract>Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber
content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural
fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density
measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various
standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant
factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the
optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard
methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers'
and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward.
Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is
measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on
result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been
measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging,
volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result
showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is
enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller
size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset
using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-0478 |
ispartof | Journal Of Natural Fibers, 2024-05, Vol.21 (1) |
issn | 1544-0478 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_742725 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; Lirias (KU Leuven Association); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
title | Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20Fibers%20Density%20Measurement%20Methods:%20Factors%20Affecting%20Density%20Result%20in%20Helium%20Gas%20Pycnometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20Of%20Natural%20Fibers&rft.au=Abdela,%20Abebayehu&rft.date=2024-05-31&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1544-0478&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_742725%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |