Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry

Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal Of Natural Fibers 2024-05, Vol.21 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Abdela, Abebayehu, Asfaw, Mieraf, Buffel, Bart, Sirahbizu, Belete, Desplentere, frederik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal Of Natural Fibers
container_volume 21
creator Abdela, Abebayehu
Asfaw, Mieraf
Buffel, Bart
Sirahbizu, Belete
Desplentere, frederik
description Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers' and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward. Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging, volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_742725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_742725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7427253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyr1uwjAUQGEPReL3HTxXAjmOozTdEBBYQKjqbpnkppg6Dsq9RuTtYUDMMJ0zfB9sECVKTYVKv_psiHgSQmZJJAcMdoZCaxzP7QFa5EvwaKnjWzAYWqjB0_3p2JT4zXNTUHNH86qCgqz_e_IfwOCIW8834Gyo-dog33eFb2qgthuzXmUcwuTREfvMV7-LzfQ_OAgX8LrEsylAS6ETIXQkMyV1qmQqk_hNPHsZa7pSfAPr7ldA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Abdela, Abebayehu ; Asfaw, Mieraf ; Buffel, Bart ; Sirahbizu, Belete ; Desplentere, frederik</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdela, Abebayehu ; Asfaw, Mieraf ; Buffel, Bart ; Sirahbizu, Belete ; Desplentere, frederik</creatorcontrib><description>Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers' and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward. Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging, volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-0478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><ispartof>Journal Of Natural Fibers, 2024-05, Vol.21 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,777,781,27841</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdela, Abebayehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asfaw, Mieraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffel, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirahbizu, Belete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desplentere, frederik</creatorcontrib><title>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</title><title>Journal Of Natural Fibers</title><description>Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers' and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward. Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging, volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.</description><issn>1544-0478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyr1uwjAUQGEPReL3HTxXAjmOozTdEBBYQKjqbpnkppg6Dsq9RuTtYUDMMJ0zfB9sECVKTYVKv_psiHgSQmZJJAcMdoZCaxzP7QFa5EvwaKnjWzAYWqjB0_3p2JT4zXNTUHNH86qCgqz_e_IfwOCIW8834Gyo-dog33eFb2qgthuzXmUcwuTREfvMV7-LzfQ_OAgX8LrEsylAS6ETIXQkMyV1qmQqk_hNPHsZa7pSfAPr7ldA</recordid><startdate>20240531</startdate><enddate>20240531</enddate><creator>Abdela, Abebayehu</creator><creator>Asfaw, Mieraf</creator><creator>Buffel, Bart</creator><creator>Sirahbizu, Belete</creator><creator>Desplentere, frederik</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240531</creationdate><title>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</title><author>Abdela, Abebayehu ; Asfaw, Mieraf ; Buffel, Bart ; Sirahbizu, Belete ; Desplentere, frederik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7427253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdela, Abebayehu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asfaw, Mieraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffel, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirahbizu, Belete</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desplentere, frederik</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Journal Of Natural Fibers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdela, Abebayehu</au><au>Asfaw, Mieraf</au><au>Buffel, Bart</au><au>Sirahbizu, Belete</au><au>Desplentere, frederik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal Of Natural Fibers</jtitle><date>2024-05-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1544-0478</issn><abstract>Fiber density can be used to estimate composite weight and to evaluate fiber content for property predictions in fiber-reinforced composites. Yet, natural fibers don't have fixed density value given on datasheet and their density measurement is affected by various factors. This study compares various standard natural fiber's density mearusing methods and identifies determinant factors to, then, estimate the density of Enset fibers by using the optimal combination. The advantages and disadvantages of five standard methods were compared considering the characteristics of natural fibers' and methods' effectiveness where Helium gas Pycnometry is selected afterward. Standard calibration sphere and synthetic fiber with known density is measured for validation. The study analyzed the impact of variables on result's precision and accuracy. Then, Density of Enset fiber have been measured with varied factors including uniformity and duration purging, volume cell type and amount of fiber in a cell, and fiber size. The result showed that fluctuation is minimized, and accuracy and precision is enhanced for the larger volume cell, larger mass of fiber in a cell, smaller size fiber and longer uniform purging. Finally, measured density of Enset using the best combination of factors is 1.38 ± 0.01 g/cm3.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1544-0478
ispartof Journal Of Natural Fibers, 2024-05, Vol.21 (1)
issn 1544-0478
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_742725
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Lirias (KU Leuven Association); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Natural Fibers Density Measurement Methods: Factors Affecting Density Result in Helium Gas Pycnometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T03%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20Fibers%20Density%20Measurement%20Methods:%20Factors%20Affecting%20Density%20Result%20in%20Helium%20Gas%20Pycnometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20Of%20Natural%20Fibers&rft.au=Abdela,%20Abebayehu&rft.date=2024-05-31&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1544-0478&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_742725%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true