PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial
Background: Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. Objective: Theaimofthistrialistocomparemetastasis-directedtherapy(MDT)withor without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT). Des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European Urology Oncology 2024-06, Vol.7 (3), p.462-468 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 468 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 462 |
container_title | European Urology Oncology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Ost, Piet Siva, Shankar Braband, Sigmund Dirix, Piet Liefhooghe, Nick Otte, Francois-Xavier Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso Everaerts, Wouter Shelan, Mohamed Conde-Moreno, Antonio Lopez-Campos, Fernando Papachristofilou, Alexandros Guckenberger, Matthias Scorsetti, Marta Zapatero, Almudena Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena Eito, Clara Counago, Filipe Muto, Paolo Van De Voorde, Lien Mach, Nicolas Bultijnck, Renée Fonteyne, Valérie Moon, Daniel Thon, Kristian Mercier, Carole Achard, Vérane Stellemans, Karin Goetghebeur, Els Reynders, Dries Zilli, Thomas |
description | Background:
Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. Objective: Theaimofthistrialistocomparemetastasis-directedtherapy(MDT)withor without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT).
Design, setting, and participants:
PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, random- ized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis:
We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires.
Results and limitations:
Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area.
Conclusions:
No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade 2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT.
Patient summary:
We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treat- ment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_737102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_737102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7371023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj0FrAjEQhUOpULH-hznawpZstqL2JrKlF1HWxWsYsqONjYkkWbE99pc3ggePlneYx-PjDe-OdcVwPM4mRZ7fX_kH1g9hxzkXSTkXXfa7LKezEtbZCs0RtwS1J4x7shHcBhZGb11FqvX-nFjXoIGDdyFiJFBoFXmYU8QUBAowWNWLav70BlPVJqB2J610_D5XIVRoG7fXP9TA8jPhINIzjeaRdTZoAvUvt8ee38t69pF9tYbaI1nZhAMqkoLLIecyF5NXIUfFKA0oeuzlZljGUyz-1f4HI5piGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ost, Piet ; Siva, Shankar ; Braband, Sigmund ; Dirix, Piet ; Liefhooghe, Nick ; Otte, Francois-Xavier ; Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso ; Everaerts, Wouter ; Shelan, Mohamed ; Conde-Moreno, Antonio ; Lopez-Campos, Fernando ; Papachristofilou, Alexandros ; Guckenberger, Matthias ; Scorsetti, Marta ; Zapatero, Almudena ; Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena ; Eito, Clara ; Counago, Filipe ; Muto, Paolo ; Van De Voorde, Lien ; Mach, Nicolas ; Bultijnck, Renée ; Fonteyne, Valérie ; Moon, Daniel ; Thon, Kristian ; Mercier, Carole ; Achard, Vérane ; Stellemans, Karin ; Goetghebeur, Els ; Reynders, Dries ; Zilli, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet ; Siva, Shankar ; Braband, Sigmund ; Dirix, Piet ; Liefhooghe, Nick ; Otte, Francois-Xavier ; Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso ; Everaerts, Wouter ; Shelan, Mohamed ; Conde-Moreno, Antonio ; Lopez-Campos, Fernando ; Papachristofilou, Alexandros ; Guckenberger, Matthias ; Scorsetti, Marta ; Zapatero, Almudena ; Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena ; Eito, Clara ; Counago, Filipe ; Muto, Paolo ; Van De Voorde, Lien ; Mach, Nicolas ; Bultijnck, Renée ; Fonteyne, Valérie ; Moon, Daniel ; Thon, Kristian ; Mercier, Carole ; Achard, Vérane ; Stellemans, Karin ; Goetghebeur, Els ; Reynders, Dries ; Zilli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. Objective: Theaimofthistrialistocomparemetastasis-directedtherapy(MDT)withor without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT).
Design, setting, and participants:
PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, random- ized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis:
We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires.
Results and limitations:
Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area.
Conclusions:
No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade 2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT.
Patient summary:
We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treat- ment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2588-9311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><ispartof>European Urology Oncology, 2024-06, Vol.7 (3), p.462-468</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siva, Shankar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braband, Sigmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirix, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liefhooghe, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otte, Francois-Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everaerts, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelan, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Campos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papachristofilou, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guckenberger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorsetti, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapatero, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eito, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counago, Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muto, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van De Voorde, Lien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bultijnck, Renée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonteyne, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thon, Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achard, Vérane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stellemans, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetghebeur, Els</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynders, Dries</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial</title><title>European Urology Oncology</title><description>Background:
Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. Objective: Theaimofthistrialistocomparemetastasis-directedtherapy(MDT)withor without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT).
Design, setting, and participants:
PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, random- ized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis:
We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires.
Results and limitations:
Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area.
Conclusions:
No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade 2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT.
Patient summary:
We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treat- ment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence.</description><issn>2588-9311</issn><issn>2588-9311</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVj0FrAjEQhUOpULH-hznawpZstqL2JrKlF1HWxWsYsqONjYkkWbE99pc3ggePlneYx-PjDe-OdcVwPM4mRZ7fX_kH1g9hxzkXSTkXXfa7LKezEtbZCs0RtwS1J4x7shHcBhZGb11FqvX-nFjXoIGDdyFiJFBoFXmYU8QUBAowWNWLav70BlPVJqB2J610_D5XIVRoG7fXP9TA8jPhINIzjeaRdTZoAvUvt8ee38t69pF9tYbaI1nZhAMqkoLLIecyF5NXIUfFKA0oeuzlZljGUyz-1f4HI5piGg</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Ost, Piet</creator><creator>Siva, Shankar</creator><creator>Braband, Sigmund</creator><creator>Dirix, Piet</creator><creator>Liefhooghe, Nick</creator><creator>Otte, Francois-Xavier</creator><creator>Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso</creator><creator>Everaerts, Wouter</creator><creator>Shelan, Mohamed</creator><creator>Conde-Moreno, Antonio</creator><creator>Lopez-Campos, Fernando</creator><creator>Papachristofilou, Alexandros</creator><creator>Guckenberger, Matthias</creator><creator>Scorsetti, Marta</creator><creator>Zapatero, Almudena</creator><creator>Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena</creator><creator>Eito, Clara</creator><creator>Counago, Filipe</creator><creator>Muto, Paolo</creator><creator>Van De Voorde, Lien</creator><creator>Mach, Nicolas</creator><creator>Bultijnck, Renée</creator><creator>Fonteyne, Valérie</creator><creator>Moon, Daniel</creator><creator>Thon, Kristian</creator><creator>Mercier, Carole</creator><creator>Achard, Vérane</creator><creator>Stellemans, Karin</creator><creator>Goetghebeur, Els</creator><creator>Reynders, Dries</creator><creator>Zilli, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial</title><author>Ost, Piet ; Siva, Shankar ; Braband, Sigmund ; Dirix, Piet ; Liefhooghe, Nick ; Otte, Francois-Xavier ; Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso ; Everaerts, Wouter ; Shelan, Mohamed ; Conde-Moreno, Antonio ; Lopez-Campos, Fernando ; Papachristofilou, Alexandros ; Guckenberger, Matthias ; Scorsetti, Marta ; Zapatero, Almudena ; Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena ; Eito, Clara ; Counago, Filipe ; Muto, Paolo ; Van De Voorde, Lien ; Mach, Nicolas ; Bultijnck, Renée ; Fonteyne, Valérie ; Moon, Daniel ; Thon, Kristian ; Mercier, Carole ; Achard, Vérane ; Stellemans, Karin ; Goetghebeur, Els ; Reynders, Dries ; Zilli, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7371023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siva, Shankar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braband, Sigmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dirix, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liefhooghe, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otte, Francois-Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everaerts, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelan, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Campos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papachristofilou, Alexandros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guckenberger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorsetti, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapatero, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eito, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Counago, Filipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muto, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van De Voorde, Lien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bultijnck, Renée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonteyne, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thon, Kristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achard, Vérane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stellemans, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetghebeur, Els</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynders, Dries</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zilli, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>European Urology Oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ost, Piet</au><au>Siva, Shankar</au><au>Braband, Sigmund</au><au>Dirix, Piet</au><au>Liefhooghe, Nick</au><au>Otte, Francois-Xavier</au><au>Gomez-Iturriaga, Alfonso</au><au>Everaerts, Wouter</au><au>Shelan, Mohamed</au><au>Conde-Moreno, Antonio</au><au>Lopez-Campos, Fernando</au><au>Papachristofilou, Alexandros</au><au>Guckenberger, Matthias</au><au>Scorsetti, Marta</au><au>Zapatero, Almudena</au><au>Villafranca Iturre, Ana-Elena</au><au>Eito, Clara</au><au>Counago, Filipe</au><au>Muto, Paolo</au><au>Van De Voorde, Lien</au><au>Mach, Nicolas</au><au>Bultijnck, Renée</au><au>Fonteyne, Valérie</au><au>Moon, Daniel</au><au>Thon, Kristian</au><au>Mercier, Carole</au><au>Achard, Vérane</au><au>Stellemans, Karin</au><au>Goetghebeur, Els</au><au>Reynders, Dries</au><au>Zilli, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial</atitle><jtitle>European Urology Oncology</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>462-468</pages><issn>2588-9311</issn><eissn>2588-9311</eissn><abstract>Background:
Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. Objective: Theaimofthistrialistocomparemetastasis-directedtherapy(MDT)withor without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT).
Design, setting, and participants:
PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, random- ized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis:
We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade 2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires.
Results and limitations:
Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade 2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area.
Conclusions:
No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade 2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT.
Patient summary:
We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treat- ment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence.</abstract><pub>Elsevier</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2588-9311 |
ispartof | European Urology Oncology, 2024-06, Vol.7 (3), p.462-468 |
issn | 2588-9311 2588-9311 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_737102 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T19%3A35%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PEACE%20V-Salvage%20Treatment%20of%20OligoRecurrent%20nodal%20prostate%20cancer%20Metastases%20(STORM):%20Acute%20Toxicity%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Phase%202%20Trial&rft.jtitle=European%20Urology%20Oncology&rft.au=Ost,%20Piet&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=462-468&rft.issn=2588-9311&rft.eissn=2588-9311&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_737102%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |