Measuring in-hospital quality multidimensionally by integrating patients', kin's and healthcare professionals' perspectives: development and validation of the FlaQuM-Quickscan
BACKGROUND: Measuring quality is essential to drive improvement initiatives in hospitals. An instrument that measures healthcare quality multidimensionally and integrates patients', kin's and professionals' perspectives is lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to mea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bmc Health Services Research 2023-12, Vol.23 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Bmc Health Services Research |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Claessens, Fien Seys, Deborah Van der Auwera, Charlotte Jans, Anneke Castro, Eva Marie Jacobs, Laura De Ridder, Dirk Bruyneel, Luk Leenaerts, Zita Van Wilder, Astrid Brouwers, Jonas Lachman, Peter Vanhaecht, Kris The FlaQuM Research Group |
description | BACKGROUND: Measuring quality is essential to drive improvement initiatives in hospitals. An instrument that measures healthcare quality multidimensionally and integrates patients', kin's and professionals' perspectives is lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure healthcare quality multidimensionally from a multistakeholder perspective. METHODS: A multi-method approach started by establishing content and face validity, followed by a multi-centre study in 17 Flemish (Belgian) hospitals to assess construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, criterion validity through determining Pearson's correlations and reliability through Cronbach's alpha measurement. The instrument FlaQuM-Quickscan measures 'Healthcare quality for patients and kin' (part 1) and 'Healthcare quality for professionals' (part 2). This bipartite instrument mirrors 15 quality items and 3 general items (the overall quality score, recommendation score and intention-to-stay score). A process evaluation was organised to identify effective strategies in instrument distribution by conducting semi-structured interviews with quality managers. RESULTS: By involving experts in the development of quality items and through pilot testing by a multi-stakeholder group, the content and face validity of instrument items was ensured. In total, 13,615 respondents (5,891 Patients/kin and 7,724 Professionals) completed the FlaQuM-Quickscan. Confirmatory factor analyses showed good to very good fit and correlations supported the associations between the quality items and general items for both instrument parts. Cronbach's alphas supported the internal consistency. The process evaluation revealed that supportive technical structures and approaching respondents individually were effective strategies to distribute the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure healthcare quality experiences multidimensionally from an integrated multistakeholder perspective. This new instrument offers unique and detailed data to design sustainable quality management systems in hospitals. Based on these data, hospital management and policymakers can set quality priorities for patients', kin's and professionals' care. Future research should investigate the transferability to other healthcare systems and examine between-stakeholders and between-hospitals variation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_731930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_731930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7319303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjT9PwzAQRyMEEuXPd7gtEiLISUpDWBEVS4dK7JZJLo2Ja5vcOSKfiq-IoQyMMP1ueO_dUbLIl1WRrepVefzrPk3OiF6FyKu7olokHxtUFEZtd6Bt1jvympWBt6CM5hn2wbBu9R4taWeVMTO8zJFk3I2KvywfBy1Teg2DtimBsi30qAz3jRoR_Og6pINNKXgcyWPDekK6hxYnNM7HPH97U_zaxqCz4DrgHmFt1DZssm3QzUCNshfJSRdDePmz58nV-vH54SkbgsEwoZUtedWgLIS8FULmRb0sZFXmdSnKf8I3f4Ylv3P5CX_Adjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring in-hospital quality multidimensionally by integrating patients', kin's and healthcare professionals' perspectives: development and validation of the FlaQuM-Quickscan</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Claessens, Fien ; Seys, Deborah ; Van der Auwera, Charlotte ; Jans, Anneke ; Castro, Eva Marie ; Jacobs, Laura ; De Ridder, Dirk ; Bruyneel, Luk ; Leenaerts, Zita ; Van Wilder, Astrid ; Brouwers, Jonas ; Lachman, Peter ; Vanhaecht, Kris ; The FlaQuM Research Group</creator><creatorcontrib>Claessens, Fien ; Seys, Deborah ; Van der Auwera, Charlotte ; Jans, Anneke ; Castro, Eva Marie ; Jacobs, Laura ; De Ridder, Dirk ; Bruyneel, Luk ; Leenaerts, Zita ; Van Wilder, Astrid ; Brouwers, Jonas ; Lachman, Peter ; Vanhaecht, Kris ; The FlaQuM Research Group</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Measuring quality is essential to drive improvement initiatives in hospitals. An instrument that measures healthcare quality multidimensionally and integrates patients', kin's and professionals' perspectives is lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure healthcare quality multidimensionally from a multistakeholder perspective. METHODS: A multi-method approach started by establishing content and face validity, followed by a multi-centre study in 17 Flemish (Belgian) hospitals to assess construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, criterion validity through determining Pearson's correlations and reliability through Cronbach's alpha measurement. The instrument FlaQuM-Quickscan measures 'Healthcare quality for patients and kin' (part 1) and 'Healthcare quality for professionals' (part 2). This bipartite instrument mirrors 15 quality items and 3 general items (the overall quality score, recommendation score and intention-to-stay score). A process evaluation was organised to identify effective strategies in instrument distribution by conducting semi-structured interviews with quality managers. RESULTS: By involving experts in the development of quality items and through pilot testing by a multi-stakeholder group, the content and face validity of instrument items was ensured. In total, 13,615 respondents (5,891 Patients/kin and 7,724 Professionals) completed the FlaQuM-Quickscan. Confirmatory factor analyses showed good to very good fit and correlations supported the associations between the quality items and general items for both instrument parts. Cronbach's alphas supported the internal consistency. The process evaluation revealed that supportive technical structures and approaching respondents individually were effective strategies to distribute the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure healthcare quality experiences multidimensionally from an integrated multistakeholder perspective. This new instrument offers unique and detailed data to design sustainable quality management systems in hospitals. Based on these data, hospital management and policymakers can set quality priorities for patients', kin's and professionals' care. Future research should investigate the transferability to other healthcare systems and examine between-stakeholders and between-hospitals variation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMC</publisher><ispartof>Bmc Health Services Research, 2023-12, Vol.23 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Claessens, Fien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seys, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Auwera, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jans, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Eva Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ridder, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyneel, Luk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenaerts, Zita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wilder, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwers, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhaecht, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The FlaQuM Research Group</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring in-hospital quality multidimensionally by integrating patients', kin's and healthcare professionals' perspectives: development and validation of the FlaQuM-Quickscan</title><title>Bmc Health Services Research</title><description>BACKGROUND: Measuring quality is essential to drive improvement initiatives in hospitals. An instrument that measures healthcare quality multidimensionally and integrates patients', kin's and professionals' perspectives is lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure healthcare quality multidimensionally from a multistakeholder perspective. METHODS: A multi-method approach started by establishing content and face validity, followed by a multi-centre study in 17 Flemish (Belgian) hospitals to assess construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, criterion validity through determining Pearson's correlations and reliability through Cronbach's alpha measurement. The instrument FlaQuM-Quickscan measures 'Healthcare quality for patients and kin' (part 1) and 'Healthcare quality for professionals' (part 2). This bipartite instrument mirrors 15 quality items and 3 general items (the overall quality score, recommendation score and intention-to-stay score). A process evaluation was organised to identify effective strategies in instrument distribution by conducting semi-structured interviews with quality managers. RESULTS: By involving experts in the development of quality items and through pilot testing by a multi-stakeholder group, the content and face validity of instrument items was ensured. In total, 13,615 respondents (5,891 Patients/kin and 7,724 Professionals) completed the FlaQuM-Quickscan. Confirmatory factor analyses showed good to very good fit and correlations supported the associations between the quality items and general items for both instrument parts. Cronbach's alphas supported the internal consistency. The process evaluation revealed that supportive technical structures and approaching respondents individually were effective strategies to distribute the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure healthcare quality experiences multidimensionally from an integrated multistakeholder perspective. This new instrument offers unique and detailed data to design sustainable quality management systems in hospitals. Based on these data, hospital management and policymakers can set quality priorities for patients', kin's and professionals' care. Future research should investigate the transferability to other healthcare systems and examine between-stakeholders and between-hospitals variation.</description><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjT9PwzAQRyMEEuXPd7gtEiLISUpDWBEVS4dK7JZJLo2Ja5vcOSKfiq-IoQyMMP1ueO_dUbLIl1WRrepVefzrPk3OiF6FyKu7olokHxtUFEZtd6Bt1jvympWBt6CM5hn2wbBu9R4taWeVMTO8zJFk3I2KvywfBy1Teg2DtimBsi30qAz3jRoR_Og6pINNKXgcyWPDekK6hxYnNM7HPH97U_zaxqCz4DrgHmFt1DZssm3QzUCNshfJSRdDePmz58nV-vH54SkbgsEwoZUtedWgLIS8FULmRb0sZFXmdSnKf8I3f4Ylv3P5CX_Adjw</recordid><startdate>20231216</startdate><enddate>20231216</enddate><creator>Claessens, Fien</creator><creator>Seys, Deborah</creator><creator>Van der Auwera, Charlotte</creator><creator>Jans, Anneke</creator><creator>Castro, Eva Marie</creator><creator>Jacobs, Laura</creator><creator>De Ridder, Dirk</creator><creator>Bruyneel, Luk</creator><creator>Leenaerts, Zita</creator><creator>Van Wilder, Astrid</creator><creator>Brouwers, Jonas</creator><creator>Lachman, Peter</creator><creator>Vanhaecht, Kris</creator><creator>The FlaQuM Research Group</creator><general>BMC</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231216</creationdate><title>Measuring in-hospital quality multidimensionally by integrating patients', kin's and healthcare professionals' perspectives: development and validation of the FlaQuM-Quickscan</title><author>Claessens, Fien ; Seys, Deborah ; Van der Auwera, Charlotte ; Jans, Anneke ; Castro, Eva Marie ; Jacobs, Laura ; De Ridder, Dirk ; Bruyneel, Luk ; Leenaerts, Zita ; Van Wilder, Astrid ; Brouwers, Jonas ; Lachman, Peter ; Vanhaecht, Kris ; The FlaQuM Research Group</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7319303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Claessens, Fien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seys, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Auwera, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jans, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Eva Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Ridder, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyneel, Luk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenaerts, Zita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wilder, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwers, Jonas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanhaecht, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The FlaQuM Research Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Bmc Health Services Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Claessens, Fien</au><au>Seys, Deborah</au><au>Van der Auwera, Charlotte</au><au>Jans, Anneke</au><au>Castro, Eva Marie</au><au>Jacobs, Laura</au><au>De Ridder, Dirk</au><au>Bruyneel, Luk</au><au>Leenaerts, Zita</au><au>Van Wilder, Astrid</au><au>Brouwers, Jonas</au><au>Lachman, Peter</au><au>Vanhaecht, Kris</au><au>The FlaQuM Research Group</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring in-hospital quality multidimensionally by integrating patients', kin's and healthcare professionals' perspectives: development and validation of the FlaQuM-Quickscan</atitle><jtitle>Bmc Health Services Research</jtitle><date>2023-12-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Measuring quality is essential to drive improvement initiatives in hospitals. An instrument that measures healthcare quality multidimensionally and integrates patients', kin's and professionals' perspectives is lacking. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure healthcare quality multidimensionally from a multistakeholder perspective. METHODS: A multi-method approach started by establishing content and face validity, followed by a multi-centre study in 17 Flemish (Belgian) hospitals to assess construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, criterion validity through determining Pearson's correlations and reliability through Cronbach's alpha measurement. The instrument FlaQuM-Quickscan measures 'Healthcare quality for patients and kin' (part 1) and 'Healthcare quality for professionals' (part 2). This bipartite instrument mirrors 15 quality items and 3 general items (the overall quality score, recommendation score and intention-to-stay score). A process evaluation was organised to identify effective strategies in instrument distribution by conducting semi-structured interviews with quality managers. RESULTS: By involving experts in the development of quality items and through pilot testing by a multi-stakeholder group, the content and face validity of instrument items was ensured. In total, 13,615 respondents (5,891 Patients/kin and 7,724 Professionals) completed the FlaQuM-Quickscan. Confirmatory factor analyses showed good to very good fit and correlations supported the associations between the quality items and general items for both instrument parts. Cronbach's alphas supported the internal consistency. The process evaluation revealed that supportive technical structures and approaching respondents individually were effective strategies to distribute the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure healthcare quality experiences multidimensionally from an integrated multistakeholder perspective. This new instrument offers unique and detailed data to design sustainable quality management systems in hospitals. Based on these data, hospital management and policymakers can set quality priorities for patients', kin's and professionals' care. Future research should investigate the transferability to other healthcare systems and examine between-stakeholders and between-hospitals variation.</abstract><pub>BMC</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6963 |
ispartof | Bmc Health Services Research, 2023-12, Vol.23 (1) |
issn | 1472-6963 1472-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_731930 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
title | Measuring in-hospital quality multidimensionally by integrating patients', kin's and healthcare professionals' perspectives: development and validation of the FlaQuM-Quickscan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20in-hospital%20quality%20multidimensionally%20by%20integrating%20patients',%20kin's%20and%20healthcare%20professionals'%20perspectives:%20development%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20FlaQuM-Quickscan&rft.jtitle=Bmc%20Health%20Services%20Research&rft.au=Claessens,%20Fien&rft.date=2023-12-16&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_731930%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |