Comparison of acoustic performance of different sensors for the purposes of on body auscultation in noisy environments

Lung auscultation is a widely used clinical tool for quick physical assessment of the respiratory system. The ideal sensor preferable for lung auscultation would have high sensitivity to body- conducted sounds with a good resilience to airborne noise. This work envisions to benchmark different senso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ieee Sensors Journal 2023-07, Vol.23 (13), p.14203-14214
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Suraj, De Smedt, Valentijn, Karsmakers, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14214
container_issue 13
container_start_page 14203
container_title Ieee Sensors Journal
container_volume 23
creator Khan, Suraj
De Smedt, Valentijn
Karsmakers, Peter
description Lung auscultation is a widely used clinical tool for quick physical assessment of the respiratory system. The ideal sensor preferable for lung auscultation would have high sensitivity to body- conducted sounds with a good resilience to airborne noise. This work envisions to benchmark different sensors starting from air coupled microphones, a bone conduction microphone and PVDF (Polyvinylidene difluoride) sensors on a small chest simulator in a controlled environment. The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of different sensors, which could be used for lung auscultation both in silent and noisy environments. The proposed work evaluates the performance of different kinds of sensors in terms of their frequency response, noise resilience and a quality metric that expresses sensor's robustness to airborne noise.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_719395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_719395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7193953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjEFOwzAQRb0AiVK4w6yRipy4UZR1BeoBumBnGWcsDMmM5bEjentSqQcoqy-9__Tu1KbpjN7tTf_xoB5FvrVuhr7rN2o58JxcjsIEHMB5rlKih4Q5cJ4debzwMYaAGamAIAlngfWF8oWQak4sKBdrbXzyeAZXxdepuBJXEgmIo5wBaYmZaV4r8qTug5sEn6-7VS_vb6fDcfdTJ6wLkh0lOY-21bbT2jbtsG9t3wxm6MxWvd4s2_JbzL_qf0yaX0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of acoustic performance of different sensors for the purposes of on body auscultation in noisy environments</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Khan, Suraj ; De Smedt, Valentijn ; Karsmakers, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Khan, Suraj ; De Smedt, Valentijn ; Karsmakers, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Lung auscultation is a widely used clinical tool for quick physical assessment of the respiratory system. The ideal sensor preferable for lung auscultation would have high sensitivity to body- conducted sounds with a good resilience to airborne noise. This work envisions to benchmark different sensors starting from air coupled microphones, a bone conduction microphone and PVDF (Polyvinylidene difluoride) sensors on a small chest simulator in a controlled environment. The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of different sensors, which could be used for lung auscultation both in silent and noisy environments. The proposed work evaluates the performance of different kinds of sensors in terms of their frequency response, noise resilience and a quality metric that expresses sensor's robustness to airborne noise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-437X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</publisher><ispartof>Ieee Sensors Journal, 2023-07, Vol.23 (13), p.14203-14214</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27839</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khan, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Smedt, Valentijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsmakers, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of acoustic performance of different sensors for the purposes of on body auscultation in noisy environments</title><title>Ieee Sensors Journal</title><description>Lung auscultation is a widely used clinical tool for quick physical assessment of the respiratory system. The ideal sensor preferable for lung auscultation would have high sensitivity to body- conducted sounds with a good resilience to airborne noise. This work envisions to benchmark different sensors starting from air coupled microphones, a bone conduction microphone and PVDF (Polyvinylidene difluoride) sensors on a small chest simulator in a controlled environment. The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of different sensors, which could be used for lung auscultation both in silent and noisy environments. The proposed work evaluates the performance of different kinds of sensors in terms of their frequency response, noise resilience and a quality metric that expresses sensor's robustness to airborne noise.</description><issn>1530-437X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjEFOwzAQRb0AiVK4w6yRipy4UZR1BeoBumBnGWcsDMmM5bEjentSqQcoqy-9__Tu1KbpjN7tTf_xoB5FvrVuhr7rN2o58JxcjsIEHMB5rlKih4Q5cJ4debzwMYaAGamAIAlngfWF8oWQak4sKBdrbXzyeAZXxdepuBJXEgmIo5wBaYmZaV4r8qTug5sEn6-7VS_vb6fDcfdTJ6wLkh0lOY-21bbT2jbtsG9t3wxm6MxWvd4s2_JbzL_qf0yaX0w</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Khan, Suraj</creator><creator>De Smedt, Valentijn</creator><creator>Karsmakers, Peter</creator><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Comparison of acoustic performance of different sensors for the purposes of on body auscultation in noisy environments</title><author>Khan, Suraj ; De Smedt, Valentijn ; Karsmakers, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7193953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khan, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Smedt, Valentijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsmakers, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Ieee Sensors Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khan, Suraj</au><au>De Smedt, Valentijn</au><au>Karsmakers, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of acoustic performance of different sensors for the purposes of on body auscultation in noisy environments</atitle><jtitle>Ieee Sensors Journal</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>14203</spage><epage>14214</epage><pages>14203-14214</pages><issn>1530-437X</issn><abstract>Lung auscultation is a widely used clinical tool for quick physical assessment of the respiratory system. The ideal sensor preferable for lung auscultation would have high sensitivity to body- conducted sounds with a good resilience to airborne noise. This work envisions to benchmark different sensors starting from air coupled microphones, a bone conduction microphone and PVDF (Polyvinylidene difluoride) sensors on a small chest simulator in a controlled environment. The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of different sensors, which could be used for lung auscultation both in silent and noisy environments. The proposed work evaluates the performance of different kinds of sensors in terms of their frequency response, noise resilience and a quality metric that expresses sensor's robustness to airborne noise.</abstract><pub>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-437X
ispartof Ieee Sensors Journal, 2023-07, Vol.23 (13), p.14203-14214
issn 1530-437X
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_719395
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
title Comparison of acoustic performance of different sensors for the purposes of on body auscultation in noisy environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T06%3A45%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20acoustic%20performance%20of%20different%20sensors%20for%20the%20purposes%20of%20on%20body%20auscultation%20in%20noisy%20environments&rft.jtitle=Ieee%20Sensors%20Journal&rft.au=Khan,%20Suraj&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=14203&rft.epage=14214&rft.pages=14203-14214&rft.issn=1530-437X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_719395%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true