Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?

PURPOSE: Inguinal lymph node dissection within 3 months of primary tumor resection in penile cancer has been associated with longer recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the optimal timing and effect of lymphadenectomy performed concurrently at the time of primary lesion management...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2023-03, Vol.209 (3), p.557-564
Hauptverfasser: Huelster, Heather L, Chang, Andrew, Rose, Kyle M, Bandini, Marco, Albersen, Maarten, Roussel, Eduard, Chipollini, Juan, Zhu, Yao, Ye, Ding-Wei, Ornellas, Antonio A, Catanzaro, Mario, Marandino, Laura, Pederzoli, Filippo, Hakenberg, Oliver W, Heidenreich, Axel, Haidl, Friederike, Watkin, Nick, Ager, Michael, Ahmed, Mohamed E, Karnes, Jeffrey R, Briganti, Alberto, Kim, Youngchul, Montorsi, Francesco, Necchi, Andrea, Spiess, Philippe E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 564
container_issue 3
container_start_page 557
container_title JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
container_volume 209
creator Huelster, Heather L
Chang, Andrew
Rose, Kyle M
Bandini, Marco
Albersen, Maarten
Roussel, Eduard
Chipollini, Juan
Zhu, Yao
Ye, Ding-Wei
Ornellas, Antonio A
Catanzaro, Mario
Marandino, Laura
Pederzoli, Filippo
Hakenberg, Oliver W
Heidenreich, Axel
Haidl, Friederike
Watkin, Nick
Ager, Michael
Ahmed, Mohamed E
Karnes, Jeffrey R
Briganti, Alberto
Kim, Youngchul
Montorsi, Francesco
Necchi, Andrea
Spiess, Philippe E
description PURPOSE: Inguinal lymph node dissection within 3 months of primary tumor resection in penile cancer has been associated with longer recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the optimal timing and effect of lymphadenectomy performed concurrently at the time of primary lesion management on oncologic outcomes in clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international, multicenter cohort of 966 penile cancer cases was queried for penile squamous cell carcinoma management after the year 2000, clinically lymph node positive status, and performance of penile surgery and inguinal lymph node dissection. Cohorts were stratified as concomitant if inguinal lymph node dissection and penile surgery occurred on the same date or staged when inguinal lymph node dissection was performed after penile resection. Rates and patterns of penile squamous cell carcinoma recurrence were reported. Distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and groups compared with log-rank testing. RESULTS: Of 253 contemporary men with clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma, 96 (38%) underwent concomitant inguinal lymph node dissection and 157 (62%) had inguinal lymph node dissection performed in a staged manner. Penile cancer was most likely to recur distantly (19%) followed by in the groin (14%) or pelvis (5%). There were no differences in distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival between management strategies. Multivariable analysis adjusting for stage, treatment center, and perioperative chemoradiation also demonstrated no recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival benefit between management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal lymph node dissection performed concurrently with excision of the penile tumor for clinically node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma is not associated with differences in recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival compared to staged lymph node dissection.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_712586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_712586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7125863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyk1OwzAQQOEsQKL83GHWSEWOkxBgwyIFUQkQUru3Rs6kHeqMQ2xH5BjcGBYcAFbvLb6jbKGU1suqKOuT7DSEd6Xysqr1IvtqvFjfc0SJMAXYRNxRC9s9jThQimxhLbvEgg6e537YY0tCNvp-BhZoHAtbdG6GV98SvPnAkaefIWFHsPlI2PsUoCHnoMHRsvge72DlKcA6wgseCBBW3HU0kli6P8-OO3SBLn57ll0-Pmybp-UhOUoTiWnDgJaMVqZSyuT6ttSmznV1c138E1_9GZv4GYtvT-xm6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Huelster, Heather L ; Chang, Andrew ; Rose, Kyle M ; Bandini, Marco ; Albersen, Maarten ; Roussel, Eduard ; Chipollini, Juan ; Zhu, Yao ; Ye, Ding-Wei ; Ornellas, Antonio A ; Catanzaro, Mario ; Marandino, Laura ; Pederzoli, Filippo ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Heidenreich, Axel ; Haidl, Friederike ; Watkin, Nick ; Ager, Michael ; Ahmed, Mohamed E ; Karnes, Jeffrey R ; Briganti, Alberto ; Kim, Youngchul ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Necchi, Andrea ; Spiess, Philippe E</creator><creatorcontrib>Huelster, Heather L ; Chang, Andrew ; Rose, Kyle M ; Bandini, Marco ; Albersen, Maarten ; Roussel, Eduard ; Chipollini, Juan ; Zhu, Yao ; Ye, Ding-Wei ; Ornellas, Antonio A ; Catanzaro, Mario ; Marandino, Laura ; Pederzoli, Filippo ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Heidenreich, Axel ; Haidl, Friederike ; Watkin, Nick ; Ager, Michael ; Ahmed, Mohamed E ; Karnes, Jeffrey R ; Briganti, Alberto ; Kim, Youngchul ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Necchi, Andrea ; Spiess, Philippe E</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE: Inguinal lymph node dissection within 3 months of primary tumor resection in penile cancer has been associated with longer recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the optimal timing and effect of lymphadenectomy performed concurrently at the time of primary lesion management on oncologic outcomes in clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international, multicenter cohort of 966 penile cancer cases was queried for penile squamous cell carcinoma management after the year 2000, clinically lymph node positive status, and performance of penile surgery and inguinal lymph node dissection. Cohorts were stratified as concomitant if inguinal lymph node dissection and penile surgery occurred on the same date or staged when inguinal lymph node dissection was performed after penile resection. Rates and patterns of penile squamous cell carcinoma recurrence were reported. Distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and groups compared with log-rank testing. RESULTS: Of 253 contemporary men with clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma, 96 (38%) underwent concomitant inguinal lymph node dissection and 157 (62%) had inguinal lymph node dissection performed in a staged manner. Penile cancer was most likely to recur distantly (19%) followed by in the groin (14%) or pelvis (5%). There were no differences in distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival between management strategies. Multivariable analysis adjusting for stage, treatment center, and perioperative chemoradiation also demonstrated no recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival benefit between management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal lymph node dissection performed concurrently with excision of the penile tumor for clinically node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma is not associated with differences in recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival compared to staged lymph node dissection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</publisher><ispartof>JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023-03, Vol.209 (3), p.557-564</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,777,27841</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/20.500.12942/712586$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huelster, Heather L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Kyle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albersen, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipollini, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ornellas, Antonio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catanzaro, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marandino, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederzoli, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidenreich, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haidl, Friederike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkin, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ager, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karnes, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briganti, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youngchul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montorsi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Necchi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiess, Philippe E</creatorcontrib><title>Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?</title><title>JOURNAL OF UROLOGY</title><description>PURPOSE: Inguinal lymph node dissection within 3 months of primary tumor resection in penile cancer has been associated with longer recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the optimal timing and effect of lymphadenectomy performed concurrently at the time of primary lesion management on oncologic outcomes in clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international, multicenter cohort of 966 penile cancer cases was queried for penile squamous cell carcinoma management after the year 2000, clinically lymph node positive status, and performance of penile surgery and inguinal lymph node dissection. Cohorts were stratified as concomitant if inguinal lymph node dissection and penile surgery occurred on the same date or staged when inguinal lymph node dissection was performed after penile resection. Rates and patterns of penile squamous cell carcinoma recurrence were reported. Distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and groups compared with log-rank testing. RESULTS: Of 253 contemporary men with clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma, 96 (38%) underwent concomitant inguinal lymph node dissection and 157 (62%) had inguinal lymph node dissection performed in a staged manner. Penile cancer was most likely to recur distantly (19%) followed by in the groin (14%) or pelvis (5%). There were no differences in distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival between management strategies. Multivariable analysis adjusting for stage, treatment center, and perioperative chemoradiation also demonstrated no recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival benefit between management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal lymph node dissection performed concurrently with excision of the penile tumor for clinically node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma is not associated with differences in recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival compared to staged lymph node dissection.</description><issn>0022-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyk1OwzAQQOEsQKL83GHWSEWOkxBgwyIFUQkQUru3Rs6kHeqMQ2xH5BjcGBYcAFbvLb6jbKGU1suqKOuT7DSEd6Xysqr1IvtqvFjfc0SJMAXYRNxRC9s9jThQimxhLbvEgg6e537YY0tCNvp-BhZoHAtbdG6GV98SvPnAkaefIWFHsPlI2PsUoCHnoMHRsvge72DlKcA6wgseCBBW3HU0kli6P8-OO3SBLn57ll0-Pmybp-UhOUoTiWnDgJaMVqZSyuT6ttSmznV1c138E1_9GZv4GYtvT-xm6Q</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Huelster, Heather L</creator><creator>Chang, Andrew</creator><creator>Rose, Kyle M</creator><creator>Bandini, Marco</creator><creator>Albersen, Maarten</creator><creator>Roussel, Eduard</creator><creator>Chipollini, Juan</creator><creator>Zhu, Yao</creator><creator>Ye, Ding-Wei</creator><creator>Ornellas, Antonio A</creator><creator>Catanzaro, Mario</creator><creator>Marandino, Laura</creator><creator>Pederzoli, Filippo</creator><creator>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creator><creator>Heidenreich, Axel</creator><creator>Haidl, Friederike</creator><creator>Watkin, Nick</creator><creator>Ager, Michael</creator><creator>Ahmed, Mohamed E</creator><creator>Karnes, Jeffrey R</creator><creator>Briganti, Alberto</creator><creator>Kim, Youngchul</creator><creator>Montorsi, Francesco</creator><creator>Necchi, Andrea</creator><creator>Spiess, Philippe E</creator><general>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?</title><author>Huelster, Heather L ; Chang, Andrew ; Rose, Kyle M ; Bandini, Marco ; Albersen, Maarten ; Roussel, Eduard ; Chipollini, Juan ; Zhu, Yao ; Ye, Ding-Wei ; Ornellas, Antonio A ; Catanzaro, Mario ; Marandino, Laura ; Pederzoli, Filippo ; Hakenberg, Oliver W ; Heidenreich, Axel ; Haidl, Friederike ; Watkin, Nick ; Ager, Michael ; Ahmed, Mohamed E ; Karnes, Jeffrey R ; Briganti, Alberto ; Kim, Youngchul ; Montorsi, Francesco ; Necchi, Andrea ; Spiess, Philippe E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7125863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huelster, Heather L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Kyle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandini, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albersen, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipollini, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ornellas, Antonio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catanzaro, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marandino, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pederzoli, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakenberg, Oliver W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidenreich, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haidl, Friederike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkin, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ager, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karnes, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briganti, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Youngchul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montorsi, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Necchi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiess, Philippe E</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>JOURNAL OF UROLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huelster, Heather L</au><au>Chang, Andrew</au><au>Rose, Kyle M</au><au>Bandini, Marco</au><au>Albersen, Maarten</au><au>Roussel, Eduard</au><au>Chipollini, Juan</au><au>Zhu, Yao</au><au>Ye, Ding-Wei</au><au>Ornellas, Antonio A</au><au>Catanzaro, Mario</au><au>Marandino, Laura</au><au>Pederzoli, Filippo</au><au>Hakenberg, Oliver W</au><au>Heidenreich, Axel</au><au>Haidl, Friederike</au><au>Watkin, Nick</au><au>Ager, Michael</au><au>Ahmed, Mohamed E</au><au>Karnes, Jeffrey R</au><au>Briganti, Alberto</au><au>Kim, Youngchul</au><au>Montorsi, Francesco</au><au>Necchi, Andrea</au><au>Spiess, Philippe E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?</atitle><jtitle>JOURNAL OF UROLOGY</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>209</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>557-564</pages><issn>0022-5347</issn><abstract>PURPOSE: Inguinal lymph node dissection within 3 months of primary tumor resection in penile cancer has been associated with longer recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival. However, the optimal timing and effect of lymphadenectomy performed concurrently at the time of primary lesion management on oncologic outcomes in clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international, multicenter cohort of 966 penile cancer cases was queried for penile squamous cell carcinoma management after the year 2000, clinically lymph node positive status, and performance of penile surgery and inguinal lymph node dissection. Cohorts were stratified as concomitant if inguinal lymph node dissection and penile surgery occurred on the same date or staged when inguinal lymph node dissection was performed after penile resection. Rates and patterns of penile squamous cell carcinoma recurrence were reported. Distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and groups compared with log-rank testing. RESULTS: Of 253 contemporary men with clinically lymph node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma, 96 (38%) underwent concomitant inguinal lymph node dissection and 157 (62%) had inguinal lymph node dissection performed in a staged manner. Penile cancer was most likely to recur distantly (19%) followed by in the groin (14%) or pelvis (5%). There were no differences in distant recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival between management strategies. Multivariable analysis adjusting for stage, treatment center, and perioperative chemoradiation also demonstrated no recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival benefit between management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal lymph node dissection performed concurrently with excision of the penile tumor for clinically node positive penile squamous cell carcinoma is not associated with differences in recurrence-free, cancer-specific, or overall survival compared to staged lymph node dissection.</abstract><pub>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0022-5347
ispartof JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023-03, Vol.209 (3), p.557-564
issn 0022-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_712586
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Concomitant vs Staged Therapeutic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Node Positive Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does It Make a Difference?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concomitant%20vs%20Staged%20Therapeutic%20Inguinal%20Lymphadenectomy%20in%20Clinically%20Node%20Positive%20Penile%20Squamous%20Cell%20Carcinoma:%20Does%20It%20Make%20a%20Difference?&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20UROLOGY&rft.au=Huelster,%20Heather%20L&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=209&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=557-564&rft.issn=0022-5347&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E20_500_12942_712586%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true