Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation

Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive techno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148
Hauptverfasser: Koloda, Yulia, Korsak, Vladislav, Rozenson, Oleg, Anshina, Margarita, Sagamonova, Karina, Baranov, Igor, Yakovenko, Sergey, D'Hooghe, Thomas, Ershova, Anna, Lispi, Monica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue Pt B
container_start_page 134
container_title BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
container_volume 85
creator Koloda, Yulia
Korsak, Vladislav
Rozenson, Oleg
Anshina, Margarita
Sagamonova, Karina
Baranov, Igor
Yakovenko, Sergey
D'Hooghe, Thomas
Ershova, Anna
Lispi, Monica
description Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_707054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_707054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7070543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj01LAzEQQFdQsFZP_oE5qrCS_bJ0byKWHjz5cV7iZtqNZpMymazWX29Wighe9DQMvHmP2U8mWZVn6dW8KA-TI-9fhCiKeV5N9k6fPIJbgQTC1vXP2krL0IVeWlg5Y3RrMPWs-2Aka7uGzlHvLNa_cRMYtdUfPyg4o7RbPCzrOO6W55DXGezOWLuxQHG3TLGECtwgSUfTdy8iKtAolN5rz5Eh3JBToWU9IDC2nXXGrbfAhJJ7tFzDdYSkSd8cGRVdQW3HD8mF-ADChmQ8bhG0Be4Q7kNUx-gCFdJX8zg5WEnj8WQ3p8nF4vbxZpm-BoNhQNsov5EtNrloKiGaLJ-XeTMTM1GVxTS5_DPc8DsX_7J_An2jmF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-6934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ELSEVIER SCI LTD</publisher><ispartof>BEST PRACTICE &amp; RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNAECOLOGY, 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,777,781,27841</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsak, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenson, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anshina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagamonova, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ershova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><title>BEST PRACTICE &amp; RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNAECOLOGY</title><description>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.</description><issn>1521-6934</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVj01LAzEQQFdQsFZP_oE5qrCS_bJ0byKWHjz5cV7iZtqNZpMymazWX29Wighe9DQMvHmP2U8mWZVn6dW8KA-TI-9fhCiKeV5N9k6fPIJbgQTC1vXP2krL0IVeWlg5Y3RrMPWs-2Aka7uGzlHvLNa_cRMYtdUfPyg4o7RbPCzrOO6W55DXGezOWLuxQHG3TLGECtwgSUfTdy8iKtAolN5rz5Eh3JBToWU9IDC2nXXGrbfAhJJ7tFzDdYSkSd8cGRVdQW3HD8mF-ADChmQ8bhG0Be4Q7kNUx-gCFdJX8zg5WEnj8WQ3p8nF4vbxZpm-BoNhQNsov5EtNrloKiGaLJ-XeTMTM1GVxTS5_DPc8DsX_7J_An2jmF0</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Koloda, Yulia</creator><creator>Korsak, Vladislav</creator><creator>Rozenson, Oleg</creator><creator>Anshina, Margarita</creator><creator>Sagamonova, Karina</creator><creator>Baranov, Igor</creator><creator>Yakovenko, Sergey</creator><creator>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creator><creator>Ershova, Anna</creator><creator>Lispi, Monica</creator><general>ELSEVIER SCI LTD</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><author>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7070543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsak, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenson, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anshina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagamonova, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ershova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>BEST PRACTICE &amp; RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNAECOLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koloda, Yulia</au><au>Korsak, Vladislav</au><au>Rozenson, Oleg</au><au>Anshina, Margarita</au><au>Sagamonova, Karina</au><au>Baranov, Igor</au><au>Yakovenko, Sergey</au><au>D'Hooghe, Thomas</au><au>Ershova, Anna</au><au>Lispi, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</atitle><jtitle>BEST PRACTICE &amp; RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS &amp; GYNAECOLOGY</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>Pt B</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>134-148</pages><issn>1521-6934</issn><abstract>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.</abstract><pub>ELSEVIER SCI LTD</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1521-6934
ispartof BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148
issn 1521-6934
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_707054
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A05%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20a%20recombinant%20human%20follicle-stimulating%20hormone:recombinant%20human%20luteinizing%20hormone%20(r-hFSH:r-hLH)%202:1%20combination%20for%20controlled%20ovarian%20stimulation%20during%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20treatment:%20A%20real-world%20study%20of%20routine%20practice%20in%20the%20Russian%20Federation&rft.jtitle=BEST%20PRACTICE%20&%20RESEARCH%20CLINICAL%20OBSTETRICS%20&%20GYNAECOLOGY&rft.au=Koloda,%20Yulia&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=Pt%20B&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=134-148&rft.issn=1521-6934&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_707054%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true