Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial

BACKGROUND: China has low seasonal influenza vaccination rates among priority populations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a pay-it-forward strategy to increase influenza vaccine uptake in rural, suburban, and urban settings in China. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1484-1492
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Dan, Jin, Chenqi, Bessame, Khaoula, Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi, Ong, Jason J, Wang, Zaisheng, Xie, Yewei, Jit, Mark, Larson, Heidi J, Chantler, Tracey, Lin, Leesa, Gong, Wenfeng, Yang, Fan, Jing, Fengshi, Wei, Shufang, Cheng, Weibin, Zhou, Yi, Ren, Nina, Qiu, Shuhao, Bao, Jianmin, Wen, Liufen, Yang, Qinlu, Tian, Junzhang, Tang, Weiming, Tucker, Joseph D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1492
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1484
container_title LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
container_volume 22
creator Wu, Dan
Jin, Chenqi
Bessame, Khaoula
Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi
Ong, Jason J
Wang, Zaisheng
Xie, Yewei
Jit, Mark
Larson, Heidi J
Chantler, Tracey
Lin, Leesa
Gong, Wenfeng
Yang, Fan
Jing, Fengshi
Wei, Shufang
Cheng, Weibin
Zhou, Yi
Ren, Nina
Qiu, Shuhao
Bao, Jianmin
Wen, Liufen
Yang, Qinlu
Tian, Junzhang
Tang, Weiming
Tucker, Joseph D
description BACKGROUND: China has low seasonal influenza vaccination rates among priority populations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a pay-it-forward strategy to increase influenza vaccine uptake in rural, suburban, and urban settings in China. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial to examine the effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention (a free influenza vaccine and an opportunity to donate financially to support vaccination of other individuals) to increase influenza vaccine uptake compared with standard-of-care user-paid vaccination among children (aged between 6 months and 8 years) and older people (≥60 years) in China. Recruitment took place in the standard-of-care group until the expected sample size was reached and then in the pay-it-forward group in primary care clinics from a rural site (Yangshan), a suburban site (Zengcheng), and an urban site (Tianhe). Participants were introduced to the influenza vaccine by project staff using a pamphlet about influenza vaccination and were either asked to pay out-of-pocket at the standard market price (US$8·5-23·2; standard-of-care group) or to donate any amount anonymously (pay-it-forward group). Participants had to be eligible to receive an influenza vaccine and to have not received an influenza vaccine in the past year. The primary outcome was vaccine uptake. Secondary outcomes were vaccine confidence and costs (from the health-care provider perspective). Regression methods compared influenza vaccine uptake and vaccine confidence between the two groups. This trial is registered with ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000040048. FINDINGS: From Sept 21, 2020, to March 3, 2021, 300 enrolees were recruited from patients visiting three primary care clinics. 55 (37%) of 150 people in the standard-of-care group (40 [53%] of 75 children and 15 [20%] of 75 older adults) and 111 (74%) of 150 in the pay-it-forward group (66 [88%] of 75 children and 45 [60%] of 75 older adults) received an influenza vaccine. People in the pay-it-forward group were more likely to receive an influenza vaccine compared with those in the standard-of-care group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6·7 [95% CI 2·7-16·6] among children and 5·0 [2·3-10·8] among older adults). People in the pay-it-forward group had greater confidence in vaccine safety (aOR 2·2 [95% CI 1·2-3·9]), importance (3·1 [1·6-5·9]), and effectiveness (3·1 [1·7-5·7]). In the pay-it-forward group, 107 (96%) of 111 participants donated money for subsequent vaccinations. The pay-it-fo
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_706026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_706026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7060263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj0tOwzAQhrMAiUK5w6yRgpwHjcq2KuIA7KORPUmGOrbxow8Oy1lwqx4AVrOY73_dFIuq7ZqyEev1XXEfwqcQVVeJdlH8bIeBZOQ9GQoB7AAIDk8lx3Kw_oBeAZtIPv8jWwPSzg49KThwnCAF8qVDVrBHKdnghYkWeHbe7ilrB53IfOMVIEgu4o4AjTp7zclwPAGZEUeacwbgbM0IcmKtPJkLZ7UiD6iSjiE7wmbKSa-56FfCwCUdHXk-i1GD8zjOuYaE6Bn1srgdUAd6vN6H4ult-7F5L3dJU8qjehUcSupr0b8I0Vf1uq37TqxEvWr-CT__Ge7jMTa_BQCF0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Wu, Dan ; Jin, Chenqi ; Bessame, Khaoula ; Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi ; Ong, Jason J ; Wang, Zaisheng ; Xie, Yewei ; Jit, Mark ; Larson, Heidi J ; Chantler, Tracey ; Lin, Leesa ; Gong, Wenfeng ; Yang, Fan ; Jing, Fengshi ; Wei, Shufang ; Cheng, Weibin ; Zhou, Yi ; Ren, Nina ; Qiu, Shuhao ; Bao, Jianmin ; Wen, Liufen ; Yang, Qinlu ; Tian, Junzhang ; Tang, Weiming ; Tucker, Joseph D</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dan ; Jin, Chenqi ; Bessame, Khaoula ; Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi ; Ong, Jason J ; Wang, Zaisheng ; Xie, Yewei ; Jit, Mark ; Larson, Heidi J ; Chantler, Tracey ; Lin, Leesa ; Gong, Wenfeng ; Yang, Fan ; Jing, Fengshi ; Wei, Shufang ; Cheng, Weibin ; Zhou, Yi ; Ren, Nina ; Qiu, Shuhao ; Bao, Jianmin ; Wen, Liufen ; Yang, Qinlu ; Tian, Junzhang ; Tang, Weiming ; Tucker, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: China has low seasonal influenza vaccination rates among priority populations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a pay-it-forward strategy to increase influenza vaccine uptake in rural, suburban, and urban settings in China. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial to examine the effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention (a free influenza vaccine and an opportunity to donate financially to support vaccination of other individuals) to increase influenza vaccine uptake compared with standard-of-care user-paid vaccination among children (aged between 6 months and 8 years) and older people (≥60 years) in China. Recruitment took place in the standard-of-care group until the expected sample size was reached and then in the pay-it-forward group in primary care clinics from a rural site (Yangshan), a suburban site (Zengcheng), and an urban site (Tianhe). Participants were introduced to the influenza vaccine by project staff using a pamphlet about influenza vaccination and were either asked to pay out-of-pocket at the standard market price (US$8·5-23·2; standard-of-care group) or to donate any amount anonymously (pay-it-forward group). Participants had to be eligible to receive an influenza vaccine and to have not received an influenza vaccine in the past year. The primary outcome was vaccine uptake. Secondary outcomes were vaccine confidence and costs (from the health-care provider perspective). Regression methods compared influenza vaccine uptake and vaccine confidence between the two groups. This trial is registered with ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000040048. FINDINGS: From Sept 21, 2020, to March 3, 2021, 300 enrolees were recruited from patients visiting three primary care clinics. 55 (37%) of 150 people in the standard-of-care group (40 [53%] of 75 children and 15 [20%] of 75 older adults) and 111 (74%) of 150 in the pay-it-forward group (66 [88%] of 75 children and 45 [60%] of 75 older adults) received an influenza vaccine. People in the pay-it-forward group were more likely to receive an influenza vaccine compared with those in the standard-of-care group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6·7 [95% CI 2·7-16·6] among children and 5·0 [2·3-10·8] among older adults). People in the pay-it-forward group had greater confidence in vaccine safety (aOR 2·2 [95% CI 1·2-3·9]), importance (3·1 [1·6-5·9]), and effectiveness (3·1 [1·7-5·7]). In the pay-it-forward group, 107 (96%) of 111 participants donated money for subsequent vaccinations. The pay-it-forward group had a lower economic cost (calculated as the cost without subtraction of donations) per person vaccinated (US$45·60) than did the standard-of-care group ($64·67). INTERPRETATION: The pay-it-forward intervention seemed to be effective in improving influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement. Our data have implications for prosocial interventions to enhance influenza vaccine uptake in countries where influenza vaccines are available for a fee. FUNDING: Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK National Institute for Health Research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ELSEVIER SCI LTD</publisher><ispartof>LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1484-1492</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Chenqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessame, Khaoula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Jason J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zaisheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yewei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jit, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Heidi J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantler, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Leesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Wenfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Fengshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Shufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Weibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Shuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Jianmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Liufen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qinlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Junzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Weiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial</title><title>LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES</title><description>BACKGROUND: China has low seasonal influenza vaccination rates among priority populations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a pay-it-forward strategy to increase influenza vaccine uptake in rural, suburban, and urban settings in China. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial to examine the effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention (a free influenza vaccine and an opportunity to donate financially to support vaccination of other individuals) to increase influenza vaccine uptake compared with standard-of-care user-paid vaccination among children (aged between 6 months and 8 years) and older people (≥60 years) in China. Recruitment took place in the standard-of-care group until the expected sample size was reached and then in the pay-it-forward group in primary care clinics from a rural site (Yangshan), a suburban site (Zengcheng), and an urban site (Tianhe). Participants were introduced to the influenza vaccine by project staff using a pamphlet about influenza vaccination and were either asked to pay out-of-pocket at the standard market price (US$8·5-23·2; standard-of-care group) or to donate any amount anonymously (pay-it-forward group). Participants had to be eligible to receive an influenza vaccine and to have not received an influenza vaccine in the past year. The primary outcome was vaccine uptake. Secondary outcomes were vaccine confidence and costs (from the health-care provider perspective). Regression methods compared influenza vaccine uptake and vaccine confidence between the two groups. This trial is registered with ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000040048. FINDINGS: From Sept 21, 2020, to March 3, 2021, 300 enrolees were recruited from patients visiting three primary care clinics. 55 (37%) of 150 people in the standard-of-care group (40 [53%] of 75 children and 15 [20%] of 75 older adults) and 111 (74%) of 150 in the pay-it-forward group (66 [88%] of 75 children and 45 [60%] of 75 older adults) received an influenza vaccine. People in the pay-it-forward group were more likely to receive an influenza vaccine compared with those in the standard-of-care group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6·7 [95% CI 2·7-16·6] among children and 5·0 [2·3-10·8] among older adults). People in the pay-it-forward group had greater confidence in vaccine safety (aOR 2·2 [95% CI 1·2-3·9]), importance (3·1 [1·6-5·9]), and effectiveness (3·1 [1·7-5·7]). In the pay-it-forward group, 107 (96%) of 111 participants donated money for subsequent vaccinations. The pay-it-forward group had a lower economic cost (calculated as the cost without subtraction of donations) per person vaccinated (US$45·60) than did the standard-of-care group ($64·67). INTERPRETATION: The pay-it-forward intervention seemed to be effective in improving influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement. Our data have implications for prosocial interventions to enhance influenza vaccine uptake in countries where influenza vaccines are available for a fee. FUNDING: Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK National Institute for Health Research.</description><issn>1473-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVj0tOwzAQhrMAiUK5w6yRgpwHjcq2KuIA7KORPUmGOrbxow8Oy1lwqx4AVrOY73_dFIuq7ZqyEev1XXEfwqcQVVeJdlH8bIeBZOQ9GQoB7AAIDk8lx3Kw_oBeAZtIPv8jWwPSzg49KThwnCAF8qVDVrBHKdnghYkWeHbe7ilrB53IfOMVIEgu4o4AjTp7zclwPAGZEUeacwbgbM0IcmKtPJkLZ7UiD6iSjiE7wmbKSa-56FfCwCUdHXk-i1GD8zjOuYaE6Bn1srgdUAd6vN6H4ult-7F5L3dJU8qjehUcSupr0b8I0Vf1uq37TqxEvWr-CT__Ge7jMTa_BQCF0A</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Wu, Dan</creator><creator>Jin, Chenqi</creator><creator>Bessame, Khaoula</creator><creator>Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi</creator><creator>Ong, Jason J</creator><creator>Wang, Zaisheng</creator><creator>Xie, Yewei</creator><creator>Jit, Mark</creator><creator>Larson, Heidi J</creator><creator>Chantler, Tracey</creator><creator>Lin, Leesa</creator><creator>Gong, Wenfeng</creator><creator>Yang, Fan</creator><creator>Jing, Fengshi</creator><creator>Wei, Shufang</creator><creator>Cheng, Weibin</creator><creator>Zhou, Yi</creator><creator>Ren, Nina</creator><creator>Qiu, Shuhao</creator><creator>Bao, Jianmin</creator><creator>Wen, Liufen</creator><creator>Yang, Qinlu</creator><creator>Tian, Junzhang</creator><creator>Tang, Weiming</creator><creator>Tucker, Joseph D</creator><general>ELSEVIER SCI LTD</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial</title><author>Wu, Dan ; Jin, Chenqi ; Bessame, Khaoula ; Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi ; Ong, Jason J ; Wang, Zaisheng ; Xie, Yewei ; Jit, Mark ; Larson, Heidi J ; Chantler, Tracey ; Lin, Leesa ; Gong, Wenfeng ; Yang, Fan ; Jing, Fengshi ; Wei, Shufang ; Cheng, Weibin ; Zhou, Yi ; Ren, Nina ; Qiu, Shuhao ; Bao, Jianmin ; Wen, Liufen ; Yang, Qinlu ; Tian, Junzhang ; Tang, Weiming ; Tucker, Joseph D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_7060263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Chenqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessame, Khaoula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ong, Jason J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zaisheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yewei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jit, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Heidi J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantler, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Leesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Wenfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Fengshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Shufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Weibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Shuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Jianmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Liufen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qinlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Junzhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Weiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Dan</au><au>Jin, Chenqi</au><au>Bessame, Khaoula</au><au>Tang, Fanny Fong-Yi</au><au>Ong, Jason J</au><au>Wang, Zaisheng</au><au>Xie, Yewei</au><au>Jit, Mark</au><au>Larson, Heidi J</au><au>Chantler, Tracey</au><au>Lin, Leesa</au><au>Gong, Wenfeng</au><au>Yang, Fan</au><au>Jing, Fengshi</au><au>Wei, Shufang</au><au>Cheng, Weibin</au><au>Zhou, Yi</au><au>Ren, Nina</au><au>Qiu, Shuhao</au><au>Bao, Jianmin</au><au>Wen, Liufen</au><au>Yang, Qinlu</au><au>Tian, Junzhang</au><au>Tang, Weiming</au><au>Tucker, Joseph D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial</atitle><jtitle>LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1484</spage><epage>1492</epage><pages>1484-1492</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: China has low seasonal influenza vaccination rates among priority populations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a pay-it-forward strategy to increase influenza vaccine uptake in rural, suburban, and urban settings in China. METHODS: We performed a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial to examine the effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention (a free influenza vaccine and an opportunity to donate financially to support vaccination of other individuals) to increase influenza vaccine uptake compared with standard-of-care user-paid vaccination among children (aged between 6 months and 8 years) and older people (≥60 years) in China. Recruitment took place in the standard-of-care group until the expected sample size was reached and then in the pay-it-forward group in primary care clinics from a rural site (Yangshan), a suburban site (Zengcheng), and an urban site (Tianhe). Participants were introduced to the influenza vaccine by project staff using a pamphlet about influenza vaccination and were either asked to pay out-of-pocket at the standard market price (US$8·5-23·2; standard-of-care group) or to donate any amount anonymously (pay-it-forward group). Participants had to be eligible to receive an influenza vaccine and to have not received an influenza vaccine in the past year. The primary outcome was vaccine uptake. Secondary outcomes were vaccine confidence and costs (from the health-care provider perspective). Regression methods compared influenza vaccine uptake and vaccine confidence between the two groups. This trial is registered with ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000040048. FINDINGS: From Sept 21, 2020, to March 3, 2021, 300 enrolees were recruited from patients visiting three primary care clinics. 55 (37%) of 150 people in the standard-of-care group (40 [53%] of 75 children and 15 [20%] of 75 older adults) and 111 (74%) of 150 in the pay-it-forward group (66 [88%] of 75 children and 45 [60%] of 75 older adults) received an influenza vaccine. People in the pay-it-forward group were more likely to receive an influenza vaccine compared with those in the standard-of-care group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6·7 [95% CI 2·7-16·6] among children and 5·0 [2·3-10·8] among older adults). People in the pay-it-forward group had greater confidence in vaccine safety (aOR 2·2 [95% CI 1·2-3·9]), importance (3·1 [1·6-5·9]), and effectiveness (3·1 [1·7-5·7]). In the pay-it-forward group, 107 (96%) of 111 participants donated money for subsequent vaccinations. The pay-it-forward group had a lower economic cost (calculated as the cost without subtraction of donations) per person vaccinated (US$45·60) than did the standard-of-care group ($64·67). INTERPRETATION: The pay-it-forward intervention seemed to be effective in improving influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement. Our data have implications for prosocial interventions to enhance influenza vaccine uptake in countries where influenza vaccines are available for a fee. FUNDING: Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK National Institute for Health Research.</abstract><pub>ELSEVIER SCI LTD</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-3099
ispartof LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1484-1492
issn 1473-3099
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_706026
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Effectiveness of a pay-it-forward intervention compared with user-paid vaccination to improve influenza vaccine uptake and community engagement among children and older adults in China: a quasi-experimental pragmatic trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T06%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20pay-it-forward%20intervention%20compared%20with%20user-paid%20vaccination%20to%20improve%20influenza%20vaccine%20uptake%20and%20community%20engagement%20among%20children%20and%20older%20adults%20in%20China:%20a%20quasi-experimental%20pragmatic%20trial&rft.jtitle=LANCET%20INFECTIOUS%20DISEASES&rft.au=Wu,%20Dan&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1484&rft.epage=1492&rft.pages=1484-1492&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_706026%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true