A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)

PURPOSE: ATHENA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522246) was designed to evaluate rucaparib first-line maintenance treatment in a broad patient population, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 2022-12, Vol.40 (34), p.3952-3964
Hauptverfasser: Monk, Bradley J, Parkinson, Christine, Lim, Myong Cheol, O'Malley, David M, Oaknin, Ana, Wilson, Michelle K, Coleman, Robert L, Lorusso, Domenica, Bessette, Paul, Ghamande, Sharad, Christopoulou, Athina, Provencher, Diane, Prendergast, Emily, Demirkiran, Fuat, Mikheeva, Olga, Yeku, Oladapo, Chudecka-Glaz, Anita, Schenker, Michael, Littell, Ramey D, Safra, Tamar, Chou, Hung-Hsueh, Morgan, Mark A, Drochytek, Vit, Barlin, Joyce N, Van Gorp, Toon, Ueland, Fred, Lindahl, Gabriel, Anderson, Charles, Collins, Dearbhaile C, Moore, Kathleen, Marme, Frederik, Westin, Shannon N, McNeish, Iain A, Shih, Danny, Lin, Kevin K, Goble, Sandra, Hume, Stephanie, Fujiwara, Keiichi, Kristeleit, Rebecca S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3964
container_issue 34
container_start_page 3952
container_title JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
container_volume 40
creator Monk, Bradley J
Parkinson, Christine
Lim, Myong Cheol
O'Malley, David M
Oaknin, Ana
Wilson, Michelle K
Coleman, Robert L
Lorusso, Domenica
Bessette, Paul
Ghamande, Sharad
Christopoulou, Athina
Provencher, Diane
Prendergast, Emily
Demirkiran, Fuat
Mikheeva, Olga
Yeku, Oladapo
Chudecka-Glaz, Anita
Schenker, Michael
Littell, Ramey D
Safra, Tamar
Chou, Hung-Hsueh
Morgan, Mark A
Drochytek, Vit
Barlin, Joyce N
Van Gorp, Toon
Ueland, Fred
Lindahl, Gabriel
Anderson, Charles
Collins, Dearbhaile C
Moore, Kathleen
Marme, Frederik
Westin, Shannon N
McNeish, Iain A
Shih, Danny
Lin, Kevin K
Goble, Sandra
Hume, Stephanie
Fujiwara, Keiichi
Kristeleit, Rebecca S
description PURPOSE: ATHENA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522246) was designed to evaluate rucaparib first-line maintenance treatment in a broad patient population, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. We report the results from the ATHENA-MONO comparison of rucaparib versus placebo. METHODS: Patients with stage III-IV high-grade ovarian cancer undergoing surgical cytoreduction (R0/complete resection permitted) and responding to first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomly assigned 4:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice a day or placebo. Stratification factors were HRD test status, residual disease after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery. The primary end point of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was assessed in a step-down procedure, first in the HRD population (BRCA-mutant or BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity high tumor), and then in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: As of March 23, 2022 (data cutoff), 427 and 111 patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib or placebo, respectively (HRD population: 185 v 49). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 28.7 months (23.0 to not reached) with rucaparib versus 11.3 months (9.1 to 22.1) with placebo in the HRD population (log-rank P = .0004; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.72); 20.2 months (15.2 to 24.7) versus 9.2 months (8.3 to 12.2) in the intent-to-treat population (log-rank P < .0001; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68); and 12.1 months (11.1 to 17.7) versus 9.1 months (4.0 to 12.2) in the HRD-negative population (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.95). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (rucaparib, 28.7% v placebo, 0%) and neutropenia (14.6% v 0.9%). CONCLUSION: Rucaparib monotherapy is effective as first-line maintenance, conferring significant benefit versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with and without HRD.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_698845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_698845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_6988453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjM1Og0AURlloYv15h7tUI3ZgQOmSVKQsgKYh0d3kClcZpTMNM6D1kXxKMfEBdPWdxTnfgTNjt9x3vYg_HjnHxrwy5gURD2fOVwwbVI3eyk9qrmDdoiHIsgyqXmIHVkMyYjegJdgMNe6wl0-Qa6VtSz3u9oAGcpTKkkJV05QR2i0pC1LBGq2c0MCDtC0U9N7t4U7ii9KGGijH6QwVLH_CHs7japUUsZuXRTlPy9TlzGfzpEjLytVjEF6cOofP2Bk6-90T5_I-qZYr923oaBhJicbssCbhMxEyJjx_EfjiZhFFQcj_KV__WRb2w_Jv0EpsNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Monk, Bradley J ; Parkinson, Christine ; Lim, Myong Cheol ; O'Malley, David M ; Oaknin, Ana ; Wilson, Michelle K ; Coleman, Robert L ; Lorusso, Domenica ; Bessette, Paul ; Ghamande, Sharad ; Christopoulou, Athina ; Provencher, Diane ; Prendergast, Emily ; Demirkiran, Fuat ; Mikheeva, Olga ; Yeku, Oladapo ; Chudecka-Glaz, Anita ; Schenker, Michael ; Littell, Ramey D ; Safra, Tamar ; Chou, Hung-Hsueh ; Morgan, Mark A ; Drochytek, Vit ; Barlin, Joyce N ; Van Gorp, Toon ; Ueland, Fred ; Lindahl, Gabriel ; Anderson, Charles ; Collins, Dearbhaile C ; Moore, Kathleen ; Marme, Frederik ; Westin, Shannon N ; McNeish, Iain A ; Shih, Danny ; Lin, Kevin K ; Goble, Sandra ; Hume, Stephanie ; Fujiwara, Keiichi ; Kristeleit, Rebecca S</creator><creatorcontrib>Monk, Bradley J ; Parkinson, Christine ; Lim, Myong Cheol ; O'Malley, David M ; Oaknin, Ana ; Wilson, Michelle K ; Coleman, Robert L ; Lorusso, Domenica ; Bessette, Paul ; Ghamande, Sharad ; Christopoulou, Athina ; Provencher, Diane ; Prendergast, Emily ; Demirkiran, Fuat ; Mikheeva, Olga ; Yeku, Oladapo ; Chudecka-Glaz, Anita ; Schenker, Michael ; Littell, Ramey D ; Safra, Tamar ; Chou, Hung-Hsueh ; Morgan, Mark A ; Drochytek, Vit ; Barlin, Joyce N ; Van Gorp, Toon ; Ueland, Fred ; Lindahl, Gabriel ; Anderson, Charles ; Collins, Dearbhaile C ; Moore, Kathleen ; Marme, Frederik ; Westin, Shannon N ; McNeish, Iain A ; Shih, Danny ; Lin, Kevin K ; Goble, Sandra ; Hume, Stephanie ; Fujiwara, Keiichi ; Kristeleit, Rebecca S</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE: ATHENA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522246) was designed to evaluate rucaparib first-line maintenance treatment in a broad patient population, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. We report the results from the ATHENA-MONO comparison of rucaparib versus placebo. METHODS: Patients with stage III-IV high-grade ovarian cancer undergoing surgical cytoreduction (R0/complete resection permitted) and responding to first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomly assigned 4:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice a day or placebo. Stratification factors were HRD test status, residual disease after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery. The primary end point of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was assessed in a step-down procedure, first in the HRD population (BRCA-mutant or BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity high tumor), and then in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: As of March 23, 2022 (data cutoff), 427 and 111 patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib or placebo, respectively (HRD population: 185 v 49). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 28.7 months (23.0 to not reached) with rucaparib versus 11.3 months (9.1 to 22.1) with placebo in the HRD population (log-rank P = .0004; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.72); 20.2 months (15.2 to 24.7) versus 9.2 months (8.3 to 12.2) in the intent-to-treat population (log-rank P &lt; .0001; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68); and 12.1 months (11.1 to 17.7) versus 9.1 months (4.0 to 12.2) in the HRD-negative population (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.95). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (rucaparib, 28.7% v placebo, 0%) and neutropenia (14.6% v 0.9%). CONCLUSION: Rucaparib monotherapy is effective as first-line maintenance, conferring significant benefit versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with and without HRD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</publisher><ispartof>JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022-12, Vol.40 (34), p.3952-3964</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monk, Bradley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Myong Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oaknin, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Michelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorusso, Domenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessette, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghamande, Sharad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopoulou, Athina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provencher, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkiran, Fuat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikheeva, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeku, Oladapo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudecka-Glaz, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Littell, Ramey D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safra, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Hung-Hsueh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drochytek, Vit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlin, Joyce N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gorp, Toon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueland, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindahl, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Dearbhaile C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marme, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westin, Shannon N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeish, Iain A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Kevin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goble, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hume, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristeleit, Rebecca S</creatorcontrib><title>A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)</title><title>JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY</title><description>PURPOSE: ATHENA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522246) was designed to evaluate rucaparib first-line maintenance treatment in a broad patient population, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. We report the results from the ATHENA-MONO comparison of rucaparib versus placebo. METHODS: Patients with stage III-IV high-grade ovarian cancer undergoing surgical cytoreduction (R0/complete resection permitted) and responding to first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomly assigned 4:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice a day or placebo. Stratification factors were HRD test status, residual disease after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery. The primary end point of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was assessed in a step-down procedure, first in the HRD population (BRCA-mutant or BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity high tumor), and then in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: As of March 23, 2022 (data cutoff), 427 and 111 patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib or placebo, respectively (HRD population: 185 v 49). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 28.7 months (23.0 to not reached) with rucaparib versus 11.3 months (9.1 to 22.1) with placebo in the HRD population (log-rank P = .0004; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.72); 20.2 months (15.2 to 24.7) versus 9.2 months (8.3 to 12.2) in the intent-to-treat population (log-rank P &lt; .0001; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68); and 12.1 months (11.1 to 17.7) versus 9.1 months (4.0 to 12.2) in the HRD-negative population (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.95). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (rucaparib, 28.7% v placebo, 0%) and neutropenia (14.6% v 0.9%). CONCLUSION: Rucaparib monotherapy is effective as first-line maintenance, conferring significant benefit versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with and without HRD.</description><issn>0732-183X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjM1Og0AURlloYv15h7tUI3ZgQOmSVKQsgKYh0d3kClcZpTMNM6D1kXxKMfEBdPWdxTnfgTNjt9x3vYg_HjnHxrwy5gURD2fOVwwbVI3eyk9qrmDdoiHIsgyqXmIHVkMyYjegJdgMNe6wl0-Qa6VtSz3u9oAGcpTKkkJV05QR2i0pC1LBGq2c0MCDtC0U9N7t4U7ii9KGGijH6QwVLH_CHs7japUUsZuXRTlPy9TlzGfzpEjLytVjEF6cOofP2Bk6-90T5_I-qZYr923oaBhJicbssCbhMxEyJjx_EfjiZhFFQcj_KV__WRb2w_Jv0EpsNg</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Monk, Bradley J</creator><creator>Parkinson, Christine</creator><creator>Lim, Myong Cheol</creator><creator>O'Malley, David M</creator><creator>Oaknin, Ana</creator><creator>Wilson, Michelle K</creator><creator>Coleman, Robert L</creator><creator>Lorusso, Domenica</creator><creator>Bessette, Paul</creator><creator>Ghamande, Sharad</creator><creator>Christopoulou, Athina</creator><creator>Provencher, Diane</creator><creator>Prendergast, Emily</creator><creator>Demirkiran, Fuat</creator><creator>Mikheeva, Olga</creator><creator>Yeku, Oladapo</creator><creator>Chudecka-Glaz, Anita</creator><creator>Schenker, Michael</creator><creator>Littell, Ramey D</creator><creator>Safra, Tamar</creator><creator>Chou, Hung-Hsueh</creator><creator>Morgan, Mark A</creator><creator>Drochytek, Vit</creator><creator>Barlin, Joyce N</creator><creator>Van Gorp, Toon</creator><creator>Ueland, Fred</creator><creator>Lindahl, Gabriel</creator><creator>Anderson, Charles</creator><creator>Collins, Dearbhaile C</creator><creator>Moore, Kathleen</creator><creator>Marme, Frederik</creator><creator>Westin, Shannon N</creator><creator>McNeish, Iain A</creator><creator>Shih, Danny</creator><creator>Lin, Kevin K</creator><creator>Goble, Sandra</creator><creator>Hume, Stephanie</creator><creator>Fujiwara, Keiichi</creator><creator>Kristeleit, Rebecca S</creator><general>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)</title><author>Monk, Bradley J ; Parkinson, Christine ; Lim, Myong Cheol ; O'Malley, David M ; Oaknin, Ana ; Wilson, Michelle K ; Coleman, Robert L ; Lorusso, Domenica ; Bessette, Paul ; Ghamande, Sharad ; Christopoulou, Athina ; Provencher, Diane ; Prendergast, Emily ; Demirkiran, Fuat ; Mikheeva, Olga ; Yeku, Oladapo ; Chudecka-Glaz, Anita ; Schenker, Michael ; Littell, Ramey D ; Safra, Tamar ; Chou, Hung-Hsueh ; Morgan, Mark A ; Drochytek, Vit ; Barlin, Joyce N ; Van Gorp, Toon ; Ueland, Fred ; Lindahl, Gabriel ; Anderson, Charles ; Collins, Dearbhaile C ; Moore, Kathleen ; Marme, Frederik ; Westin, Shannon N ; McNeish, Iain A ; Shih, Danny ; Lin, Kevin K ; Goble, Sandra ; Hume, Stephanie ; Fujiwara, Keiichi ; Kristeleit, Rebecca S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_6988453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monk, Bradley J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Myong Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oaknin, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Michelle K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorusso, Domenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bessette, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghamande, Sharad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopoulou, Athina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provencher, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prendergast, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirkiran, Fuat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikheeva, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeku, Oladapo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudecka-Glaz, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Littell, Ramey D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safra, Tamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Hung-Hsueh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drochytek, Vit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlin, Joyce N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gorp, Toon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueland, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindahl, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Dearbhaile C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marme, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westin, Shannon N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeish, Iain A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Kevin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goble, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hume, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujiwara, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristeleit, Rebecca S</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monk, Bradley J</au><au>Parkinson, Christine</au><au>Lim, Myong Cheol</au><au>O'Malley, David M</au><au>Oaknin, Ana</au><au>Wilson, Michelle K</au><au>Coleman, Robert L</au><au>Lorusso, Domenica</au><au>Bessette, Paul</au><au>Ghamande, Sharad</au><au>Christopoulou, Athina</au><au>Provencher, Diane</au><au>Prendergast, Emily</au><au>Demirkiran, Fuat</au><au>Mikheeva, Olga</au><au>Yeku, Oladapo</au><au>Chudecka-Glaz, Anita</au><au>Schenker, Michael</au><au>Littell, Ramey D</au><au>Safra, Tamar</au><au>Chou, Hung-Hsueh</au><au>Morgan, Mark A</au><au>Drochytek, Vit</au><au>Barlin, Joyce N</au><au>Van Gorp, Toon</au><au>Ueland, Fred</au><au>Lindahl, Gabriel</au><au>Anderson, Charles</au><au>Collins, Dearbhaile C</au><au>Moore, Kathleen</au><au>Marme, Frederik</au><au>Westin, Shannon N</au><au>McNeish, Iain A</au><au>Shih, Danny</au><au>Lin, Kevin K</au><au>Goble, Sandra</au><au>Hume, Stephanie</au><au>Fujiwara, Keiichi</au><au>Kristeleit, Rebecca S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)</atitle><jtitle>JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>34</issue><spage>3952</spage><epage>3964</epage><pages>3952-3964</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><abstract>PURPOSE: ATHENA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03522246) was designed to evaluate rucaparib first-line maintenance treatment in a broad patient population, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. We report the results from the ATHENA-MONO comparison of rucaparib versus placebo. METHODS: Patients with stage III-IV high-grade ovarian cancer undergoing surgical cytoreduction (R0/complete resection permitted) and responding to first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomly assigned 4:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice a day or placebo. Stratification factors were HRD test status, residual disease after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery. The primary end point of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was assessed in a step-down procedure, first in the HRD population (BRCA-mutant or BRCA wild-type/loss of heterozygosity high tumor), and then in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: As of March 23, 2022 (data cutoff), 427 and 111 patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib or placebo, respectively (HRD population: 185 v 49). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 28.7 months (23.0 to not reached) with rucaparib versus 11.3 months (9.1 to 22.1) with placebo in the HRD population (log-rank P = .0004; hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.72); 20.2 months (15.2 to 24.7) versus 9.2 months (8.3 to 12.2) in the intent-to-treat population (log-rank P &lt; .0001; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.68); and 12.1 months (11.1 to 17.7) versus 9.1 months (4.0 to 12.2) in the HRD-negative population (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.95). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (rucaparib, 28.7% v placebo, 0%) and neutropenia (14.6% v 0.9%). CONCLUSION: Rucaparib monotherapy is effective as first-line maintenance, conferring significant benefit versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with and without HRD.</abstract><pub>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022-12, Vol.40 (34), p.3952-3964
issn 0732-183X
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_698845
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Randomized,%20Phase%20III%20Trial%20to%20Evaluate%20Rucaparib%20Monotherapy%20as%20Maintenance%20Treatment%20in%20Patients%20With%20Newly%20Diagnosed%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20(ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45)&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20CLINICAL%20ONCOLOGY&rft.au=Monk,%20Bradley%20J&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=34&rft.spage=3952&rft.epage=3964&rft.pages=3952-3964&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_698845%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true