Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HYPERTENSION 2022-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1101-1111
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Yi-Bang, Thijs, Lutgarde, Aparicio, Lucas S, Huang, Qi-Fang, Wei, Fang-Fei, Yu, Yu-Ling, Barochiner, Jessica, Sheng, Chang-Sheng, Yang, Wen-Yi, Niiranen, Teemu J, Boggia, Jose, Zhang, Zhen-Yu, Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna, Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza, Tikhonoff, Valerie, Wojciechowska, Wiktoria, Casiglia, Edoardo, Narkiewicz, Krzysztof, Filipovsky, Jan, Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina, Wang, Ji-Guang, Li, Yan, Staessen, Jan A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1111
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1101
container_title HYPERTENSION
container_volume 79
creator Cheng, Yi-Bang
Thijs, Lutgarde
Aparicio, Lucas S
Huang, Qi-Fang
Wei, Fang-Fei
Yu, Yu-Ling
Barochiner, Jessica
Sheng, Chang-Sheng
Yang, Wen-Yi
Niiranen, Teemu J
Boggia, Jose
Zhang, Zhen-Yu
Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Tikhonoff, Valerie
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Casiglia, Edoardo
Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
Filipovsky, Jan
Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina
Wang, Ji-Guang
Li, Yan
Staessen, Jan A
description BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. RESULTS: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1-111.8), 120.2 (119.4-121.0), 130.0 (129.6-130.3), and 149.5 (148.4-150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58-2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21-4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41-2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37-10.06) and 2.60 (1.35-5.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_692887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_692887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_6928873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyj0LwjAYBOAMCtaP_5BZqCRptO3aojiKdRAcQmxTjA2N5E3F_ns7CK663HHHM0IBoSkPU0rPEzQFuBNCOedxgC5HDQ0uvJNe17oc0rb42uPcWYAwNxLg-9sa56odrMGyrXDmZHnTwyh68NboEmfG2gofnALonJqjcS0NqMWnZ2i5257yfdh0RnVP1YoKHrJUghGxJkRQlnImNilLkjj6E69-xsK_fPQGXEpT9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cheng, Yi-Bang ; Thijs, Lutgarde ; Aparicio, Lucas S ; Huang, Qi-Fang ; Wei, Fang-Fei ; Yu, Yu-Ling ; Barochiner, Jessica ; Sheng, Chang-Sheng ; Yang, Wen-Yi ; Niiranen, Teemu J ; Boggia, Jose ; Zhang, Zhen-Yu ; Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna ; Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza ; Tikhonoff, Valerie ; Wojciechowska, Wiktoria ; Casiglia, Edoardo ; Narkiewicz, Krzysztof ; Filipovsky, Jan ; Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina ; Wang, Ji-Guang ; Li, Yan ; Staessen, Jan A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yi-Bang ; Thijs, Lutgarde ; Aparicio, Lucas S ; Huang, Qi-Fang ; Wei, Fang-Fei ; Yu, Yu-Ling ; Barochiner, Jessica ; Sheng, Chang-Sheng ; Yang, Wen-Yi ; Niiranen, Teemu J ; Boggia, Jose ; Zhang, Zhen-Yu ; Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna ; Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza ; Tikhonoff, Valerie ; Wojciechowska, Wiktoria ; Casiglia, Edoardo ; Narkiewicz, Krzysztof ; Filipovsky, Jan ; Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina ; Wang, Ji-Guang ; Li, Yan ; Staessen, Jan A</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. RESULTS: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1-111.8), 120.2 (119.4-121.0), 130.0 (129.6-130.3), and 149.5 (148.4-150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58-2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21-4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41-2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37-10.06) and 2.60 (1.35-5.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-911X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</publisher><ispartof>HYPERTENSION, 2022-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1101-1111</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yi-Bang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijs, Lutgarde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aparicio, Lucas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qi-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Fang-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yu-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barochiner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Chang-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wen-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niiranen, Teemu J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggia, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhen-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonoff, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casiglia, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narkiewicz, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipovsky, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ji-Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staessen, Jan A</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure</title><title>HYPERTENSION</title><description>BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. RESULTS: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1-111.8), 120.2 (119.4-121.0), 130.0 (129.6-130.3), and 149.5 (148.4-150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58-2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21-4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41-2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37-10.06) and 2.60 (1.35-5.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.</description><issn>0194-911X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyj0LwjAYBOAMCtaP_5BZqCRptO3aojiKdRAcQmxTjA2N5E3F_ns7CK663HHHM0IBoSkPU0rPEzQFuBNCOedxgC5HDQ0uvJNe17oc0rb42uPcWYAwNxLg-9sa56odrMGyrXDmZHnTwyh68NboEmfG2gofnALonJqjcS0NqMWnZ2i5257yfdh0RnVP1YoKHrJUghGxJkRQlnImNilLkjj6E69-xsK_fPQGXEpT9Q</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Cheng, Yi-Bang</creator><creator>Thijs, Lutgarde</creator><creator>Aparicio, Lucas S</creator><creator>Huang, Qi-Fang</creator><creator>Wei, Fang-Fei</creator><creator>Yu, Yu-Ling</creator><creator>Barochiner, Jessica</creator><creator>Sheng, Chang-Sheng</creator><creator>Yang, Wen-Yi</creator><creator>Niiranen, Teemu J</creator><creator>Boggia, Jose</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhen-Yu</creator><creator>Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna</creator><creator>Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza</creator><creator>Tikhonoff, Valerie</creator><creator>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</creator><creator>Casiglia, Edoardo</creator><creator>Narkiewicz, Krzysztof</creator><creator>Filipovsky, Jan</creator><creator>Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina</creator><creator>Wang, Ji-Guang</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Staessen, Jan A</creator><general>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure</title><author>Cheng, Yi-Bang ; Thijs, Lutgarde ; Aparicio, Lucas S ; Huang, Qi-Fang ; Wei, Fang-Fei ; Yu, Yu-Ling ; Barochiner, Jessica ; Sheng, Chang-Sheng ; Yang, Wen-Yi ; Niiranen, Teemu J ; Boggia, Jose ; Zhang, Zhen-Yu ; Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna ; Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza ; Tikhonoff, Valerie ; Wojciechowska, Wiktoria ; Casiglia, Edoardo ; Narkiewicz, Krzysztof ; Filipovsky, Jan ; Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina ; Wang, Ji-Guang ; Li, Yan ; Staessen, Jan A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_6928873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yi-Bang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijs, Lutgarde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aparicio, Lucas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Qi-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Fang-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yu-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barochiner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng, Chang-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wen-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niiranen, Teemu J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggia, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhen-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonoff, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casiglia, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narkiewicz, Krzysztof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipovsky, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ji-Guang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staessen, Jan A</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>HYPERTENSION</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Yi-Bang</au><au>Thijs, Lutgarde</au><au>Aparicio, Lucas S</au><au>Huang, Qi-Fang</au><au>Wei, Fang-Fei</au><au>Yu, Yu-Ling</au><au>Barochiner, Jessica</au><au>Sheng, Chang-Sheng</au><au>Yang, Wen-Yi</au><au>Niiranen, Teemu J</au><au>Boggia, Jose</au><au>Zhang, Zhen-Yu</au><au>Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna</au><au>Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza</au><au>Tikhonoff, Valerie</au><au>Wojciechowska, Wiktoria</au><au>Casiglia, Edoardo</au><au>Narkiewicz, Krzysztof</au><au>Filipovsky, Jan</au><au>Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina</au><au>Wang, Ji-Guang</au><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Staessen, Jan A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure</atitle><jtitle>HYPERTENSION</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1101</spage><epage>1111</epage><pages>1101-1111</pages><issn>0194-911X</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. RESULTS: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1-111.8), 120.2 (119.4-121.0), 130.0 (129.6-130.3), and 149.5 (148.4-150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58-2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21-4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41-2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37-10.06) and 2.60 (1.35-5.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.</abstract><pub>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-911X
ispartof HYPERTENSION, 2022-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1101-1111
issn 0194-911X
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_692887
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Stratification%20by%20Cross-Classification%20of%20Central%20and%20Brachial%20Systolic%20Blood%20Pressure&rft.jtitle=HYPERTENSION&rft.au=Cheng,%20Yi-Bang&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1101&rft.epage=1111&rft.pages=1101-1111&rft.issn=0194-911X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_692887%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true