Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND: In patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the optimal level of pharmacologic support is unknown. Whereas higher doses may increase myocardial oxygen consumption and induce arrhythmias, diastolic hypotension may reduce coronary perfusion and increase infarct size. OB...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 2020-08, Vol.76 (7), p.812-824
Hauptverfasser: Ameloot, Koen, Jakkula, Pekka, Haestbacka, Johanna, Reinikainen, Matti, Pettila, Ville, Loisa, Pekka, Tiainen, Marjaana, Bendel, Stepani, Birkelund, Thomas, Belmans, Ann, Palmers, Pieter-Jan, Bogaerts, Eline, Lemmens, Robin, De Deyne, Cathy, Ferdinande, Bert, Dupont, Matthias, Janssens, Stefan, Dens, Joseph, Skrifvars, Markus B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 824
container_issue 7
container_start_page 812
container_title JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
container_volume 76
creator Ameloot, Koen
Jakkula, Pekka
Haestbacka, Johanna
Reinikainen, Matti
Pettila, Ville
Loisa, Pekka
Tiainen, Marjaana
Bendel, Stepani
Birkelund, Thomas
Belmans, Ann
Palmers, Pieter-Jan
Bogaerts, Eline
Lemmens, Robin
De Deyne, Cathy
Ferdinande, Bert
Dupont, Matthias
Janssens, Stefan
Dens, Joseph
Skrifvars, Markus B
description BACKGROUND: In patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the optimal level of pharmacologic support is unknown. Whereas higher doses may increase myocardial oxygen consumption and induce arrhythmias, diastolic hypotension may reduce coronary perfusion and increase infarct size. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with AMI and shock after cardiac arrest. METHODS: This study used patient-level pooled analysis of post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI randomized in the Neuroprotect (Neuroprotective Goal Directed Hemodynamic Optimization in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients; NCT02541591) and COMACARE (Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen and Mean Arterial Pressure After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation; NCT02698917) trials who were randomized to MAP 65 mm Hg or MAP 80/85 to 100 mm Hg targets during the first 36 h after admission. The primary endpoint was the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve. RESULTS: Of 235 patients originally randomized, 120 patients had AMI with shock. Patients assigned to the higher MAP target (n = 58) received higher doses of norepinephrine (p = 0.004) and dobutamine (p = 0.01) and reached higher MAPs (86 ± 9 mm Hg vs. 72 ± 10 mm Hg, p 
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_686731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20_500_12942_686731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_6867313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjMuqwjAUALNQ8HH9h7MWlLS9tnZZRdGFWFC4y5CbnmK0JpKciP69In6ArgaGYVqsy7NkMop4nnVYz_sj5zydRnmX_W8vpM_hDLPG2gpKh94Hh6ANlJI0GvLwp-kAu4NVJyhqQgeFCoSwuVslXaVlA2tTS6dIWwPSVDB_aQWFe-7oh7Vr2XgcvNlnw-ViP1-NTqHBcEUjKn-RCkXMxYRzEcX5byzSaZolUdJn449jQTdKvro_AHosVac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ameloot, Koen ; Jakkula, Pekka ; Haestbacka, Johanna ; Reinikainen, Matti ; Pettila, Ville ; Loisa, Pekka ; Tiainen, Marjaana ; Bendel, Stepani ; Birkelund, Thomas ; Belmans, Ann ; Palmers, Pieter-Jan ; Bogaerts, Eline ; Lemmens, Robin ; De Deyne, Cathy ; Ferdinande, Bert ; Dupont, Matthias ; Janssens, Stefan ; Dens, Joseph ; Skrifvars, Markus B</creator><creatorcontrib>Ameloot, Koen ; Jakkula, Pekka ; Haestbacka, Johanna ; Reinikainen, Matti ; Pettila, Ville ; Loisa, Pekka ; Tiainen, Marjaana ; Bendel, Stepani ; Birkelund, Thomas ; Belmans, Ann ; Palmers, Pieter-Jan ; Bogaerts, Eline ; Lemmens, Robin ; De Deyne, Cathy ; Ferdinande, Bert ; Dupont, Matthias ; Janssens, Stefan ; Dens, Joseph ; Skrifvars, Markus B</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: In patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the optimal level of pharmacologic support is unknown. Whereas higher doses may increase myocardial oxygen consumption and induce arrhythmias, diastolic hypotension may reduce coronary perfusion and increase infarct size. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with AMI and shock after cardiac arrest. METHODS: This study used patient-level pooled analysis of post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI randomized in the Neuroprotect (Neuroprotective Goal Directed Hemodynamic Optimization in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients; NCT02541591) and COMACARE (Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen and Mean Arterial Pressure After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation; NCT02698917) trials who were randomized to MAP 65 mm Hg or MAP 80/85 to 100 mm Hg targets during the first 36 h after admission. The primary endpoint was the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve. RESULTS: Of 235 patients originally randomized, 120 patients had AMI with shock. Patients assigned to the higher MAP target (n = 58) received higher doses of norepinephrine (p = 0.004) and dobutamine (p = 0.01) and reached higher MAPs (86 ± 9 mm Hg vs. 72 ± 10 mm Hg, p &lt; 0.001). Whereas admission hemodynamics and angiographic findings were all well-balanced and revascularization was performed equally effective, the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve was lower in patients assigned to the higher MAP target (median: 1.14 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.35 to 2.31 μg.72 h/l] vs. median: 1.56 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.61 to 4.72 μg. 72 h/l]; p = 0.04). Additional pharmacologic support did not increase the risk of a new cardiac arrest (p = 0.88) or atrial fibrillation (p = 0.94). Survival with good neurologic outcome at 180 days was not different between both groups (64% vs. 53%, odds ratio: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 3.22). CONCLUSIONS: In post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI, targeting MAP between 80/85 and 100 mm Hg with additional use of inotropes and vasopressors was associated with smaller myocardial injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC</publisher><ispartof>JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020-08, Vol.76 (7), p.812-824</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ameloot, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakkula, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haestbacka, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinikainen, Matti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettila, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loisa, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiainen, Marjaana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendel, Stepani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkelund, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belmans, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmers, Pieter-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogaerts, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemmens, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Deyne, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferdinande, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dens, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skrifvars, Markus B</creatorcontrib><title>Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest</title><title>JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY</title><description>BACKGROUND: In patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the optimal level of pharmacologic support is unknown. Whereas higher doses may increase myocardial oxygen consumption and induce arrhythmias, diastolic hypotension may reduce coronary perfusion and increase infarct size. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with AMI and shock after cardiac arrest. METHODS: This study used patient-level pooled analysis of post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI randomized in the Neuroprotect (Neuroprotective Goal Directed Hemodynamic Optimization in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients; NCT02541591) and COMACARE (Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen and Mean Arterial Pressure After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation; NCT02698917) trials who were randomized to MAP 65 mm Hg or MAP 80/85 to 100 mm Hg targets during the first 36 h after admission. The primary endpoint was the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve. RESULTS: Of 235 patients originally randomized, 120 patients had AMI with shock. Patients assigned to the higher MAP target (n = 58) received higher doses of norepinephrine (p = 0.004) and dobutamine (p = 0.01) and reached higher MAPs (86 ± 9 mm Hg vs. 72 ± 10 mm Hg, p &lt; 0.001). Whereas admission hemodynamics and angiographic findings were all well-balanced and revascularization was performed equally effective, the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve was lower in patients assigned to the higher MAP target (median: 1.14 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.35 to 2.31 μg.72 h/l] vs. median: 1.56 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.61 to 4.72 μg. 72 h/l]; p = 0.04). Additional pharmacologic support did not increase the risk of a new cardiac arrest (p = 0.88) or atrial fibrillation (p = 0.94). Survival with good neurologic outcome at 180 days was not different between both groups (64% vs. 53%, odds ratio: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 3.22). CONCLUSIONS: In post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI, targeting MAP between 80/85 and 100 mm Hg with additional use of inotropes and vasopressors was associated with smaller myocardial injury.</description><issn>0735-1097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjMuqwjAUALNQ8HH9h7MWlLS9tnZZRdGFWFC4y5CbnmK0JpKciP69In6ArgaGYVqsy7NkMop4nnVYz_sj5zydRnmX_W8vpM_hDLPG2gpKh94Hh6ANlJI0GvLwp-kAu4NVJyhqQgeFCoSwuVslXaVlA2tTS6dIWwPSVDB_aQWFe-7oh7Vr2XgcvNlnw-ViP1-NTqHBcEUjKn-RCkXMxYRzEcX5byzSaZolUdJn449jQTdKvro_AHosVac</recordid><startdate>20200818</startdate><enddate>20200818</enddate><creator>Ameloot, Koen</creator><creator>Jakkula, Pekka</creator><creator>Haestbacka, Johanna</creator><creator>Reinikainen, Matti</creator><creator>Pettila, Ville</creator><creator>Loisa, Pekka</creator><creator>Tiainen, Marjaana</creator><creator>Bendel, Stepani</creator><creator>Birkelund, Thomas</creator><creator>Belmans, Ann</creator><creator>Palmers, Pieter-Jan</creator><creator>Bogaerts, Eline</creator><creator>Lemmens, Robin</creator><creator>De Deyne, Cathy</creator><creator>Ferdinande, Bert</creator><creator>Dupont, Matthias</creator><creator>Janssens, Stefan</creator><creator>Dens, Joseph</creator><creator>Skrifvars, Markus B</creator><general>ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200818</creationdate><title>Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest</title><author>Ameloot, Koen ; Jakkula, Pekka ; Haestbacka, Johanna ; Reinikainen, Matti ; Pettila, Ville ; Loisa, Pekka ; Tiainen, Marjaana ; Bendel, Stepani ; Birkelund, Thomas ; Belmans, Ann ; Palmers, Pieter-Jan ; Bogaerts, Eline ; Lemmens, Robin ; De Deyne, Cathy ; Ferdinande, Bert ; Dupont, Matthias ; Janssens, Stefan ; Dens, Joseph ; Skrifvars, Markus B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_6867313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ameloot, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakkula, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haestbacka, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinikainen, Matti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettila, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loisa, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiainen, Marjaana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendel, Stepani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkelund, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belmans, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmers, Pieter-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogaerts, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemmens, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Deyne, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferdinande, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dens, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skrifvars, Markus B</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ameloot, Koen</au><au>Jakkula, Pekka</au><au>Haestbacka, Johanna</au><au>Reinikainen, Matti</au><au>Pettila, Ville</au><au>Loisa, Pekka</au><au>Tiainen, Marjaana</au><au>Bendel, Stepani</au><au>Birkelund, Thomas</au><au>Belmans, Ann</au><au>Palmers, Pieter-Jan</au><au>Bogaerts, Eline</au><au>Lemmens, Robin</au><au>De Deyne, Cathy</au><au>Ferdinande, Bert</au><au>Dupont, Matthias</au><au>Janssens, Stefan</au><au>Dens, Joseph</au><au>Skrifvars, Markus B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest</atitle><jtitle>JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY</jtitle><date>2020-08-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>812</spage><epage>824</epage><pages>812-824</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: In patients with shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the optimal level of pharmacologic support is unknown. Whereas higher doses may increase myocardial oxygen consumption and induce arrhythmias, diastolic hypotension may reduce coronary perfusion and increase infarct size. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with AMI and shock after cardiac arrest. METHODS: This study used patient-level pooled analysis of post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI randomized in the Neuroprotect (Neuroprotective Goal Directed Hemodynamic Optimization in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients; NCT02541591) and COMACARE (Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen and Mean Arterial Pressure After Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation; NCT02698917) trials who were randomized to MAP 65 mm Hg or MAP 80/85 to 100 mm Hg targets during the first 36 h after admission. The primary endpoint was the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve. RESULTS: Of 235 patients originally randomized, 120 patients had AMI with shock. Patients assigned to the higher MAP target (n = 58) received higher doses of norepinephrine (p = 0.004) and dobutamine (p = 0.01) and reached higher MAPs (86 ± 9 mm Hg vs. 72 ± 10 mm Hg, p &lt; 0.001). Whereas admission hemodynamics and angiographic findings were all well-balanced and revascularization was performed equally effective, the area under the 72-h high-sensitivity troponin-T curve was lower in patients assigned to the higher MAP target (median: 1.14 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.35 to 2.31 μg.72 h/l] vs. median: 1.56 μg.72 h/l [interquartile range: 0.61 to 4.72 μg. 72 h/l]; p = 0.04). Additional pharmacologic support did not increase the risk of a new cardiac arrest (p = 0.88) or atrial fibrillation (p = 0.94). Survival with good neurologic outcome at 180 days was not different between both groups (64% vs. 53%, odds ratio: 1.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 3.22). CONCLUSIONS: In post-cardiac arrest patients with shock after AMI, targeting MAP between 80/85 and 100 mm Hg with additional use of inotropes and vasopressors was associated with smaller myocardial injury.</abstract><pub>ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020-08, Vol.76 (7), p.812-824
issn 0735-1097
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_20_500_12942_686731
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Optimum Blood Pressure in Patients With Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimum%20Blood%20Pressure%20in%20Patients%20With%20Shock%20After%20Acute%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20and%20Cardiac%20Arrest&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20THE%20AMERICAN%20COLLEGE%20OF%20CARDIOLOGY&rft.au=Ameloot,%20Koen&rft.date=2020-08-18&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=812&rft.epage=824&rft.pages=812-824&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E20_500_12942_686731%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true