Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design on canal preparation by NiTi rotary techniques. METHODOLOGY: A XMCT-scanner (SkyScan 1072) and developed software (Bergmans et al. 2001) were used to nondestructively analyze the mesial c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Endodontic Journal 2002-10, Vol.35 (10), p.820-828
Hauptverfasser: Bergmans, Lars, Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan, Beullens, M, Wevers, Martine, Van Meerbeek, Bart, Lambrechts, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 828
container_issue 10
container_start_page 820
container_title International Endodontic Journal
container_volume 35
creator Bergmans, Lars
Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan
Beullens, M
Wevers, Martine
Van Meerbeek, Bart
Lambrechts, Paul
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design on canal preparation by NiTi rotary techniques. METHODOLOGY: A XMCT-scanner (SkyScan 1072) and developed software (Bergmans et al. 2001) were used to nondestructively analyze the mesial canals of 10 extracted mandibular molars in 3D with a spatial resolution of 30 microm. Specimens (n = 10 per group) were scanned before (PRE) and after (POST) preparation using Lightspeed (smooth flexible) or GT-rotary (active tapered) files. Numerical values for volumes, dentine removal (net) transportation and centring ability were obtained in addition to a visual inspection on canal aberrations. Data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test, multiway factorial anova, Tukey-Kramer test, Wilcoxon test and t-test. RESULTS: Results indicated that the active tapered shaft removed significantly more dentine in the middle to apical portion of the root compared to the smooth flexible design. Both groups demonstrated some straightening, but no significant differences were found with respect to instrument types. However, absolute values for net transportation and centering ratio were small and no canal aberrations could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The smooth flexible shaft design did not improve the morphological characteristics of canal preparation by NiTi rotary instruments when compared with the active tapered design. Therefore, system selection should be based upon other criteria.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_9801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_9801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_98013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzL0OgjAUQOEOmog_73AXBweTQkFhNhonY6I7qXCBKhTSe0v07V18AKezfDkTEcgwVtsoTZOZmBM9pZSJVGEgrreu77mBqsW3ebQIIzryBLpgMyKwHtBhCdToiqFEMrUFT8bWcDF3A65n7T5gLLHzHVqmpZhWuiVc_boQ69PxfjhvX75FP6LNSxp0gXkYqTjZ7dMsz1IZqoXY_ONyfrP69_kFOIFMfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Bergmans, Lars ; Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan ; Beullens, M ; Wevers, Martine ; Van Meerbeek, Bart ; Lambrechts, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergmans, Lars ; Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan ; Beullens, M ; Wevers, Martine ; Van Meerbeek, Bart ; Lambrechts, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design on canal preparation by NiTi rotary techniques. METHODOLOGY: A XMCT-scanner (SkyScan 1072) and developed software (Bergmans et al. 2001) were used to nondestructively analyze the mesial canals of 10 extracted mandibular molars in 3D with a spatial resolution of 30 microm. Specimens (n = 10 per group) were scanned before (PRE) and after (POST) preparation using Lightspeed (smooth flexible) or GT-rotary (active tapered) files. Numerical values for volumes, dentine removal (net) transportation and centring ability were obtained in addition to a visual inspection on canal aberrations. Data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test, multiway factorial anova, Tukey-Kramer test, Wilcoxon test and t-test. RESULTS: Results indicated that the active tapered shaft removed significantly more dentine in the middle to apical portion of the root compared to the smooth flexible design. Both groups demonstrated some straightening, but no significant differences were found with respect to instrument types. However, absolute values for net transportation and centering ratio were small and no canal aberrations could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The smooth flexible shaft design did not improve the morphological characteristics of canal preparation by NiTi rotary instruments when compared with the active tapered design. Therefore, system selection should be based upon other criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston</publisher><ispartof>International Endodontic Journal, 2002-10, Vol.35 (10), p.820-828</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27859</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergmans, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wevers, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Meerbeek, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambrechts, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments</title><title>International Endodontic Journal</title><description>AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design on canal preparation by NiTi rotary techniques. METHODOLOGY: A XMCT-scanner (SkyScan 1072) and developed software (Bergmans et al. 2001) were used to nondestructively analyze the mesial canals of 10 extracted mandibular molars in 3D with a spatial resolution of 30 microm. Specimens (n = 10 per group) were scanned before (PRE) and after (POST) preparation using Lightspeed (smooth flexible) or GT-rotary (active tapered) files. Numerical values for volumes, dentine removal (net) transportation and centring ability were obtained in addition to a visual inspection on canal aberrations. Data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test, multiway factorial anova, Tukey-Kramer test, Wilcoxon test and t-test. RESULTS: Results indicated that the active tapered shaft removed significantly more dentine in the middle to apical portion of the root compared to the smooth flexible design. Both groups demonstrated some straightening, but no significant differences were found with respect to instrument types. However, absolute values for net transportation and centering ratio were small and no canal aberrations could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The smooth flexible shaft design did not improve the morphological characteristics of canal preparation by NiTi rotary instruments when compared with the active tapered design. Therefore, system selection should be based upon other criteria.</description><issn>0143-2885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzL0OgjAUQOEOmog_73AXBweTQkFhNhonY6I7qXCBKhTSe0v07V18AKezfDkTEcgwVtsoTZOZmBM9pZSJVGEgrreu77mBqsW3ebQIIzryBLpgMyKwHtBhCdToiqFEMrUFT8bWcDF3A65n7T5gLLHzHVqmpZhWuiVc_boQ69PxfjhvX75FP6LNSxp0gXkYqTjZ7dMsz1IZqoXY_ONyfrP69_kFOIFMfg</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Bergmans, Lars</creator><creator>Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan</creator><creator>Beullens, M</creator><creator>Wevers, Martine</creator><creator>Van Meerbeek, Bart</creator><creator>Lambrechts, Paul</creator><general>Boston</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments</title><author>Bergmans, Lars ; Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan ; Beullens, M ; Wevers, Martine ; Van Meerbeek, Bart ; Lambrechts, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_98013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergmans, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wevers, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Meerbeek, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambrechts, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>International Endodontic Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergmans, Lars</au><au>Van Cleynenbreugel, Johan</au><au>Beullens, M</au><au>Wevers, Martine</au><au>Van Meerbeek, Bart</au><au>Lambrechts, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments</atitle><jtitle>International Endodontic Journal</jtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>820</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>820-828</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><abstract>AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design on canal preparation by NiTi rotary techniques. METHODOLOGY: A XMCT-scanner (SkyScan 1072) and developed software (Bergmans et al. 2001) were used to nondestructively analyze the mesial canals of 10 extracted mandibular molars in 3D with a spatial resolution of 30 microm. Specimens (n = 10 per group) were scanned before (PRE) and after (POST) preparation using Lightspeed (smooth flexible) or GT-rotary (active tapered) files. Numerical values for volumes, dentine removal (net) transportation and centring ability were obtained in addition to a visual inspection on canal aberrations. Data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test, multiway factorial anova, Tukey-Kramer test, Wilcoxon test and t-test. RESULTS: Results indicated that the active tapered shaft removed significantly more dentine in the middle to apical portion of the root compared to the smooth flexible design. Both groups demonstrated some straightening, but no significant differences were found with respect to instrument types. However, absolute values for net transportation and centering ratio were small and no canal aberrations could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The smooth flexible shaft design did not improve the morphological characteristics of canal preparation by NiTi rotary instruments when compared with the active tapered design. Therefore, system selection should be based upon other criteria.</abstract><pub>Boston</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International Endodontic Journal, 2002-10, Vol.35 (10), p.820-828
issn 0143-2885
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_9801
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A04%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smooth%20flexible%20versus%20active%20tapered%20shaft%20design%20using%20NiTi%20rotary%20instruments&rft.jtitle=International%20Endodontic%20Journal&rft.au=Bergmans,%20Lars&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=820&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=820-828&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_9801%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true