Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card for children and youth: a comparison across Europe

Objectives The Global Matrix of report card grades on physical activity serves as a public health awareness tool by summarising the status of child and youth physical activity prevalence and action. The objectives were to: (1) provide a detailed examination of the evidence informing the 'School...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public Health 2020-10, Vol.187, p.150-156
Hauptverfasser: Coppinger, Tara, Milton, Karen, Murtagh, Elaine M, Harrington, Deirdre M, Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager, Seghers, Jan, Skovgaard, Thomas, HEPA Europe Children & Youth Working Group, Chalkley, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue
container_start_page 150
container_title Public Health
container_volume 187
creator Coppinger, Tara
Milton, Karen
Murtagh, Elaine M
Harrington, Deirdre M
Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager
Seghers, Jan
Skovgaard, Thomas
HEPA Europe Children & Youth Working Group
Chalkley, Anna
description Objectives The Global Matrix of report card grades on physical activity serves as a public health awareness tool by summarising the status of child and youth physical activity prevalence and action. The objectives were to: (1) provide a detailed examination of the evidence informing the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators across all participating European Global Matrix 3.0 countries; (2) explore the comparability of the grades for these two indicators across Europe; (3) detail any limitations or issues with the methods used to assign grades; and (4) provide suggestions on how future grading of the indicators could be improved. Study design A comparative review of published methods on the grading of Global Matrix 3.0 indicators across European countries. Methods Key documents relating to the European countries involved in the 2018 Global Matrix 3.0 were collated and a template used to extract data for both the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators. Results Seventeen of the 20 European Report Card countries (85%) had a grade for schools, and 15 countries (75%) had a grade for community and environment. All countries considered between one and five factors when assigning the grade for these indicators. There were wide disparities in the number and sources of evidence used to assign the grades for both indicators, limiting the comparability of the evidence between different countries. Conclusion To enable comparability, the authors recommend moving towards an agreed standardised set of metrics for grading each indicator. Furthermore, it would be useful to develop and share common tools, methods and instruments to collect data in a uniform way across countries, where possible. Such action will ultimately make the Global Matrix a more robust and useful tool for the future.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_660942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_660942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6609423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyjkOwjAQQFEXILHeYToKFGRiEpYWsTR09NbEMYrBxNbYQcntoeAAUH3p6ffYkHMhEpHxfMBGIdw55-laZENWnKwr0MIFI5kWxIKDr7pg1MdQRfMysQPS3lEEhVTCzRGoytiSdA1Yl9C5JlY7QFDu6ZFMcB9X5EKAQ0PO6wnr39AGPf12zGbHw3V_Th6N1c1L17IMHpWWy1Sssny92co859tVKv4557-dMrZRvAFAT1MN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card for children and youth: a comparison across Europe</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Coppinger, Tara ; Milton, Karen ; Murtagh, Elaine M ; Harrington, Deirdre M ; Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager ; Seghers, Jan ; Skovgaard, Thomas ; HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group ; Chalkley, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Coppinger, Tara ; Milton, Karen ; Murtagh, Elaine M ; Harrington, Deirdre M ; Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager ; Seghers, Jan ; Skovgaard, Thomas ; HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group ; Chalkley, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The Global Matrix of report card grades on physical activity serves as a public health awareness tool by summarising the status of child and youth physical activity prevalence and action. The objectives were to: (1) provide a detailed examination of the evidence informing the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators across all participating European Global Matrix 3.0 countries; (2) explore the comparability of the grades for these two indicators across Europe; (3) detail any limitations or issues with the methods used to assign grades; and (4) provide suggestions on how future grading of the indicators could be improved. Study design A comparative review of published methods on the grading of Global Matrix 3.0 indicators across European countries. Methods Key documents relating to the European countries involved in the 2018 Global Matrix 3.0 were collated and a template used to extract data for both the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators. Results Seventeen of the 20 European Report Card countries (85%) had a grade for schools, and 15 countries (75%) had a grade for community and environment. All countries considered between one and five factors when assigning the grade for these indicators. There were wide disparities in the number and sources of evidence used to assign the grades for both indicators, limiting the comparability of the evidence between different countries. Conclusion To enable comparability, the authors recommend moving towards an agreed standardised set of metrics for grading each indicator. Furthermore, it would be useful to develop and share common tools, methods and instruments to collect data in a uniform way across countries, where possible. Such action will ultimately make the Global Matrix a more robust and useful tool for the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><ispartof>Public Health, 2020-10, Vol.187, p.150-156</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,777,781,27841</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coppinger, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milton, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtagh, Elaine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Deirdre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seghers, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skovgaard, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalkley, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card for children and youth: a comparison across Europe</title><title>Public Health</title><description>Objectives The Global Matrix of report card grades on physical activity serves as a public health awareness tool by summarising the status of child and youth physical activity prevalence and action. The objectives were to: (1) provide a detailed examination of the evidence informing the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators across all participating European Global Matrix 3.0 countries; (2) explore the comparability of the grades for these two indicators across Europe; (3) detail any limitations or issues with the methods used to assign grades; and (4) provide suggestions on how future grading of the indicators could be improved. Study design A comparative review of published methods on the grading of Global Matrix 3.0 indicators across European countries. Methods Key documents relating to the European countries involved in the 2018 Global Matrix 3.0 were collated and a template used to extract data for both the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators. Results Seventeen of the 20 European Report Card countries (85%) had a grade for schools, and 15 countries (75%) had a grade for community and environment. All countries considered between one and five factors when assigning the grade for these indicators. There were wide disparities in the number and sources of evidence used to assign the grades for both indicators, limiting the comparability of the evidence between different countries. Conclusion To enable comparability, the authors recommend moving towards an agreed standardised set of metrics for grading each indicator. Furthermore, it would be useful to develop and share common tools, methods and instruments to collect data in a uniform way across countries, where possible. Such action will ultimately make the Global Matrix a more robust and useful tool for the future.</description><issn>0033-3506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyjkOwjAQQFEXILHeYToKFGRiEpYWsTR09NbEMYrBxNbYQcntoeAAUH3p6ffYkHMhEpHxfMBGIdw55-laZENWnKwr0MIFI5kWxIKDr7pg1MdQRfMysQPS3lEEhVTCzRGoytiSdA1Yl9C5JlY7QFDu6ZFMcB9X5EKAQ0PO6wnr39AGPf12zGbHw3V_Th6N1c1L17IMHpWWy1Sssny92co859tVKv4557-dMrZRvAFAT1MN</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Coppinger, Tara</creator><creator>Milton, Karen</creator><creator>Murtagh, Elaine M</creator><creator>Harrington, Deirdre M</creator><creator>Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager</creator><creator>Seghers, Jan</creator><creator>Skovgaard, Thomas</creator><creator>HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group</creator><creator>Chalkley, Anna</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card for children and youth: a comparison across Europe</title><author>Coppinger, Tara ; Milton, Karen ; Murtagh, Elaine M ; Harrington, Deirdre M ; Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager ; Seghers, Jan ; Skovgaard, Thomas ; HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group ; Chalkley, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6609423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coppinger, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milton, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtagh, Elaine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Deirdre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seghers, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skovgaard, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalkley, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Public Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coppinger, Tara</au><au>Milton, Karen</au><au>Murtagh, Elaine M</au><au>Harrington, Deirdre M</au><au>Johansen, Danielle Louise Nørager</au><au>Seghers, Jan</au><au>Skovgaard, Thomas</au><au>HEPA Europe Children &amp; Youth Working Group</au><au>Chalkley, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card for children and youth: a comparison across Europe</atitle><jtitle>Public Health</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>187</volume><spage>150</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>150-156</pages><issn>0033-3506</issn><abstract>Objectives The Global Matrix of report card grades on physical activity serves as a public health awareness tool by summarising the status of child and youth physical activity prevalence and action. The objectives were to: (1) provide a detailed examination of the evidence informing the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators across all participating European Global Matrix 3.0 countries; (2) explore the comparability of the grades for these two indicators across Europe; (3) detail any limitations or issues with the methods used to assign grades; and (4) provide suggestions on how future grading of the indicators could be improved. Study design A comparative review of published methods on the grading of Global Matrix 3.0 indicators across European countries. Methods Key documents relating to the European countries involved in the 2018 Global Matrix 3.0 were collated and a template used to extract data for both the 'School' and 'Community and Environment' indicators. Results Seventeen of the 20 European Report Card countries (85%) had a grade for schools, and 15 countries (75%) had a grade for community and environment. All countries considered between one and five factors when assigning the grade for these indicators. There were wide disparities in the number and sources of evidence used to assign the grades for both indicators, limiting the comparability of the evidence between different countries. Conclusion To enable comparability, the authors recommend moving towards an agreed standardised set of metrics for grading each indicator. Furthermore, it would be useful to develop and share common tools, methods and instruments to collect data in a uniform way across countries, where possible. Such action will ultimately make the Global Matrix a more robust and useful tool for the future.</abstract><pub>Elsevier</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3506
ispartof Public Health, 2020-10, Vol.187, p.150-156
issn 0033-3506
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_660942
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card for children and youth: a comparison across Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A24%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Matrix%203.0%20physical%20activity%20report%20card%20for%20children%20and%20youth:%20a%20comparison%20across%20Europe&rft.jtitle=Public%20Health&rft.au=Coppinger,%20Tara&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=187&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=150-156&rft.issn=0033-3506&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_660942%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true