European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis
The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public Administration Review 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), p.765-773 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 773 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 765 |
container_title | Public Administration Review |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Bouckaert, Geert Galli, Davide Kuhlmann, Sabine Reiter, Renate Van Hecke, Steven |
description | The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_657783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_657783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6577833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyrsOgjAUgOEOmoiXdzibgyEpHG5OagjKSKJ700A1VWhJW4iPL4MPoMv3L_-MeJQi-ohxuCBLa5-UBmEQZR45FoPRveAKcm204k5OtNJ2BzhBqR1c-4mLHoVRUj2AQ8VVIzpZQ26klXZN5nfeWrH5dkW25-KWl_5raMUwCsUa2_NasCDEKE7SbM-SOE0zxH_O3W8nc2-HH4TLRoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bouckaert, Geert ; Galli, Davide ; Kuhlmann, Sabine ; Reiter, Renate ; Van Hecke, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, Geert ; Galli, Davide ; Kuhlmann, Sabine ; Reiter, Renate ; Van Hecke, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley</publisher><ispartof>Public Administration Review, 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), p.765-773</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmann, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</title><title>Public Administration Review</title><description>The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</description><issn>0033-3352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyrsOgjAUgOEOmoiXdzibgyEpHG5OagjKSKJ700A1VWhJW4iPL4MPoMv3L_-MeJQi-ohxuCBLa5-UBmEQZR45FoPRveAKcm204k5OtNJ2BzhBqR1c-4mLHoVRUj2AQ8VVIzpZQ26klXZN5nfeWrH5dkW25-KWl_5raMUwCsUa2_NasCDEKE7SbM-SOE0zxH_O3W8nc2-HH4TLRoA</recordid><startdate>20200522</startdate><enddate>20200522</enddate><creator>Bouckaert, Geert</creator><creator>Galli, Davide</creator><creator>Kuhlmann, Sabine</creator><creator>Reiter, Renate</creator><creator>Van Hecke, Steven</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200522</creationdate><title>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</title><author>Bouckaert, Geert ; Galli, Davide ; Kuhlmann, Sabine ; Reiter, Renate ; Van Hecke, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6577833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmann, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Public Administration Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouckaert, Geert</au><au>Galli, Davide</au><au>Kuhlmann, Sabine</au><au>Reiter, Renate</au><au>Van Hecke, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</atitle><jtitle>Public Administration Review</jtitle><date>2020-05-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>773</epage><pages>765-773</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><abstract>The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</abstract><pub>Wiley</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
ispartof | Public Administration Review, 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), p.765-773 |
issn | 0033-3352 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_657783 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Education Source; Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
title | European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=European%20Coronationalism?%20A%20Hot%20Spot%20Governing%20a%20Pandemic%20Crisis&rft.jtitle=Public%20Administration%20Review&rft.au=Bouckaert,%20Geert&rft.date=2020-05-22&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=773&rft.pages=765-773&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_657783%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |