European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis

The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public Administration Review 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), p.765-773
Hauptverfasser: Bouckaert, Geert, Galli, Davide, Kuhlmann, Sabine, Reiter, Renate, Van Hecke, Steven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 773
container_issue 5
container_start_page 765
container_title Public Administration Review
container_volume 80
creator Bouckaert, Geert
Galli, Davide
Kuhlmann, Sabine
Reiter, Renate
Van Hecke, Steven
description The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_657783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_657783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6577833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyrsOgjAUgOEOmoiXdzibgyEpHG5OagjKSKJ700A1VWhJW4iPL4MPoMv3L_-MeJQi-ohxuCBLa5-UBmEQZR45FoPRveAKcm204k5OtNJ2BzhBqR1c-4mLHoVRUj2AQ8VVIzpZQ26klXZN5nfeWrH5dkW25-KWl_5raMUwCsUa2_NasCDEKE7SbM-SOE0zxH_O3W8nc2-HH4TLRoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Bouckaert, Geert ; Galli, Davide ; Kuhlmann, Sabine ; Reiter, Renate ; Van Hecke, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, Geert ; Galli, Davide ; Kuhlmann, Sabine ; Reiter, Renate ; Van Hecke, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley</publisher><ispartof>Public Administration Review, 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), p.765-773</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmann, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</title><title>Public Administration Review</title><description>The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</description><issn>0033-3352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyrsOgjAUgOEOmoiXdzibgyEpHG5OagjKSKJ700A1VWhJW4iPL4MPoMv3L_-MeJQi-ohxuCBLa5-UBmEQZR45FoPRveAKcm204k5OtNJ2BzhBqR1c-4mLHoVRUj2AQ8VVIzpZQ26klXZN5nfeWrH5dkW25-KWl_5raMUwCsUa2_NasCDEKE7SbM-SOE0zxH_O3W8nc2-HH4TLRoA</recordid><startdate>20200522</startdate><enddate>20200522</enddate><creator>Bouckaert, Geert</creator><creator>Galli, Davide</creator><creator>Kuhlmann, Sabine</creator><creator>Reiter, Renate</creator><creator>Van Hecke, Steven</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200522</creationdate><title>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</title><author>Bouckaert, Geert ; Galli, Davide ; Kuhlmann, Sabine ; Reiter, Renate ; Van Hecke, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6577833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhlmann, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Public Administration Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouckaert, Geert</au><au>Galli, Davide</au><au>Kuhlmann, Sabine</au><au>Reiter, Renate</au><au>Van Hecke, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis</atitle><jtitle>Public Administration Review</jtitle><date>2020-05-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>773</epage><pages>765-773</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><abstract>The COVID-19 crisis has shown that European countries still remain poorly prepared for dealing and coping with health crises and for responding in a coordinated way to a severe influenza pandemic. Within the EU, the response to the COVID-19 virus has a striking diversity in its approach. By focusing on Belgium, France, Germany and Italy, four countries which represent different models of administrative systems in Europe, the analysis shows that major similarities and convergences have become apparent from a cross-countries perspective. Moreover, coping with the crises has been first and foremost an issue of the national states whereas the European voice has been weak. Hence, the countries' immediate responses has appeared to be Corona-nationalistic, which we label as Coronationalism. The paper shows to what extent the four countries adopted different crisis management strategies and which factors explain this variance, with a special focus on their institutional settings and administrative systems. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</abstract><pub>Wiley</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3352
ispartof Public Administration Review, 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), p.765-773
issn 0033-3352
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_657783
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Education Source; Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
title European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=European%20Coronationalism?%20A%20Hot%20Spot%20Governing%20a%20Pandemic%20Crisis&rft.jtitle=Public%20Administration%20Review&rft.au=Bouckaert,%20Geert&rft.date=2020-05-22&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=773&rft.pages=765-773&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_657783%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true