Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review
Eye tracking is an increasingly popular method in mathematics education. While the technology has greatly evolved in recent years, there is a debate about the specific benefits that eye tracking offers and about the kinds of insights it may allow. The aim of this review is to contribute to this disc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational Studies In Mathematics 2020-06, Vol.104 (2), p.147-200 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 200 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Educational Studies In Mathematics |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Strohmaier, Anselm Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey Obersteiner, Andreas Reiss, Kristina |
description | Eye tracking is an increasingly popular method in mathematics education. While the technology has greatly evolved in recent years, there is a debate about the specific benefits that eye tracking offers and about the kinds of insights it may allow. The aim of this review is to contribute to this discussion by providing a comprehensive overview of the use of eye tracking in mathematics education research. We reviewed 161 eye-tracking studies published between 1921 and 2018 to assess what domains and topics were addressed, how the method was used, and how eye movements were related to mathematical thinking and learning. The results show that most studies were in the domain of numbers and arithmetic, but that a large variety of other areas of mathematics education research was investigated as well. We identify a need to report more methodological details in eye-tracking studies and to be more critical about how to gather, analyze, and interpret eye-tracking data. In conclusion, eye tracking seemed particularly beneficial for studying processes rather than outcomes, for revealing mental representations, and for assessing subconscious aspects of mathematical thinking. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_655741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_655741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6557413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyjkOwjAURVEXIBGGPfyOAkVycEY6hEAsgIrGspxPYjIhD4HsnkiwAGjefcWZEI_SgPlBFoUzMjfmTilNKU08cj0O6FstZKXaAhq0ZZd3dVcMoFpohC1xHCUNYO7k-LoWNBoUWpY72IMZjP0IqJVFLazTOIpe4XNJpjdRG1x9uyDr0_FyOPuVq9H12PLcPIREHmxZGMVJmvE4ipIwYP_IzW-S25dlb4KGUZc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Strohmaier, Anselm ; Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey ; Obersteiner, Andreas ; Reiss, Kristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Strohmaier, Anselm ; Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey ; Obersteiner, Andreas ; Reiss, Kristina</creatorcontrib><description>Eye tracking is an increasingly popular method in mathematics education. While the technology has greatly evolved in recent years, there is a debate about the specific benefits that eye tracking offers and about the kinds of insights it may allow. The aim of this review is to contribute to this discussion by providing a comprehensive overview of the use of eye tracking in mathematics education research. We reviewed 161 eye-tracking studies published between 1921 and 2018 to assess what domains and topics were addressed, how the method was used, and how eye movements were related to mathematical thinking and learning. The results show that most studies were in the domain of numbers and arithmetic, but that a large variety of other areas of mathematics education research was investigated as well. We identify a need to report more methodological details in eye-tracking studies and to be more critical about how to gather, analyze, and interpret eye-tracking data. In conclusion, eye tracking seemed particularly beneficial for studying processes rather than outcomes, for revealing mental representations, and for assessing subconscious aspects of mathematical thinking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer (part of Springer Nature)</publisher><ispartof>Educational Studies In Mathematics, 2020-06, Vol.104 (2), p.147-200</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strohmaier, Anselm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obersteiner, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Kristina</creatorcontrib><title>Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review</title><title>Educational Studies In Mathematics</title><description>Eye tracking is an increasingly popular method in mathematics education. While the technology has greatly evolved in recent years, there is a debate about the specific benefits that eye tracking offers and about the kinds of insights it may allow. The aim of this review is to contribute to this discussion by providing a comprehensive overview of the use of eye tracking in mathematics education research. We reviewed 161 eye-tracking studies published between 1921 and 2018 to assess what domains and topics were addressed, how the method was used, and how eye movements were related to mathematical thinking and learning. The results show that most studies were in the domain of numbers and arithmetic, but that a large variety of other areas of mathematics education research was investigated as well. We identify a need to report more methodological details in eye-tracking studies and to be more critical about how to gather, analyze, and interpret eye-tracking data. In conclusion, eye tracking seemed particularly beneficial for studying processes rather than outcomes, for revealing mental representations, and for assessing subconscious aspects of mathematical thinking.</description><issn>0013-1954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyjkOwjAURVEXIBGGPfyOAkVycEY6hEAsgIrGspxPYjIhD4HsnkiwAGjefcWZEI_SgPlBFoUzMjfmTilNKU08cj0O6FstZKXaAhq0ZZd3dVcMoFpohC1xHCUNYO7k-LoWNBoUWpY72IMZjP0IqJVFLazTOIpe4XNJpjdRG1x9uyDr0_FyOPuVq9H12PLcPIREHmxZGMVJmvE4ipIwYP_IzW-S25dlb4KGUZc</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Strohmaier, Anselm</creator><creator>Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey</creator><creator>Obersteiner, Andreas</creator><creator>Reiss, Kristina</creator><general>Springer (part of Springer Nature)</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review</title><author>Strohmaier, Anselm ; Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey ; Obersteiner, Andreas ; Reiss, Kristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6557413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strohmaier, Anselm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obersteiner, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Kristina</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Educational Studies In Mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strohmaier, Anselm</au><au>Seunarine-MacKay, Kelsey</au><au>Obersteiner, Andreas</au><au>Reiss, Kristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>Educational Studies In Mathematics</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>147-200</pages><issn>0013-1954</issn><abstract>Eye tracking is an increasingly popular method in mathematics education. While the technology has greatly evolved in recent years, there is a debate about the specific benefits that eye tracking offers and about the kinds of insights it may allow. The aim of this review is to contribute to this discussion by providing a comprehensive overview of the use of eye tracking in mathematics education research. We reviewed 161 eye-tracking studies published between 1921 and 2018 to assess what domains and topics were addressed, how the method was used, and how eye movements were related to mathematical thinking and learning. The results show that most studies were in the domain of numbers and arithmetic, but that a large variety of other areas of mathematics education research was investigated as well. We identify a need to report more methodological details in eye-tracking studies and to be more critical about how to gather, analyze, and interpret eye-tracking data. In conclusion, eye tracking seemed particularly beneficial for studying processes rather than outcomes, for revealing mental representations, and for assessing subconscious aspects of mathematical thinking.</abstract><pub>Springer (part of Springer Nature)</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-1954 |
ispartof | Educational Studies In Mathematics, 2020-06, Vol.104 (2), p.147-200 |
issn | 0013-1954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_655741 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source |
title | Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A30%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye-tracking%20methodology%20in%20mathematics%20education%20research:%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Educational%20Studies%20In%20Mathematics&rft.au=Strohmaier,%20Anselm&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=147-200&rft.issn=0013-1954&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_655741%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |