An Agenda for Open Science in Communication
In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal Of Communication 2021-02, Vol.71 (1), p.1-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal Of Communication |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Dienlin, Thomas Johannes, Niklas Bowman, Nicholas David Masur, Philpp K Engesser, Sven Kümpel, Anne Sophie Lukito, Josephine Bier, Lindsey M Zhang, Renwen Johnson, Benjamin K Huskey, Richard Schneider, Frank M Breuer, Johannes Parry, Douglas A Vermeulen, Ivar Fisher, Jacob T Banks, Jaime Weber, René Ellis, David A Smits, Tim Ivory, James D Trepte, Sabine McEwan, Bree Rinke, Eike Mark Neubaum, German Winter, Stephan Carpenter, Christopher J Krämer, Nicole Utz, Sonja Unkel, Julian Wang, Xiaohui Davidson, Brittany I Kim, Nuri Stevenson Won, Andrea Domahidi, Emese Lewis, Neil A de Vreese, Claes |
description | In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_651691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_651691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6516913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LW0NDTjYOAqLs4yAPKNDQ04GbQd8xQc01PzUhIV0vKLFPwLUvMUgpMzU_OSUxUy8xSc83NzS_MykxNLMvPzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7qba4izh252aU5qaVlqXnxKcUFicmq8oZGxiamZuYVlvJmpoZmloTEpKrWJUxlfUlFiDADHnj5h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dienlin, Thomas ; Johannes, Niklas ; Bowman, Nicholas David ; Masur, Philpp K ; Engesser, Sven ; Kümpel, Anne Sophie ; Lukito, Josephine ; Bier, Lindsey M ; Zhang, Renwen ; Johnson, Benjamin K ; Huskey, Richard ; Schneider, Frank M ; Breuer, Johannes ; Parry, Douglas A ; Vermeulen, Ivar ; Fisher, Jacob T ; Banks, Jaime ; Weber, René ; Ellis, David A ; Smits, Tim ; Ivory, James D ; Trepte, Sabine ; McEwan, Bree ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Neubaum, German ; Winter, Stephan ; Carpenter, Christopher J ; Krämer, Nicole ; Utz, Sonja ; Unkel, Julian ; Wang, Xiaohui ; Davidson, Brittany I ; Kim, Nuri ; Stevenson Won, Andrea ; Domahidi, Emese ; Lewis, Neil A ; de Vreese, Claes</creator><creatorcontrib>Dienlin, Thomas ; Johannes, Niklas ; Bowman, Nicholas David ; Masur, Philpp K ; Engesser, Sven ; Kümpel, Anne Sophie ; Lukito, Josephine ; Bier, Lindsey M ; Zhang, Renwen ; Johnson, Benjamin K ; Huskey, Richard ; Schneider, Frank M ; Breuer, Johannes ; Parry, Douglas A ; Vermeulen, Ivar ; Fisher, Jacob T ; Banks, Jaime ; Weber, René ; Ellis, David A ; Smits, Tim ; Ivory, James D ; Trepte, Sabine ; McEwan, Bree ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Neubaum, German ; Winter, Stephan ; Carpenter, Christopher J ; Krämer, Nicole ; Utz, Sonja ; Unkel, Julian ; Wang, Xiaohui ; Davidson, Brittany I ; Kim, Nuri ; Stevenson Won, Andrea ; Domahidi, Emese ; Lewis, Neil A ; de Vreese, Claes</creatorcontrib><description>In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisher><ispartof>Journal Of Communication, 2021-02, Vol.71 (1), p.1-26</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dienlin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannes, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Nicholas David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masur, Philpp K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engesser, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukito, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bier, Lindsey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Renwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huskey, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Frank M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacob T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivory, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trepte, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan, Bree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinke, Eike Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubaum, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krämer, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unkel, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Brittany I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson Won, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domahidi, Emese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Neil A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vreese, Claes</creatorcontrib><title>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</title><title>Journal Of Communication</title><description>In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.</description><issn>0021-9916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LW0NDTjYOAqLs4yAPKNDQ04GbQd8xQc01PzUhIV0vKLFPwLUvMUgpMzU_OSUxUy8xSc83NzS_MykxNLMvPzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7qba4izh252aU5qaVlqXnxKcUFicmq8oZGxiamZuYVlvJmpoZmloTEpKrWJUxlfUlFiDADHnj5h</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Dienlin, Thomas</creator><creator>Johannes, Niklas</creator><creator>Bowman, Nicholas David</creator><creator>Masur, Philpp K</creator><creator>Engesser, Sven</creator><creator>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</creator><creator>Lukito, Josephine</creator><creator>Bier, Lindsey M</creator><creator>Zhang, Renwen</creator><creator>Johnson, Benjamin K</creator><creator>Huskey, Richard</creator><creator>Schneider, Frank M</creator><creator>Breuer, Johannes</creator><creator>Parry, Douglas A</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Ivar</creator><creator>Fisher, Jacob T</creator><creator>Banks, Jaime</creator><creator>Weber, René</creator><creator>Ellis, David A</creator><creator>Smits, Tim</creator><creator>Ivory, James D</creator><creator>Trepte, Sabine</creator><creator>McEwan, Bree</creator><creator>Rinke, Eike Mark</creator><creator>Neubaum, German</creator><creator>Winter, Stephan</creator><creator>Carpenter, Christopher J</creator><creator>Krämer, Nicole</creator><creator>Utz, Sonja</creator><creator>Unkel, Julian</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaohui</creator><creator>Davidson, Brittany I</creator><creator>Kim, Nuri</creator><creator>Stevenson Won, Andrea</creator><creator>Domahidi, Emese</creator><creator>Lewis, Neil A</creator><creator>de Vreese, Claes</creator><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</title><author>Dienlin, Thomas ; Johannes, Niklas ; Bowman, Nicholas David ; Masur, Philpp K ; Engesser, Sven ; Kümpel, Anne Sophie ; Lukito, Josephine ; Bier, Lindsey M ; Zhang, Renwen ; Johnson, Benjamin K ; Huskey, Richard ; Schneider, Frank M ; Breuer, Johannes ; Parry, Douglas A ; Vermeulen, Ivar ; Fisher, Jacob T ; Banks, Jaime ; Weber, René ; Ellis, David A ; Smits, Tim ; Ivory, James D ; Trepte, Sabine ; McEwan, Bree ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Neubaum, German ; Winter, Stephan ; Carpenter, Christopher J ; Krämer, Nicole ; Utz, Sonja ; Unkel, Julian ; Wang, Xiaohui ; Davidson, Brittany I ; Kim, Nuri ; Stevenson Won, Andrea ; Domahidi, Emese ; Lewis, Neil A ; de Vreese, Claes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6516913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dienlin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannes, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Nicholas David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masur, Philpp K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engesser, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukito, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bier, Lindsey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Renwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huskey, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Frank M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacob T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivory, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trepte, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan, Bree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinke, Eike Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubaum, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krämer, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unkel, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Brittany I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson Won, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domahidi, Emese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Neil A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vreese, Claes</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Journal Of Communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dienlin, Thomas</au><au>Johannes, Niklas</au><au>Bowman, Nicholas David</au><au>Masur, Philpp K</au><au>Engesser, Sven</au><au>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</au><au>Lukito, Josephine</au><au>Bier, Lindsey M</au><au>Zhang, Renwen</au><au>Johnson, Benjamin K</au><au>Huskey, Richard</au><au>Schneider, Frank M</au><au>Breuer, Johannes</au><au>Parry, Douglas A</au><au>Vermeulen, Ivar</au><au>Fisher, Jacob T</au><au>Banks, Jaime</au><au>Weber, René</au><au>Ellis, David A</au><au>Smits, Tim</au><au>Ivory, James D</au><au>Trepte, Sabine</au><au>McEwan, Bree</au><au>Rinke, Eike Mark</au><au>Neubaum, German</au><au>Winter, Stephan</au><au>Carpenter, Christopher J</au><au>Krämer, Nicole</au><au>Utz, Sonja</au><au>Unkel, Julian</au><au>Wang, Xiaohui</au><au>Davidson, Brittany I</au><au>Kim, Nuri</au><au>Stevenson Won, Andrea</au><au>Domahidi, Emese</au><au>Lewis, Neil A</au><au>de Vreese, Claes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</atitle><jtitle>Journal Of Communication</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><abstract>In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press (OUP)</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9916 |
ispartof | Journal Of Communication, 2021-02, Vol.71 (1), p.1-26 |
issn | 0021-9916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_651691 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
title | An Agenda for Open Science in Communication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A27%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Agenda%20for%20Open%20Science%20in%20Communication&rft.jtitle=Journal%20Of%20Communication&rft.au=Dienlin,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_651691%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |