An Agenda for Open Science in Communication

In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal Of Communication 2021-02, Vol.71 (1), p.1-26
Hauptverfasser: Dienlin, Thomas, Johannes, Niklas, Bowman, Nicholas David, Masur, Philpp K, Engesser, Sven, Kümpel, Anne Sophie, Lukito, Josephine, Bier, Lindsey M, Zhang, Renwen, Johnson, Benjamin K, Huskey, Richard, Schneider, Frank M, Breuer, Johannes, Parry, Douglas A, Vermeulen, Ivar, Fisher, Jacob T, Banks, Jaime, Weber, René, Ellis, David A, Smits, Tim, Ivory, James D, Trepte, Sabine, McEwan, Bree, Rinke, Eike Mark, Neubaum, German, Winter, Stephan, Carpenter, Christopher J, Krämer, Nicole, Utz, Sonja, Unkel, Julian, Wang, Xiaohui, Davidson, Brittany I, Kim, Nuri, Stevenson Won, Andrea, Domahidi, Emese, Lewis, Neil A, de Vreese, Claes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal Of Communication
container_volume 71
creator Dienlin, Thomas
Johannes, Niklas
Bowman, Nicholas David
Masur, Philpp K
Engesser, Sven
Kümpel, Anne Sophie
Lukito, Josephine
Bier, Lindsey M
Zhang, Renwen
Johnson, Benjamin K
Huskey, Richard
Schneider, Frank M
Breuer, Johannes
Parry, Douglas A
Vermeulen, Ivar
Fisher, Jacob T
Banks, Jaime
Weber, René
Ellis, David A
Smits, Tim
Ivory, James D
Trepte, Sabine
McEwan, Bree
Rinke, Eike Mark
Neubaum, German
Winter, Stephan
Carpenter, Christopher J
Krämer, Nicole
Utz, Sonja
Unkel, Julian
Wang, Xiaohui
Davidson, Brittany I
Kim, Nuri
Stevenson Won, Andrea
Domahidi, Emese
Lewis, Neil A
de Vreese, Claes
description In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_651691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_651691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6516913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LW0NDTjYOAqLs4yAPKNDQ04GbQd8xQc01PzUhIV0vKLFPwLUvMUgpMzU_OSUxUy8xSc83NzS_MykxNLMvPzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7qba4izh252aU5qaVlqXnxKcUFicmq8oZGxiamZuYVlvJmpoZmloTEpKrWJUxlfUlFiDADHnj5h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dienlin, Thomas ; Johannes, Niklas ; Bowman, Nicholas David ; Masur, Philpp K ; Engesser, Sven ; Kümpel, Anne Sophie ; Lukito, Josephine ; Bier, Lindsey M ; Zhang, Renwen ; Johnson, Benjamin K ; Huskey, Richard ; Schneider, Frank M ; Breuer, Johannes ; Parry, Douglas A ; Vermeulen, Ivar ; Fisher, Jacob T ; Banks, Jaime ; Weber, René ; Ellis, David A ; Smits, Tim ; Ivory, James D ; Trepte, Sabine ; McEwan, Bree ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Neubaum, German ; Winter, Stephan ; Carpenter, Christopher J ; Krämer, Nicole ; Utz, Sonja ; Unkel, Julian ; Wang, Xiaohui ; Davidson, Brittany I ; Kim, Nuri ; Stevenson Won, Andrea ; Domahidi, Emese ; Lewis, Neil A ; de Vreese, Claes</creator><creatorcontrib>Dienlin, Thomas ; Johannes, Niklas ; Bowman, Nicholas David ; Masur, Philpp K ; Engesser, Sven ; Kümpel, Anne Sophie ; Lukito, Josephine ; Bier, Lindsey M ; Zhang, Renwen ; Johnson, Benjamin K ; Huskey, Richard ; Schneider, Frank M ; Breuer, Johannes ; Parry, Douglas A ; Vermeulen, Ivar ; Fisher, Jacob T ; Banks, Jaime ; Weber, René ; Ellis, David A ; Smits, Tim ; Ivory, James D ; Trepte, Sabine ; McEwan, Bree ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Neubaum, German ; Winter, Stephan ; Carpenter, Christopher J ; Krämer, Nicole ; Utz, Sonja ; Unkel, Julian ; Wang, Xiaohui ; Davidson, Brittany I ; Kim, Nuri ; Stevenson Won, Andrea ; Domahidi, Emese ; Lewis, Neil A ; de Vreese, Claes</creatorcontrib><description>In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press (OUP)</publisher><ispartof>Journal Of Communication, 2021-02, Vol.71 (1), p.1-26</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dienlin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannes, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Nicholas David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masur, Philpp K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engesser, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukito, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bier, Lindsey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Renwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huskey, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Frank M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacob T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivory, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trepte, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan, Bree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinke, Eike Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubaum, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krämer, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unkel, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Brittany I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson Won, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domahidi, Emese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Neil A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vreese, Claes</creatorcontrib><title>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</title><title>Journal Of Communication</title><description>In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.</description><issn>0021-9916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LW0NDTjYOAqLs4yAPKNDQ04GbQd8xQc01PzUhIV0vKLFPwLUvMUgpMzU_OSUxUy8xSc83NzS_MykxNLMvPzeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7qba4izh252aU5qaVlqXnxKcUFicmq8oZGxiamZuYVlvJmpoZmloTEpKrWJUxlfUlFiDADHnj5h</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Dienlin, Thomas</creator><creator>Johannes, Niklas</creator><creator>Bowman, Nicholas David</creator><creator>Masur, Philpp K</creator><creator>Engesser, Sven</creator><creator>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</creator><creator>Lukito, Josephine</creator><creator>Bier, Lindsey M</creator><creator>Zhang, Renwen</creator><creator>Johnson, Benjamin K</creator><creator>Huskey, Richard</creator><creator>Schneider, Frank M</creator><creator>Breuer, Johannes</creator><creator>Parry, Douglas A</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Ivar</creator><creator>Fisher, Jacob T</creator><creator>Banks, Jaime</creator><creator>Weber, René</creator><creator>Ellis, David A</creator><creator>Smits, Tim</creator><creator>Ivory, James D</creator><creator>Trepte, Sabine</creator><creator>McEwan, Bree</creator><creator>Rinke, Eike Mark</creator><creator>Neubaum, German</creator><creator>Winter, Stephan</creator><creator>Carpenter, Christopher J</creator><creator>Krämer, Nicole</creator><creator>Utz, Sonja</creator><creator>Unkel, Julian</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaohui</creator><creator>Davidson, Brittany I</creator><creator>Kim, Nuri</creator><creator>Stevenson Won, Andrea</creator><creator>Domahidi, Emese</creator><creator>Lewis, Neil A</creator><creator>de Vreese, Claes</creator><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</title><author>Dienlin, Thomas ; Johannes, Niklas ; Bowman, Nicholas David ; Masur, Philpp K ; Engesser, Sven ; Kümpel, Anne Sophie ; Lukito, Josephine ; Bier, Lindsey M ; Zhang, Renwen ; Johnson, Benjamin K ; Huskey, Richard ; Schneider, Frank M ; Breuer, Johannes ; Parry, Douglas A ; Vermeulen, Ivar ; Fisher, Jacob T ; Banks, Jaime ; Weber, René ; Ellis, David A ; Smits, Tim ; Ivory, James D ; Trepte, Sabine ; McEwan, Bree ; Rinke, Eike Mark ; Neubaum, German ; Winter, Stephan ; Carpenter, Christopher J ; Krämer, Nicole ; Utz, Sonja ; Unkel, Julian ; Wang, Xiaohui ; Davidson, Brittany I ; Kim, Nuri ; Stevenson Won, Andrea ; Domahidi, Emese ; Lewis, Neil A ; de Vreese, Claes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6516913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dienlin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannes, Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, Nicholas David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masur, Philpp K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engesser, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukito, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bier, Lindsey M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Renwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Benjamin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huskey, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Frank M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breuer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Ivar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacob T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivory, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trepte, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwan, Bree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinke, Eike Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubaum, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krämer, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utz, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unkel, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Brittany I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson Won, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domahidi, Emese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Neil A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vreese, Claes</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Journal Of Communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dienlin, Thomas</au><au>Johannes, Niklas</au><au>Bowman, Nicholas David</au><au>Masur, Philpp K</au><au>Engesser, Sven</au><au>Kümpel, Anne Sophie</au><au>Lukito, Josephine</au><au>Bier, Lindsey M</au><au>Zhang, Renwen</au><au>Johnson, Benjamin K</au><au>Huskey, Richard</au><au>Schneider, Frank M</au><au>Breuer, Johannes</au><au>Parry, Douglas A</au><au>Vermeulen, Ivar</au><au>Fisher, Jacob T</au><au>Banks, Jaime</au><au>Weber, René</au><au>Ellis, David A</au><au>Smits, Tim</au><au>Ivory, James D</au><au>Trepte, Sabine</au><au>McEwan, Bree</au><au>Rinke, Eike Mark</au><au>Neubaum, German</au><au>Winter, Stephan</au><au>Carpenter, Christopher J</au><au>Krämer, Nicole</au><au>Utz, Sonja</au><au>Unkel, Julian</au><au>Wang, Xiaohui</au><au>Davidson, Brittany I</au><au>Kim, Nuri</au><au>Stevenson Won, Andrea</au><au>Domahidi, Emese</au><au>Lewis, Neil A</au><au>de Vreese, Claes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Agenda for Open Science in Communication</atitle><jtitle>Journal Of Communication</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><abstract>In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called "replication crisis" has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press (OUP)</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9916
ispartof Journal Of Communication, 2021-02, Vol.71 (1), p.1-26
issn 0021-9916
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_651691
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library All Journals
title An Agenda for Open Science in Communication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A27%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Agenda%20for%20Open%20Science%20in%20Communication&rft.jtitle=Journal%20Of%20Communication&rft.au=Dienlin,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_651691%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true