Is opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was introduced to avoid tolerance and hyperalgesia, allowing reduction in postoperative opioids. OFA focused initially on postoperative respiratory safety for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery and for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients othe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY 2019-06, Vol.32 (3), p.257-262
1. Verfasser: Mulier, Jan P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 3
container_start_page 257
container_title CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY
container_volume 32
creator Mulier, Jan P
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was introduced to avoid tolerance and hyperalgesia, allowing reduction in postoperative opioids. OFA focused initially on postoperative respiratory safety for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery and for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients otherwise requiring intensive care admission. What about using OFA in plastic and oncological breast surgery, in deep inferior epigastric perforators flap surgery, and in gynecological laparoscopy? RECENT FINDINGS: OFA requires the use of other drugs to block the unwanted reactions from surgical injury. This can be achieved with a single drug at a high dose or with a combination of different drugs at a lower dose, such as with alpha-2-agonists, ketamine, lidocaine, and magnesium, each working on a different target and therefore described as multitarget anesthesia. Three factors can explain OFA success: improved analgesia with less postoperative opioids, the near absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting if no opioid is needed postoperatively, and reduced inflammation enhancing the recovery after surgery. SUMMARY: Opioid-free general anesthesia is a viable option for breast and gynecological surgery and its use will only increase when anesthesiologists listen to their patients' experiences after undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_649944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_649944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6499443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzLsKwjAYhuEMCtbDPWRzkELsOZODKLoLjiFt_9ZoSEr-tNi7t4MXoNMHLw_fjASMp1GYc5YvyBLxyRiLeMECcr8itZ2yqg4bB0BbMOCkptIA-gegkrSxjpYOJPqp1rQdDVRW21ZVk8PeteBGKumgZKlhOvPKmsOazBupETbfXZHt-XQ7XsJXr6EfwIgaO1mB2EdxkmZ5wUWWcJ4k8T9y95sU_u3jD-xBT9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Mulier, Jan P</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulier, Jan P</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was introduced to avoid tolerance and hyperalgesia, allowing reduction in postoperative opioids. OFA focused initially on postoperative respiratory safety for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery and for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients otherwise requiring intensive care admission. What about using OFA in plastic and oncological breast surgery, in deep inferior epigastric perforators flap surgery, and in gynecological laparoscopy? RECENT FINDINGS: OFA requires the use of other drugs to block the unwanted reactions from surgical injury. This can be achieved with a single drug at a high dose or with a combination of different drugs at a lower dose, such as with alpha-2-agonists, ketamine, lidocaine, and magnesium, each working on a different target and therefore described as multitarget anesthesia. Three factors can explain OFA success: improved analgesia with less postoperative opioids, the near absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting if no opioid is needed postoperatively, and reduced inflammation enhancing the recovery after surgery. SUMMARY: Opioid-free general anesthesia is a viable option for breast and gynecological surgery and its use will only increase when anesthesiologists listen to their patients' experiences after undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-7907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</publisher><ispartof>CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019-06, Vol.32 (3), p.257-262</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>316,782,27867</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/649944$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulier, Jan P</creatorcontrib><title>Is opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?</title><title>CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY</title><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was introduced to avoid tolerance and hyperalgesia, allowing reduction in postoperative opioids. OFA focused initially on postoperative respiratory safety for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery and for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients otherwise requiring intensive care admission. What about using OFA in plastic and oncological breast surgery, in deep inferior epigastric perforators flap surgery, and in gynecological laparoscopy? RECENT FINDINGS: OFA requires the use of other drugs to block the unwanted reactions from surgical injury. This can be achieved with a single drug at a high dose or with a combination of different drugs at a lower dose, such as with alpha-2-agonists, ketamine, lidocaine, and magnesium, each working on a different target and therefore described as multitarget anesthesia. Three factors can explain OFA success: improved analgesia with less postoperative opioids, the near absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting if no opioid is needed postoperatively, and reduced inflammation enhancing the recovery after surgery. SUMMARY: Opioid-free general anesthesia is a viable option for breast and gynecological surgery and its use will only increase when anesthesiologists listen to their patients' experiences after undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.</description><issn>0952-7907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVzLsKwjAYhuEMCtbDPWRzkELsOZODKLoLjiFt_9ZoSEr-tNi7t4MXoNMHLw_fjASMp1GYc5YvyBLxyRiLeMECcr8itZ2yqg4bB0BbMOCkptIA-gegkrSxjpYOJPqp1rQdDVRW21ZVk8PeteBGKumgZKlhOvPKmsOazBupETbfXZHt-XQ7XsJXr6EfwIgaO1mB2EdxkmZ5wUWWcJ4k8T9y95sU_u3jD-xBT9g</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Mulier, Jan P</creator><general>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Is opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?</title><author>Mulier, Jan P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6499443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulier, Jan P</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulier, Jan P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?</atitle><jtitle>CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>257-262</pages><issn>0952-7907</issn><abstract>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) was introduced to avoid tolerance and hyperalgesia, allowing reduction in postoperative opioids. OFA focused initially on postoperative respiratory safety for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery and for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients otherwise requiring intensive care admission. What about using OFA in plastic and oncological breast surgery, in deep inferior epigastric perforators flap surgery, and in gynecological laparoscopy? RECENT FINDINGS: OFA requires the use of other drugs to block the unwanted reactions from surgical injury. This can be achieved with a single drug at a high dose or with a combination of different drugs at a lower dose, such as with alpha-2-agonists, ketamine, lidocaine, and magnesium, each working on a different target and therefore described as multitarget anesthesia. Three factors can explain OFA success: improved analgesia with less postoperative opioids, the near absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting if no opioid is needed postoperatively, and reduced inflammation enhancing the recovery after surgery. SUMMARY: Opioid-free general anesthesia is a viable option for breast and gynecological surgery and its use will only increase when anesthesiologists listen to their patients' experiences after undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.</abstract><pub>LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS &amp; WILKINS</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0952-7907
ispartof CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019-06, Vol.32 (3), p.257-262
issn 0952-7907
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_649944
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Is opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A04%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20opioid-free%20general%20anesthesia%20for%20breast%20and%20gynecological%20surgery%20a%20viable%20option?&rft.jtitle=CURRENT%20OPINION%20IN%20ANESTHESIOLOGY&rft.au=Mulier,%20Jan%20P&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=257-262&rft.issn=0952-7907&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_649944%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true