Neutrality, Fairness or Freedom? Principles for Platform Regulation
The need for online platform regulation has been a topic of scholarly debate. However, reality is now catching up to and even overtaking the academic writing on this subject. France has adopted a law on platform fairness, the European Commission recently ordered Google to implement a form of search...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Internet Policy Review 2018-03, Vol.2018 (1), p.1-19 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Internet Policy Review |
container_volume | 2018 |
creator | Bostoen, Friso |
description | The need for online platform regulation has been a topic of scholarly debate. However, reality is now catching up to and even overtaking the academic writing on this subject. France has adopted a law on platform fairness, the European Commission recently ordered Google to implement a form of search neutrality, and more regulatory initiatives are on the horizon. That is why we have to look beyond the question whether online platforms should be regulated. As actual regulation supplants the scholarly debate, we must also examine how they are being regulated. This article distils from the various proposals at EU and member state level a set of operational principles that can serve as a frame of reference for productive debate on platform regulation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_649518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_649518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6495183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVir0KwjAYAIMoWLTvkM1BC01_knZyKBYnKeJeQvtVomla8iP69nZwcNTpjuNmyItIzgLKWDr_8iXyjbmFYUgYjRNKPVScwFnNpbCvHS650AqMwYPGpQZoh36PKy1UI0YJBndTryS3E3t8hqubXAxqjRYdlwb8D1doUx4uxTG4OwnuAapuzcgbqEkUJyllWV7TJE9JFv9zbn87a_u08RtmZErU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neutrality, Fairness or Freedom? Principles for Platform Regulation</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bostoen, Friso</creator><creatorcontrib>Bostoen, Friso</creatorcontrib><description>The need for online platform regulation has been a topic of scholarly debate. However, reality is now catching up to and even overtaking the academic writing on this subject. France has adopted a law on platform fairness, the European Commission recently ordered Google to implement a form of search neutrality, and more regulatory initiatives are on the horizon. That is why we have to look beyond the question whether online platforms should be regulated. As actual regulation supplants the scholarly debate, we must also examine how they are being regulated. This article distils from the various proposals at EU and member state level a set of operational principles that can serve as a frame of reference for productive debate on platform regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2197-6775</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2197-6775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</publisher><ispartof>Internet Policy Review, 2018-03, Vol.2018 (1), p.1-19</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27859</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bostoen, Friso</creatorcontrib><title>Neutrality, Fairness or Freedom? Principles for Platform Regulation</title><title>Internet Policy Review</title><description>The need for online platform regulation has been a topic of scholarly debate. However, reality is now catching up to and even overtaking the academic writing on this subject. France has adopted a law on platform fairness, the European Commission recently ordered Google to implement a form of search neutrality, and more regulatory initiatives are on the horizon. That is why we have to look beyond the question whether online platforms should be regulated. As actual regulation supplants the scholarly debate, we must also examine how they are being regulated. This article distils from the various proposals at EU and member state level a set of operational principles that can serve as a frame of reference for productive debate on platform regulation.</description><issn>2197-6775</issn><issn>2197-6775</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVir0KwjAYAIMoWLTvkM1BC01_knZyKBYnKeJeQvtVomla8iP69nZwcNTpjuNmyItIzgLKWDr_8iXyjbmFYUgYjRNKPVScwFnNpbCvHS650AqMwYPGpQZoh36PKy1UI0YJBndTryS3E3t8hqubXAxqjRYdlwb8D1doUx4uxTG4OwnuAapuzcgbqEkUJyllWV7TJE9JFv9zbn87a_u08RtmZErU</recordid><startdate>20180331</startdate><enddate>20180331</enddate><creator>Bostoen, Friso</creator><general>Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180331</creationdate><title>Neutrality, Fairness or Freedom? Principles for Platform Regulation</title><author>Bostoen, Friso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6495183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bostoen, Friso</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Internet Policy Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bostoen, Friso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neutrality, Fairness or Freedom? Principles for Platform Regulation</atitle><jtitle>Internet Policy Review</jtitle><date>2018-03-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2018</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>1-19</pages><issn>2197-6775</issn><eissn>2197-6775</eissn><abstract>The need for online platform regulation has been a topic of scholarly debate. However, reality is now catching up to and even overtaking the academic writing on this subject. France has adopted a law on platform fairness, the European Commission recently ordered Google to implement a form of search neutrality, and more regulatory initiatives are on the horizon. That is why we have to look beyond the question whether online platforms should be regulated. As actual regulation supplants the scholarly debate, we must also examine how they are being regulated. This article distils from the various proposals at EU and member state level a set of operational principles that can serve as a frame of reference for productive debate on platform regulation.</abstract><pub>Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2197-6775 |
ispartof | Internet Policy Review, 2018-03, Vol.2018 (1), p.1-19 |
issn | 2197-6775 2197-6775 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_649518 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Neutrality, Fairness or Freedom? Principles for Platform Regulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T01%3A24%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neutrality,%20Fairness%20or%20Freedom?%20Principles%20for%20Platform%20Regulation&rft.jtitle=Internet%20Policy%20Review&rft.au=Bostoen,%20Friso&rft.date=2018-03-31&rft.volume=2018&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=1-19&rft.issn=2197-6775&rft.eissn=2197-6775&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_649518%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |