Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs

© 2019 American Society for Quality Much research has been done concerning 24-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-23 factors and 28-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-27 factors. The focus of this research was on completely randomized screening designs and led to lists of recommen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY 2019-04, Vol.51 (2), p.143-158
Hauptverfasser: Schoen, Eric D, Nha, Vo-Thanh, Goos, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 2
container_start_page 143
container_title JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY
container_volume 51
creator Schoen, Eric D
Nha, Vo-Thanh
Goos, Peter
description © 2019 American Society for Quality Much research has been done concerning 24-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-23 factors and 28-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-27 factors. The focus of this research was on completely randomized screening designs and led to lists of recommended designs for each number of factors. When using the recommended designs, there is either no aliasing between the main effects and the two-factor interaction effects or only a limited amount. Among all designs with this attractive property, the recommended designs minimize the aliasing among the two-factor interaction effects. It is, however, unclear which 24- and 28-run designs are best when complete randomization is infeasible and the designs have to be arranged in blocks. In this article, we address this issue and present the best arrangements of 24-run designs in 3, 4, and 6 blocks and the best arrangements of 28-run designs in 7 blocks.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_647386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_647386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6473863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLEOwiAUABk0sVb_gc3BkFBKKc5G083FnWD7WmsRDNDq55sYP6DT3XC5BUooZYxwKooVWofwoDRjVPIEVRcf765zVht8M64eetth7b22HTzBxoBb5zHjxI8Wa9tgJn8a344YmMDgBkLf2bBBy1abANs_U7Q7n67HigyjgXECq5rw0jWojOW8EKU8KMHLXIo8Rft5pYqfmM__fgFBXUlo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Schoen, Eric D ; Nha, Vo-Thanh ; Goos, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Eric D ; Nha, Vo-Thanh ; Goos, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>© 2019 American Society for Quality Much research has been done concerning 24-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-23 factors and 28-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-27 factors. The focus of this research was on completely randomized screening designs and led to lists of recommended designs for each number of factors. When using the recommended designs, there is either no aliasing between the main effects and the two-factor interaction effects or only a limited amount. Among all designs with this attractive property, the recommended designs minimize the aliasing among the two-factor interaction effects. It is, however, unclear which 24- and 28-run designs are best when complete randomization is infeasible and the designs have to be arranged in blocks. In this article, we address this issue and present the best arrangements of 24-run designs in 3, 4, and 6 blocks and the best arrangements of 28-run designs in 7 blocks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>TAYLOR &amp; FRANCIS INC</publisher><ispartof>JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2019-04, Vol.51 (2), p.143-158</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,776,27837</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/647386$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nha, Vo-Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goos, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs</title><title>JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY</title><description>© 2019 American Society for Quality Much research has been done concerning 24-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-23 factors and 28-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-27 factors. The focus of this research was on completely randomized screening designs and led to lists of recommended designs for each number of factors. When using the recommended designs, there is either no aliasing between the main effects and the two-factor interaction effects or only a limited amount. Among all designs with this attractive property, the recommended designs minimize the aliasing among the two-factor interaction effects. It is, however, unclear which 24- and 28-run designs are best when complete randomization is infeasible and the designs have to be arranged in blocks. In this article, we address this issue and present the best arrangements of 24-run designs in 3, 4, and 6 blocks and the best arrangements of 28-run designs in 7 blocks.</description><issn>0022-4065</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLEOwiAUABk0sVb_gc3BkFBKKc5G083FnWD7WmsRDNDq55sYP6DT3XC5BUooZYxwKooVWofwoDRjVPIEVRcf765zVht8M64eetth7b22HTzBxoBb5zHjxI8Wa9tgJn8a344YmMDgBkLf2bBBy1abANs_U7Q7n67HigyjgXECq5rw0jWojOW8EKU8KMHLXIo8Rft5pYqfmM__fgFBXUlo</recordid><startdate>20190403</startdate><enddate>20190403</enddate><creator>Schoen, Eric D</creator><creator>Nha, Vo-Thanh</creator><creator>Goos, Peter</creator><general>TAYLOR &amp; FRANCIS INC</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190403</creationdate><title>Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs</title><author>Schoen, Eric D ; Nha, Vo-Thanh ; Goos, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6473863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schoen, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nha, Vo-Thanh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goos, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schoen, Eric D</au><au>Nha, Vo-Thanh</au><au>Goos, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs</atitle><jtitle>JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY</jtitle><date>2019-04-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>143</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>143-158</pages><issn>0022-4065</issn><abstract>© 2019 American Society for Quality Much research has been done concerning 24-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-23 factors and 28-run orthogonal two-level designs involving 3-27 factors. The focus of this research was on completely randomized screening designs and led to lists of recommended designs for each number of factors. When using the recommended designs, there is either no aliasing between the main effects and the two-factor interaction effects or only a limited amount. Among all designs with this attractive property, the recommended designs minimize the aliasing among the two-factor interaction effects. It is, however, unclear which 24- and 28-run designs are best when complete randomization is infeasible and the designs have to be arranged in blocks. In this article, we address this issue and present the best arrangements of 24-run designs in 3, 4, and 6 blocks and the best arrangements of 28-run designs in 7 blocks.</abstract><pub>TAYLOR &amp; FRANCIS INC</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0022-4065
ispartof JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2019-04, Vol.51 (2), p.143-158
issn 0022-4065
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_647386
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Orthogonal blocking arrangements for 24-run and 28-run two-level designs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthogonal%20blocking%20arrangements%20for%2024-run%20and%2028-run%20two-level%20designs&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20QUALITY%20TECHNOLOGY&rft.au=Schoen,%20Eric%20D&rft.date=2019-04-03&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=143&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=143-158&rft.issn=0022-4065&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_647386%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true