Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?

OBJECTIVES: Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACTA CLINICA BELGICA 2019-04, Vol.75 (4), p.250-257
Hauptverfasser: Cool, Lieselot, Brewaeys, Celine, Viaene, Stefaan, Missiaen, Jana, Lycke, Michelle, Lefebvre, Tessa, Tack, Laura, Foulon, Veerle, Pottel, Hans, Debruyne, Philip, Vandijck, Dominique, Van Eygen, Koen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 257
container_issue 4
container_start_page 250
container_title ACTA CLINICA BELGICA
container_volume 75
creator Cool, Lieselot
Brewaeys, Celine
Viaene, Stefaan
Missiaen, Jana
Lycke, Michelle
Lefebvre, Tessa
Tack, Laura
Foulon, Veerle
Pottel, Hans
Debruyne, Philip
Vandijck, Dominique
Van Eygen, Koen
description OBJECTIVES: Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of this trial was to explore patients', specialists' and general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives towards the opportunities of implementing OHH within the Belgian health-care system. METHODS: A regional cross-sectional survey study was launched in order to investigate the stakeholders' views on OHH and the current cancer care focusing on integration of primary care and continuous care. RESULTS: Of the responders, 37 out of 163 patients (23%), 45 of 62 GPs (73%) and 10 of 15 specialists (67%) feel positive about the opportunities for OHH. Nevertheless, 11/15 specialists (73%) and 51/62 GPs (82%) feel primary care might currently be (too) little involved in order to ensure continuous care for cancer patients. Opportunities for improved continuous care are seen in better communication between primary care and hospital, and more patient contacts for primary care during the cancer treatment process. CONCLUSION: The results of this local survey study demonstrated there is support among different stakeholder groups for the implementation of OHH within the Belgian health-care context. However, some barriers impeding transmural continuous care should be tackled before implementing such model into practice. Better communication between health-care professionals and more patients contacts are suggested, and an adjusted legal and financial framework is required.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_640286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_640286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6402863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj7FKxEAQhrdQ8NB7h-mu0MBdNpfL2ViIYq99GDaTZLzN7pKZiPgOvrMriLX-zfDDNx_8Z2a1OzRVYcumvjBrkddtjj1WtS1X5vN55F45DCCJHKPnD-ogBhd9HNihB4czQT_HCcYoiRV9ARpzmagQ0u_fW2ABHSmDsqQUZwWcYnYmVKagcvNrFxXA0MFAgeZsTzM6ZeWYq9xdmfMevdD6516azePDy_1TcVo8LW8U2k4SOmp3pa329aE5tnW1zcPsf8jrv5Gtvqv9Av8fZVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Cool, Lieselot ; Brewaeys, Celine ; Viaene, Stefaan ; Missiaen, Jana ; Lycke, Michelle ; Lefebvre, Tessa ; Tack, Laura ; Foulon, Veerle ; Pottel, Hans ; Debruyne, Philip ; Vandijck, Dominique ; Van Eygen, Koen</creator><creatorcontrib>Cool, Lieselot ; Brewaeys, Celine ; Viaene, Stefaan ; Missiaen, Jana ; Lycke, Michelle ; Lefebvre, Tessa ; Tack, Laura ; Foulon, Veerle ; Pottel, Hans ; Debruyne, Philip ; Vandijck, Dominique ; Van Eygen, Koen</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of this trial was to explore patients', specialists' and general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives towards the opportunities of implementing OHH within the Belgian health-care system. METHODS: A regional cross-sectional survey study was launched in order to investigate the stakeholders' views on OHH and the current cancer care focusing on integration of primary care and continuous care. RESULTS: Of the responders, 37 out of 163 patients (23%), 45 of 62 GPs (73%) and 10 of 15 specialists (67%) feel positive about the opportunities for OHH. Nevertheless, 11/15 specialists (73%) and 51/62 GPs (82%) feel primary care might currently be (too) little involved in order to ensure continuous care for cancer patients. Opportunities for improved continuous care are seen in better communication between primary care and hospital, and more patient contacts for primary care during the cancer treatment process. CONCLUSION: The results of this local survey study demonstrated there is support among different stakeholder groups for the implementation of OHH within the Belgian health-care context. However, some barriers impeding transmural continuous care should be tackled before implementing such model into practice. Better communication between health-care professionals and more patients contacts are suggested, and an adjusted legal and financial framework is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1784-3286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>TAYLOR &amp; FRANCIS LTD</publisher><ispartof>ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2019-04, Vol.75 (4), p.250-257</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>316,781,27862</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/640286$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cool, Lieselot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewaeys, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viaene, Stefaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Missiaen, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lycke, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefebvre, Tessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tack, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulon, Veerle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottel, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debruyne, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandijck, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eygen, Koen</creatorcontrib><title>Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?</title><title>ACTA CLINICA BELGICA</title><description>OBJECTIVES: Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of this trial was to explore patients', specialists' and general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives towards the opportunities of implementing OHH within the Belgian health-care system. METHODS: A regional cross-sectional survey study was launched in order to investigate the stakeholders' views on OHH and the current cancer care focusing on integration of primary care and continuous care. RESULTS: Of the responders, 37 out of 163 patients (23%), 45 of 62 GPs (73%) and 10 of 15 specialists (67%) feel positive about the opportunities for OHH. Nevertheless, 11/15 specialists (73%) and 51/62 GPs (82%) feel primary care might currently be (too) little involved in order to ensure continuous care for cancer patients. Opportunities for improved continuous care are seen in better communication between primary care and hospital, and more patient contacts for primary care during the cancer treatment process. CONCLUSION: The results of this local survey study demonstrated there is support among different stakeholder groups for the implementation of OHH within the Belgian health-care context. However, some barriers impeding transmural continuous care should be tackled before implementing such model into practice. Better communication between health-care professionals and more patients contacts are suggested, and an adjusted legal and financial framework is required.</description><issn>1784-3286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVj7FKxEAQhrdQ8NB7h-mu0MBdNpfL2ViIYq99GDaTZLzN7pKZiPgOvrMriLX-zfDDNx_8Z2a1OzRVYcumvjBrkddtjj1WtS1X5vN55F45DCCJHKPnD-ogBhd9HNihB4czQT_HCcYoiRV9ARpzmagQ0u_fW2ABHSmDsqQUZwWcYnYmVKagcvNrFxXA0MFAgeZsTzM6ZeWYq9xdmfMevdD6516azePDy_1TcVo8LW8U2k4SOmp3pa329aE5tnW1zcPsf8jrv5Gtvqv9Av8fZVc</recordid><startdate>20190421</startdate><enddate>20190421</enddate><creator>Cool, Lieselot</creator><creator>Brewaeys, Celine</creator><creator>Viaene, Stefaan</creator><creator>Missiaen, Jana</creator><creator>Lycke, Michelle</creator><creator>Lefebvre, Tessa</creator><creator>Tack, Laura</creator><creator>Foulon, Veerle</creator><creator>Pottel, Hans</creator><creator>Debruyne, Philip</creator><creator>Vandijck, Dominique</creator><creator>Van Eygen, Koen</creator><general>TAYLOR &amp; FRANCIS LTD</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190421</creationdate><title>Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?</title><author>Cool, Lieselot ; Brewaeys, Celine ; Viaene, Stefaan ; Missiaen, Jana ; Lycke, Michelle ; Lefebvre, Tessa ; Tack, Laura ; Foulon, Veerle ; Pottel, Hans ; Debruyne, Philip ; Vandijck, Dominique ; Van Eygen, Koen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6402863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cool, Lieselot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewaeys, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viaene, Stefaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Missiaen, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lycke, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefebvre, Tessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tack, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulon, Veerle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottel, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debruyne, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandijck, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eygen, Koen</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>ACTA CLINICA BELGICA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cool, Lieselot</au><au>Brewaeys, Celine</au><au>Viaene, Stefaan</au><au>Missiaen, Jana</au><au>Lycke, Michelle</au><au>Lefebvre, Tessa</au><au>Tack, Laura</au><au>Foulon, Veerle</au><au>Pottel, Hans</au><au>Debruyne, Philip</au><au>Vandijck, Dominique</au><au>Van Eygen, Koen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?</atitle><jtitle>ACTA CLINICA BELGICA</jtitle><date>2019-04-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>250-257</pages><issn>1784-3286</issn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: Oncological home-hospitalization (OHH) might be a patient-centred approach to deal with the increasing burden of cancer on health-care facilities and finances. Before implementation into practice, its feasibility, costs and support among stakeholders should be evaluated. The purpose of this trial was to explore patients', specialists' and general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives towards the opportunities of implementing OHH within the Belgian health-care system. METHODS: A regional cross-sectional survey study was launched in order to investigate the stakeholders' views on OHH and the current cancer care focusing on integration of primary care and continuous care. RESULTS: Of the responders, 37 out of 163 patients (23%), 45 of 62 GPs (73%) and 10 of 15 specialists (67%) feel positive about the opportunities for OHH. Nevertheless, 11/15 specialists (73%) and 51/62 GPs (82%) feel primary care might currently be (too) little involved in order to ensure continuous care for cancer patients. Opportunities for improved continuous care are seen in better communication between primary care and hospital, and more patient contacts for primary care during the cancer treatment process. CONCLUSION: The results of this local survey study demonstrated there is support among different stakeholder groups for the implementation of OHH within the Belgian health-care context. However, some barriers impeding transmural continuous care should be tackled before implementing such model into practice. Better communication between health-care professionals and more patients contacts are suggested, and an adjusted legal and financial framework is required.</abstract><pub>TAYLOR &amp; FRANCIS LTD</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1784-3286
ispartof ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2019-04, Vol.75 (4), p.250-257
issn 1784-3286
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_640286
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Shifting specialized oncological care from hospital- to home-setting: is there support among patients, specialists and general practitioners?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A37%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shifting%20specialized%20oncological%20care%20from%20hospital-%20to%20home-setting:%20is%20there%20support%20among%20patients,%20specialists%20and%20general%20practitioners?&rft.jtitle=ACTA%20CLINICA%20BELGICA&rft.au=Cool,%20Lieselot&rft.date=2019-04-21&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=250-257&rft.issn=1784-3286&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_640286%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true