Design Trade-Offs in Self-Management Technology: the HeartMan Case
Health self-management technology has the potential to significantly improve the Quality of Life of patients suffering from chronic diseases. However, designing the technology involves numerous highly context-dependent design decisions. In this paper, we analyse a case study of self-monitoring techn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2020-01, Vol.39 (1), p.1-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Derboven, Jan Voorend, Roos Slegers, Karin |
description | Health self-management technology has the potential to significantly improve the Quality of Life of patients suffering from chronic diseases. However, designing the technology involves numerous highly context-dependent design decisions. In this paper, we analyse a case study of self-monitoring technology in the field of congestive heart failure. We analyse the design process of the technology from the perspective of design trade-offs. Three important trade-offs related to health self-monitoring technology are described in detail, related to patient autonomy, technology appropriation, and patient well-being. For each of the trade-offs, various mediating factors that influence design decisions are described in detail. On a practical level, this analysis can inform future developments in self-management technology. In addition, this design trade-off analysis provides intermediary knowledge that can contribute to a better theoretical understanding of health self-management technology. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_638364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_638364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6383643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyrsOgjAYQOEOmoiXd-jmYJoUWis4ihoW4yCDW9PAX0BrMbQYfXsdfACdznC-AQpoyDlJouQ8QmPnLpRSLuIoQJstuKayOO9UCeSotcONxScwmhyUVRXcwHqcQ1Hb1rTVa419DTgD1fnPx6lyMEVDrYyD2bcTNN_v8jQj195A_wArS3dXBcgwYnwpVnEiBYuZ4OwfufhNSv_07A3vBUbZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design Trade-Offs in Self-Management Technology: the HeartMan Case</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Derboven, Jan ; Voorend, Roos ; Slegers, Karin</creator><creatorcontrib>Derboven, Jan ; Voorend, Roos ; Slegers, Karin</creatorcontrib><description>Health self-management technology has the potential to significantly improve the Quality of Life of patients suffering from chronic diseases. However, designing the technology involves numerous highly context-dependent design decisions. In this paper, we analyse a case study of self-monitoring technology in the field of congestive heart failure. We analyse the design process of the technology from the perspective of design trade-offs. Three important trade-offs related to health self-monitoring technology are described in detail, related to patient autonomy, technology appropriation, and patient well-being. For each of the trade-offs, various mediating factors that influence design decisions are described in detail. On a practical level, this analysis can inform future developments in self-management technology. In addition, this design trade-off analysis provides intermediary knowledge that can contribute to a better theoretical understanding of health self-management technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-929X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><ispartof>BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020-01, Vol.39 (1), p.1-16</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derboven, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorend, Roos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slegers, Karin</creatorcontrib><title>Design Trade-Offs in Self-Management Technology: the HeartMan Case</title><title>BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY</title><description>Health self-management technology has the potential to significantly improve the Quality of Life of patients suffering from chronic diseases. However, designing the technology involves numerous highly context-dependent design decisions. In this paper, we analyse a case study of self-monitoring technology in the field of congestive heart failure. We analyse the design process of the technology from the perspective of design trade-offs. Three important trade-offs related to health self-monitoring technology are described in detail, related to patient autonomy, technology appropriation, and patient well-being. For each of the trade-offs, various mediating factors that influence design decisions are described in detail. On a practical level, this analysis can inform future developments in self-management technology. In addition, this design trade-off analysis provides intermediary knowledge that can contribute to a better theoretical understanding of health self-management technology.</description><issn>0144-929X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVyrsOgjAYQOEOmoiXd-jmYJoUWis4ihoW4yCDW9PAX0BrMbQYfXsdfACdznC-AQpoyDlJouQ8QmPnLpRSLuIoQJstuKayOO9UCeSotcONxScwmhyUVRXcwHqcQ1Hb1rTVa419DTgD1fnPx6lyMEVDrYyD2bcTNN_v8jQj195A_wArS3dXBcgwYnwpVnEiBYuZ4OwfufhNSv_07A3vBUbZ</recordid><startdate>20200102</startdate><enddate>20200102</enddate><creator>Derboven, Jan</creator><creator>Voorend, Roos</creator><creator>Slegers, Karin</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200102</creationdate><title>Design Trade-Offs in Self-Management Technology: the HeartMan Case</title><author>Derboven, Jan ; Voorend, Roos ; Slegers, Karin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_6383643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derboven, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voorend, Roos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slegers, Karin</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derboven, Jan</au><au>Voorend, Roos</au><au>Slegers, Karin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design Trade-Offs in Self-Management Technology: the HeartMan Case</atitle><jtitle>BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY</jtitle><date>2020-01-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><issn>0144-929X</issn><abstract>Health self-management technology has the potential to significantly improve the Quality of Life of patients suffering from chronic diseases. However, designing the technology involves numerous highly context-dependent design decisions. In this paper, we analyse a case study of self-monitoring technology in the field of congestive heart failure. We analyse the design process of the technology from the perspective of design trade-offs. Three important trade-offs related to health self-monitoring technology are described in detail, related to patient autonomy, technology appropriation, and patient well-being. For each of the trade-offs, various mediating factors that influence design decisions are described in detail. On a practical level, this analysis can inform future developments in self-management technology. In addition, this design trade-off analysis provides intermediary knowledge that can contribute to a better theoretical understanding of health self-management technology.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-929X |
ispartof | BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020-01, Vol.39 (1), p.1-16 |
issn | 0144-929X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_638364 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Business Source Complete |
title | Design Trade-Offs in Self-Management Technology: the HeartMan Case |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20Trade-Offs%20in%20Self-Management%20Technology:%20the%20HeartMan%20Case&rft.jtitle=BEHAVIOUR%20&%20INFORMATION%20TECHNOLOGY&rft.au=Derboven,%20Jan&rft.date=2020-01-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.issn=0144-929X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_638364%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |