Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug informatio sources for health care professionals: a delphi study

The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related informatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2017-08, Vol.90, p.87-94
Hauptverfasser: Arguello, Blanca, Salgado, Teresa, Laekeman, Gert, Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue
container_start_page 87
container_title Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
container_volume 90
creator Arguello, Blanca
Salgado, Teresa
Laekeman, Gert
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
description The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related information items was performed by searching several resources for health care professionals and a final list of 162 items was obtained. Fifty-seven experts in drug information from 23 different European countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi technique to obtain consensus on items considered essential and non-essential content of information. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as 90%, 80%, and 75% agreement, respectively. Of the 57 experts invited, 32 completed the first round, 27 the second, and 29 the third. Consensus was achieved for 28.3% of the items in the first round, 49.3% in the second, and 58.3% in the third. The final cumulative consensus was 67.7% (n ¼ 126) for items considered essential and 16.1% (n ¼ 30) for items considered non-essential. The final tool obtained to assess the completeness of drug information sources was composed by 126 essential items grouped into 11 sections. This tool allows for the comparison of different information sources for the same medicine and the information content for different medicines in the same source.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_590982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_590982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5909823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE1uwjAQhb1oJShwh9mxqJBcG0jSbX_UA3QfWcmEBByP5Rmjcvu6Ug_A5j3p0_feg1pqU9mdsVov1BPzWWtt6rpaqts7XtFTnDEI0AAOhMiXAMeMzCAjQkdz9CgY_kCR-pRPMIWB0uxkImDKqUOGAmBE52WEziWEmGgok4mC8_xavnv0cZyAJfe3tXocCsbNf6_U9vPj--1rd8ke8xVD23N0HbYvxu4Px6pu2kOjm9rYlXq-z2zlR-z9v79R_FzD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug informatio sources for health care professionals: a delphi study</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Arguello, Blanca ; Salgado, Teresa ; Laekeman, Gert ; Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Arguello, Blanca ; Salgado, Teresa ; Laekeman, Gert ; Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related information items was performed by searching several resources for health care professionals and a final list of 162 items was obtained. Fifty-seven experts in drug information from 23 different European countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi technique to obtain consensus on items considered essential and non-essential content of information. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as 90%, 80%, and 75% agreement, respectively. Of the 57 experts invited, 32 completed the first round, 27 the second, and 29 the third. Consensus was achieved for 28.3% of the items in the first round, 49.3% in the second, and 58.3% in the third. The final cumulative consensus was 67.7% (n ¼ 126) for items considered essential and 16.1% (n ¼ 30) for items considered non-essential. The final tool obtained to assess the completeness of drug information sources was composed by 126 essential items grouped into 11 sections. This tool allows for the comparison of different information sources for the same medicine and the information content for different medicines in the same source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Academic Press</publisher><ispartof>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2017-08, Vol.90, p.87-94</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27851</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arguello, Blanca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laekeman, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug informatio sources for health care professionals: a delphi study</title><title>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology</title><description>The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related information items was performed by searching several resources for health care professionals and a final list of 162 items was obtained. Fifty-seven experts in drug information from 23 different European countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi technique to obtain consensus on items considered essential and non-essential content of information. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as 90%, 80%, and 75% agreement, respectively. Of the 57 experts invited, 32 completed the first round, 27 the second, and 29 the third. Consensus was achieved for 28.3% of the items in the first round, 49.3% in the second, and 58.3% in the third. The final cumulative consensus was 67.7% (n ¼ 126) for items considered essential and 16.1% (n ¼ 30) for items considered non-essential. The final tool obtained to assess the completeness of drug information sources was composed by 126 essential items grouped into 11 sections. This tool allows for the comparison of different information sources for the same medicine and the information content for different medicines in the same source.</description><issn>0273-2300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjE1uwjAQhb1oJShwh9mxqJBcG0jSbX_UA3QfWcmEBByP5Rmjcvu6Ug_A5j3p0_feg1pqU9mdsVov1BPzWWtt6rpaqts7XtFTnDEI0AAOhMiXAMeMzCAjQkdz9CgY_kCR-pRPMIWB0uxkImDKqUOGAmBE52WEziWEmGgok4mC8_xavnv0cZyAJfe3tXocCsbNf6_U9vPj--1rd8ke8xVD23N0HbYvxu4Px6pu2kOjm9rYlXq-z2zlR-z9v79R_FzD</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Arguello, Blanca</creator><creator>Salgado, Teresa</creator><creator>Laekeman, Gert</creator><creator>Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</creator><general>Academic Press</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug informatio sources for health care professionals: a delphi study</title><author>Arguello, Blanca ; Salgado, Teresa ; Laekeman, Gert ; Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5909823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arguello, Blanca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laekeman, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arguello, Blanca</au><au>Salgado, Teresa</au><au>Laekeman, Gert</au><au>Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug informatio sources for health care professionals: a delphi study</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>87</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>87-94</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><abstract>The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related information items was performed by searching several resources for health care professionals and a final list of 162 items was obtained. Fifty-seven experts in drug information from 23 different European countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi technique to obtain consensus on items considered essential and non-essential content of information. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as 90%, 80%, and 75% agreement, respectively. Of the 57 experts invited, 32 completed the first round, 27 the second, and 29 the third. Consensus was achieved for 28.3% of the items in the first round, 49.3% in the second, and 58.3% in the third. The final cumulative consensus was 67.7% (n ¼ 126) for items considered essential and 16.1% (n ¼ 30) for items considered non-essential. The final tool obtained to assess the completeness of drug information sources was composed by 126 essential items grouped into 11 sections. This tool allows for the comparison of different information sources for the same medicine and the information content for different medicines in the same source.</abstract><pub>Academic Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-2300
ispartof Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2017-08, Vol.90, p.87-94
issn 0273-2300
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_590982
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug informatio sources for health care professionals: a delphi study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A38%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20tool%20to%20assess%20the%20completeness%20of%20drug%20informatio%20sources%20for%20health%20care%20professionals:%20a%20delphi%20study&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20Toxicology%20and%20Pharmacology&rft.au=Arguello,%20Blanca&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=87-94&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_590982%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true